Weight Loss Forum / General Topics / June 2004
Article: Young, skinny ? and obsessed with diets
|
|
Thread rating:  |
Carol Frilegh - 05 Jun 2004 22:40 GMT Young, skinny and obsessed with diets Weight concerns can as early as 14 Fashion, parents take the blameGirls, and some boys too, unduly concerned about weight
MARGO VARADI TORONTO STAR
Dominique Dasti hates her body and no matter how hard she tries she can't get it to look the way she wants.
"People say I'm too skinny but I look in the mirror and don't see that at all," says Dominique, 13. "Kids used to tease me and say I'm fat but they don't anymore ... I've kept that thought that I'm big and fatter than anyone else and it won't go away. I don't think I could ever feel skinny."
Dominique is proof of a growing phenomenon of young girls dissatisfied with their bodies. According to a recent study, young girls are becoming increasingly concerned about their weight and are taking drastic dieting measures even when there is no need. The Canadian Medical Association Journal study states that by 14, more than half of girls want to be thinner and are afraid of being overweight.
Experts blame the problem on everything from images of the ultra-thin in the media and fashion, to dieting parents and peer pressure. Local children and their parents talked to the Star to voice their own experiences.
On the verge of starving, Dominique says she often goes an entire day eating only a piece of fruit, just to stay thin. Standing at 5-foot-6, she used to be 150 pounds and now she's 114.
"Everybody says she looks great and that's what makes her lose weight, so I wish people would stop saying it," says her worried mother Madeline, who is desperate to get help for her daughter. "She won't put a thing in her mouth because she's afraid to gain weight. She's always looking in the mirror."
Angela Jardine is the mother of an 11-year-old.
"My daughter pinches her waist and says, `If I can pinch more than an inch, I need to lose weight.' She likes to be skinny so she can wear belly shirts," says Jardine. "If somebody chunky is walking down the street in a short top she would say, `Why are they wearing that and letting their `flob' hang out?'"
As far as kids are concerned, to be fat is to be an outcast. Gail McVey, the lead researcher for the recent Canadian Medical Association Journal study says peer acceptance is critical, especially for girls who believe in only one acceptable body type.
"I feel sorry for this girl in my class who's fat," says 9-year-old Gabrielle Segal. "I wonder what it's like to look in the mirror and think you're fat. I think it must feel really bad."
Her mother Ilana is shocked that her daughter even has a concept of weight issues at her age. Gabrielle's brother Dan, 7, has picked up on them, too.
"My sister is so skinny but I'm not," says Dan. "I think I could be skinnier so now I eat mangos because they're a nice fruit and low fat."
McVey has just completed another study which showed that 24.5 per cent of a sample of 10- to 14-year-old boys were dieting compared to 31 per cent of the girls. According to McVey, the message for boys is that they want a trim and defined physique. Extreme methods of weight control including laxatives, diuretics and self-induced vomiting were actually higher among the boys than girls. A small number of boys reported taking food supplements and even steroids to gain muscle.
Many children blame the media for their obsessions.
"The media can't get enough of girls whose ribs you can see. If you watch TV or walk down Queen St., you see models or people trying to look like models," says Lee Melamed, 14. "That's going to rub off on a girl no matter what age."
Like many kids her age, Tabatha Goncalves, 11, and her friends read tween magazines, filled with impossibly perfect celebrities in slinky clothes.
"We're all like, `Oh my gosh ... I wish I looked like that. I wish I had her body,'" Tabatha says.
While some try to fit the mould, others, like Jody Steinman, 11, think it's unnatural.
"I go to a store and try on a million pants that don't fit me. I think pants are made for anorexic people," Jody says. She points out that among her peers, in order to be popular, everyone thinks they need to be small, skinny and wear tight, expensive clothes.
"Girls think their appearance is more important than how they act. One of my friends sucks in her stomach all the time. She thinks she looks fat but she's one of the skinniest people I know."
Many girls believe that boys don't want fat girls.
"Sometimes I stand in front of the mirror for an hour fixing myself because I feel like I'm not good enough for this world," says Tabatha. "Sometimes just to bug me, guys will be like `you're fat.' I feel like I have to do something about it."
It doesn't help that tween magazines are filled with so-called diet miracles, nor does it help that many parents are dissatisfied with their own bodies and following these same diets.
"My mom is on a diet because she thinks she's fat, too ... I feel like I should do what my mom does, like diet and exercise, because it's working for her," says Tabatha.
It's this kind of thinking in kids that Sari Simkins, manager of the Healthy Lifestyle Program at Toronto Public Health, is trying to alter. The program, founded by McVey, aims to steer kids away from fixating on dieting and more into leading a healthy lifestyle.
"We work with children and youth to promote healthy body image by focusing on positive behaviours, encouraging kids to be active, be well and be themselves."
Simkins says that supporting more positive behaviour should begin by changing language like: "You look great. Have you lost weight?" We should all be thinking about how we contribute to what these girls are saying to themselves and how our values, attitude and our language are influencing their thoughts and behaviour.
Having wrestled with her own body image, Dominique has advice for other kids.
"Just live with what you have," she says. "When you get obsessed with appearances it takes over your life. It's all you can think about and all you can do."
 Signature Diva ****** There is no substitute for the right food
Ignoramus8628 - 05 Jun 2004 23:16 GMT > Young, skinny and obsessed with diets
> On the verge of starving, Dominique says she often goes an entire day > eating only a piece of fruit, just to stay thin. Standing at 5-foot-6, > she used to be 150 pounds and now she's 114. If dominique lives to old age, she would be less likely to have breast cancer than her statistical peers.
http://dceg2.cancer.gov/pdfs/mellemkjaer121732001.pdf
i
That T Woman - 06 Jun 2004 03:19 GMT This is one of your more stupid posts, Ig. You're scraping the bottom of the barrel to find something positive to say about a 13 year old girl starving herself to stay stick thin. I wonder what her school work is like the days she only eats the piece of fruit. This is so not what we should want a 13 year old to be doing. "If she lives to old age"? What about the *quality* of her life now and in the immediate future?
Tonia
> > Young, skinny < and obsessed with diets > [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > > i MH - 06 Jun 2004 03:45 GMT > This is one of your more stupid posts, Ig. You're scraping the bottom of > the barrel to find something positive to say about a 13 year old girl [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > > Tonia Since I've kill-filed him, I had not read this post until now. I think he's obsessed with thinness, so it doesn't matter if it will kill the young girl. Hey, she'll be dead and buried, but her breasts will look good!
He continues to know zilch about anorexia. As someone who was anorexic and stopped this deadly behavior, his post digusts me.
Martha
> > > Young, skinny < and obsessed with diets > > [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > > > > i beeswing - 06 Jun 2004 03:51 GMT Martha wrote:
>Since I've kill-filed him, I had not read this post until now. I think he's >obsessed with thinness, so it doesn't matter if it will kill the young girl. >Hey, she'll be dead and buried, but her breasts will look good! If she's THAT thin, that won't be the case, either.
beeswing
Ignoramus8628 - 06 Jun 2004 05:38 GMT > This is one of your more stupid posts, Ig. You're scraping the bottom of > the barrel to find something positive to say about a 13 year old girl > starving herself to stay stick thin. I wonder what her school work is like > the days she only eats the piece of fruit. This is so not what we should > want a 13 year old to be doing. "If she lives to old age"? What about the > *quality* of her life now and in the immediate future? Well, I merely pointed out one aspect of her anorexic lifestyle that happens to be beneficial. Surely, one could find many other not so positive sides of anorexia, and you did a splendid job at that.
Calling a post that brings up an interesting finding regarding cancer risk of anorexic women, stupid just because it does not pay lip service to dangers of anorexia (already well known), is not justifiable.
i
> Tonia > [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] >> >> i JMA - 06 Jun 2004 16:55 GMT > > This is one of your more stupid posts, Ig. You're scraping the bottom of > > the barrel to find something positive to say about a 13 year old girl [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] > > i So if that was your 13 year old living on one piece of fruit a day in order to stay thin, it would be ok with you because it would reduce the possibility of cancer at a later age (if she lives long enough)?
I find your pro-ana attitude extremely disturbing and I'm actually stunned that someone who claims to be such an intelligent adult can be so completely obtuse about this one subject. Anorexia has a high mortality rate, the highest rate of any psychiatric disorder and probably higher than some forms of breast cancer these days. Sorry if I'm just paying lip service to the truth. I'm not referring to your adult friends who maintain a calorie restricted WOE because they think it's going to help them live longer. I'm talking about teenagers who are terrified to eat because they think that their emaciated bodies are unattractively fat and who will literally starve themselves to death as a result. So much for increasing life expectancy, huh?
Ignoramus25707 - 06 Jun 2004 19:18 GMT >> > This is one of your more stupid posts, Ig. You're scraping the bottom > of [quoted text clipped - 21 lines] > to stay thin, it would be ok with you because it would reduce the > possibility of cancer at a later age (if she lives long enough)? No, it would not be okay with me, and I did not say that her dieting was okay, it was your faulty inference.
> I find your pro-ana attitude extremely disturbing and I'm actually stunned > that someone who claims to be such an intelligent adult can be so completely > obtuse about this one subject. Anorexia has a high mortality rate, the > highest rate of any psychiatric disorder and probably higher than some forms > of breast cancer these days. Doubtless, it is a dangeour affliction, as I said before.
> Sorry if I'm just paying lip service to the > truth. I'm not referring to your adult friends who maintain a calorie [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > themselves to death as a result. So much for increasing life expectancy, > huh? Well, you are making unjustified inferences.
i
JMA - 06 Jun 2004 22:09 GMT > >> > This is one of your more stupid posts, Ig. You're scraping the bottom > > of [quoted text clipped - 24 lines] > No, it would not be okay with me, and I did not say that her dieting > was okay, it was your faulty inference.
> > I find your pro-ana attitude extremely disturbing and I'm actually stunned > > that someone who claims to be such an intelligent adult can be so completely [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > > Doubtless, it is a dangeour affliction, as I said before. Yet you feel the need to somehow point out "beneficial" aspects of it as if that's an actual benefit.
> > Sorry if I'm just paying lip service to the > > truth. I'm not referring to your adult friends who maintain a calorie [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > > i Unjustified only because I disagree with you. You tried to point out that there may actually be some type of benefit to having a serious, potentially fatal disorder based on one study. All I did was counter that with the fact that even IF being anorexic reduces your chance of getting breast cancer, the chance of death from the anorexia itself is relatively high thus negating any alleged benefit. I even went so far as to counter an argument you made in the past defending anorexia as an acceptable WOL since you haven't yet demonstrated that you understand the difference between anorexia nervosa the disease and the colloquial use of the term anorexia.
You said that "one could find many other not so positive sides of anorexia" and yet we're not supposed to infer that you think there *IS* a positive side to having anorexia???? I didn't pull this one out of thin air either - these are your own words. I'm perfectly justified in believing that it's a disturbed way of thinking based on my personal experience with anorexics and knowledge about the disease.
I'm not going to argue this one anymore since I made my point and all you want to do is complain about how unfair we're being toward you.
jma another one for the vault
Ignoramus25707 - 07 Jun 2004 01:55 GMT >> >> > This is one of your more stupid posts, Ig. You're scraping the > bottom [quoted text clipped - 42 lines] > Yet you feel the need to somehow point out "beneficial" aspects of it as if > that's an actual benefit. of course reducing risk of breast cancer is a real benefit, unless you think that breast cancer is a good thing. Surely, for those who have not heard it enough times, I must say, that there are also bad consequences from "anorexia"!!!
It is also a scientifically interesting finding, that I wanted to share.
>> > Sorry if I'm just paying lip service to the >> > truth. I'm not referring to your adult friends who maintain a calorie [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] > there may actually be some type of benefit to having a serious, potentially > fatal disorder based on one study. Yep!
> All I did was counter that with the fact that even IF being anorexic > reduces your chance of getting breast cancer, the chance of death > from the anorexia itself is relatively high thus negating any > alleged benefit. You are not countering anything, you simply added more useful information about anorexia, without in any way disproving the findings of that study.
> I even went so far as to counter an argument you > made in the past defending anorexia as an acceptable WOL since you [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > and yet we're not supposed to infer that you think there *IS* a positive > side to having anorexia???? Do you want to get breast cancer? If not, surely you will appreciate lowering its chances, all other things being equal.
i
JMA - 07 Jun 2004 03:12 GMT > of course reducing risk of breast cancer is a real benefit, unless you > think that breast cancer is a good thing. Surely, for those who have > not heard it enough times, I must say, that there are also bad > consequences from "anorexia"!!!
> It is also a scientifically interesting finding, that I wanted to > share.
> > You said that "one could find many other not so positive sides of anorexia" > > and yet we're not supposed to infer that you think there *IS* a positive [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > > i Crack kills. You need to put down the pipe now.
The Queen of Cans and Jars - 07 Jun 2004 03:58 GMT > > Do you want to get breast cancer? If not, surely you will appreciate > > lowering its chances, all other things being equal. > > Crack kills. You need to put down the pipe now. hee!
it's true, ig. give it up. you have no argument here.
MH - 07 Jun 2004 04:38 GMT > > > Do you want to get breast cancer? If not, surely you will appreciate > > > lowering its chances, all other things being equal. [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > > it's true, ig. give it up. you have no argument here. Isn't it fascinating how, in his desire to make every thread about him, he will never stop, even when it makes him look like a complete ninny? : )
Martha
The Queen of Cans and Jars - 08 Jun 2004 05:19 GMT > > > > Do you want to get breast cancer? If not, surely you will appreciate > > > > lowering its chances, all other things being equal. [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > Isn't it fascinating how, in his desire to make every thread about him, he > will never stop, even when it makes him look like a complete ninny? : ) fascinating like a trainwreck is. the worst part of it is that his ignorance seems to be willful.
Dally - 07 Jun 2004 23:23 GMT >>You said that "one could find many other not so positive sides of anorexia" >>and yet we're not supposed to infer that you think there *IS* a positive >>side to having anorexia???? > > Do you want to get breast cancer? If not, surely you will appreciate > lowering its chances, all other things being equal. Ig, now you are outright trolling. You can't seriously be submitting anorexia as a viable choice based on a risk-benefit analysis where the risk is breast cancer. You understand that the girl's chances of dying from anorexia far, far, far outweigh her chances of getting breast cancer?
Breast cancer definitely kills. But heart disease kills a lot more. And she's damaging her heart. Osteoporosis kills, too, indirectly, in that most people who break a hip are dead within a year. Anorexia weakens her bones. It's just not sane to suggest that anorexia is a good idea if you don't want to get breast cancer.
The fact is, the main risk for getting breast cancer is unknown. There are all sorts of things that raise the risk factor somewhat, but the MAIN correlation is to some unknown thing.
I have no immediate relatives with breast cancer, I've nursed children for a total of four years and I have a normal fat percentage. Functionally speaking I've lowered my risk nearly not at all. I know women just like me who are getting it all around me. It's like the new phase in our lives... first were the years we were all marrying, then the years we all had little babies, now we're into the "adventures in medicine" years. Most of us survive these adventures, though. None of us deserve them, it just goes with the territory when you own a human body.
Dally
Ignoramus2772 - 07 Jun 2004 23:43 GMT >>>You said that "one could find many other not so positive sides of anorexia" >>>and yet we're not supposed to infer that you think there *IS* a positive [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > anorexia as a viable choice based on a risk-benefit analysis where the > risk is breast cancer. I have not done the analysis (which involves looking at fatality rates and would give a priority to living longer, even if life is terminated by breast cancer), but I would expect anorexia to be a worse choice than non-anorexia, especially when better alternatives like sane calorie restriction are available.
That said, I think that a finding of a negative link between anorexia and brest cancer to be interesting and worth mentioning.
> You understand that the girl's chances of dying from anorexia far, > far, far outweigh her chances of getting breast cancer? Let's look at "girl's chances of dying from anorexia" vs. "her chances of getting breast cancer".
An average anorexic's chance of dying from anorexia, according to
http://www.mentalhealth.com/mag1/p5m-et01.html
is 5-10%.
An average woman's risk of getting breast cancer is 6.3%, about in the same range.
So, these numbers are not incomparable at all.
Lest the more stupid members of this newsgroup jump at me for allegedly "supporting anorexia", I want to point out that other methods of reducing breast cancer incidence are superior to anorexia, for example staying relatively slim, eating well and having a few children.
> Breast cancer definitely kills. But heart disease kills a lot more. > And she's damaging her heart. No doubt.
> Osteoporosis kills, too, indirectly, in that most people who break a > hip are dead within a year. Anorexia weakens her bones. It's just > not sane to suggest that anorexia is a good idea if you don't want > to get breast cancer. I agree with you Dally.
> The fact is, the main risk for getting breast cancer is unknown. There > are all sorts of things that raise the risk factor somewhat, but the > MAIN correlation is to some unknown thing. Parity is a well known and controllable negative influence on breast cancer risk.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=1 2133652&dopt=Abstract
``It is estimated that the cumulative incidence of breast cancer in developed countries would be reduced by more than half, from 6.3 to 2.7 per 100 women by age 70, if women had the average number of births and lifetime duration of breastfeeding that had been prevalent in developing countries until recently.''
> I have no immediate relatives with breast cancer, I've nursed > children for a total of four years and I have a normal fat [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > adventures, though. None of us deserve them, it just goes with the > territory when you own a human body. I do not share your fatalistic attitude when it comes to chances of breast cancer. It is not supportd by evidence. You cannot eliminate all chances, but you can improve them.
i
JMA - 08 Jun 2004 00:14 GMT > Lest the more stupid members of this newsgroup jump at me for allegedly > "supporting anorexia", I want to point out that other methods of > reducing breast cancer incidence are superior to anorexia, for example > staying relatively slim, eating well and having a few children. Stupid is as stupid does. You've posted things in the past that defend anorexia as a way of life for some people, simply demonstrating your lack of knowlege on the issue. I'm not the only one who's noticed it or called you on it. You troll and then call me stupid? So now why do you get to call names and yet *I'm* not? Hey, at least I have balls to say directly that you, ignoramus, are almost intellectually honest in using that name (a remark from mfw a long time ago), however I still think the m should be an n because you are definitely an a.shole too.
Oops, I guess I'm being uncivil.
Again, lay off the pipe.
Ignoramus2772 - 08 Jun 2004 01:05 GMT >> Lest the more stupid members of this newsgroup jump at me for allegedly >> "supporting anorexia", I want to point out that other methods of [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > > Oops, I guess I'm being uncivil. Yes, you are being uncivil, and not only you are being uncivil, but you also did not add much of value in the post that I am responding to. No references to anything worthwhile, no factual refutations etc. Whereas I posted interesting references to actual information regarding risks of breast cancer and anorexia etc, your post contained nothing but namecalling.
i
> Again, lay off the pipe. JMA - 08 Jun 2004 01:24 GMT > >> Lest the more stupid members of this newsgroup jump at me for allegedly > >> "supporting anorexia", I want to point out that other methods of [quoted text clipped - 20 lines] > > i Could you be any more full of yourself? Your promotion of anorexia as a preventative for breast cancer is twisted and sick, not interesting. However, as usual, you can't handle anyone disagreeing with you or pointing out the problem with your premises and you start talking down to people and whining about "unjustified" assertions.
You're the one that called me stupid, then the gloves came off. Deal with it. Prior to that, all I did was point out exactly what you said and why I disagreed with it. *YOU* became the troll. I didn't respond "thoughtfully" to the remark about my wanting to possibly prevent breast cancer because I honestly believed you had to be trolling, hence the comment about the crack.
I spent time with anorexics when I was in treatment for my bulimia. It's nothing to joke about or even pretend that there might be some benefit to the condition. If you really aren't kidding around here then you are even more sick than I gave you credit for. This reminds me of the thread when you were curious about forcibly starving a fat person. You really are a piece of work. Go play with yourself for a while because you're just too much of a freak for me to deal with at this point.
Ignoramus2772 - 08 Jun 2004 02:53 GMT >> >> Lest the more stupid members of this newsgroup jump at me for allegedly >> >> "supporting anorexia", I want to point out that other methods of [quoted text clipped - 31 lines] > disagreeing with you or pointing out the problem with your premises and you > start talking down to people and whining about "unjustified" assertions. There were some posters to this thread who disagreed with me, in a respectful manner, added some reasoned opinions, and I attempted to treat them respectfully as well. So, saying that I cannot handle any disagreements just because I pointed out your namecalling, is not based on reality.
> You're the one that called me stupid, then the gloves came off. Deal with > it. Prior to that, all I did was point out exactly what you said and why I [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > piece of work. Go play with yourself for a while because you're just too > much of a freak for me to deal with at this point. I could very well be a disgusting person, however, that has nothing to do with the impact of anorexia on breast cancer risk.
i
Ignoramus2772 - 08 Jun 2004 03:07 GMT >>> >> Lest the more stupid members of this newsgroup jump at me for allegedly >>> >> "supporting anorexia", I want to point out that other methods of [quoted text clipped - 39 lines] > >> You're the one that called me stupid, then the gloves came off. Deal with forgot to say, you called on me to get off crack and used other cheap insults before I even posted a message mentioning "stupid" individuals.
So, somehow saying that I treat you in a manner worse than you treat me, is not supported by facts!
i
>> it. Prior to that, all I did was point out exactly what you said and why I >> disagreed with it. *YOU* became the troll. I didn't respond "thoughtfully" [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] > > i JMA - 08 Jun 2004 03:19 GMT > forgot to say, you called on me to get off crack and used other cheap > insults before I even posted a message mentioning "stupid" [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > > i Right, I acknowledged that wisecrack - it wasn't namecalling. I seriously thought you were joking because in no way would a sane individual insinuate that a person should consider anorexia as a potential deterrent to breast cancer. I guess I was wrong and you really are a sick individual.
Ignoramus2772 - 08 Jun 2004 04:33 GMT >> forgot to say, you called on me to get off crack and used other cheap >> insults before I even posted a message mentioning "stupid" [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > that a person should consider anorexia as a potential deterrent to breast > cancer. I guess I was wrong and you really are a sick individual. In case if you did not intend to use "crack smoking" as an insult, I apologize for implying that you are stupid.
i
Perple Gyrl - 08 Jun 2004 03:25 GMT "Ignoramus2772"
> In case if you did not intend to use "crack smoking" as an insult, I > apologize for implying that you are stupid. > > i I think calling you a crack smoker is an insult to actual crack smokers. Even they wouldn't stoop so low....
MH - 08 Jun 2004 06:11 GMT > >> forgot to say, you called on me to get off crack and used other cheap > >> insults before I even posted a message mentioning "stupid" > >> individuals. Yes, Bitch?
I think one of the things that you should remember, bitch,is when you asked how to rugged you were. Remember how everyone smirked, even under their breath? Oh please, it was the funniest moment since Clinton said "I did not have sex with that woman"> Not only did it provide, oh damn, days and days of entertainment, no, weeks, of entertainment, but honey, you were so clueless of how f.cking gay you seemed.
So now you are out of the closet. Not that there's anything wrong with being gay, but you are seen as gay buy folks.
Not only that, but you're seen as stupid, ignorant and downright close-minded, the death sentence of a Bay Arean.
So, as my friend in Glen Park said, you are the dumb sh.t extrordinnaire. Congrats!
er. I guess I was wrong and you really are a sick individual.
> In case if you did not intend to use "crack smoking" as an insult, I > apologize for implying that you are stupid. > > i JMA - 08 Jun 2004 03:11 GMT > > Could you be any more full of yourself? > > Your promotion of anorexia as a preventative for breast cancer is twisted [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > any disagreements just because I pointed out your namecalling, is not > based on reality. I didn't even start the namecalling until you called me stupid. You always try to hide behind that one so I went out of my way to make sure I didn't call you names. Now that I went and called you names, you'll wave that banner up and down for months in order to avoid the issue. It's your M.O.
TTFN freak
Jenn might as well get my money's worth
MH - 08 Jun 2004 05:27 GMT > I have not done the analysis You haven't done much. The gloves are off as are you from my killfile.
(which involves looking at fatality rates
> and would give a priority to living longer, even if life is terminated > by breast cancer), but I would expect anorexia to be a worse choice [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > That said, I think that a finding of a negative link between anorexia > and brest cancer to be interesting and worth mentioning. Interesting??? Interesting??? Have you suffered from anorexia? Ever know anyone who did? Ever have anyone you know die from it? Or, are you wishing you had it? Sounds like the latter to me. You need some real life friends. But anyway, here's some real facts for you, and yes, I quote them in here, rather than just post links (lazy, lazy, lazy).
Hey, if she lives in old age, she might not get breast cancer, according to the ignorant one. But here are some really, really bad things that may happen:
From: http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/thin/faq.html
What Are the Long-Term Medical and Emotional Consequences of these Disorders? ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---- The longer these illnesses persist, the greater the impairment to the individual's ability to work, love, and play. The course of these illnesses is very similar to other psychiatric difficulties such as drug and alcohol abuse, depression, anxiety, phobia, and obsessive-compulsive disorder. The illnesses dramatically interfere with being able to consistently work or go to school. They ruin relationships and make it very difficult to experience pleasure in life.
In addition to being emotionally devastating, the illnesses can create serious medical problems. Adolescence is a time of rapid growth and development. The average weight gain for girls between the ages of 11 and 14 is 40 pounds. Approximately 90 percent of adult bone mass will be established during adolescence. Osteoporosis ("porous bones" that break easily) can begin early in both girls and boys who are dieting or suffering from Anorexia nervosa. An extended period of semi-starvation stunts growth, can delay the onset of menstruation, and can damage vital organs such as the heart and brain. Listed below are some of the most common medical problems.
Medical Consequences of Anorexia Nervosa: - Starvation deprives the body of protein and prevents the normal metabolism of fat. In an effort to protect itself, the body slows down.
- The heart muscle changes and its beat becomes irregular. The ultimate result can be heart failure that results in death.
- Menstruation often stops, even before extensive weight loss. This is called amenorrhea.
- Dehydration, kidney stones and kidney failure may result.
- A fine body hair, called lanugo, develops on the arms and can even cover the face.
- Muscles atrophy or waste away, resulting in weakness and lost muscle function.
- Delayed gastric emptying caused by a lack of energy and slowed body function results in bowel irritation and constipation.
- Loss of bone calcium leads to osteoporosis.
But hey, no breast cancer!!
f.cking moron.
But wait...there's more!
From: http://www.geocities.com/iamafatguy/pro.html
Complications of Anorexia Nervosa
Long Term Outlook. At this time no treatment program for anorexia nervosa is completely effective. In a recent study, although most women with anorexia nervosa recovered after treatment, many remained very thin and displayed traits characteristic of the disorder, including perfectionism and a drive for thinness, that could keep them at risk for recurrence of the eating disorder. Even in those who recover, one study indicated that recovery took between four and nearly seven years. Those at highest risk for poor outcome were people who had accompanying severe psychological disorders.
Risk of Death. Many studies of anorexic patients have reported death rates ranging from 4% to 20%. The risk for early death is twice as high in bulimic anorexics as it is in the anorexic-restrictor types. Patients who are at the lowest weights when they are first treated are in the greatest danger. Suicide has been estimated in some studies to comprise as many as half the deaths in anorexia; although, in one study, suicide rates were lower in women with anorexia (1.4%) than in those with depression (4.1%). The study, however, only looked at death records of all women, which listed accompanying anorexia but which might have missed many unrecorded cases of anorexia. Other risk factors for early death include being sick for more than six years, previous obesity, personality disorders, and dysfunctional marriages. Males with anorexia are at particular risk for life-threatening medical problems, probably because they are diagnosed later than are females.
Heart Disease. Heart disease is the most common medical cause of death in people with severe anorexia. The heart can develop dangerous rhythms, including slow rhythms known as bradycardia. Blood flow is reduced and blood pressure may drop. In addition, the heart muscles starve, losing size. Cholesterol levels tend to rise. Heart problems are a particular risk when anorexia is compounded by bulimia and the use of ipecac, the drug that causes vomiting.
Electrolyte Imbalances. Minerals such as potassium, calcium, magnesium, and phosphate are normally dissolved in the body's fluid. Calcium and potassium are particularly critical for maintaining the electric currents that cause the heart to beat regularly. The dehydration and starvation of anorexia can reduce fluid levels and mineral content, a condition known as electrolyte imbalance, which can be very serious and even life-threatening unless fluids and minerals are replaced.
Reproductive and Hormonal Abnormalities. Anorexia causes low levels of reproductive hormones, changes in thyroid hormones, and increased levels of the stress hormones. Long-term irregular or absent menstruation (amenorrhea) is common, which eventually may cause sterility and bone loss. Low weight alone may not be sufficient to cause amenorrhea; extreme fasting and purging behaviors may play an even stronger role in hormonal disturbance. Children and adolescents with anorexia may also experience retarded growth due to reduced levels of growth hormone. Resumption of menstruation, indicating restored estrogen levels, and weight increase improves the outlook, but in severe anorexia, even after treatment, normal menstruation never returns in 25% of such patients. Women who become pregnant before regaining normal weight face a poor reproductive future, with low birth weights, frequent miscarriages, and a high rate of children with birth defects. Loss of bone minerals (osteopenia) and osteoporosis caused by low estrogen levels and increased steroid hormones result in bones becoming porous and subject to fracture. Up to two-thirds of children and adolescent girls with anorexia fail to develop strong bones during this critical growing period; one study reported that after eleven years, low bone density persisted in 85% of women who had been anorexic as adolescents but had regained normal weight and menstruation. Only restoring regular menstruation as soon as possible can protect against permanent bone loss; weight gain is not enough. The longer the eating disorder persists the more likely the bone loss will be permanent. Patients who are rehabilitated at a young age (15 years or younger) are more likely to achieve normal bone density.
Neurological Problems. People with severe anorexia may suffer nerve damage and experience seizures, disordered thinking, loss of feeling, or other nerve problems in the hands or feet. Brains scans indicate that parts of the brain undergo structural changes and abnormal activity during anorexic states; some of these changes return to normal after weight gain, but there is evidence that some damage may be permanent.
Blood Problems. Anemia is a common result of anorexia and starvation. A particularly serious blood problem is pernicious anemia, which can be caused by severely low levels of vitamin B12. If anorexia becomes extreme, the bone marrow dramatically reduces its production of blood cells, a life-threatening condition called pancytopenia.
Gastrointestinal Problems. Bloating and constipation are both very common problems in people with anorexia.
Complications in Diabetic Adolescents
Eating disorders are very serious in young people with type 1 diabetes. Hypoglycemia, or low blood sugar, is a danger in anyone with anorexia, but it is a particularly dangerous risk in those with diabetes. A recent study found that 85% of young women with diabetes and eating disorders had retinopathy -- damage in the retina in the eye, which can lead to blindness. It also reported that eating disorders persisted in such young people, increasing the risk for other acute and chronic diabetic complications.
You Don't have to live this way.
But wait, there's more!
This is from: http://www.biopsychology.com/index.php?descType=always&id=anorexia&type=sear ch&x=17&y=17 EATING DISORDER BEHAVIORS LINKED TO SUICIDE RISKS By Becky Ham, Science Writer A study of Swiss women with eating disorders suggests that those who binge and purge are more likely to have attempted suicide in the past, regardless of whether they have been diagnosed with anorexia nervosa, bulimia or another eating disorder. Women with anorexia, however, are more likely to have suicidal thoughts than those with bulimia or other disorders, say Gabriella Milos, M.D., and colleagues at the University Hospital in Zurich, Switzerland. Their study appears in the journal General Hospital Psychiatry. The researchers also found that most of the women in the study had other psychiatric disorders besides an eating disorder, including depression, drug or alcohol abuse or fearfulness or anxiety. Almost 84 percent of the patients had at least one other psychiatric problem. Milos and colleagues say the link between purging and suicidal attempts might be due to a lack of impulse control, which would affect both behaviors. See also: Chapter 13: Homeostasis: Active Regulation of Internal States Keyword: Anorexia & Bulimia Posted: 05.08.2004
But wait! There's more.... From the same website as listed above: A Secret Society of the Starving By MIM UDOVITCH Claire is 18. She is a pretty teenager, with long strawberry-blond hair, and she is almost abnormally self-possessed for a girl from a small town who has suddenly been descended upon by a big-city reporter who is there to talk to her, in secret, about her secret life. She is sitting on the track that runs around the field of her high school's football stadium, wearing running shorts and a T-shirt and shivering a little because even though we are in Florida -- in the kind of town where, according to Claire, during ''season'' when you see yet another car with New York plates, you just feel like running it down -- there's an evening chill. Claire's is also the kind of town where how the local high school does in sports matters. Claire herself plays two sports. Practice and team fund-raisers are a regular part of her life, along with the typical small-town-Florida teenage occupations -- going to ''some hick party,'' hanging out with friends in the parking lot of the Taco Bell, bowling, going to the beach. Another regular part of her life, also a common teenage occupation, is anorexia -- refusal to eat enough to maintain a minimally healthy weight. So she is possibly shivering because she hasn't consumed enough calories for her body to keep itself warm. Claire first got into eating disorders when she was 14 or 15 and a bulimic friend introduced her to them. But she was already kind of on the lookout for something: ''I was gonna do it on my own, basically. Just because, like, exercise can only take you so far, you know? And I don't know, I just started to wonder if there was another way. Because they made it seem like, 'You do drugs, you die; be anorexic and you're gonna die in a year.' I knew that they kind of overplayed it and tried to frighten you away. So I always thought it can't be that bad for you.'' Copyright The New York Times Company See also: Chapter 13: Homeostasis: Active Regulation of Internal States Keyword: Anorexia & Bulimia Posted: 09.09.2002
Women's Health: Eating Disorders (Anorexia & Bulimia)
? American Institute of Preventive Medicine (Excerpted from The Art and Heart of Drum Circles)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---- An eating disorder may be defined, in a sense, as self-abuse. It can be just as harmful to your health as substance abuse involving alcohol or drugs. Two of these disorders, anorexia and bulimia, result from the fear of overeating and gaining weight. They share other common traits, as well, that reflect the mental/physical health of the sufferer:
Depression. Low self-esteem, poor body image. Self-destructive outlook, self-punishment for some imaginary wrong. Disturbed family relationships. Abnormal pre-occupation with food and feeling out of control. Increased rate of illness due to low weight, frequent weight gain/loss and/or poor nutrition.
But wait!! There's more: http://www.healthy.net/scr/Article.asp?Id=1443 In addition, anorexia and bulimia have factors specific to each:
Anorexia Nervosa sufferers tend to: Be female, pre-teen or teenage. Grow up in over-achieving families who establish unusually high expectations for their children. Place exaggerated emphasis on body image and perfection. Have parents who are very busy and involved in their own lives. The anorexic may feel the need to be perfect to gain their parents' attention. Have marked physical effects - loss of head hair, stoppage of ovulation/menstruation, slowed heart rate, low blood pressure, cold intolerance. Have depression more extreme than in bulimia patients. Develop osteoporosis later in life due to lack of calcium and decreased production of estrogen if menstruation stops. Excessive exercise can contribute to this as well. Have severe damage to heart and vital organs if weight drops sufficiently. Approximately 1% of American females have anorexia.
But wait..there's more!!!
A Body to Die For From: http://www.discoveryhealth.co.uk/teens/t_story.asp?storyid=112767&oldstoryid =47547&feature=
For most people food is a pleasurable part of every day life, but for some people it is little more than a living nightmare.
One in a hundred teenage girls suffers from anorexia and, of those, 60% will fully recover, 20% will recover partially and 20% will die.
Anorexics are obsessed with being thin. They starve themselves and are terrified of gaining weight. They believe they are fat even when they are wasting away. Anorexia isn't just a problem with food or weight. It's an attempt to use food and weight to deal with emotional problems.
Anorexia takes many shapes and forms - it is possible to be overweight and anorexic. Anorexia is a fatal illness if untreated, and there have been many cases of deaths of anorexics who were of normal weight and some even overweight.
If you, or someone you, know suffers from anorexia then it is VERY important to seek help, as anorexia can cause severe long term damage: osteoporosis, severe dehydration leading to kidney damage and low blood pressure as well as death. The sooner treatment is started the higher the chance of making a full recovery.
Warning signs of anorexia
Deliberate self-starvation with weight loss
Fear of gaining weight
Refusal to eat
Constant exercising
Sensitivity to cold temperatures
Absent or irregular periods (in women)
Loss of scalp hair
A self-perception of being fat when the person is really starving.
Another common eating disorder is bulimia, affecting approximately 1 in 50 teenage girls and 1 in 100 women.
Bulimia is similar to anorexia, with the sufferer facing the same revulsion towards food. However, in bulimia there is a binge-and-purge cycle and, unlike anorexics, they are more likely to be of a normal weight. A binge can be a piece of fruit or a whole box of biscuits, after eating the bulimic feels guilty because they've eaten and so gets rid of it.
There are four ways that bulimics get rid of food: exercise, self-induced vomiting, taking diuretics or laxatives, or 'balancing out' binges with periods of starvation.
Bulimia leads to digestive problems, electrolyte imbalance, inflammation of the oesophagus, stained and decayed teeth from the stomach acid, constipation and possibly death (more than 20% die from complications related to their bulimia).
As with anorexia if you feel that you or someone you know has a problem then it is VERY important to seek help as the sooner treatment is started the better the chance of making a full recovery.
But wait, there's more!!!
From: http://student.fortlewis.edu/MMCROWLEY/finalwords.htm
One of three things can happen to someone who is severely anorexic. First off, everyday the voice in the anorexics head will become louder and louder telling her to eat. Sometimes the anorexic will break down and begin to binge eat, eating enormous amounts of food at one time, sometimes even as much as 20,000 calories at one sitting. The victim will always eat alone and secretly sneak food. In this case the anorexic has now developed signs of a bulimic. Most researchers will say that almost everyone that becomes anorexic is also bulimic, although it doesn't happen right away, it happens over time. When there is so much pressure to eat from friends and family and without the nutrients in the brain, the level of serotonin decreases causing sever depression. After the victim has eaten so much food they begin to feel very anxious and guilty. Quickly, they will find somewhere to go and get rid of it all (or barely any) of the food in their stomach, that is why bulimia is referred to as the binge-purge cycle. Although bulimia has not been uncommon, it wasn't until 1980 that bulimia was diagnosed as its own eating disorder. Some other methods bulimics use to control their weight are laxatives and compulsive exercising. In some cases binge eating does not occur because of ones hunger, but rather it can result from stress, low self-esteem, and depression (www.mamashealth.com). Anorexics don't reverse their behaviors and take over the binge-purge methods as often as bulimics, for example, a bulimic may go eat a whole pizza and a gallon of ice cream, while an anorexic chooses carefully what she eats, but still feels as if she needs to get rid of the food before putting on weight, so she purges.
Anorexia has the highest mortality rate of any other psychiatric diagnosis. Between 5-18% of anorexics die from the damaging affects on their body. Just like cars people need to fuel their body to run, or even turn on for that matter. As the body starts to shut down the heart rate decreases immensely, it sometimes gets to the point when the person can't even hold food down because to the body, food can be so foreign. Obviously no one wants to see this happen, so how is someone supposed to make sure a loved one doesn't get to that level?
Many anorexics are in denial of their disease. One reason is because a part of them seriously thinks they are normal, and the other part doesn't want to gain weight. They often feel when their secret has been discovered they feel trapped. At this point the anorexic is clearly not ready for treatment, and the treatment will not be beneficial until they are. That is when it becomes a struggle, not only with the family and the anorexic, but more so with the doctor and the anorexic. The victim needs to go into treatment before it comes this far, (this is generally the time when they'll start eating to prove to the people around them they don't have a problem and develop bulimia). There are a variety of different treatment choices. If the anorexic is progressing in the treatment they are in, then obviously that is the right treatment for them, if they are showing no signs whatsoever of progress then there needs to be a change in treatments. There are even treatment centers for parents, so they can get involved and create a healthy environment for their daughter.
Anorexia is not uncommon and can result from many life altering changes, but it is important, especially for parents, to be involved with their children. All adolescent girls go through pretty much the same problems and personal identity issues; they just chose to cope with the issues differently. People have habits to compensate for their feelings. Some people bite their nails when they are nervous, other people will religiously wash their hands. When people are stressed they will over eat, and when they are lonely, they won't eat at all. It's a matter whether or not the coping mechanisms are healthy, and in an anorexic's case, they could lead to death. So many people confuse anorexics with choosing that lifestyle. Where it's not the lifestyle they choose, it's the lifestyle the person already has that makes them run to something else.
Of course, Dumbass forgets many things...things is a disorder of the young, in most cases. OK, 6% to 20% death rate ain't no big deal, right? Until you start thinking about the age of the dead!!! Which of course, the moron never did!
20% dead at age 17? Is that acceptable? Ever! Apparently to Ignorant, it is.
I did suffer from anorexia. I was at about 10% body fat and I looked it, but I never felt it. I always felt I was fat. I felt that the only thing I could cojntrol was my weight. I couldn't control anything else in my life. Without going into things, I just want to say that this is the lowest that the slimebag has stooped and I don't think he'll say anything further about anorexia.
You see, if I hadn't stopped, I could have been one of the ones who died, not who survived. That means a whole lot more than some really stupid troll.
Martha
Dally - 08 Jun 2004 14:22 GMT > That said, I think that a finding of a negative link between anorexia > and brest cancer to be interesting and worth mentioning. I objected to you saying, "do you want to get breast cancer" in the context of advocating choosing anorexia as a reasonable risk management method. You really did, Ig. Really.
>>You understand that the girl's chances of dying from anorexia far, >>far, far outweigh her chances of getting breast cancer? [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > An average woman's risk of getting breast cancer is 6.3%, about in the > same range.
> So, these numbers are not incomparable at all. And 10% of 15 year olds dying from breast cancer is equivalent to 6.3% of women getting breast cancer by the time they're 90? (Please note that most women do NOT die of breast cancer, and the young women who DO die of breast cancer tend to have the kind that isn't ameliorated by risk management, i.e., they've got the genetic kind of an aggressive fast moving tumor.)
You're wrong.
> Lest the more stupid members of this newsgroup jump at me for allegedly > "supporting anorexia", I want to point out that other methods of > reducing breast cancer incidence are superior to anorexia, for example > staying relatively slim, eating well and having a few children. You're wrong: the correlation between these risk factors and breast cancer is there, but it's slight. MOST risk factors are minor in nature. The big Daddy risk factor isn't identified. There are ways to slightly improve your odds of not getting cancer, but the odds improve so slightly that it's hardly worth mentioning.
> Parity is a well known and controllable negative influence on breast > cancer risk. [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > and lifetime duration of breastfeeding that had been prevalent in > developing countries until recently.'' So now you're advocating overpopulation as a theoretical method of reducing your chances of getting (probably curable) breast cancer from 6 to 3 women in 100?
You're not very good at risk/benefit analysis, are you?
A much better reason to breastfeed is the benefits to the child. The benefits to the mother are mild and quite possibly outweighed by the damage to the mother. (I'm speaking here as someone who nursed all over her children past infancy.)
>>I have no immediate relatives with breast cancer, I've nursed >>children for a total of four years and I have a normal fat [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > breast cancer. It is not supportd by evidence. You cannot eliminate > all chances, but you can improve them. How much, at what cost. That question must be in every single discussion on this subject.
I'm not living my life in fear of breast cancer. Colon cancer is just as likely to get me, and heart disease is the one with a bullet with my name on it. But at this point I'm better off making sure I buckle my seat belt and having a working smoke detector.
Dally
Ignoramus11156 - 08 Jun 2004 15:08 GMT >> That said, I think that a finding of a negative link between anorexia >> and brest cancer to be interesting and worth mentioning. > > I objected to you saying, "do you want to get breast cancer" in the > context of advocating choosing anorexia as a reasonable risk management > method. You really did, Ig. Really. I can see that you look at what I mentioned as an advocacy for "anorexic lifestyle". Perhaps what I wrote really comes across as that, even though I did not intend it, and I think that I was clear enough in not intending to endorse "anorexia".
But, try to look at this finding to see an interesting fact in it, which is that undereating at younger age reduces incidence of breast cancer (and possibly other cancers). So maybe there is some way to undereat without going too far like anorexics do, without having osteoporosis etc. Many female reproductive cancers are correlated with obesity and, as this study shows, also are negatively correlated with undereating. I find this interesting worth thinking about, instead of passing moralistic judgments.
>>>You understand that the girl's chances of dying from anorexia far, >>>far, far outweigh her chances of getting breast cancer? [quoted text clipped - 15 lines] > And 10% of 15 year olds dying from breast cancer is equivalent to 6.3% > of women getting breast cancer by the time they're 90? Check out what I said in that post: ``[[I would give a priority to living longer, even if life is terminated by breast cancer]''
> (Please note that most women do NOT die of breast cancer, and the Are you saying that most women who get breast cancer do not die from it?
As for the numbers that I was comparing, I was comparing exactly the two numbers that you yourself contrasted. ``"girl's chances of dying from anorexia" vs. "her chances of getting breast cancer"''
> young women who DO die of breast cancer tend to have the kind that > isn't ameliorated by risk management, i.e., they've got the genetic > kind of an aggressive fast moving tumor.) > > You're wrong. Note though, that other cancers other than breast cancer are correlated with obesity, for instance uterine cancer. So, it is possible that a study that would look at those cancers, and not only at breast cancer as the study I mentioned originally, could potentially find negative correlation between anorexia and those cancers.
>> Lest the more stupid members of this newsgroup jump at me for allegedly >> "supporting anorexia", I want to point out that other methods of [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > slightly improve your odds of not getting cancer, but the odds improve > so slightly that it's hardly worth mentioning. It is a subjective judgment what is worth and what is not worth mentioning, but, to me, cutting the risk in half is quite significant. That said, I agree with you in that the risk of breast cancer has unknown factors.
>> Parity is a well known and controllable negative influence on breast >> cancer risk. [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > reducing your chances of getting (probably curable) breast cancer from 6 > to 3 women in 100? Well, some things really work, but have side effects in aggregate.
> You're not very good at risk/benefit analysis, are you? Maybe I am not very good at it.
> A much better reason to breastfeed is the benefits to the child. > The benefits to the mother are mild and quite possibly outweighed by > the damage to the mother. (I'm speaking here as someone who nursed > all over her children past infancy.) Benefits to children are also great.
>> I do not share your fatalistic attitude when it comes to chances of >> breast cancer. It is not supportd by evidence. You cannot eliminate [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > name on it. But at this point I'm better off making sure I buckle my > seat belt and having a working smoke detector. You also worked your a.s off to lose weight Dally... Do not forget that.
i
jmk - 07 Jun 2004 14:09 GMT >>>>This is one of your more stupid posts, Ig. You're scraping the bottom >> [quoted text clipped - 32 lines] > No, it would not be okay with me, and I did not say that her dieting > was okay, it was your faulty inference. So, statemetn at at least she's less likely to get breast cancer was not a endorsement? It sure sounded like one from here. Would you please clarify your position on this then?
 Signature jmk in NC
Ignoramus2772 - 07 Jun 2004 14:15 GMT >>>>>This is one of your more stupid posts, Ig. You're scraping the bottom >>> [quoted text clipped - 36 lines] > a endorsement? It sure sounded like one from here. Would you please > clarify your position on this then? Of course it is not an endorsement of anorexia.
Suppose that someone mentioned a crazy woman who chopped off her breasts with an axle. And then, it would be a matter of fact that her chances of breast cancer are greatly reduced (duh). Would mentioning that imply endorsement of chopping off breasts with an axe? Surely not.
Same with anorexia, it is obviously a dangerous condition, with one interesting and positive consequence, and numerous negative consequences.
i
jmk - 07 Jun 2004 14:18 GMT >>>>>>This is one of your more stupid posts, Ig. You're scraping the bottom >>>> [quoted text clipped - 44 lines] > that imply endorsement of chopping off breasts with an axe? Surely > not. Oh, but she'd weigh less so I suppose that you would be supportive, right?
 Signature jmk in NC
Ignoramus2772 - 07 Jun 2004 14:26 GMT >>>>>>>This is one of your more stupid posts, Ig. You're scraping the bottom >>>>> [quoted text clipped - 46 lines] > > Oh, but she'd weigh less so I suppose that you would be supportive, right? I personally like breasts too much to be supportive of chopping them off... Breasts are some of my most favorite things, and I do not mean chicken breasts.
i
Perple Gyrl - 08 Jun 2004 03:02 GMT "jmk"
> Oh, but she'd weigh less so I suppose that you would be supportive, right? > -- > jmk in NC No, because he wouldn't want to sleep with her then...
jmk - 08 Jun 2004 12:21 GMT > "jmk" > [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > > No, because he wouldn't want to sleep with her then... Ah, good point. He's the one who goes through BFL and says, do you think she looked better in her bikini before or after. I forgot. Thanks for the reminder PG!
 Signature jmk in NC
Perple Gyrl - 08 Jun 2004 14:24 GMT Anytime.. just don't forget that he judges women on whether or not he'll sleep with them! Therefore, breastless women would not be f*ckable to him. Therefore, he spouts the benefits of anorexia because he likes breasts.... its all getting clear to me now.
"jmk" wrote in message
> Ah, good point. He's the one who goes through BFL and says, do you > think she looked better in her bikini before or after. I forgot. > Thanks for the reminder PG! > > -- > jmk in NC jmk - 07 Jun 2004 14:07 GMT > Calling a post that brings up an interesting finding regarding cancer > risk of anorexic women, stupid just because it does not pay lip > service to dangers of anorexia (already well known), is not > justifiable. Of course it's justifiable! Besides, your post really *is* scraping the bottom of the barrel and isn't even consistent with your previous posts regarding individuals with low BMIs.
 Signature jmk in NC
Ignoramus2772 - 07 Jun 2004 14:13 GMT >> Calling a post that brings up an interesting finding regarding cancer >> risk of anorexic women, stupid just because it does not pay lip [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > the bottom of the barrel and isn't even consistent with your > previous posts regarding individuals with low BMIs. Are you saying that the study that I posted is scientifically invalid?
If not, please explain how mentioning such a study is "scraping the bottom of the barrel".
i
jmk - 07 Jun 2004 14:14 GMT >>>Calling a post that brings up an interesting finding regarding cancer >>>risk of anorexic women, stupid just because it does not pay lip [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > > Are you saying that the study that I posted is scientifically invalid? No, I'm saying that you are a dufus for implying that a teenager having a weight this low is a good thing.
 Signature jmk in NC
Ignoramus2772 - 07 Jun 2004 14:25 GMT >>>>Calling a post that brings up an interesting finding regarding cancer >>>>risk of anorexic women, stupid just because it does not pay lip [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > No, I'm saying that you are a dufus for implying that a teenager having > a weight this low is a good thing. No, you are a dufus if you think that mentioning a study discussing one aspect of anorexia "implies" that it is a good thing.
i
Crafting Mom - 08 Jun 2004 13:01 GMT >> This is one of your more stupid posts, Ig. You're scraping the bottom >> of the barrel to find something positive to say about a 13 year old girl [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > happens to be beneficial. Surely, one could find many other not so > positive sides of anorexia, and you did a splendid job at that. Hello??? Anorexia is an ILLNESS, a DISORDER!
Yeah, there's plus sides to cancer too, I could point those out. One loses weight at a rapid rate, without even trying. Yet, for some odd reason, people think cancer is a not so cool illness to have.
I get so sick of the glamourization of anorexia, a "movie star"s illness. As someone who suffered a whole gamut of eating disorders for nearly 2 decades, let me tell you, there is no "plus side".
Sure, an anorexic might not have breast cancer, but they have ANOREXIA. Their teeth may be falling out, their bones may be brittle, but hey, they don't have breast cancer....
Anorexia is an ILLNESS, a psychological, all-consuming ILLNESS, not a "lifestyle".
 Signature The post you just read, unless otherwise noted, is strictly my opinion and experience. Please interpret accordingly.
Ignoramus11156 - 08 Jun 2004 13:42 GMT >>> This is one of your more stupid posts, Ig. You're scraping the bottom >>> of the barrel to find something positive to say about a 13 year old girl [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] > weight at a rapid rate, without even trying. Yet, for some odd reason, > people think cancer is a not so cool illness to have. Do you suppose that I would disagree with you?
> I get so sick of the glamourization of anorexia, a "movie star"s illness. > As someone who suffered a whole gamut of eating disorders for nearly 2 [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > Anorexia is an ILLNESS, a psychological, all-consuming ILLNESS, not a > "lifestyle". yep...
i
Perple Gyrl - 08 Jun 2004 14:25 GMT "Crafting Mom"
> Hello??? Anorexia is an ILLNESS, a DISORDER! > [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > Anorexia is an ILLNESS, a psychological, all-consuming ILLNESS, not a > "lifestyle". Quit trying to make sense!!! It won't work!
DZ - 11 Jun 2004 00:13 GMT > If dominique lives to old age, she would be less likely to have > breast cancer than her statistical peers. A study in Nature (2004; 427:411-412) looked if the lifespan of mice is affected by their growth rate at the suckling age. It found that limiting the growth during that period through restriction in food intake increases longevity. The early restriction also protects against the effects of obesity-inducing diet later in life.
Suppose these findings confirm to be true for humans as well, without adverse effects on IQ in adulthood etc. (the article calls for such studies).
Then you'd have the contradiction between the biological determination of mothers to feed their young well and what's good for the kids.
Many would vehemently object - and if you call for dietary restriction in children, the names you're called now would be nicest of the compliments you'll be getting.
DZ
Ignoramus2546 - 11 Jun 2004 05:01 GMT >> If dominique lives to old age, she would be less likely to have >> breast cancer than her statistical peers. [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > adverse effects on IQ in adulthood etc. (the article calls for such > studies). Thanks.
Supposedly, IQ of rats is not negatively affected by calorie restriction, according to maze experiments.
According to this article, IQ of anorexic patients is higher than the IQ of their peers:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=pubmed&dopt=Abstra ct&list_uids=11393050
``Other characteristics of anorectic patients include a higher-than-average IQ''
So, at the very least, their anorexia does not push them into the bottom of the IQ distribution, although whether they would be smarter or dumber without their anorexia, remains to be seen.
According to same article, anorexics demonstrated less psychopathology than bulimics on the psychopatology scale.
> Then you'd have the contradiction between the biological determination > of mothers to feed their young well and what's good for the kids. One may suppose that the behavior of mouse mothers has been selected to increase fertility of their offspring and not their lifespan. Mice kind of are throwaway animals, in the sense that they are not well protected and die a lot, but reproduce plentifully. A mouse who lived 45 months is not a great mouse, but a mouse who has many living grandchildren is a great mouse, from the standpoint of natural selection. That's my theory.
> Many would vehemently object - and if you call for dietary restriction > in children, the names you're called now would be nicest of the > compliments you'll be getting. Some people are simply not made to comprehend that certain facts have, first, scientific interest, and second, that truth is more important than advocacy. So that's nothing new and being called names is the price of saying things that are not conventional (regardless of whether these things are true or not).
As for advocating dietary restriction on children, it is pretty clear that at the very least, children do not benefit from plumpness very much and are greatly hurt by obesity, later in life.
Just at what slimness the benefits of being slim end, in people, is not quite obvious.
i
GaryG - 05 Jun 2004 23:41 GMT > Young, skinny < and obsessed with diets > Weight concerns can as early as 14 Fashion, parents take the [quoted text clipped - 27 lines] > eating only a piece of fruit, just to stay thin. Standing at 5-foot-6, > she used to be 150 pounds and now she's 114. A 13 year old girl, 5' 6" tall, who weighs 114 lbs, is in the "Normal Range" according to the Centers for Disease Control/World Health Organization, with a Body Mass Index of 18.4. At her age, height, and gender she would be in the 31st weight percentile, compared to US averages. Although she is at the low end of normal, and may indeed have an eating disorder, her current weight is not that extreme by comparison.
GG http://www.WeightWare.com Your Weight and Health Diary
> "Everybody says she looks great and that's what makes her lose weight, > so I wish people would stop saying it," says her worried mother [quoted text clipped - 96 lines] > appearances it takes over your life. It's all you can think about and > all you can do." Carol Frilegh - 06 Jun 2004 02:21 GMT > A 13 year old girl, 5' 6" tall, who weighs 114 lbs, is in the "Normal Range" > according to the Centers for Disease Control/World Health Organization, with [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > http://www.WeightWare.com > Your Weight and Health Diary Fitday has that girl off the chart in a blank zone underweight.
 Signature Diva ****** There is no substitute for the right food
GaryG - 06 Jun 2004 04:00 GMT > > A 13 year old girl, 5' 6" tall, who weighs 114 lbs, is in the "Normal Range" > > according to the Centers for Disease Control/World Health Organization, with [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > > Fitday has that girl off the chart in a blank zone underweight. Interesting...I wonder where fitday gets their numbers from? Does their system take into account her age and sex? (I couldn't find anything on their web site).
One of the better Body Mass Index sites I've found is Steven Halls, MD. His calculator is here:
http://www.halls.md/body-mass-index/bmi.htm
It's true that some BMI calculators indicate "Underweight" starting around BMI=18.5. But, most of those are for adults...teens tend to naturally run low BMI's. Her weight is in the 31st percentile, which is on the low side, but not abnormally low for her age and height.
It sounds like she may have an eating disorder, but based on her weight alone, she may not yet be in a dangerous condition (physically, anyway).
GG
Carol Frilegh - 06 Jun 2004 13:17 GMT > > > A 13 year old girl, 5' 6" tall, who weighs 114 lbs, is in the "Normal > Range" [quoted text clipped - 31 lines] > > GG Doing it subjectively, at 13 I had reached my full height of 5 ft 6 1/2 inches and a weight of 165. The lowest I ever got subsequently was the low 130's and it was below my set point. Now shorter and wiser, I hang around 139-141 with an acceptable BMI, some pinchable areas and the ongoing battle with gravity one expects at age 73.
That teen would have to be extremely small boned at 113-115 and is probably headed for a career as a runway supermodel.
You sound very weight wise and savvy and I look forward to downloading and checking out your program because there is something magical about the words "Free Trial"
 Signature Diva ***** The Best Man for the Job May Be A Woman
GaryG - 06 Jun 2004 14:50 GMT > > > > A 13 year old girl, 5' 6" tall, who weighs 114 lbs, is in the "Normal > > Range" [quoted text clipped - 44 lines] > and checking out your program because there is something magical about > the words "Free Trial" Ahhh, thanks...that's music to my ears :-). I hope you enjoy WeightWare and find it useful, but you might want to wait a day or two before downloading it. The new version 1.4 includes several new graphs, some bug fixes, and some ease-of-use enhancements. I hope to release it to the website early tomorrow.
GG http://www.WeightWare.com Your Weight and Health Diary
Dally - 07 Jun 2004 23:14 GMT >>>A 13 year old girl, 5' 6" tall, who weighs 114 lbs, is in the "Normal > [quoted text clipped - 37 lines] > It sounds like she may have an eating disorder, but based on her weight > alone, she may not yet be in a dangerous condition (physically, anyway). Just as another example, I just called up to my 13 year old daughter and asked her what she weighs. She replied "I have no idea." I told her to go weigh herself on my scale. She came in at 95 pounds at 5'3". She's in the 25th percentile, which makes perfect sense: she slender but not boney. Furthermore, she's been between the 10th and 25th percentile for weight at every well-child checkup since she was 2 months old. Pardon me if I don't get hysterical about her being under 100 pounds.
Dally
JMA - 08 Jun 2004 00:15 GMT > > It's true that some BMI calculators indicate "Underweight" starting around > > BMI=18.5. But, most of those are for adults...teens tend to naturally run [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] > > Dally Well, just being a low weight or underweight doesn't make a person anorexic. The girl in the original article specifically said she only eats one piece of fruit a day because she is afraid of getting fat. *That* is what differentiates an anorexic from a healthy, slender individual.
jmk - 07 Jun 2004 14:11 GMT >>Young, skinny < and obsessed with diets >>Weight concerns can as early as 14 Fashion, parents take the [quoted text clipped - 38 lines] > http://www.WeightWare.com > Your Weight and Health Diary Wrong. According to the CDC, a BMI of 18.5 or lower is underweight.
http://www.cdc.gov/nccdphp/dnpa/bmi/calc-bmi.htm
 Signature jmk in NC
GaryG - 07 Jun 2004 14:45 GMT > >>Young, skinny < and obsessed with diets > >>Weight concerns can as early as 14 Fashion, parents take the [quoted text clipped - 42 lines] > > http://www.cdc.gov/nccdphp/dnpa/bmi/calc-bmi.htm That is for adults...for adolescents they use a different standard, because teenagers tend to naturally have very low BMI's compared to adults:
http://www.cdc.gov/nccdphp/dnpa/bmi/bmi-for-age.htm
GG
jmk - 07 Jun 2004 14:13 GMT On 6/7/2004 9:11 AM, jmk wrote:
> On 6/5/2004 6:41 PM, GaryG wrote: > [quoted text clipped - 48 lines] > > http://www.cdc.gov/nccdphp/dnpa/bmi/calc-bmi.htm Oops, that below 18.5, not 18.5 or below. Sorry.
 Signature jmk in NC
MH - 06 Jun 2004 01:11 GMT > Young, skinny < and obsessed with diets > Weight concerns can as early as 14 Fashion, parents take the > blameGirls, and some boys too, unduly concerned about weight > > MARGO VARADI > TORONTO STAR (snipped)
The simple, horrible truth about anorexia is, if they do not stop the behavior, they will die. It will kill them. And, if they do stop, they still risk suffering from osteoporosis in old age. Anorexia is growing is some parts of the population. It's growing in younger girls and in young gay males.
It's a dreadful addiction that is spurned on by our modern media.
Martha
OceanView - 06 Jun 2004 18:41 GMT >> Young, skinny < and obsessed with diets >> Weight concerns can as early as 14 Fashion, parents take [quoted text clipped - 17 lines] > > Martha Not to mention the stress created by our double standards like low-rider pants and fast-food on every corner.
MH - 07 Jun 2004 03:57 GMT > > (snipped) > > [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > Not to mention the stress created by our double standards like > low-rider pants and fast-food on every corner. I had that growing up. My mom would say "finish your plate" and then in the next sentence, "why do you eat so much, the boys will never like you if you're too fat."
No wonder I developed an eating disorder.....
Martha
Carol Frilegh - 07 Jun 2004 09:45 GMT > > > (snipped) > > > [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] > > I had that growing up. My mom would say "finish your plate" I used to stop at the part that says "Ainsley, pure bone china" :-)
 Signature Diva ***** The Best Man For The Job Is A Woman
Perple Gyrl - 08 Jun 2004 03:07 GMT "MH"
> I had that growing up. My mom would say "finish your plate" and then in the > next sentence, "why do you eat so much, the boys will never like you if [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > > Martha I think we grew up in the same home...
Steve - 06 Jun 2004 04:34 GMT > Young, skinny ‹ and obsessed with diets > Weight concerns can as early as 14 Fashion, parents take the > blameGirls, and some boys too, unduly concerned about weight <snip>
A decade ago this article would have inspired outrage, but that was before obese toddlers and teen agers with type II diabetes.
Steve
That T Woman - 06 Jun 2004 04:58 GMT > > Young, skinny ? and obsessed with diets > > Weight concerns can as early as 14 Fashion, parents take the [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > > Steve So we should ignore that some teenagers are starving themselves because some toddlers are obese and some teenagers have diabetes? Can't we be outraged about all the extremes?
Tonia
JMA - 06 Jun 2004 16:56 GMT > > > Young, skinny < and obsessed with diets > > > Weight concerns can as early as 14 Fashion, parents take the [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > > Tonia Well T, I guess anything is better than being fat (or perceived as fat).
OceanView - 06 Jun 2004 18:44 GMT >> > > Young, skinny < and obsessed with diets >> > > Weight concerns can as early as 14 Fashion, parents [quoted text clipped - 19 lines] > Well T, I guess anything is better than being fat (or > perceived as fat). Skinny kids don't get abused, tormented and bullied, but fat kids sure do. And it has lifelong repercusions.
The Queen of Cans and Jars - 06 Jun 2004 19:18 GMT > Skinny kids don't get abused, tormented and bullied, but fat > kids sure do. And it has lifelong repercusions. skinny kids *do* get bullied, they just don't get it for being fat. kids are cruel, and they don't discriminate. if someone is different enough, they'll get picked on whether they're skinny or fat.
jmk - 07 Jun 2004 14:16 GMT >>>>>Young, skinny < and obsessed with diets >>>>>Weight concerns can as early as 14 Fashion, parents [quoted text clipped - 24 lines] > Skinny kids don't get abused, tormented and bullied, but fat > kids sure do. And it has lifelong repercusions. Actually, skinny kids do too -- at least guys. My brother was always (and still is) extremely thin and he was always picked on for it.
 Signature jmk in NC
Carol Frilegh - 06 Jun 2004 13:11 GMT > > Young, skinny ã and obsessed with diets > > Weight concerns can as early as 14 Fashion, parents take the [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > > Steve Once there was a little girl named Alice who fell down the rabbit hole and confronted with a door she couldn't get through nibbled one side of a mushroom and got too tall, then ate from the other side and became too small.
Moral of the story: be moderate and realistic or eat zucchini instead of mushrooms!
 Signature Diva ******** Completing 4 years of maintenance
OceanView - 06 Jun 2004 18:45 GMT >> > Young, skinny ? and obsessed with diets >> > Weight concerns can as early as 14 Fashion, parents take [quoted text clipped - 16 lines] > Moral of the story: be moderate and realistic or eat > zucchini instead of mushrooms! You forgot: Watch where you step!
Carol Frilegh - 07 Jun 2004 00:16 GMT > >> > Young, skinny ã and obsessed with diets > >> > Weight concerns can as early as 14 Fashion, parents take [quoted text clipped - 18 lines] > > You forgot: Watch where you step! Especially in Paris. It's loaded with dog sh.t.
 Signature Diva ***** The Best Man for the Job May Be A Woman
OceanView - 06 Jun 2004 18:38 GMT > Young, skinny ? and obsessed with diets > Weight concerns can as early as 14 Fashion, parents take > the blameGirls, and some boys too, unduly concerned about > weight <snipped>
In spite of the anorexia debate, I can tell you that the disease is not restricted to girls.
I went from 6'0 225 at 14 to 6'2" 160 at 17 and still saw myself as fat. I'd had a lifetime of extremes and I consider it all the same disease: low self-esteem. (Side note: John Lennon became anorexic after reading that he'd gotten a nickname as "the fat Beatle.")
I've been busy lately, not making money, unfortunately, but it's nice to be back!
260/230/195
GaryG - 06 Jun 2004 21:51 GMT > > Young, skinny < and obsessed with diets > > Weight concerns can as early as 14 Fashion, parents take [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > became anorexic after reading that he'd gotten a nickname as > "the fat Beatle.") Are you saying you were anorexic during that period? The numbers don't seem to support that. Losing 65 lbs over the course of 3 years would require a daily deficit of around 210 calories per day - a very reasonable and healthy rate of weight loss. A 6'2" 160 lb 17 year old male has a Body Mass Index of 20.5 (in the Normal Range), and is in the 38th weight percentile based on US averages. So, you were on the low side of normal, but still well above the "Underweight" category.
The CDC definition of "Underweight" for adolescents is "< 5th percentile" for Body Mass Index. For a 17-year old male, that would require a BMI<17.6 (137 lbs at your height). Based on this definition, at 160 lbs, you were still 23 lbs above "Underweight".
Perhaps it's one of those "good news/bad news" scenarios...while it's true that you may have suffered from low self-esteem and had an obsession with food during that time, it seems unlikely that you were truly anorexic.
GG http://www.WeightWare.com Your Weight and Health Diary
> I've been busy lately, not making money, unfortunately, but it's > nice to be back! > > 260/230/195 JMA - 06 Jun 2004 23:56 GMT > > > Young, skinny < and obsessed with diets > > > Weight concerns can as early as 14 Fashion, parents take [quoted text clipped - 27 lines] > that you may have suffered from low self-esteem and had an obsession with > food during that time, it seems unlikely that you were truly anorexic. In order for a person to be "truly" anorexic the BMI needs to be <18 AND they have to be overly concerned with weight, body appearance, or be extremely fearful of being fat or gaining weight.
megan - 07 Jun 2004 13:34 GMT "JMA" <bjenniferb@yahoo.com> wrote in message [...]
> In order for a person to be "truly" anorexic the BMI needs to be <18 AND > they have to be overly concerned with weight, body appearance, or be > extremely fearful of being fat or gaining weight. Is this true?
I'm not trying to correct you, I'm just curious. If someone exhibited anorexic behavior - only ate, I don't know, an apple and a cracker a day and worked out like a demon - but weighed 200 pounds (They would, of course, probably not stay 200 for long, I realize)... are they not an anorexic because their BMI is too high?
megan
GaryG - 07 Jun 2004 14:55 GMT > "JMA" <bjenniferb@yahoo.com> wrote in message > [...] [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > > megan Good questions...I think low BMI is definitely an indicator, but not required for the diagnosis:
http://www.ucdmc.ucdavis.edu/ucdhs/health/a-z/49EatingDisorders/doc49diagnosis.html
http://www.emedicinehealth.com/articles/12688-5.asp
GG
beeswing - 07 Jun 2004 22:51 GMT > Good questions...I think low BMI is definitely an indicator, but not > required for the diagnosis: > > http://www.ucdmc.ucdavis.edu/ucdhs/health/a-z/49EatingDisorders/doc49diagnosis.html > > http://www.emedicinehealth.com/articles/12688-5.asp According to the DSM, the psych "bible," low BMI *is* required for a diagnosis of anorexia (see my earlier post). However, even if someone does not fit all of the diagnostic criteria for anorexia, they can still have an eating disorder.
beeswing
beeswing - 07 Jun 2004 15:28 GMT >I'm not trying to correct you, I'm just curious. If someone >exhibited anorexic behavior - only ate, I don't know, an apple and a >cracker a day and worked out like a demon - but weighed 200 pounds >(They would, of course, probably not stay 200 for long, I realize)... >are they not an anorexic because their BMI is too high? One of diagnostic criterion for a diagnosis of anorexia is having lower than normal weight/BMI. To receive a diagnosis of anorexia, you must meet this criterion, among others:
In the American description: Refusal to maintain body weight at or above a minimally normal weight for age and height (e.g., weight loss leading to maintenance of body weight less than 85% of that expected; or failure to make expected weight gain during period of growth, leading to body weight less than 85% of that expected).
The European description: Body weight is maintained at least 15% below that expected (either lost or never achieved), or Quetelet's body-mass index is 17.5 or less. Prepubertal patients may show failure to make the expected weight gain during the period of growth.
See http://www.mentalhealth.com for more information.
beeswing
Crafting Mom - 08 Jun 2004 12:55 GMT > x-no-archive: yes > [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] > make expected weight gain during period of growth, leading to body weight > less than 85% of that expected). In other words, the damage has to already be done. :P The physical symptoms have to be quite severe before it's taken seriously that there is an actual problem.... that's always been my hangup with eating disorder diagnosis.
I was quite overweight as a teen (at least in my opinion), before I began anorexic and purging behavior. It was not until I was underweight that people took notice and had done something about it. Nobody noticed (or cared) me when I was overweight, when I went 2 days without eating, only to break that fast with 12 grapes (I thought I was overeating if I went beyond 12, for some odd reason), or an apple or some carrots. For those who did notice, it was the rare time, and I still had "padding on me" and I could afford it, so to speak.
 Signature The post you just read, unless otherwise noted, is strictly my opinion and experience. Please interpret accordingly.
beeswing - 08 Jun 2004 15:21 GMT >In other words, the damage has to already be done. :P The physical >symptoms have to be quite severe before it's taken seriously that there is >an actual problem.... that's always been my hangup with eating disorder >diagnosis. As I wrote elsewhere, just because one isn't diagnosed specifically as "anorexic" doesn't preclude one from having an eating disorder. I'm sorry that the people around you failed to recognize that you needed help.
Please realize, too, that I'm in no way defending the diagnostic criteria, I'm just stating what it is.
beeswing
Crafting Mom - 08 Jun 2004 16:43 GMT > x-no-archive: yes > [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > > beeswing beeswing, no problem... I wasn't taking a potshot at you, just at the diagnostic criteria ;-)
I'm now free of eating disorders. The people in my life, once they did notice there was a problem, did take pro-active steps to help me. I didn't like it, but they were tough. It was not until I was an adult, though, that I realized that in order to truly recover, I had to *want* to get out of the cycle. So I did.
 Signature The post you just read, unless otherwise noted, is strictly my opinion and experience. Please interpret accordingly.
beeswing - 09 Jun 2004 03:18 GMT >I'm now free of eating disorders. The people in my life, once they did >notice there was a problem, did take pro-active steps to help me. I didn't >like it, but they were tough. It was not until I was an adult, though, >that I realized that in order to truly recover, I had to *want* to get out >of the cycle. So I did. I'm glad to hear that you've made it through.
Take care, and all the best to you.
beeswing
OceanView - 07 Jun 2004 14:33 GMT >> > Young, skinny < and obsessed with diets >> > Weight concerns can as early as 14 Fashion, parents take [quoted text clipped - 40 lines] >> >> 260/230/195 I wasn't anorexic, but a lot of people telling me I was too "skinny." BTW, I lost most of that weight in a three month period, 225-175, but bottomed out at 160. The 175 would be nice now!
|
|
|