> >> Or...you could just lose weight on your own.
> >
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> weight. However, you did publicly post that you had to be towed to
> shore. You must understand how incredible that sounds to some people.
>> >> Or...you could just lose weight on your own.
>> >
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>
>Actually imbecile, this is a forgery.
The original post was. This response does not appear to be. Regardless
of that, the real Jackibar posted this in public somewhere. How is it
I'm being an imbecile, oh obviously angry one?
> Where the forger found the
>original post is not apparent, though the forgery is.
Yep. I assumed they got it from the NAAFA message board, as many of
the previous forgeries have come.
> While there
>appears to be a real person posting as Jackibar, if you would have
>taken a second to read full headers or to google the poster's history,
>it is very obvious the real Jackibar has only this single post to
>SSFA.
What difference does it make and why would I go through all of that
work when I knew the original post was a forgery already, dumbass?
>A quick google searched based on Jacki's response, reveals the
>simpleminded change in subject header and where the post originated
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>usual obsessive idiot/fr/troll manner decided to attack a person with
>more worth then they can every hope to have.
You're in a real pisser of a rage today it appears. I dont have time
to check all the headers and google people's freaking posting history
or even look at their websites, just to respond to a goddamned post.
Beside the fact, my opinion remains the same whether I'm responding to
a forgery or not.
I'm surprised you have time for all that, considering the oh so full
life you claim to have.
>> > The mere fact I am brave enough to get out there on the jet
>> >ski speaks volumes!
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
>The patented Jade selective perception thing going on once again.
So fat acceptors don't often congratulate one another on their courage
in performing quotidian tasks that any normal sized person does
without thinking about it? Please be clear that this is what you mean
before I go searching for examples.
><sigh>
>
>Do you see fat acceptors behind every fat person with self worth and
>the desire to live a healthy life?
I don't think you know the first thing about self worth. People that
have it don't crow about it.
> Those two attributes are good for
>anybody, fat or not. The ability for a fat person to hold on to them
>in a fat hating society shows more strength and value than you or any
>of you troll/fr/idiots can ever hope to aspire to.
Oh Gawd. Save the feel good emotional rhetoric for someone who gives a
damn.
>> But do you really think it is appropriate to be patting yourself on
>> the back for trying to lead a healthy life? People should do that
>> anyway.
>
>Tell me, do you think that you gain any credibility by making such
>bonehead comments?
HOw is this boneheaded? Have you ever asked yourself that maybe it
should be a normal thing for people to want to live healthy? Why is it
some goal to be met or obstacle to be overcome to you?
>> > The fact I'm having a little logistical difficulty was
>> >the reason I asked for help from others who may know more about jet skis
[quoted text clipped - 37 lines]
>tripe that has been published in its name that it is obviously
>responsible for.
You mean all that stuff you seem completely unable to produce in the
form of quotes or message Ids for the public to judge for themselves?
>I think the irony meter may have topped out on this one.
Thanks for ending trite. I can always count on you for that.
Jade
A J Davenport - 12 Jun 2004 02:22 GMT
> >> >> Or...you could just lose weight on your own.
> >> >
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>
> The original post was. This response does not appear to be.
Yes, as I pointed out this is exactly the case.
> Regardless
> of that, the real Jackibar posted this in public somewhere. How is it
> I'm being an imbecile, oh obviously angry one?
How did you come to the conclusion that my comment on the obviousness
of the forgery makes me angry? Is it because forgeries make you so
angry that you made that leap?
> > Where the forger found the
> >original post is not apparent, though the forgery is.
>
> Yep. I assumed they got it from the NAAFA message board, as many of
> the previous forgeries have come.
Wrong, but then that is usually the case with you.
> > While there
> >appears to be a real person posting as Jackibar, if you would have
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> What difference does it make and why would I go through all of that
> work when I knew the original post was a forgery already, dumbass?
How convenient that you now claim that you "knew the original post was
a forgery" pray tell, how did you come by that knowledge?
Do you think responding to an obvious forgery makes you look
intelligent?
<rhetorical>
> >A quick google searched based on Jack's response, reveals the
> >simpleminded change in subject header and where the post originated
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> to check all the headers and google people's freaking posting history
> or even look at their websites, just to respond to a goddamned post.
That you see rage is no less than I would expect from you. Always
ascribing emotions that are not there.
For your edification, you and your troll buddies have made it almost
imperative that one read full headers so that we can tell at a glance
what is a forgery and what isn't. That you don't appear to care what
is a troll and what isn't simply shows that your sole intent
is/was/and seeming always will be to provoke and sow discord.
> Beside the fact, my opinion remains the same whether I'm responding to
> a forgery or not.
Yes, your opinion, worthless as it is, will not change. You don't
have the intelligence or humility to accept new ideas it appears.
> I'm surprised you have time for all that, considering the oh so full
> life you claim to have.
My life and its fullness is not the point here is it? But nice try at
changing the focus. You trolls can always be counted on to trundle
that one out when you are unable or unwilling to concede that you are
on the losing end of a debate.
Given the number of posts you've been making [did you recently loose
your job, Jade? I don't know how else one can justify the hours and
hours you seemingly spend reading, and responding if one has gainful
employment, much less a life away from the computer] I can understand
that you wouldn't take the few moments [all of about 3 that it took
me] to bother to google a poster's history.
> >> > The mere fact I am brave enough to get out there on the jet
> >> >ski speaks volumes!
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> without thinking about it? Please be clear that this is what you mean
> before I go searching for examples.
You see fat acceptors everywhere Jade. Your agenda doesn't allow for
anything else obviously.
> ><sigh>
> >
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> I don't think you know the first thing about self worth. People that
> have it don't crow about it.
I wasn't talking about myself here Jade, I was asking you a question
about your perception of Jackie. That you once again resort to an
snide comment about me gives away just how obsessive you are about me
and my views on fat acceptance.
<placing tongue firmly in cheek>
You know, us Diva's like it when people obsess about us. Just
reinforces that we are the center of the universe.
<removing tongue from cheek>
> > Those two attributes are good for
> >anybody, fat or not. The ability for a fat person to hold on to them
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> Oh Gawd. Save the feel good emotional rhetoric for someone who gives a
> damn.
Hit a nerve there, Jadie? Can't refute that a person who holds onto
their self worth in spite of inept attempts to belittle them is
strong, so you make another snide comment. Your predictability is
getting really old.
> >> But do you really think it is appropriate to be patting yourself on
> >> the back for trying to lead a healthy life? People should do that
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> should be a normal thing for people to want to live healthy? Why is it
> some goal to be met or obstacle to be overcome to you?
Bonehead in that you try and brush off the pride that a person [of any
size] feels in trying to live a healthy life as a trait only
applicable to FA is where the stupidity shows itself. If this comment
had come from a person you didn't identify as a FA I'm certain your
response would have been very different.
> >> > The fact I'm having a little logistical difficulty was
> >> >the reason I asked for help from others who may know more about jet skis
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> >> climbing on a stationary object. I know athletic people who have a
> >> hell of a time climbing up on an innertube.
Then why not just say this, instead of slamming Jackie for being fat?
<rhetorical>
> >> I am not aware of any apparatus that will help you. You simply need to
> >> continue to lose weight and build muscle. Raw strength is the only
[quoted text clipped - 30 lines]
> You mean all that stuff you seem completely unable to produce in the
> form of quotes or message Ids for the public to judge for themselves?
That you ignore posts that provide that proof and then ignore the
message ID's as of no consequence doesn't surprise me in the least.
You head is so deeply buried in the sand that you can't concede
defeat. Must suck to have that much ego. Even I, a actor, who
identifies as a diva don't have that much.
> >I think the irony meter may have topped out on this one.
>
> Thanks for ending trite. I can always count on you for that.
Trite or not, I obviously hit the nail right on the head.
AJ
Because, somebody has to be the Diva!