>> Sounds like a pretty sane diet to me, although I would consider adding
>> maybe 500 calories per day. one stone per month weight loss is not
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> the second month I lost 9lbs. I expect to lose around that, or a little
> less, until my taget is met.
Oh, that's very sensible!
> To me that gives assurance that my weight loss isn't too great, to
> cause concerns that my health or muscle loss could be compromised,
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> great then I will adjust my intake accordingly but as yet I am quite
> happy to continue in the method that I'm using.
Sounds like a rational, reality based approach.
By the way, what is your exercise regimen is like? I am sorry if you
mentioned it before. Basically, it is necessary to do some strength
training to preserve muscle... or else the dieter will end up looking
pretty bad. All in all, the point of a diet normally should be
becoming healthier, and good health requires good exercising, pretty
much by definition.
>> Do you feel much better now, physically?
>
> Overall yes I do. It it nice to walk without sweating as much and be
> able to do things without being as out of breath as I was - although
> this is more to do with my general fitness level as I have been
> working on that also.
I am happy for you...
> BTW I found your website, and your pictures truely inspirational - I really
> mean that. Well done to you, you must be proud of what you achieved....!!!
Oh, I am glad to hear that, thanks!
i
Bob - 14 Jun 2004 16:13 GMT
> By the way, what is your exercise regimen is like? I am sorry if you
> mentioned it before. Basically, it is necessary to do some strength
> training to preserve muscle... or else the dieter will end up looking
> pretty bad. All in all, the point of a diet normally should be
> becoming healthier, and good health requires good exercising, pretty
> much by definition.
I agree with you.
However I have to be aware that, due to some physical limitations, my
ability to do to much in the way of weight work, and other forms of
exercise, is a little compromised. Not impossible mind you but it does need
consideration and thought otherwise I find myself having to use too many
meds and be almost totally inactive for long periods of time.
By reducing my weight this, hopefully, will have a beneficial effect on my
back problems and cycling, walking and some light weights are, as yet, being
beneficial too.
I just have to remember that as focussed as my mental attitude now is I do
have to apply a common sense approach and do these things slowly.
Again congratulations to you.
Best wishes
Bob
Ignoramus8649 - 14 Jun 2004 16:42 GMT
>> By the way, what is your exercise regimen is like? I am sorry if you
>> mentioned it before. Basically, it is necessary to do some strength
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> consideration and thought otherwise I find myself having to use too many
> meds and be almost totally inactive for long periods of time.
There are so many exercises, that there are some exercises that can be
done with a lot of illnesses, like bad back, for example. Obviously,
you need some medical attention to be safe, just don't presume that
there are no exercises fitting your health.
For example, let's say with back problems, you can probably (!) do
some bicep/tricep exercises, squats without weights, etc. Ask your doc
for a referral.
> By reducing my weight this, hopefully, will have a beneficial effect on my
> back problems and cycling, walking and some light weights are, as yet, being
> beneficial too.
yeppers.
> I just have to remember that as focussed as my mental attitude now is I do
> have to apply a common sense approach and do these things slowly.
My own opinion only, but being superconservative is the way to go with
respect to health. There is no need to "get ripped in 6 weeks", you
can as well take 6 years.
i