I read in a magazine that the FDA is may start pushing for companies not
only to list the nutritional values and calories *per serving*, but the same
information for the entire contents of a package (the premise being that
sometimes people consume an entire package of something not realizing that
the package is comprised of 2.5 servings). I remarked to my dh that I
thought this was a good idea and he said that other than ingredients (he's
allergic to a bunch of stuff that crops up when you least expect it) he's
never read the nutrional values. I was amazed. I *always* flip a package
and read how much of what is in there. What is the percentage of people who
read those listings? I guessed 75% but my dh said I'm way overestimating.
Does anybody know what percent of American Adults are on a diet or
conscientious in regard to what their eating? Just curious.
Teri
Beverly - 15 Jun 2004 14:18 GMT
I always read the nutritional labels on foods. I've put many things back on
the shelf after reading them<G>
Beverly
> I read in a magazine that the FDA is may start pushing for companies not
> only to list the nutritional values and calories *per serving*, but the same
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> conscientious in regard to what their eating? Just curious.
> Teri
SnugBear - 18 Jun 2004 02:16 GMT
"Beverly" wrote:
> I always read the nutritional labels on foods. I've put many things
> back on the shelf after reading them<G>
ygtr! It's just so much easier to *not* buy it. Sometimes though, I'll
start hunting for something that has fewer calories than the initial item
I checked. After awhile I'll find my husband and say "Let's get out of
here before I have to buy crackers" I usually make it out the door and
I'm so pleased.
Grocery shopping isn't really the torture that sounds like though. I
enjoy it as long as I spend more time in the produce section than
elsewhere.

Signature
Walking on . . .
Laurie in Maine
207/110 60 inches of attitude!
Start: 2/02 Maintained since 2/03
Beverly - 20 Jun 2004 15:21 GMT
> > I always read the nutritional labels on foods. I've put many things
> > back on the shelf after reading them<G>
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> enjoy it as long as I spend more time in the produce section than
> elsewhere.
For the past couple weeks I've done most of my grocery shopping at Trader
Joe's. It's much smaller and they stock everything we like. We stop at
the regular grocery for those items they don't sell such as paper and
cleaning products.
Beverly
SnugBear - 20 Jun 2004 16:28 GMT
"Beverly" wrote:
> For the past couple weeks I've done most of my grocery shopping at
> Trader Joe's. It's much smaller and they stock everything we like.
> We stop at the regular grocery for those items they don't sell such
> as paper and cleaning products.
Next Sunday at this time I should be on my way to Trader Joe's in Danbury
CT. I need more Triple ginger snaps. <g>

Signature
Walking on . . .
Laurie in Maine
207/110 60 inches of attitude!
Start: 2/02 Maintained since 2/03
jayjay - 15 Jun 2004 14:26 GMT
>I read in a magazine that the FDA is may start pushing for companies not
>only to list the nutritional values and calories *per serving*, but the same
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>conscientious in regard to what their eating? Just curious.
>Teri
I never used to read them. And many times I don't still. I hate
food journalling and meticulaizing over such details.
The packages I do read are any processed foods I plan to buy. I'll
keep some *quick fix* foods around for those nights that I don't want
to cook and there are no leftovers or other such items around.
Generally its not the calorie content I'm concerned about as much as I
am the sodium (salt) content. That stuff really affects me.
Although I have made observations over the years. And if you are one
to eat the convience bags of chips found in vending machines you will
find that many of them are indeed 2 or 2.5 servings.
Likewise, breads are another thing I will look at - as I do try to
find high fiber/low carb breads, but you also have to watch the
packaging because one brand will consider a "Serving" as 2 slices (a
sandwich). Where others will consider a serving only 1 slice. I
end up sitting there doing the math to calculate the carbs and fiber
and calorie content.
But, once I find what something suitable and that I like, I tend to
buy the same thing week after week, so I don't look again until I have
to switch brands.
Ignoramus15206 - 15 Jun 2004 14:42 GMT
> I read in a magazine that the FDA is may start pushing for companies not
> only to list the nutritional values and calories *per serving*, but the same
> information for the entire contents of a package (the premise being that
> sometimes people consume an entire package of something not realizing that
> the package is comprised of 2.5 servings).
Would be wonderful!
I always do this in my head, to find out just how much is in a
package.
i
susanjoneslewis - 15 Jun 2004 22:16 GMT
No, what would be wonderful is if when you went into a Taco Bell (just
an example) and either on the receipt or on the actual paper that wraps
that taco.. had the nutritional info on it. *That* would be a boon to
the food industry imo. Say you go to Chili's and you get the cobb
salad.. the waiter hands you your plate AND a leaflet with that dishes
nutritional info.
Just a thought.
Susan
260/192/140
> > I read in a magazine that the FDA is may start pushing for companies not
> > only to list the nutritional values and calories *per serving*, but the same
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> i
JMA - 15 Jun 2004 22:29 GMT
Ruby Tuesday's is starting to do that on their menu, at least the calorie,
fat, and net carb count after each item's description. In the 6/7 issue of
Time they had a short article about it and said "the first chain
restaurateur to print nutrition facts on the menu plainly, and perhaps
painfully, between an item's description and its price. Classic, slow-cooked
"hang off the plate" ribs? Yum. Calories: 1,437. Fat: 92 g. Net
carbohydrates: 72 g. Yech"
The entire article is on line for Time subscribers.
Jenn
> No, what would be wonderful is if when you went into a Taco Bell (just
> an example) and either on the receipt or on the actual paper that wraps
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
> >
> > i
susanjoneslewis - 15 Jun 2004 22:51 GMT
That's outstanding, I can only hope others follow suit.
Susan
260/192/140
> Ruby Tuesday's is starting to do that on their menu, at least the calorie,
> fat, and net carb count after each item's description. In the 6/7 issue of
[quoted text clipped - 36 lines]
> > >
> > > i
Beverly - 16 Jun 2004 13:12 GMT
Applebee's has the nutritional value of their new WW entrees on the menu.
My daughter and I ate there last night. There was a family with three
children seated next to us. Everyone in the family ordered from the WW
section of the menu. I also noticed another couple ordering dessert from
the WW selections. I certainly hope others follow suit, too. My daughter
and I eat out often and it's nice to have a larger selection.
Beverly
> That's outstanding, I can only hope others follow suit.
>
[quoted text clipped - 56 lines]
> > > >
> > > > i
Cynthia Perry - 17 Jun 2004 19:22 GMT
>Applebee's has the nutritional value of their new WW entrees on the menu.
>My daughter and I ate there last night. There was a family with three
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
>Beverly
Don't go to Applebee's that often, but on my trip to Chicago, by the
time I got into the hotel, was ravenous. My roommate and I went to
Applebee's and that was the first time I'd seen the WW entrees.
I tried a citrus chicken salad, which was tasty. Though I'm afraid I
did not opt for a WW dessert. And I caved and had a margarita.
Cynthia
Perple Gyrl - 17 Jun 2004 05:15 GMT
> No, what would be wonderful is if when you went into a Taco Bell (just
> an example) and either on the receipt or on the actual paper that wraps
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> Susan
> 260/192/140
That is a great idea.... it is such a pain to try to figure out my calorie
count after going out to eat for my log.
Patricia Heil - 15 Jun 2004 16:04 GMT
After years of reading the packages, I decided packaged food mostly isn't
worth the money. My rules of thumb are these:
I can usually make it or a reasonable facsimile or a substitute so I don't
buy it.
If I can't make it (like yogurt) then the fewer ingredients on the package
the more likely I am to buy it.
Sometimes I will buy something pre-packaged to see if I like it, and then I
look for a recipe. Example: Baba Ghanoush. But I probably won't look for a
recipe, I wasn't impressed and it had mayonnaise in it. Maybe an authentic
recipe doesn't or I could reduce it, but I have enough salad recipes with
mayonnaise so it isn't high on my priorities. (yes I have a recipe for
mayonnaise in case you were wondering)
Now, I will have to break the rules in a couple of weeks when I go for
abdominal surgery and can't make my own bread for a while, so I will have to
tell my shopper (probably my brother) exactly which brand of bread to buy to
make sure I know what I'm getting.
> I read in a magazine that the FDA is may start pushing for companies not
> only to list the nutritional values and calories *per serving*, but the same
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> conscientious in regard to what their eating? Just curious.
> Teri
SnugBear - 18 Jun 2004 02:25 GMT
"Patricia Heil" wrote:
> Example: Baba Ghanoush. But I probably won't look for a
> recipe, I wasn't impressed and it had mayonnaise in it. Maybe an
> authentic recipe doesn't or I could reduce it, but I have enough salad
> recipes with mayonnaise so it isn't high on my priorities. (yes I have
> a recipe for mayonnaise in case you were wondering)
I made Baba Ghanoush and not a single recipe I looked at took mayonnaise.
It didn't thrill me anyway and even though I finally tried dipping
veggies in it, I still couldn't see past it as a spread for crackers.
Now, if you have a *salad* recipe for it, I'd be interested in that.

Signature
Walking on . . .
Laurie in Maine
207/110 60 inches of attitude!
Start: 2/02 Maintained since 2/03
JMA - 15 Jun 2004 16:56 GMT
> I read in a magazine that the FDA is may start pushing for companies not
> only to list the nutritional values and calories *per serving*, but the same
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> conscientious in regard to what their eating? Just curious.
> Teri
I would imagine that in the general population not many people read the
packages in the store, but maybe when they're home eating and want something
to read :) I spend a lot of time in the store because I read every package
that I'm not familiar with. First I read the ingredients because there are
things I'm trying to avoid, then I read the nutrition information, mostly to
check sat fat, sodium, and fiber. I don't notice too many other people
around me doing the same thing though.
Jenn
janice - 15 Jun 2004 20:02 GMT
In the UK, nutritional value is expressed on the pack as per 100g of
the product. This makes it very easy to work out however much you're
eating as a percentage of this. IMO, this seems easier than talking
about servings.
janice
>I read in a magazine that the FDA is may start pushing for companies not
>only to list the nutritional values and calories *per serving*, but the same
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>conscientious in regard to what their eating? Just curious.
>Teri
Crafting Mom - 15 Jun 2004 20:11 GMT
> I remarked to my dh that I
>thought this was a good idea and he said that other than ingredients (he's
>allergic to a bunch of stuff that crops up when you least expect it) he's
>never read the nutrional values. I was amazed. I *always* flip a package
>and read how much of what is in there. What is the percentage of people
>who read those listings?
Raise hand high on the side of your husband. I am very much a "what's IN
it?" person, as opposed to "what category does it fall under?" For me,
whether it's low-carb, low-fat, low-this, low-that, or contains X grams of
emergency nutrient of the week, simply does NOTHING for me as long as the
list of ingredients sucks the big one. (I'm mildly sensitive to a lot of
ingredients and fillers and like to make an informed choice about what goes
into this temple;)
That said, once the list of ingredients meets my scrutiny, I then will read
the "Nutritional Info" label for my own amusement.

Signature
The post you just read, unless otherwise noted, is strictly my opinion
and experience. Please interpret accordingly.
Chris Braun - 16 Jun 2004 04:00 GMT
Since I'm a calorie counter, I always read the labels when I'm buying
a packaged product with which I'm unfamiliar. I'll use labels to pick
among alternative brands, or to decide whether to buy the item at all.
And at home I use the label information to put into my database.
I'm kind of a numbers geek and I enjoy this stuff :-).
Chris
262/146/ (145-150)
Jim Bard - 16 Jun 2004 04:06 GMT
> Since I'm a calorie counter, I always read the labels when I'm buying
> a packaged product with which I'm unfamiliar. I'll use labels to pick
> among alternative brands, or to decide whether to buy the item at all.
Dang it! Here I was, counting my calories, and you made me lose count.
Now I have to start all over!