Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsGeneral TopicsLow CarbWeightWatchers
WeightAdviser.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Weight Loss Forum / General Topics / June 2004

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Fitday & walking

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Morgs - 22 Jun 2004 17:54 GMT
Dear group,
    I've Googled about this, but I've found conflicting answers, so I am
asking for your personal experiences.
    It seems like Fitday guestimates individual bmrs relatively high--at
least mine seems high at "seated work." I've entered "sedentary" instead and
that seems more accurate. But...
    I've been disappointed at how low the exercise values are! For
instance, I'd always thought it was a rule of thumb that a person exerts
approx. 100 cals per mile, but Fitday gives me much less than that. Do they
underestimate the expenditure, or is the 100 cals per mile just an old
wives' tale?
    Two things: first: I've looked on other sites which confirm the 100
c.p.m. burn. Secondly, I know these are all just estmiates, not hard and
fast numbers. I'm just anal about my calculations.
Cheers
\Morgs
Ignoramus11028 - 22 Jun 2004 18:01 GMT
> Dear group,
>      I've Googled about this, but I've found conflicting answers, so I am
> asking for your personal experiences.
>      It seems like Fitday guestimates individual bmrs relatively high--at
> least mine seems high at "seated work." I've entered "sedentary" instead and
> that seems more accurate. But...

that's the way to go. Enter sedentary/bedridden.

>      I've been disappointed at how low the exercise values are! For
> instance, I'd always thought it was a rule of thumb that a person exerts
> approx. 100 cals per mile, but Fitday gives me much less than that. Do they
> underestimate the expenditure, or is the 100 cals per mile just an old
> wives' tale?

What do they give you? Check out www.caloriesperhour.com also.

>      Two things: first: I've looked on other sites which confirm the 100
> c.p.m. burn. Secondly, I know these are all just estmiates, not hard and
> fast numbers. I'm just anal about my calculations.

which is a good thing!

i
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2012 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.