Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsGeneral TopicsLow CarbWeightWatchers
WeightAdviser.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Weight Loss Forum / General Topics / July 2004

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Hi , i'm seem to be eating nothing but rubbish in my hectic life , as anyone got a list of food that will be low in fat but high in energy , any links to web sites for furthur info would be much appreciated.

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Concerned - 29 Jun 2004 20:59 GMT
Hi , i'm seem to be eating nothing but rubbish in my hectic life , as anyone
got a list of food that will be low in fat but high in energy , any links to
web sites for furthur info would be much appreciated.

Best regards

Tubby (but hoping to be calling myself slim soon)
Ignoramus11738 - 29 Jun 2004 21:22 GMT
Why do you want food that is low in fat?

Anyway, bread would be low in fat, but high in "energy", just to name
one example. Bananas would be another example of a low fat but
relatively high energy food.

If you are not willing to spend time to find out about dieting etc, it
is better to not even start dieting.

i

> Hi , i'm seem to be eating nothing but rubbish in my hectic life , as anyone
> got a list of food that will be low in fat but high in energy , any links to
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> Tubby (but hoping to be calling myself slim soon)
Concerned - 29 Jun 2004 21:33 GMT
Thank you

> Why do you want food that is low in fat?
>
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
> >
> > Tubby (but hoping to be calling myself slim soon)
Rainbow-Seeker - 30 Jun 2004 02:17 GMT
Chicken, turkey, fish, bread, low fat yogurt...just to name a few.  Most
home cooked things you should have some control over.  It all depends on how
you prepare it.

Signature

Hopeful (282,279,145)

> Hi , i'm seem to be eating nothing but rubbish in my hectic life , as anyone
> got a list of food that will be low in fat but high in energy , any links to
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> Tubby (but hoping to be calling myself slim soon)
Ignoramus11738 - 30 Jun 2004 04:17 GMT
> Chicken, turkey, fish, bread, low fat yogurt...just to name a few.  Most
> home cooked things you should have some control over.  It all depends on how
> you prepare it.

chicken is not necessarily low fat... think chicken thighs.

i
Beverly - 30 Jun 2004 13:54 GMT
> > Chicken, turkey, fish, bread, low fat yogurt...just to name a few.  Most
> > home cooked things you should have some control over.  It all depends on how
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> i

chicken thigh roasted w/o skin, 109 calories, 6 g fat....seems pretty low
fat to me

http://www.caloriescount.org/cgi-bin/calorie_calculator.cgi
Ignoramus19667 - 30 Jun 2004 14:02 GMT
>> In article <xAoEc.1295$1Q1.800@fe39.usenetserver.com>, Rainbow-Seeker
> wrote:
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>
> http://www.caloriescount.org/cgi-bin/calorie_calculator.cgi

6 grams of fat means 54 calories from fat. Out of 109 calories total,
50% of calories from fat, does not strike me as particularly low fat
food.

And with skin, it is surely even more than 50%.

i
SnugBear - 01 Jul 2004 16:38 GMT
> chicken thigh roasted w/o skin, 109 calories, 6 g fat....seems pretty low
> fat to me

Being the cheapskate that I am, the thigh is virtually the only part of the
chicken I buy. (actually I buy the "legs" and my husband gets the
drumstick)  It's the flip side of everyone else paying big bucks for
boneless, skinless breasts.

Signature

Walking on . . .
Laurie in Maine
207/110  60 inches of attitude!
Start: 2/02  Maintained since 2/03

Ignoramus27841 - 01 Jul 2004 17:02 GMT
> Being the cheapskate that I am, the thigh is virtually the only part of the
> chicken I buy. (actually I buy the "legs" and my husband gets the
> drumstick)  It's the flip side of everyone else paying big bucks for
> boneless, skinless breasts.

Besides, thighs are much tastier. I also buy mostly thighs.

i
SnugBear - 02 Jul 2004 02:01 GMT
Ignoramus wrote:

> Besides, thighs are much tastier. I also buy mostly thighs.

I'm always amused at Thanksgiving when people say "I only eat the breast".
(more dark meat for me!! <g>)  I roast turkey all year long.

Signature

Walking on . . .
Laurie in Maine
207/110  60 inches of attitude!
Start: 2/02  Maintained since 2/03

Chris Braun - 03 Jul 2004 20:44 GMT
>Ignoramus wrote:
>
>> Besides, thighs are much tastier. I also buy mostly thighs.
>
>I'm always amused at Thanksgiving when people say "I only eat the breast".
>(more dark meat for me!! <g>)  I roast turkey all year long.

I'm strictly a white meat person -- always have been, nothing to do
with dieting -- but DH loves the dark meat.  So, like Mr. & Mrs.
Sprat, we're a good match :-).

Chris
262/144/ (145-150)
byakee - 01 Jul 2004 17:06 GMT
One dark day on Usenet, SnugBear <snugNObear@midmaine.com> said:

> > chicken thigh roasted w/o skin, 109 calories, 6 g fat....seems pretty low
> > fat to me
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> drumstick)  It's the flip side of everyone else paying big bucks for
> boneless, skinless breasts.

No one in my family likes the breast, except in certain recipes.
For roasting, frying, or BBQ, we get "legs" and I stick to the thigh
part. Whether or not I eat the skin depends on how much fat/cals I've
already had that day... :-)

Signature

J.J. in WA * 275/231.5/1??
(COLD to HOT for e-mail)

SnugBear - 02 Jul 2004 02:03 GMT
> No one in my family likes the breast, except in certain recipes.
> For roasting, frying, or BBQ, we get "legs" and I stick to the thigh
> part. Whether or not I eat the skin depends on how much fat/cals I've
> already had that day... :-)

Chicken skin doesn't call me anymore, now *turkey* skin is another
matter!

Signature

Walking on . . .
Laurie in Maine
207/110  60 inches of attitude!
Start: 2/02  Maintained since 2/03

Chris Braun - 03 Jul 2004 20:55 GMT
>> No one in my family likes the breast, except in certain recipes.
>> For roasting, frying, or BBQ, we get "legs" and I stick to the thigh
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>Chicken skin doesn't call me anymore, now *turkey* skin is another
>matter!

Poultry skin is another thing I have never in my life liked :-).  When
I was a little kid I didn't think I liked chicken because I didn't
realize I could take the skin off.  I've also always disliked any
visible fat on my meats -- to the point that I will gag if I
involuntarily get a piece of it in my mouth.  But I realize others
differ :-).

I've never been a big fan of lots of fats.  I like oils only in
moderation -- am just as happy to eat f/f salad dressings, for
example, and really dislike things cooked with too much oil.

I do like dairy fats just fine.   I've been drinking skin milk since I
was a child and don't like any other kind, but I like full fat cheese
and ice creams.  And butter and things made with it :-).  I limit
these things nowadays, though.  And I like some kinds of relatively
fatty fish -- particularly salmon, which I love -- though I don't like
the skin of any of them, or the really fatty bits near the skin.  And
I love nuts.

Chris
262/144/ (145-150)
janice - 04 Jul 2004 07:31 GMT
>>> No one in my family likes the breast, except in certain recipes.
>>> For roasting, frying, or BBQ, we get "legs" and I stick to the thigh
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>involuntarily get a piece of it in my mouth.  But I realize others
>differ :-).

I do like the skin if it's properly cooked and I get a bit bored with
fillets with the skin removed.  I allow myself the occasional chicken
leg with skin on (not basted with any extra fat, though) as long as I
work it into my calorie allowance.   When I stick to my WOE I find
that the proportion of my calories in fat almost always comes out
lower than that recommended, while the protein is a bit higher so I
can sometimes afford a "fat treat".

janice
Anne - 30 Jun 2004 22:04 GMT
> Chicken, turkey, fish, bread, low fat yogurt...just to name a few.  Most
> home cooked things you should have some control over.  It all depends on how
> you prepare it.

Are lunch meats/cold cuts bad? That seems all I have time for.
> > Hi , i'm seem to be eating nothing but rubbish in my hectic life , as
>  anyone
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> >
> > Tubby (but hoping to be calling myself slim soon)
Beverly - 30 Jun 2004 22:16 GMT
> > Chicken, turkey, fish, bread, low fat yogurt...just to name a few.  Most
> > home cooked things you should have some control over.  It all depends on how
> > you prepare it.
> >
> Are lunch meats/cold cuts bad? That seems all I have time for.

Many of these contain a lot of sodium and can result in temporary water
retention.  I believe the Healthy Choice brand has reduced sodium and might
help reduce the water retention.  I often buy them and don't seem to have a
significant problem with them.  I also like to make hummus and spread on a
tortilla with cucumbers, tomatoes and spring greens.  This makes a quick and
easy low-cal lunch.

Beverly

> > > Hi , i'm seem to be eating nothing but rubbish in my hectic life , as
> >  anyone
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> > >
> > > Tubby (but hoping to be calling myself slim soon)
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2012 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.