Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsGeneral TopicsLow CarbWeightWatchers
WeightAdviser.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Weight Loss Forum / General Topics / July 2004

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Eating vs. Skipping Breakfast

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
KellyClarksonTV - 26 Jul 2004 16:24 GMT
Most people would agree that eating breakfast helps reduce overeating during
the afternoon, but I think this is just the opposite for me. If I eat
breakfast, it "reminds" me the joy of eating and I eat more during the day,
even without counting the breakfast. I think people with compulsive disorders
feel the same way too.

This is from my own experience. On days I don't eat breakfast, sometimes I go
until 4 or 5pm before eating my first meal. But on days I do eat breakfast I'm
usually hungry within 3 or 4 hours.
Patricia Heil - 26 Jul 2004 16:44 GMT
What are you eating for breakfast?

> Most people would agree that eating breakfast helps reduce overeating during
> the afternoon, but I think this is just the opposite for me. If I eat
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> until 4 or 5pm before eating my first meal. But on days I do eat breakfast I'm
> usually hungry within 3 or 4 hours.
Mary M - Ohio - 26 Jul 2004 17:31 GMT
> Most people would agree that eating breakfast helps reduce overeating during
> the afternoon, but I think this is just the opposite for me. If I eat
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> until 4 or 5pm before eating my first meal. But on days I do eat breakfast I'm
> usually hungry within 3 or 4 hours.

Not a great idea. Sounds like you are eating too many carbs at breakfast. A
protein-rich breakfast will not make you hungry. Waiting until 4 or 5 p.m. will just
screw up your metabolism -- I found out both of these through experience and my
nutritionist.

By the way, I hestitated to answer your post because of your screen name -- I can't
tell whether you are sincere if you use a quasi-celebrity screen name and don't
include a name at the end of your post.

And also by the way, there is nothing wrong with being hungry after 3 or 4 hours --
that is perfectly normal. Another reason why I wonder whether you are sincere in
posting or just trolling.

Mary M
325-160-148
Carol Frilegh - 27 Jul 2004 00:33 GMT
> Most people would agree that eating breakfast helps reduce overeating during
> the afternoon, but I think this is just the opposite for me. If I eat
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> until 4 or 5pm before eating my first meal. But on days I do eat breakfast I'm
> usually hungry within 3 or 4 hours.

Kelly you need to evaluate your priorities. Eating is one of life's
pleasures but gluttony isn't. I enjoy wonderful food but need to be
watchful to keep off the over 80 pounds I lost nearly five years ago
with the help of  alt.support.diet members.

My Granny used to say, "You can't dance at two weddings."

BTW: Eating breakfast is good insurance against binging later in the
day.

Signature

Diva
******
There is no substitute for the right food

NeoSmokey - 27 Jul 2004 02:30 GMT
> Most people would agree that eating breakfast helps reduce overeating during
> the afternoon, but I think this is just the opposite for me. If I eat
> breakfast, it "reminds" me the joy of eating and I eat more during the day,
> even without counting the breakfast. I think people with compulsive disorders
> feel the same way too.

According to my dietician, and verified by my own experience, breakfast is
vital simply because after fasting all night, you need that bit of fuel to
restart your metabolism. I can't eat that early in the mornings either. Try
a meal substitute drink. Don't use the Slim Fast, though, it has way too
much sugar. I can personally recommend the Carnation Instant Breakfast. The
even have a lower sugar variety (they recently changed the packaging,
focusing on the low carb angle) Mix it with skim milk and a multi vitamin,
and you'll feel like taking on the world.

> This is from my own experience. On days I don't eat breakfast, sometimes I go
> until 4 or 5pm before eating my first meal. But on days I do eat breakfast I'm
> usually hungry within 3 or 4 hours.

That's because your body is much happier processing small meals every few
hours versus the standard 3 meal format. I have my CIB at 7:00, a granola
bar about 10:00 and don't even think about food again until my stomach
starts rumbling about 1:00. If you wait until too late in the day, there's
not much to get that metabolism going, and everything you ate the previous
day just ends up turning to fat without that system processing it all.

This helped me peel off 200 pounds in 14 months, so I feel pretty safe in
saying that it should work for you too.

Smokey,

Retired into lurkdom
KellyClarksonTV - 27 Jul 2004 03:19 GMT
thanks for your responses.

Actually, I am just the kind of person who can almost force myself not to eat,
if I know I will overeat. I know most people will eventually overeat if you
fast for 18-24 hours.

Is it a good idea to "force" yourself? I haven't eaten more than 1000 Calories
a day for almost 2 months.
Crafting Mom - 27 Jul 2004 14:53 GMT
> According to my dietician, and verified by my own experience, breakfast is
>vital simply because after fasting all night, you need that bit of fuel to
>restart your metabolism.

True.  However, WHEN that fast is best broken varies from person to
person.  Some people can stomach the idea of food first thing in the
morning, others cannot.  I've never believed there is anything
particularly magical about the traditional breakfast *hours*.
Technically, everyone eats "breakfast", because they are breaking the
fast.  The metabolism can still get kick started whether the switch gets
turned on at 7 am or at 11 am.

If I do eat during what is traditionally known as the breakfast hour, it
must indeed be something low in starches and sugars, otherwise I wind up
hungrier than if I'd simply not eaten at all.  Sounds bass-ackwards but
this is just my own experience.

I find that if I simply eat whenever my body feels actual hunger, then
the "metabolism" kicks in.  Sometimes it's with what people define as
"breakfast" and sometimes it waits until later.

YMMV, as always.
Crafting Mom
Signature

The above post reflects the opinion and experience of the author.  
Please interpret accordingly.

Phil M. - 27 Jul 2004 18:13 GMT
>> According to my dietician, and verified by my own experience,
>> breakfast is
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> person.  Some people can stomach the idea of food first thing in the
> morning, others cannot.

I have a feeling that a lot of these non-breakfast eaters are also eating
late-night snacks.

Phil M.

Signature

If you can empty your own boat
Crossing the river of the world,
No one will oppose you,
No one will seek to harm you. -Chuang Tzu

jayjay - 27 Jul 2004 18:35 GMT
>>> According to my dietician, and verified by my own experience,
>>> breakfast is
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
>Phil M.

Not necessarily true.

I never eat past 10pm, never wake at night for a midnight snake.
Generally my "dinner" hour is somewhere between 6:30pm and 9pm,
depending on my schedule.   If I eat early I might have a light snack
at about 9:30.   I don't like eating late as it does mean that the
food hasn't settled before I go to sleep, therefore I end up having
trouble sleeping and the digestion process ends up causing a restless
and dreamfilled sleep.

My preference is to eat about 7pm and not eat later, and I generally
go to bed between 11:30 - midnight.   So generally my nightly "fast"
is about 8pm to 9:30am...  
"No. No.  Our private conversations have not been such that I'm anxious to continue them.  Forgive me for speaking so bluntly, but it is the truth." --as Joel Cairo in THE MALTESE FALCON (1941).
Carol Frilegh - 27 Jul 2004 19:33 GMT
> >>> According to my dietician, and verified by my own experience,
> >>> breakfast is
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>
> I never eat past 10pm, never wake at night for a midnight snake.

Munching on Cobra and Anaconda again Jay Jay? :-)

Signature

Diva
*****
The Best Man For The Job Is A Woman

Beverly - 27 Jul 2004 20:18 GMT
> > >>> According to my dietician, and verified by my own experience,
> > >>> breakfast is
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>
> Munching on Cobra and Anaconda again Jay Jay? :-)

I was going to tell her that *no way* would I wake up for that type of
snack.
SnugBear - 28 Jul 2004 02:28 GMT
> Munching on Cobra and Anaconda again Jay Jay? :-)

or the vegetarian choice - fresh garden snake ;-)

Signature

Walking on . . .
Laurie in Maine
207/110  60 inches of attitude!
Start: 2/02  Maintained since 2/03

Phil M. - 27 Jul 2004 21:36 GMT
>>>> According to my dietician, and verified by my own experience,
>>>> breakfast is
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>
> Not necessarily true.

I did not say all.

Phil M.
Crafting Mom - 27 Jul 2004 19:26 GMT
>I have a feeling that a lot of these non-breakfast eaters are also eating
>late-night snacks.

Some might.  I know of some people who purposely skip breakfast, in
spite of being hungry, thinking it will make them "eat less", but they
binge later on.

For me, eating when I am hungry, and not eating when not hungry, even if
it means I don't eat AT breakfast "time", doesn't result in late night
eating.

YMMV
Annabel Smyth - 28 Jul 2004 11:14 GMT
>Some might.  I know of some people who purposely skip breakfast, in
>spite of being hungry, thinking it will make them "eat less", but they
>binge later on.

I find that if I eat breakfast before skating, I'm just as hungry
afterwards as if I don't, so what's the point?  I even forgot to eat my
banana this morning - discovered it in my bag on the way home!

>For me, eating when I am hungry, and not eating when not hungry, even if
>it means I don't eat AT breakfast "time", doesn't result in late night
>eating.

I wish I could do this, but as I don't live alone, it's not possible.
Not unless I want to cook more than once a day, which I don't.
Signature

Annabel Smyth                   mailto:annabel@amsmyth.demon.co.uk
                               http://www.amsmyth.demon.co.uk/index.html
Website updated 18 July 2004

jayjay - 27 Jul 2004 18:32 GMT
>> According to my dietician, and verified by my own experience, breakfast is
>>vital simply because after fasting all night, you need that bit of fuel to
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>fast.  The metabolism can still get kick started whether the switch gets
>turned on at 7 am or at 11 am.

Very good point.    You can't say a particular time is breakfast.   If
you did, you'd pick an arbitary time like 8am, and for someone like
me, I've been up for 2 hrs, and am already at work.   For others they
aren't even out of bed yet.   And for others who work night hours, 8am
may be bed time....

What works for me is eating a few hours after I get up. (usually 3 to
4hrs).   Last year I did the bootcamp training thing.   While one
woman in class actually passed out during the class because she had
not eatin before training, someone like me will puke if I have
consumed antyhing more than a small glass of juice and water.  

For me, breakfast can be a simple granola bar, piece of fruit, yogurt
or something other similar, simple item or it could be an egg/cheese
sandwhich or a bowl of cereal.   But like CM - I keep startches and
sugars limited for breakfast and try to go for good fibers and
protein.   If I eat startches and sugar I wind up with a headache and
it will set me up for a day of eating more than I usually do.

"No. No.  Our private conversations have not been such that I'm anxious to continue them.  Forgive me for speaking so bluntly, but it is the truth." --as Joel Cairo in THE MALTESE FALCON (1941).
jmk - 27 Jul 2004 20:14 GMT
>>>According to my dietician, and verified by my own experience, breakfast is
>>>vital simply because after fasting all night, you need that bit of fuel to
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> aren't even out of bed yet.   And for others who work night hours, 8am
> may be bed time....

Good points.  I usually eat before I go to the gym and have a small
snack after I get to work.  I'm just opposed to the idea of eating two
meals a day at work.  I'll have to get over it some day.  Oh Friday's
though, I have spin class in the morning and I don't want to have
breakfast before spin so I have breakfast at work after spin.  I break
may fast all over the place, time wise.

Signature

jmk in NC

Chris Braun - 28 Jul 2004 02:30 GMT
>I'm just opposed to the idea of eating two
>meals a day at work.  I'll have to get over it some day.  

I sort of try to get away from the concept of meals altogether and
just bring an insulated bag of various foods to work with me.  Then I
eat something whenever I feel hungry.  Sometimes this is just at
lunchtime, but other times it might be 3-4 mini-meals during the day.
Like today -- since I had to leave early and go downtown -- I had just
a protein shake in the car for my first meal.  So I ate some
hard-boiled eggs a few hours later, then half a wrap sandwich when
lunch was served, then an apple an hour or so later, then another half
sandwich before I left to go the gym.

Chris
262/143/ (145-150)
jmk - 28 Jul 2004 13:12 GMT
>>I'm just opposed to the idea of eating two
>>meals a day at work.  I'll have to get over it some day.  
>
> I sort of try to get away from the concept of meals altogether and
> just bring an insulated bag of various foods to work with me.  Then I
> eat something whenever I feel hungry.  

hehe!  If I did that I would be done with my food by 10 am and I'd have
nothing in the "good food" category available which would lead to the
desire to (1) go to the 7-11 type place across the street or (2) visit
one of the fine dining estabilishments located nearby.  I need to use
the "meal" concept as a way to ration my food.

This seems to be another case of YMMV ;-)  OTOH, I do basically have
three meals and two to three planned snacks per day.

Signature

jmk in NC

Tulip Tracy - 27 Jul 2004 21:38 GMT
Kelly,

I used to try to skip breakfasts in the morning thinking that one less
meal meant that many less calories.

Well. What I found happened was that by lunchtime, I was starving. And
when you get that hungry, only a really calorie laden meal will do. So
I'd end up really loading up on fat and calories during lunchtime and
throw my whole metabolism off track.

Now if I'm not hungry, I just have a glass of OJ to tide me over.

> > According to my dietician, and verified by my own experience, breakfast is
> >vital simply because after fasting all night, you need that bit of fuel to
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
> YMMV, as always.
> Crafting Mom
Crafting Mom - 27 Jul 2004 21:41 GMT
>Kelly,
>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>I'd end up really loading up on fat and calories during lunchtime and
>throw my whole metabolism off track.

I used to do the same thing.  Definite good way to fool yourself.  There
is a vast difference between purposely skipping a meal *even though one
is hungry*, and not eating - yet - simply because you don't happen to be
hungry yet.

When I forced myself to "fast" for longer, I wound up bingeing bigtime.
NeoSmokey - 28 Jul 2004 06:48 GMT
> > According to my dietician, and verified by my own experience, breakfast is
> >vital simply because after fasting all night, you need that bit of fuel to
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> person.  Some people can stomach the idea of food first thing in the
> morning, others cannot.

I know, because I'm one of them. That's why I go with the drink. Even if
you're not hungry at all, one little cup of chocolatey milk doesn't trigger
the "Oh yuck! Food!" reflex yet does so much good for your body.

I've never believed there is anything
> particularly magical about the traditional breakfast *hours*.

Hours, no. What matters is the proximity to your waking. Hey, your car works
much better if you get the engine runnung _before_ you pull out of the
garage, doesn't it? It works the same way for your body. If you don't give
it what what it need when it needs it, then the only way you're going to
keep going is down hill.

> Technically, everyone eats "breakfast", because they are breaking the
> fast.  The metabolism can still get kick started whether the switch gets
> turned on at 7 am or at 11 am.

Sure, a few hours doesn't really make _that_ much of a difference, but as I
recollect, the OP said that (s)he didn't have the first meal until the
afternoon.

> If I do eat during what is traditionally known as the breakfast hour, it
> must indeed be something low in starches and sugars, otherwise I wind up
> hungrier than if I'd simply not eaten at all.  Sounds bass-ackwards but
> this is just my own experience.

That's where the low sugar breakfast drink comes into play. And not having
an appetite is not really a good thing. It means that your metabolism isn't
processing, and asking for more to process when it's finished. Without that,
you're only burning off a fraction of the calories that you would if the ol'
furnace was in full flame.

> I find that if I simply eat whenever my body feels actual hunger, then
> the "metabolism" kicks in.  Sometimes it's with what people define as
> "breakfast" and sometimes it waits until later.

That "whenever" you mentioned _is_ your metabolism finally waking up. It's
saying "Why didn't you get me up earlier? Now my schedule's going to be off
all day. You won't get away with this, I'll keep you hungry until well after
you go back to bed. Mwa ha ha!"

Keep in mind that your body's just a machine. You can make it look real
pretty, but if you don't maintain it properly, it's going to end up in the
spare parts pile long before it's time, and I'd really hate to see that
happen to a fellow ASDer.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2012 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.