Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsGeneral TopicsLow CarbWeightWatchers
WeightAdviser.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Weight Loss Forum / General Topics / August 2004

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

work stash suggestions...

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
jmk - 10 Aug 2004 13:14 GMT
Last week I ran into a friend at Whole Foods while I was reading the
labels on the cups of soup.  I was looking for a lower sodium version to
keep at my desk.  Soup does not tempt me and I like to have a few things
at my desk that I will not want to break into for days that I am just
extra hungry or have to work late or whatever.  You know, something
better than the 7-11 type place across the street where I am likely to
go with the less expensive candy bar rather than the more expensive
"healthier" alternative.  What do you keep at your desk for these
situations?
Signature

jmk in NC

Patricia Heil - 10 Aug 2004 14:05 GMT
> Last week I ran into a friend at Whole Foods while I was reading the
> labels on the cups of soup.  I was looking for a lower sodium version to
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> "healthier" alternative.  What do you keep at your desk for these
> situations?

Is there a microwave in your office?  Check the international shelves of
your grocery store and see if they have TastyBite food.  It's spicy because
it's India style but you can get it with the rice and it is shelf stable.
I'm going to stock up on it before I have surgery in a month, also Jyoti
canned food.  It's not soup, it's vegetarian (maybe even sakahara) and it's
delicious.  There's also a brand of shelf stable Gang Pha soup (Thai).

Also a mix of almonds, cheerios, peanuts, and raisins.  Complete protein,
cholesterol killing, high fiber, plus some sweetness.

Mariani dried fruit: prunes, apricots, mixed fruit (I don't really like
pears or dried apples, so I stick with the first two).  Costco has the big
resealable bags.  Low sodium, high fiber and plenty of other nutrients.
jmk - 10 Aug 2004 15:14 GMT
>>Last week I ran into a friend at Whole Foods while I was reading the
>>labels on the cups of soup.  I was looking for a lower sodium version to
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
> pears or dried apples, so I stick with the first two).  Costco has the big
> resealable bags.  Low sodium, high fiber and plenty of other nutrients.

Thanks for the suggestions.  I typically have fruit and veggies on hand
(that I bring from home) but I like to have some non-tempting items
around as well.  I used to have Soup At Hand (still have one) and stuff
but now I am finding them to be too high in sodium (970 mg per serving!)
 I will certainly check out the soups that you suggested.  Thanks again!

Signature

jmk in NC

Beverly - 10 Aug 2004 14:11 GMT
> Last week I ran into a friend at Whole Foods while I was reading the
> labels on the cups of soup.  I was looking for a lower sodium version to
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> "healthier" alternative.  What do you keep at your desk for these
> situations?

I checked my stash and here is what I found:

   small can (3oz) tuna with pack of relish and mayo - makes a quick tuna
salad
   Wasa crackers

   2 individual packs of Myoplex Lite Cappuccino Ice protein powder

   snack size microwave popcorn

   a couple cups of soup

I like the Fantastic and Health Valley soups - especially the black bean
varieties

http://www.healthvalley.com/products/category.php?cat_name=soups
http://www.fantasticfoods.com/scripts/display_category.php?category_id=300
jmk - 10 Aug 2004 15:15 GMT
>>Last week I ran into a friend at Whole Foods while I was reading the
>>labels on the cups of soup.  I was looking for a lower sodium version to
[quoted text clipped - 23 lines]
> http://www.healthvalley.com/products/category.php?cat_name=soups
> http://www.fantasticfoods.com/scripts/display_category.php?category_id=300

OK, the popcorn makes a ton of sense.  I keep soeme mini-bags at home
and having some here would be good.  I also do the soup and tuna thing
but I need to restock so I thought I'd seek out suggestions.  I'll
certainly check out the black bean :-)  Thanks!

Signature

jmk in NC

A Ross - 10 Aug 2004 14:30 GMT
> I am likely to
> go with the less expensive candy bar rather than the
> more expensive
> "healthier" alternative.  What do you keep at your desk
> for these
> situations?

Jar of peanut butter
Wasa crispbread
Trail mix (unsalted)
Tuna fish
Can of soup

I also keep a brick of cheese in the fridge (cut into 1
ounce portions), along with salad fixings and a tub of
cottage cheese.

Amy
jmk - 10 Aug 2004 15:16 GMT
>>I am likely to
>>go with the less expensive candy bar rather than the
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>
> Amy

Thanks Amy!

Signature

jmk in NC

Patricia Heil - 10 Aug 2004 16:54 GMT
> > I am likely to
> > go with the less expensive candy bar rather than the
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>
> Amy

Sounds like you have a good office -- no fridge robbers!!!
A Ross - 10 Aug 2004 17:53 GMT
> > Amy
>
> Sounds like you have a good office -- no fridge
> robbers!!!

Yup--we're a pretty good group. We tend to share some
stuff--condiments, etc. But everyone leaves everyone
elses stuff alone, and we clean the fridge, too!!

Amy
Lictor - 11 Aug 2004 18:30 GMT
> What do you keep at your desk for these
> situations?

Ok, this is the second time I read this word today, and I still don't grab
the concept fully (and dictionnary is not helping)... So, what is that work
stash thing anyway? Is it some food you keep to have dinner at the office or
something like this? Is that a common thing to do in the USA (I mean, both
dinner at the office and keeping food there)?
jmk - 11 Aug 2004 18:42 GMT
>>What do you keep at your desk for these
>>situations?
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> something like this? Is that a common thing to do in the USA (I mean, both
> dinner at the office and keeping food there)?

Main Entry: 1stash
Pronunciation: 'stash
Function: transitive verb
Etymology: origin unknown
: to store in a usually secret place for future use -- often used with away

Is it common, probably not.  I think that most folks go to the
convenience store or vending machine and get a candy bar or something.

Signature

jmk in NC

Lictor - 11 Aug 2004 19:03 GMT
> Is it common, probably not.  I think that most folks go to the
> convenience store or vending machine and get a candy bar or something.

You mean, if they feel eating in the afternoon? Or is it something they do
*instead* of a regular meal, like on these rare occasions when you can't go
off work long enough to hit a restaurant and have lunch/dinner?
Sorry, but even if you visit a country, office/work life is the part you
usually learn nothing about... And most American friends I have are somewhat
disfunctionnal and don't work in an office setting. So, no idea how long
people spend at work there or even tiny details like how long people take to
eat at noon and where people usually do that...
Beverly - 11 Aug 2004 19:12 GMT
> > What do you keep at your desk for these
> > situations?
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> something like this? Is that a common thing to do in the USA (I mean, both
> dinner at the office and keeping food there)?

Work stash is usually food kept for snacking.  It's much better than running
to the vending machines for candy bars, chips, etc.  Not too many people eat
dinner at the office - at least not where I work.
jmk - 11 Aug 2004 19:23 GMT
>>>What do you keep at your desk for these
>>>situations?
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
> to the vending machines for candy bars, chips, etc.  Not too many people eat
> dinner at the office - at least not where I work.

Where I work everyone has lunch either here (at desk) or at a local
restaurant.  I typically bring food from home for lunch.  I haven't
forgotten it in the kitchen for a while but if I do, I will go across
the street and get something.  Like Beverly said, this is mostly for
snaking in case I miscaluclated when I pack lunch, I forget lunch, I'm
just particularlly hungry that day, or I end up working a lot longer
than I anticipated.

Currently, the food items that I have here are:
- peppermill with black pepper
- 1 dehydrated soup mix in a bowl (Knorr brand)
- 1 Campbell's Soup at Hand (tomato)
- 1/2 pack of carefree gum

The soups are good because the don't tempt me into snacking when I
shouldn't but I am not happy with their sodium content and I need to do
better on that.  Dried fruit and nuts would tempt me so I will probably
not implement that suggestion, although it would certainly work for some
people.

Signature

jmk in NC

Lictor - 11 Aug 2004 19:45 GMT
> Like Beverly said, this is mostly for
> snaking in case I miscaluclated when I pack lunch, I forget lunch, I'm
> just particularlly hungry that day, or I end up working a lot longer
> than I anticipated.

Ah, most people do not snack at the office here, though they do drink coffee
(with sugar though) at the coffee machine is a complex office ritual. Only
people who actually bring food to the office are either on a diet (doctors
always insist on people on a diet carrying some healthy food around) or
overweight. If we're hungry, we just grow hungrier until this finally drives
us away from the office and back home for dinner. :p Or some do like kids
and take a short break at 4pm to buy something at a nearby bakery (usually
croissant).
But just storing food like this is just not done by most people.
Beverly - 11 Aug 2004 20:10 GMT
> > Like Beverly said, this is mostly for
> > snaking in case I miscaluclated when I pack lunch, I forget lunch, I'm
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> croissant).
> But just storing food like this is just not done by most people.

It's interesting to learn the differences.  Do you have an established lunch
break?

My company provides a convienence center on each floor and it's stocked with
free coffee, tea and hot cocoa.  This practice is not present in all
American companies and varies from business to business.  We also have a
restaurant and bakery available on site.  It's really rather nice and it's
open from 7:30 am until 5:00 pm.  Many people eat there, bring their lunch
or go out to a restaurant at lunch. Bringing your lunch is not associated
with any type of diet or being overweight.  Many people just prefer their
own food to the food available in the restaurant.

Often you will find fruit and pastries served at morning meetings.  Birthday
cakes are a common sight around here.  Whenever someone has a birthday their
co-workers  often bring a cake to celebrate.

I imagine if you looked in the office of most people around here you will
find some type of food stored in their desks.  I have oatmeal, protein
powder and ground flax seed as I fix my breakfast after I arrive at work.
This is a common practice where I work.

Beverly
jmk - 11 Aug 2004 20:29 GMT
>>>Like Beverly said, this is mostly for
>>>snaking in case I miscaluclated when I pack lunch, I forget lunch, I'm
[quoted text clipped - 28 lines]
> with any type of diet or being overweight.  Many people just prefer their
> own food to the food available in the restaurant.

Lucky you!  We don't even have a break room where we can eat!  There is
a tiny room with two ancient microwaves where we can reheat things but
there is no space to sit or anything.

Signature

jmk in NC

Lictor - 11 Aug 2004 23:53 GMT
> It's interesting to learn the differences.  Do you have an established lunch
> break?

Of course. Usually anywhere between 45 minutes and 1h30. Average would be
around 1h. The trend towards shortening the lunch break to 45 minutes is
fairly recent - people want to be back home early, and they are willing to
eat faster for that.
Usually people will eat at restaurant. We have meal tickets, accepted in any
restaurant, that are partly paid by the employer, which are usually enough
to pay the not too expensive lunch menu. Though an increasing number of
people will eat sandwiches or take-away food or even fast-food (though few
can manage that daily).

> My company provides a convienence center on each floor and it's stocked with
> free coffee, tea and hot cocoa.

That's mostly a big company thing, but yes, some do that too.

> We also have a restaurant and bakery available on site.  It's really
rather nice and it's
> open from 7:30 am until 5:00 pm.

Same here, except it's mostly a large company deal. Though some smaller ones
can sometimes share a facility like that. Opening hours would be much
tighter though, something like noon to 2pm. Few restaurants have really
extended opening hours, people who eat off hours are typically tourists.

> Many people eat there, bring their lunch
> or go out to a restaurant at lunch. Bringing your lunch is not associated
> with any type of diet or being overweight.

Actually, bringing your lunch was strongly associated with being a factory
worker, all of them used to do that ;) My father still has the billy-can my
grand-father used to bring to the factory. Some people might still do that,
but only if they're dead broke.

> Many people just prefer their
> own food to the food available in the restaurant.

The restaurant is that bad, or it's just a personnal thing?

> Often you will find fruit and pastries served at morning meetings.

It's mostly not done here, you're supposed to have had breakfast at home.
That would be only for special occasions. Like, a customer is coming to the
morning meeting or something like this. Employees would be allowed to eat
the leftovers. :p

> Birthday cakes are a common sight around here.  Whenever someone has a
birthday their
> co-workers  often bring a cake to celebrate.

Americans do have something for birthday cakes ;) No offense, but most of
the times I see such a cake at a restaurant, it's American tourists. ;)
That's usually not done too much, that would be invading a bit on privacy.
That might be done in small friendly companies or in companies with very
good office relationships. If it's done, there might be some alcool, though
we're getting Americanized there (you know, people driving drunk, insurance
problems...).
Beverly - 12 Aug 2004 02:22 GMT
> > We also have a restaurant and bakery available on site.  It's really
> rather nice and it's
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> tighter though, something like noon to 2pm. Few restaurants have really
> extended opening hours, people who eat off hours are typically tourists.

I work for a large company.  We have 2500+ employees at this location.  We
have locations world wide but the data center is located here.  The
employees often use the restaurant area for small meetings instead of
booking one of the meeting rooms.  We also have an outdoor patio area where
we hold meetings in nice weather.  I work in a very high-stress environment
so rules are a little relaxed.

> Actually, bringing your lunch was strongly associated with being a factory
> worker, all of them used to do that ;) My father still has the billy-can my
> grand-father used to bring to the factory. Some people might still do that,
> but only if they're dead broke.

I think the same applied here in the past but that seems to have changed in
the last few years since people have become more health conscious.

> > Many people just prefer their
> > own food to the food available in the restaurant.
>
> The restaurant is that bad, or it's just a personnal thing?

It's just a personal thing.  We really have a nice restaurant here.  They
have a guest chef from restaurants in the area about once a month who will
prepare one of their specialties.

> > Birthday cakes are a common sight around here.  Whenever someone has a
> birthday their
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> we're getting Americanized there (you know, people driving drunk, insurance
> problems...).

My department normally goes out to a restaurant for birthdays rather than
bring in a cake.

Most large company events are alcohol free.  We often have "off site
meetings" where alcohol is served.  An "off site meeting" means the
department has taken the afternoon off and headed to the nearest bar :)  We
only have these two or three times a year.
JMA - 12 Aug 2004 02:43 GMT
> Most large company events are alcohol free.  We often have "off site
> meetings" where alcohol is served.  An "off site meeting" means the
> department has taken the afternoon off and headed to the nearest bar :)
> We
> only have these two or three times a year.

We have a "staff" meeting every friday night at a bar out of town. I stopped
attending them when I got into a regular weightlifting routine.  We
definitely don't have alcohol at work functions since the parents would
probably not approve :)

Jenn
SnugBear - 13 Aug 2004 02:45 GMT
> We have a "staff" meeting every friday night at a bar out of town. I
> stopped attending them when I got into a regular weightlifting
> routine.  We definitely don't have alcohol at work functions since the
> parents would probably not approve :)

Nothing like *Open Bar* at the school board meetings!  ;-)

Signature

Walking (but mostly biking!) on . . .
Laurie in Maine
207/110  60 inches of attitude!
Start: 2/02  Maintained since 2/03

Annabel Smyth - 12 Aug 2004 11:40 GMT
>Of course. Usually anywhere between 45 minutes and 1h30. Average would be
>around 1h. The trend towards shortening the lunch break to 45 minutes is
>fairly recent - people want to be back home early, and they are willing to
>eat faster for that.

The second job I had when I lived in Paris, we only got 30 minutes for
lunch.  There was a canteen, which did delicious meals, followed by tea
or coffee in another room, and we seemed to manage.  It was called
"journée continue" and was coming into fashion then.

>It's mostly not done here, you're supposed to have had breakfast at home.

How many times did I eat a "pain au chocolat" running up from the metro
to where I worked!  (There was a very nice bakery en route).  At my old
job in London, we started at 6.30 am so I always brought my breakfast
in, but that is unusual here.
Signature

Annabel Smyth                   mailto:annabel@amsmyth.demon.co.uk
                               http://www.amsmyth.demon.co.uk/index.html
Website updated 7 August 2004 - for a limited time, be bored by my holiday
snaps!

Lictor - 12 Aug 2004 12:17 GMT
> The second job I had when I lived in Paris, we only got 30 minutes for
> lunch.  There was a canteen, which did delicious meals, followed by tea
> or coffee in another room, and we seemed to manage.  It was called
> "journ?e continue" and was coming into fashion then.

Ah, true, some companies do that. Having an on-site canteen makes it around
equal to the 45mins or even 1h break, since it can often take a long time to
find a restaurant, wait for a seat, order, get what you asked (service is
slower than in the US)... If the canteen is good and varied, that's actually
a good deal.

> How many times did I eat a "pain au chocolat" running up from the metro
> to where I worked!  (There was a very nice bakery en route).

This still qualifies as "having breakfast at home" lol And many many people
do that... As I wrote elsewhere, breakfast here is far from being the sacred
meal it is in other countries. To many people, that pain au chocolat is a
proper breakfast, it's not like they would eat much more at home anyway...
But this seems to frighten dietitians. Most prescribed diets include a
breakfast that is at least twice as large as what most people would eat on
their own.
Annabel Smyth - 12 Aug 2004 11:37 GMT
>But just storing food like this is just not done by most people.

It's not been done where I work, either, in the UK - although in my last
job the boss used sometimes to bring in ice-creams and stuff, and there
was a fridge and a microwave so one could bring in other stuff than
salads and sandwiches for lunch, and eat them on the premises.  In my
old job, I used to keep instant soup, but that was to eat as part of my
lunch, not as a separate snack.
Signature

Annabel Smyth                   mailto:annabel@amsmyth.demon.co.uk
                               http://www.amsmyth.demon.co.uk/index.html
Website updated 7 August 2004 - for a limited time, be bored by my holiday
snaps!

julianne - 12 Aug 2004 16:16 GMT
> >But just storing food like this is just not done by most people.
> >
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> old job, I used to keep instant soup, but that was to eat as part of my
> lunch, not as a separate snack.

Everyone I know has a desk drawer devoted to their food.  My friend Stace
uses her largest filing cabinet.  My clients are extremely busy people and
lunch is not always feasible.  After a few days of involuntary fasting, it
becomes second nature to have some munchies on hand.

As far as what is stored, it depends.  Before I worked out of my house, I
always had popcorn, nuts, maybe some candy (this pre SB), tea, orange
flavored drink mix to sweeten tea, granola bars, beef jerky.  In fact, when
I went grocery shopping, there was always one bag of food specifically for
work.

j
janice - 11 Aug 2004 21:05 GMT
>> > What do you keep at your desk for these
>> > situations?
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>to the vending machines for candy bars, chips, etc.  Not too many people eat
>dinner at the office - at least not where I work.

I've never worked in  a place that has vending machines.  If you want
food, you have to go out to the shops to look for it.

Most people here eat their lunch at their desks, and many don't take a
proper lunch break due to pressure of work.

janice
233/179/133
Lictor - 12 Aug 2004 12:00 GMT
> Most people here eat their lunch at their desks, and many don't take a
> proper lunch break due to pressure of work.

Ouch. I have done that on a few occasions, and so does my girlfriend. I
really don't like having to do that. Most of all, I don't think it's very
productive. You have a bad lunch, you produce lower quality work, and food
ruins the keyboards. It's still very rare for people to do that here, and
most would be aware that they are doing an extremelly unhealthy thing. If
you do that too often, co-workers will also start commenting on you, since
you obviously prefer to eat with your work rather than with them. In
friendly companies, lunch breaks tend to be pretty important to maintain a
proper group dynamism; people eat with each others, they get to know each
others better, and this ultimately to much smoother relationships in the
work place.
janice - 12 Aug 2004 20:59 GMT
>> Most people here eat their lunch at their desks, and many don't take a
>> proper lunch break due to pressure of work.
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>you do that too often, co-workers will also start commenting on you, since
>you obviously prefer to eat with your work rather than with them.

That wouldn't apply here, as they're probably all doing it to.  I
agree with all you say, and am not defending the practice but in many
jobs people are struggling with such impossible workloads that taking
lunch just means you don't have to stay so late or take so much work
home:(

janice
Jane Lumley - 16 Aug 2004 14:47 GMT
>Work stash is usually food kept for snacking.  It's much better than running
>to the vending machines for candy bars, chips, etc.  Not too many people eat
>dinner at the office - at least not where I work.

Isn't snacking at work best avoided?  Unless it's instead of a meal....
but being European I probably don't get it.  Here in the UK people might
conceivably have a biscuit (that is, a small cookie, like digestive) at
morning coffee and again in the afternoon - I just skip the biscuit now.
If I am starving there is a nearby shop that sells Philly cheese.  
Signature

Jane Lumley

Annabel Smyth - 16 Aug 2004 18:31 GMT
Jane Lumley wrote in alt.support.diet on Mon, 16 Aug 2004:

>Isn't snacking at work best avoided?  Unless it's instead of a meal....
>but being European I probably don't get it.  Here in the UK people might
>conceivably have a biscuit (that is, a small cookie, like digestive) at
>morning coffee and again in the afternoon - I just skip the biscuit now.
>If I am starving there is a nearby shop that sells Philly cheese.

I find many of the Americans on this newsgroup (are you new, by the way?
If so, welcome!) seem to think one must eat snacks all day long and
avoid any feelings of hunger or one's weight-loss plan is due to fail.
Signature

Annabel - "Mrs Redboots"
90/88.5/80kg

A Ross - 16 Aug 2004 18:54 GMT
> I find many of the Americans on this newsgroup (are you
> new, by the way?
> If so, welcome!) seem to think one must eat snacks all
> day long and
> avoid any feelings of hunger or one's weight-loss plan
> is due to fail.

Personally, I'm healthier (and thinner) now with eating
six times a day than I was when eating three. YMMV, of
course.

Amy

168/115
JMA - 17 Aug 2004 01:10 GMT
>> I find many of the Americans on this newsgroup (are you
>> new, by the way?
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>
> 168/115

Same here!

Jenn
Beverly - 17 Aug 2004 01:31 GMT
> >> I find many of the Americans on this newsgroup (are you
> >> new, by the way?
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>
> Jenn

I'm a member of that group, too.  I've been doing this since the mid 80's -
wonder when it will fail me?

Beverly
jmk - 17 Aug 2004 13:33 GMT
>>>>I find many of the Americans on this newsgroup (are you
>>>>new, by the way?
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
>
> Beverly

<VBG>  I  guess we'll have to keep on waiting!  ;-)

Signature

jmk in NC

Ignoramus8954 - 16 Aug 2004 18:59 GMT
> Jane Lumley wrote in alt.support.diet on Mon, 16 Aug 2004:
>
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> If so, welcome!) seem to think one must eat snacks all day long and
> avoid any feelings of hunger or one's weight-loss plan is due to fail.

Like everything, it is probably a balancing act. A little hunger is
okay, too much is bad, etc. Most real life situations involve
tradeoffs, rather than absolutes.

i
Annabel Smyth - 16 Aug 2004 19:12 GMT
Ignoramus8954 wrote in alt.support.diet on Mon, 16 Aug 2004:

>> I find many of the Americans on this newsgroup (are you new, by the way?
>> If so, welcome!) seem to think one must eat snacks all day long and
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>okay, too much is bad, etc. Most real life situations involve
>tradeoffs, rather than absolutes.

Indeed.  But what I need to learn is how to distinguish hunger from mere
appetite - and if I eat six times a day, I never feel hungry!
Signature

Annabel - "Mrs Redboots"
90/88.5/80kg

Ignoramus8954 - 16 Aug 2004 19:56 GMT
> Ignoramus8954 wrote in alt.support.diet on Mon, 16 Aug 2004:
>
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> Indeed.  But what I need to learn is how to distinguish hunger from mere
> appetite - and if I eat six times a day, I never feel hungry!

I don't have a definitive answer, but some signs of real hunger are
food obsessions. Like when people have intrusive thoughts about food
that take up much of the day. I read about them in books on
concentration camp prisoners and siege of Leningrad and other sources.

Licking the plate with your portion -- that you measured -- clean
would be another sign.

You can eat 6 times per day and still be hungry, also. It all depends
on what and how much you eat.

I have some minimal experience with this, as I did experience hunger
on my portion controlled diet. I lost weight 11 months ago and entered
maintenance. But I thought about food too much. My wife remarked on
this, which upset me, but I realized that she was right. I could
handle that much hunger, because I did not regain, but decided to look
for some better alternatives. We'll see how this search ends up.

In theory, I was at a very normal plump weight (BMIof 24), eating at
maintenance level, and still experienced hunger. Go figure.

I dug up two very interesting references to which I can relate myself,
to a small extent.

http://www.findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0GDQ/is_3_25/ai_58669772

``TABLE 1

Eating Behaviors of Victims of Semistarvation and Starvation-Research
Volunteers Long After Food Was Plentifully Available

Behavior/source

Voracious appetites followed by large and rapid food
intake[9,11,16-18,21,44]
Lack of control and distress over amounts eaten[11,17,20,21]
Complaints of hunger despite huge meals[17,21]
Belief that eating triggers hunger[17]
Cravings and preference (carbohydrates, tats,
sweets)[5,18-20,45]
Obsession with food[10,11,14,15,17,19,45,46]
Secrecy and defensiveness over food[9,10,17,18]
New preoccupation with body shape and weight[17,47]
Impulsivity (shopping for nonfood items, self-harm,
anger, violence)[18,20,21]
Scavenging or eating from garbage containers[11,18,20]
Stealing, hiding, hoarding food[10,20,21]
Manipulating others for food[9]
Making bizarre mixtures of food[18]
Eating unpalatable and inappropriate food (raw meat,
scraps)[20,21]
Thickening foods (with flour, oatmeal)[8]
Excessive flavoring (eg, with tea, coffee, lemon crystals)[8]
Excessive heating of food[24]
Excessive spicing of food[24]
Poor table manners (eg, licking knives and bottle lids,
collecting crumbs, gnawing at bones)[24]
"Souping" food and "filling up" with liquids[18,20]
Preferring to eat in isolation[17,18]
Self-induced and overeating-induced vomiting[8,19,20]
Dreading having to choose foods to eat[17]
Self-deprecation and negative affect from eating habits[17,20]
Taking drastic measures to resist binges[20]
Recidivist binge eating despite interference with quality
of life[8,9,18,45,47]
''

another good one, which I am quoting partially, but which makes a
fascinating read.

http://river-centre.org/StarvSympt.html

``As starvation progressed, the number of men who toyed with their
food increased. They made what under normal conditions would be weird
and distasteful concoctions, (p. 832). . . Those who ate in the common
dining room smuggled out bits of food and consumed them on their bunks
in a long-drawn-out ritual, (p. 833). . . Toward the end of starvation
some of the men would dawdle for almost two hours after a meal which
previously they would have consumed in a matter of minutes,
(p. 833). . . Cookbooks, menus, and information bulletins on food
production became intensely interesting to many of the men who
previously h ad little or no interest in dietetics or agriculture,
(p. 833). [The volunteers] often reported that they got a vivid
vicarious pleasure from watching other persons eat or from just
smelling food. (p. 834)

In addition to cookbooks and collecting recipes, some of the men even
began collecting coffeepots, hot plates, and other kitchen
utensils. According to the original report, hoarding even extended to
non-food-related items such as "old books, unnecessary second-hand
clothes, knick knacks, and other 'junk.? Often after making such
purchases, which could be afforded only with sacrifice, the men would
be puzzled as to why they had bought such more or less useless
articles" (p. 837). One man even began rummaging through garbage
cans. This general tendency to hoard has been observed in starved
anorexic patients (Crisp, Hsu, & Harding, 1980) and even in rats
deprived of food (Fantino & Cabanac, 1980). Despite little interest in
culinary matters prior to the experiment, almost 40% of the men
mentioned cooking as part of their postexperiment plans. For some, the
fascination was so great that they actually changed occupations after
the experiment; three became chefs, and one went into agriculture!

The Minnesota subjects were often caught between conflicting desires
to gulp their food down ravenously and consume it slowly so that the
taste and odor of each morsel would be fully appreciated. Toward the
end of starvation some of the men would dawdle for almost two hours
over a meal which previously they would have consumed in a matter of
minutes. . .they did much planning as to how they would handle their
day's allotment of food. (p. 833) The men demanded that their food be
served hot, and they made unusual concoctions by mixing foods
together, as noted above. There was also a marked increase in the use
of salt and spices. The consumption of coffee and tea increased so
dramatically that the men had to be limited to 9 cups per day;
similarly, gum chewing became excessive and had to be limited after it
was discovered that one man was chewing as many as 40 packages of gum
a day and "developed a sore mouth from such continuous exercise"
(p. 835).

During the 12-week refeeding phase of the experiment, most of the
abnormal attitudes and behaviors in regard to food persisted. A small
number of men found that their difficulties in this area were quite
severe during the first 6 weeks of refeeding:

Binge Eating

During the restrictive dieting phase of the experiment, all of the
volunteers reported increased hunger. Some appeared able to tolerate
the experience fairly well, but for others it created intense concern
and led to a complete breakdown in control. Several men were unable to
adhere to their diets and reported episodes of binge eating followed
by self-reproach. During the eighth week of starvation, one volunteer
flagrantly broke the dietary rules, eating several sundaes and malted
milks; he even stole some penny candies. He promptly confessed the
whole episode, [and] became self-deprecatory" (p. 884). While working
in a grocery store, another man

suffered a complete loss of will power and ate several cookies, a sack
of popcorn, and two overripe bananas before he could "regain control"
of himself. He immediately suffered a severe emotional upset, with
nausea, and upon returning to the laboratory he vomited. . .He was
self-deprecatory, expressing disgust and self-criticism. (p. 887)''

i
Beverly - 16 Aug 2004 20:57 GMT
> Jane Lumley wrote in alt.support.diet on Mon, 16 Aug 2004:
>
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> If so, welcome!) seem to think one must eat snacks all day long and
> avoid any feelings of hunger or one's weight-loss plan is due to fail.

You make it sound like we eat snacks all day long<g>

It's a WOE that helps keep the metabolism and blood sugar levels on an even
keel and is endorsed by many diet plans.  It normally consists of 5-6
smaller meals a day instead of 3 larger meals.  Often people who go too long
between meals have a tendency to overeat at meal times.  It's just a matter
of choice and works very well for many people.

There are several benefits from eating more frequent smaller meals than the
traditional 3 meals a day..

http://my.webmd.com/content/pages/13/66060

http://www.hispanicheritage.com/latinas/stayfit_11_02.htm

http://www.healthandage.com/Home/gid2=667
Annabel Smyth - 17 Aug 2004 12:23 GMT
Beverly wrote in alt.support.diet on Mon, 16 Aug 2004:

>It's a WOE that helps keep the metabolism and blood sugar levels on an even
>keel and is endorsed by many diet plans.  It normally consists of 5-6
>smaller meals a day instead of 3 larger meals.  Often people who go too long
>between meals have a tendency to overeat at meal times.  It's just a matter
>of choice and works very well for many people.

And probably fine if you don't have anybody else to think about; when
you have a family to cook for (or, in my case, a husband; the daughter
has grown and flown), you can't do that, or you'd be cooking two
separate meals every evening (and life is FAR too short to do that!).

I have found, all my life, that if I eat between meals, I am eating
extra food that I don't need.  I prefer the European way of eating two
small and one large meal each day, and nothing else, except possibly the
odd cup of tea or coffee.
Signature

Annabel - "Mrs Redboots"
90/88.5/80kg

JMA - 17 Aug 2004 13:22 GMT
> Beverly wrote in alt.support.diet on Mon, 16 Aug 2004:
>
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> grown and flown), you can't do that, or you'd be cooking two separate
> meals every evening (and life is FAR too short to do that!).

I cook separately for my husband and have for years since we have different
likes and dislikes.  I don't feel it's taken that much time off of my life
since I was in the kitchen cooking anyway.  Then again, my meals are rather
small, mostly a single serving of protein (meat or tofu), a vegetable or
two, and a salad.  We even have 2 different salads since I like more
vegetables and different lettuce in mine than he does.

Jenn
Annabel Smyth - 17 Aug 2004 14:12 GMT
JMA wrote in alt.support.diet on Tue, 17 Aug 2004:

>I cook separately for my husband and have for years since we have different
>likes and dislikes.  I don't feel it's taken that much time off of my life
>since I was in the kitchen cooking anyway.  Then again, my meals are rather
>small, mostly a single serving of protein (meat or tofu), a vegetable or
>two, and a salad.  We even have 2 different salads since I like more
>vegetables and different lettuce in mine than he does.

We eat the same meals, which basically mean we don't eat anything he
dislikes (luckily, that's not a great deal and mostly the same as my
dislikes!).  I should like to have butter beans again one of these days,
though....  I have never cooked separate meals for any of us, although
if he is *really* late home (like 9.00 pm or later), I occasionally eat
mine first and leave him to reheat his.  Or if we are both out at
different times, I'll let him make himself an omelette, which he likes.
Signature

Annabel - "Mrs Redboots"
90/88.5/80kg

A Ross - 17 Aug 2004 13:43 GMT
> And probably fine if you don't have anybody else to
> think about; when
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> separate meals every evening (and life is FAR too short
> to do that!).

I find it very easy to combine my WOE with my family's
preferred WOE. I prepare one meal, along with a big
salad of romaine and other assorted goodies. I have a
heaping helping of salad, and have a portion of
whatever meat--whether it be chicken, steak, or
pork--cut up on top. Very yummy and filling.

Or, for instance, last night it was pasta night. For
myself I steamed summer squash and broccoli and poured
a cup of tomato/meat sauce over top. Simple,
satisfying, not much work, and I am partaking in our
family tradition of dinner together every night.

Amy
168/115
Annabel Smyth - 17 Aug 2004 14:15 GMT
A Ross wrote in alt.support.diet on Tue, 17 Aug 2004:

>Or, for instance, last night it was pasta night. For
>myself I steamed summer squash and broccoli and poured
>a cup of tomato/meat sauce over top. Simple,
>satisfying, not much work, and I am partaking in our
>family tradition of dinner together every night.

So you had two extra saucepans to wash up, no?  Why could your family
not have also had summer squash (what is this, by the way?) and broccoli
as well as their pasta - it would have gone a long way towards their
"five a day" requirements!
Signature

Annabel - "Mrs Redboots"
90/88.5/80kg

A Ross - 17 Aug 2004 15:07 GMT
> A Ross wrote in alt.support.diet on Tue, 17 Aug 2004:
>
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> towards their
> "five a day" requirements!

Oh, they had squash (marrow?) as well--It's just that I
didn't have the pasta. And to consider nuking a bowl of
squash extra work--or the clean up after--is silly. I'm
not that lazy.

Amy
168/115
Chris Braun - 17 Aug 2004 14:13 GMT
>Beverly wrote in alt.support.diet on Mon, 16 Aug 2004:
>
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>has grown and flown), you can't do that, or you'd be cooking two
>separate meals every evening (and life is FAR too short to do that!).

Couldn't you just eat less of the food you prepare for your husband?
It's not the type of food that differs in the 5-6 meals a day
approach, it's the quantity.  Or -- radical thought -- let him get his
own dinner?  (I mean, I don't care if you eat 3 times a day or 6, but
this doesn't seem like a good reason to me.)

Chris
262/141/ (145-150)
Annabel Smyth - 17 Aug 2004 14:34 GMT
Chris Braun wrote in alt.support.diet on Tue, 17 Aug 2004:

>Couldn't you just eat less of the food you prepare for your husband?

I *could*, but the point is, I know I wouldn't!  No, for me, the
European approach works best - I've tried the other way, and know it
doesn't work for me.
Signature

Annabel - "Mrs Redboots"
90/88.5/80kg

janice - 17 Aug 2004 18:09 GMT
>And probably fine if you don't have anybody else to think about; when
>you have a family to cook for (or, in my case, a husband; the daughter
>has grown and flown), you can't do that, or you'd be cooking two
>separate meals every evening (and life is FAR too short to do that!).

Well, that's what I've done for about the past 20 years, for various
reasons and by my own choice.  I'm so used to it now, I don't even
think about it any more.

>I have found, all my life, that if I eat between meals, I am eating
>extra food that I don't need.  I prefer the European way of eating two
>small and one large meal each day, and nothing else, except possibly the
>odd cup of tea or coffee.

I tend to eat like this, too.  I just can't quite work out how to eat
at different times to people around me as no one I know eats several
small meals a day.

janice
Chris Braun - 16 Aug 2004 23:16 GMT
>Jane Lumley wrote in alt.support.diet on Mon, 16 Aug 2004:
>
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>If so, welcome!) seem to think one must eat snacks all day long and
>avoid any feelings of hunger or one's weight-loss plan is due to fail.

Well, I think that's an exaggeration, but most advice I've seen on
managing one's metabolism suggests that smaller and more frequent
meals are more effective for fat burning.  It's not so much a matter
of avoiding feelings of hunger as it is keeping the metabolism at a
more even level.  

I don't make a practice of telling others their weight loss method is
due to fail; any method in which you eat fewer calories than you burn
will lead to weight loss.  (The idea of the more frequent eating is
that a more revved-up metabolism lets you burn more calories.)

Chris (who has lost 121 lbs. eating more frequently throughout the
day)
262/141/ (145-150)
janice - 11 Aug 2004 21:04 GMT
>> What do you keep at your desk for these
>> situations?
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>something like this? Is that a common thing to do in the USA (I mean, both
>dinner at the office and keeping food there)?

It's something I've not heard of either, apart from here in the last
few days.  

I take my own lunch in a box and eat it at lunch time.  Sometimes I
keep a banana back for the afternoon in case of need, but I never
leave anything in my desk or keep any sort of store of food there.

Can someone explain?

janice
233/179/133
Beverly - 11 Aug 2004 21:28 GMT
> >> What do you keep at your desk for these
> >> situations?
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
> janice
> 233/179/133

My office looks like a small grocery store<G>

I have oatmeal, protein powder and ground flax seed for fixing breakfast
each morning.  I also have a small can of tuna, green tea bags, raspberry
flavored tea bags, dry soup mix and WW apricot bars.  I need to take the WW
bars home as I just bought them at the WW meeting yesterday.  I put them in
my bike bag when I'm out on the trails.

It's a common practice in our office to keep something on hand for snacking
or those times you get stuck here working late and don't have access to
other food.    The vending machines have nothing but candy bars, gum and
chips.

Beverly
Annabel Smyth - 12 Aug 2004 11:34 GMT
>Ok, this is the second time I read this word today, and I still don't grab
>the concept fully (and dictionnary is not helping)... So, what is that work
>stash thing anyway? Is it some food you keep to have dinner at the office or
>something like this? Is that a common thing to do in the USA (I mean, both
>dinner at the office and keeping food there)?

I think it's for them to nibble while they work.  I believe that in the
USA, like in the UK, lunch-breaks are negligible, so they can't stop and
have a proper meal, so have to nibble all day long.
Signature

Annabel Smyth                   mailto:annabel@amsmyth.demon.co.uk
                               http://www.amsmyth.demon.co.uk/index.html
Website updated 7 August 2004 - for a limited time, be bored by my holiday
snaps!

Beverly - 12 Aug 2004 15:26 GMT
> >Ok, this is the second time I read this word today, and I still don't grab
> >the concept fully (and dictionnary is not helping)... So, what is that work
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> USA, like in the UK, lunch-breaks are negligible, so they can't stop and
> have a proper meal, so have to nibble all day long.

I would say that very few people use their "work stash" for lunch.  It's
usually for snacking or those rare times when you do have to work through
lunch.

In my company very few people work through lunch.  They take the hour to get
away from their desk.  I imagine the split is 50-50 for those who go out and
those who go to the restaurant on site.  A few attend the noon exercise
classes and you see many walking the trails around campus.  We also have
noon-time volleyball and basketball events.  Our company running group often
hit the roads in the area for a short run.

Beverly
> Annabel Smyth                   mailto:annabel@amsmyth.demon.co.uk
>                                 http://www.amsmyth.demon.co.uk/index.html
> Website updated 7 August 2004 - for a limited time, be bored by my holiday
> snaps!
jmk - 12 Aug 2004 16:06 GMT
>>>Ok, this is the second time I read this word today, and I still don't
>
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
> usually for snacking or those rare times when you do have to work through
> lunch.

Right.  Mine is for when I forget my lunch at home or I am trapped at
work for some reason.

Signature

jmk in NC

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2012 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.