Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsGeneral TopicsLow CarbWeightWatchers
WeightAdviser.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Weight Loss Forum / General Topics / August 2004

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

My daily intake

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Mark - 18 Aug 2004 17:28 GMT
Now that I've lost my weight, I have a daily routine that seems to have been
keeping it off for the last couple of years.

This is for "most" days:
Morning:
1/2 cup cereal (total or wheaties) with 1/2 cup 1% milk

Afternoon:
Granola bar or other "energy" bar

Evening:
Something different each day like -
Pasta
Beef
chicken
fish

One of the above with some type of veggie.  Small portions.  Each piece of
meat/fish is approx 3-4" in diameter max.  About 1/2 cup of veggie.  Pasta
will usually be closer to 2 cups when I have it.

When I splurge (once every other week or so) it's something like this:

Morning:
Pancakes or waffles or 2 fried eggs on toast

Afternoon:
Pizza or grilled burger/hotdog or chicken

Evening:
Fried seafood or chicken or burger or pasta, and oh yea - beer!

All portions are smaller than you'd get in any average restaurant.  That's the
key, after all.

All beverages are either water (most of the time) or 1% milk unless noted
otherwise.
Annabel Smyth - 18 Aug 2004 17:49 GMT
Mark wrote in alt.support.diet on Wed, 18 Aug 2004:

>Evening:
>Something different each day like -
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>meat/fish is approx 3-4" in diameter max.  About 1/2 cup of veggie.  Pasta
>will usually be closer to 2 cups when I have it.

You keep saying "pasta", but what do you have *on* the pasta?  I mean, I
don't suppose you eat plain boiled spaghetti or macaroni, and there are
a multitude of different sauces to eat with it, from the heavy cream
sauces that I am currently reserving for treats, to an almost totally
vegetable sauce.

It strikes me that you eat extraordinarily little - but if it works for
you and you have plenty of energy.....
Signature

Annabel - "Mrs Redboots"
90/88/80kg

Mark - 19 Aug 2004 16:56 GMT
>Mark wrote in alt.support.diet on Wed, 18 Aug 2004:
>
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>sauces that I am currently reserving for treats, to an almost totally
>vegetable sauce.

Very lightly coated with margarine just to lube it up.  Less than a teaspoon.
Sometimes a dash of salt too to give it flavor.

>It strikes me that you eat extraordinarily little - but if it works for
>you and you have plenty of energy.....

That's plenty of food for me since I do not have an exercise regimen that I
follow.  My exercise consists of whatever daily activities require me to get
off my duff!
Annabel Smyth - 19 Aug 2004 17:05 GMT
Mark wrote in alt.support.diet on Thu, 19 Aug 2004:

>Very lightly coated with margarine just to lube it up.  Less than a teaspoon.
>Sometimes a dash of salt too to give it flavor.

Really?  Then what sort of (a) protein or (b) vegetables do you have
with that.  I would - do - find it very difficult to eat without a sauce
of some kind, even if that is made up of that evening's vegetables.
Signature

Annabel - "Mrs Redboots"
90/88/80kg

Mark - 19 Aug 2004 18:57 GMT
>Mark wrote in alt.support.diet on Thu, 19 Aug 2004:
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>Really?  Then what sort of (a) protein or (b) vegetables do you have
>with that.

None.  When I eat pasta, I eat more than a normal portion so that's all I eat.

>I would - do - find it very difficult to eat without a sauce
>of some kind, even if that is made up of that evening's vegetables.

I've tried "veggie sauces" and they are repulsive to me.  Meat sauce or no
sauce.  Most of the time I choose none.

I'm not following any "recommended" food guide lines here by making sure I get
the right amount of this or that on a daily basis.  Most of that is bunk
anyway.  Calorie intake and a slight variety is all that is needed.  I've
proven it by doing it.
Ignoramus29728 - 19 Aug 2004 19:04 GMT
> I'm not following any "recommended" food guide lines here by making
> sure I get the right amount of this or that on a daily basis.  Most
> of that is bunk anyway.  Calorie intake and a slight variety is all
> that is needed.  I've proven it by doing it.

Mark, how much weight have you lost and how long have you maintained
your loss? (if you are done losing)? Thanks.

i
Mark - 19 Aug 2004 19:29 GMT
>> I'm not following any "recommended" food guide lines here by making
>> sure I get the right amount of this or that on a daily basis.  Most
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>Mark, how much weight have you lost and how long have you maintained
>your loss? (if you are done losing)? Thanks.

A tad over 60lbs was lost and I'm just recently at my desired weight (about
3-4 months ago).

I can't see this being an issue because the foods I've listed is just the way
I eat now.  It's not like I'm still on a "diet".  I just eat smaller amounts
that are better for me and I'm going to keep doing it.
Ignoramus29728 - 19 Aug 2004 19:55 GMT
>>> I'm not following any "recommended" food guide lines here by making
>>> sure I get the right amount of this or that on a daily basis.  Most
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> I eat now.  It's not like I'm still on a "diet".  I just eat smaller amounts
> that are better for me and I'm going to keep doing it.

Very impressive results. Do you find it easy to limit how much you
eat? Do you think much about food? I had a history similar to yours,
50 lbs lost by eating less and not eating sweets and exercising.

i
Mark - 19 Aug 2004 22:31 GMT
>>>> I'm not following any "recommended" food guide lines here by making
>>>> sure I get the right amount of this or that on a daily basis.  Most
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>Very impressive results. Do you find it easy to limit how much you
>eat?

Now that I am in a routine, it's not even a thought.  I make my meals a
certain size and that's it.  When it's gone it's gone.  When I first decided
to drop the weight, I limited my intake to about 1000 calories a day.  That
sucked big for the first two weeks.  Not so much the hunger pains, but I got
some ugly headaches.  I took a lot of Tylenol during that time.  But after
that, you'd be surprised how it just goes away.  I found drinking lots of
water to be helpful when I started getting hungry between meals.  You can add
things like lemon or lime to the water to give it a little flavor.  I still
drink lots of water.

>Do you think much about food?

At first, yea.  I always felt hungry and always wanted to eat.  But when
you've actually made the decision to lose the weight, you stick to the plan.
Now, I don't think about food until it starts getting close to meal time.

>I had a history similar to yours,
>50 lbs lost by eating less and not eating sweets and exercising.

I never exercised and still don't.  I know that's probably not a good idea,
but I lost the weight just by cutting back on junk and eating "normal" foods
at "normal" quantities.

I can see how it would be so easy to just abandon a diet after a week or to
even cheat through a diet all the time and then give up.  That's for someone
who was never truly serious about it in the first place.  I have friends who
seem to always be on a diet yet they never lose the weight.  It's one excuse
after another with them - but hey, it's their choice and I'm not going to give
them crap about it.  If the day comes when they are truly serious about losing
the weight, they'll get serious about dieting and stop the cheating.  After
all, when someone cheats on a diet who do they think they're fooling?
Themselves?  It takes time, effort and dedication to lose weight.
Ignoramus29728 - 20 Aug 2004 04:25 GMT
I am very impressed with your real accomplishment.

i

>>>>> I'm not following any "recommended" food guide lines here by making
>>>>> sure I get the right amount of this or that on a daily basis.  Most
[quoted text clipped - 46 lines]
> all, when someone cheats on a diet who do they think they're fooling?
> Themselves?  It takes time, effort and dedication to lose weight.
Annabel Smyth - 20 Aug 2004 12:31 GMT
Mark wrote in alt.support.diet on Thu, 19 Aug 2004:

>>Really?  Then what sort of (a) protein or (b) vegetables do you have
>>with that.
>
>None.  When I eat pasta, I eat more than a normal portion so that's all I eat.

Fair enough; I shouldn't care for it, but I'm not you!
Signature

Annabel - "Mrs Redboots"
90/88/80kg

janice - 19 Aug 2004 21:48 GMT
>Mark wrote in alt.support.diet on Thu, 19 Aug 2004:
>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>with that.  I would - do - find it very difficult to eat without a sauce
>of some kind, even if that is made up of that evening's vegetables.

That's what I like about couscous.  OK, I know it's not pasta, but if
you eat it with a mountain of mixed fresh veg with a little stock
poured over, it doesn't need any sort of rich or fatty sauce with it.
I do like pasta with just veggies, too, though.
janice
Mark - 19 Aug 2004 22:36 GMT
>>Mark wrote in alt.support.diet on Thu, 19 Aug 2004:
>>
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>poured over, it doesn't need any sort of rich or fatty sauce with it.
>I do like pasta with just veggies, too, though.

Change your quantities.  If you are dieting and using phrases like "mountain
of mixed fresh veg", then you need to cut back.  Sorry to be so blunt, but you
can't eat mountains of anything when dieting.
janice - 19 Aug 2004 22:59 GMT
>>That's what I like about couscous.  OK, I know it's not pasta, but if
>>you eat it with a mountain of mixed fresh veg with a little stock
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>of mixed fresh veg", then you need to cut back.  Sorry to be so blunt, but you
>can't eat mountains of anything when dieting.

I'm sorry but I disagree.  I never cut back on vegetables, other than
a few calorie dense ones, when I'm dieting and this has never affected
my ability to lose weight.  With my evening meal I eat perhaps half a
cauliflower or cabbage, plus swede, turnips etc. in addition to a main
protein dish.  This works for me, and I have no intention of changing
my quantities.

janice
233/179/133
Beverly - 20 Aug 2004 00:39 GMT
> >>That's what I like about couscous.  OK, I know it's not pasta, but if
> >>you eat it with a mountain of mixed fresh veg with a little stock
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
> janice
> 233/179/133

I agree 100%.  Increasing vegetables and limiting other higher calorie foods
is a great way to lose weight.
janice - 20 Aug 2004 07:00 GMT
>> >>That's what I like about couscous.  OK, I know it's not pasta, but if
>> >>you eat it with a mountain of mixed fresh veg with a little stock
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
>I agree 100%.  Increasing vegetables and limiting other higher calorie foods
>is a great way to lose weight.

Thank you Beverly.  I'm glad someone else agrees with me.  I love my
veg - plenty of fibre and satiety value, with few calories.

janice
Mary M - Ohio - 20 Aug 2004 00:49 GMT
> Change your quantities.  If you are dieting and using phrases like "mountain
> of mixed fresh veg", then you need to cut back.  Sorry to be so blunt, but you
> can't eat mountains of anything when dieting.

Vegetables (excluding corn, potatoes or other starchy vegetables) are unlimited on my
food plan, which has worked very well for me.

Mary
325-154-148
janice - 20 Aug 2004 07:02 GMT
>> Change your quantities.  If you are dieting and using phrases like "mountain
>> of mixed fresh veg", then you need to cut back.  Sorry to be so blunt, but you
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>Mary
>325-154-148

Well, if  it worked for you Mary it's good enough for me.  I'm glad I
know enough about dieting and food intake to not listen to some of the
daft advice that gets handed out here.  It's exactly things like
potatoes (which I rarely eat) and corn (which I weigh carefully) that
I don't include in my mountain.

janice
Annabel Smyth - 20 Aug 2004 12:34 GMT
Mark wrote in alt.support.diet on Thu, 19 Aug 2004:

>Change your quantities.  If you are dieting and using phrases like "mountain
>of mixed fresh veg", then you need to cut back.  Sorry to be so blunt, but you
>can't eat mountains of anything when dieting.

You can when it's vegetables; I was looking at the pack of salad I had
half of last night, and the nutrition information tells me that 100
grammes contains 18 kcal.  Now, I had less than that - half of a 160g
pack, so 80 g - and I can assure you, that was a mountain of mixed fresh
vegetables!
Signature

Annabel - "Mrs Redboots"
90/88/80kg

janice - 20 Aug 2004 18:04 GMT
>Mark wrote in alt.support.diet on Thu, 19 Aug 2004:
>
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>pack, so 80 g - and I can assure you, that was a mountain of mixed fresh
>vegetables!

I've been very gratified to see from some of the posts that I'm not
weird in eating unlimited amounts of low calorie vegetables.

I do object to being told how to eat by someone who knows nothing
about me.  

janice
233/179/133
Beverly - 20 Aug 2004 18:08 GMT
> >Mark wrote in alt.support.diet on Thu, 19 Aug 2004:
> >
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
> janice
> 233/179/133

On the Weight Watchers program most vegetables are 0 points<g
Ignoramus9298 - 20 Aug 2004 18:13 GMT
>>Mark wrote in alt.support.diet on Thu, 19 Aug 2004:
>>
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> I've been very gratified to see from some of the posts that I'm not
> weird in eating unlimited amounts of low calorie vegetables.

Maybe you and me are both weird, I also eat large quantities of
whatever low can vegetables fancy me at the moment.

i
LazyEights - 20 Aug 2004 18:27 GMT
Janice, I agree. Some calories just aren't worth adding up. Lettuce,
cucumber and tomato in any reasonable quantities don't amount to much. I
soak mine in vinegar and mustard.

I'm on an extremely low calorie diet, and it's working well for me.

Lazy
223/210/175

>> Mark wrote in alt.support.diet on Thu, 19 Aug 2004:
>>
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
> janice
> 233/179/133

--
Ignoramus9298 - 20 Aug 2004 18:32 GMT
> Janice, I agree. Some calories just aren't worth adding up. Lettuce,
> cucumber and tomato in any reasonable quantities don't amount to much. I
> soak mine in vinegar and mustard.
>
> I'm on an extremely low calorie diet, and it's working well for me.

Just how low?

io

> Lazy
> 223/210/175
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
>> janice
>> 233/179/133
LazyEights - 20 Aug 2004 18:39 GMT
Ig,

I'm working with a clinical nutritionist who wants me to do 800 kcals for a
while, but I cheat; I'm often in the 300-600 range.

Lazy

>> Janice, I agree. Some calories just aren't worth adding up. Lettuce,
>> cucumber and tomato in any reasonable quantities don't amount to much. I
[quoted text clipped - 31 lines]
>>> janice
>>> 233/179/133

--
Ignoramus9298 - 20 Aug 2004 18:55 GMT
> Ig,
>
> I'm working with a clinical nutritionist who wants me to do 800 kcals for a
> while, but I cheat; I'm often in the 300-600 range.

Impressive... I don't think that I could manage that. Might be hard
to hold on to your weight loss though.

i
Annabel Smyth - 20 Aug 2004 18:48 GMT
janice wrote in alt.support.diet on Fri, 20 Aug 2004:

>I've been very gratified to see from some of the posts that I'm not
>weird in eating unlimited amounts of low calorie vegetables.
>
>I do object to being told how to eat by someone who knows nothing
>about me.

Quite.  Or, seemingly, about nutrition!
Signature

Annabel - "Mrs Redboots"
90/88/80kg

Rob - 20 Aug 2004 18:57 GMT
>>Mark wrote in alt.support.diet on Thu, 19 Aug 2004:
>>
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
> janice
> 233/179/133

I also know nothing about you but when I read the "mountain of mixed
fresh veg" it got my attention.  Not because of the calories or point
values but simply quantity.  I believe and many others disagree, the key
to any long-term weight strategy is portion control.  Under that belief,
eventually one has to learn to eat less.  A habit if you will.  Although
these veggies are low in calories, eating large portions of anything
will be slowing progress or putting off the goal of smaller quantity
type eating.  Again, it’s not the veggies that hurt, it’s the notion
that one needs to eat large quantities of anything to fill up or defeat
hunger.

Just my opinion, agree or delete.

185/140/155/160
janice - 21 Aug 2004 23:20 GMT
> > I've been very gratified to see from some of the posts that I'm not
> > weird in eating unlimited amounts of low calorie vegetables.
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
>
>Just my opinion, agree or delete.

I've never felt that it was necessary to aim to reduce my portion size
for the sake of it  - just to learn to eat smaller portions of some
foods, particularly the calorie dense ones.  But for me, the other
side to this is eating bigger portions of foods that are relatively
low in calories but provide fibre and high satiety value for the
calories involved.
When I'm in binge mode, vegetables are the first thing to get pushed
out of my diet  - they don't leave enough room for my favourite binge
foods!  But when I'm sticking with my WOE, they help me to feel
satisfied, as well as being healthy.  Same as I try to eat my fruit
with the peel on (well, things like apples and pears, not oranges or
bananas of course) - to provide higher satiety value.  I find this
helps me.

janice
233/179/133
SnugBear - 22 Aug 2004 01:31 GMT
> Same as I try to eat my fruit
> with the peel on (well, things like apples and pears, not oranges or
> bananas of course) - to provide higher satiety value.  I find this
> helps me.

Speaking of peel: I was wondering tonight if it would be better to leave
the peel on cucumbers for salad?  I stopped peeling potatoes, carrots and
the fruits you mentioned long ago.

Signature

Walking (but mostly biking!) on . . .
Laurie in Maine
207/110  60 inches of attitude!
Start: 2/02  Maintained since 2/03

JMA - 22 Aug 2004 01:42 GMT
>> Same as I try to eat my fruit
>> with the peel on (well, things like apples and pears, not oranges or
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> the peel on cucumbers for salad?  I stopped peeling potatoes, carrots and
> the fruits you mentioned long ago.

I find cucumber peels to be bitter sometimes.  If I get them from the
farmstand I leave them on, if I get them from the store, I peel them.  Or, I
do the fancy peeling and make stripes if I'm having company :)

Jenn
Chris Braun - 22 Aug 2004 04:22 GMT
>> Same as I try to eat my fruit
>> with the peel on (well, things like apples and pears, not oranges or
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>the peel on cucumbers for salad?  I stopped peeling potatoes, carrots and
>the fruits you mentioned long ago.

I don't know if it's better, but I'm pretty sure it's harmless.  I've
always left the peel on cucumbers.  I like the added crunch.

Chris
janice - 22 Aug 2004 11:40 GMT
>> Same as I try to eat my fruit
>> with the peel on (well, things like apples and pears, not oranges or
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>the peel on cucumbers for salad?  I stopped peeling potatoes, carrots and
>the fruits you mentioned long ago.

I don't know - I always do.  Peeled cucumber makes me think of dainty
sandwiches at an afternoon tea party, with the crusts cut off the
bread.

The only thing is that some people find the peel of cucumber makes it
a bit bitter.

janice
Crafting Mom - 22 Aug 2004 12:25 GMT
> The only thing is that some people find the peel of cucumber makes it
> a bit bitter.

I don't peel the cucumber if it's grown in a non-commercial garden.  But the
cucumbers I see in grocery stores are covered and sprayed with so many
layers of wax it makes it unpalatable to eat.
Annabel Smyth - 22 Aug 2004 12:10 GMT
SnugBear wrote in alt.support.diet on Sun, 22 Aug 2004:

>> Same as I try to eat my fruit
>> with the peel on (well, things like apples and pears, not oranges or
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>the peel on cucumbers for salad?  I stopped peeling potatoes, carrots and
>the fruits you mentioned long ago.

Cucumber is meant to be less indigestible if you leave the peel on,
which seems counter-intuitive, but there you are....
Signature

Annabel - "Mrs Redboots"
90/88/80kg

Chris Braun - 20 Aug 2004 19:53 GMT
>>Mark wrote in alt.support.diet on Thu, 19 Aug 2004:
>>
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>I do object to being told how to eat by someone who knows nothing
>about me.  

Ignore him, Janice.  His statement was downright silly.  Vegetables
are great for you and a great way to fill up.  There's nothing noble
about going hungry.  The thing is to learn to eat as much good food as
you need to be satisfied, and vegetables are high on the list of good
foods.  No doubt one could theoretically overdo even vegetables, but
it would be tough!

Chris
262/141/ (145-150)
Annabel Smyth - 20 Aug 2004 12:33 GMT
janice wrote in alt.support.diet on Thu, 19 Aug 2004:

>That's what I like about couscous.  OK, I know it's not pasta,

Actually, I believe it counts as pasta, being more like semolina than
anything else.

> but if
>you eat it with a mountain of mixed fresh veg with a little stock
>poured over, it doesn't need any sort of rich or fatty sauce with it.

Indeed no!  And lots and lots of harissa..... I never know quite what to
do for protein, though, as if I just have couscous & veg, I get hungry.
I suppose a little grilled or poached chicken?

>I do like pasta with just veggies, too, though.

Me too, but I tend to sprinkle grated cheese on top.
Signature

Annabel - "Mrs Redboots"
90/88/80kg

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2012 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.