Weight Loss Forum / General Topics / August 2004
Hospital equipment companies catering to obese patients see booming business
|
|
Thread rating:  |
Reese Alexis - 22 Aug 2004 01:53 GMT Posted on Sat, Aug. 21, 2004 Hospital equipment companies catering to obese patients see booming business
DAVID TWIDDY Associated Press KANSAS CITY, Mo. - When St. Luke's Hospital renovated 14 neurology intensive care rooms, officials included a feature that is becoming a standard in the health care industry.
Each room comes with a ceiling-mounted patient lift system that can handle up to 600 pounds, a $6,000-per-room expense hospital officials said is far from an extravagance.
"When you have a patient who comes in who is of larger size it's a safety issue of having the lift rather than have five or six nurses at the bedside trying to do that," said Jennifer Ball, director of patient care for medical/surgical. "I think we're seeing more (obese patients) and people are more conscientious about it."
Nationwide, the $3 billion market for hospital beds, wheelchairs and other equipment designed for plus-size patients is booming, a welcome development for the growing number of companies that cater to the health care industry.
Kinetic Concepts Inc. of San Antonio, for example, said its line of beds and accessories for obese patients took in $282 million last year, a 6 percent increase from the year before.
"There's more and more and more of these patients showing up at hospitals now," said Ron Dziedziula, director of marketing for KCI's therapeutic surfaces division.
SIZEWise Rentals of Las Vegas, another market leader, declined to discuss financial numbers but said it has seen growth of 15 percent to 20 percent per year and its work force has grown from 23 two years ago to 125 now.
"There's always something on TV," said COO Trever Frickey, whose company was one of the first to market complete suites of equipment to hospitals. "Everywhere there's this awareness of obesity."
The U.S. Centers for Disease Control estimate that 65 percent of American adults are overweight and 31 percent are obese.
Overweight people tend to have more health problems but they often can't fit in standard beds or wheelchairs built for 300-pound people.
Instead, health care providers are calling companies such as KCI and SIZEWise for beds built to support up to 1,000 pounds and wheelchairs that are 32 inches or wider.
The equipment is not cheap, often costing much more than its regular counterparts. A typical hospital bed can cost $2,000, but a reinforced bed for heavier patients can cost $6,000 or more.
"Everything has to be custom," said DuWayne Kramer, president of Kansas City, Kan.-based Burke Mobility Products, a key manufacturer. "You can't use the same foam. It becomes more and more custom the heavier the person gets. You have to be thinking in a different way for everything."
Kramer said he remembers when severely overweight patients first began appearing in hospitals, forcing staff to improvise.
"In years past, people were welding beds together or putting beds on the floor," he said. "When we first got into this (in 1979), there was nothing out there."
The equipment can be a blessing for hospital staff, who have the third-highest rate of injuries or illnesses among industries with 100,000 or more reported cases, according to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics.
Many of those injuries come from lifting and moving patients, an activity made more dangerous when the patient is obese.
"With the average nursing age in the mid-40s, we need to protect our older, more experienced nurses," Ball, of St. Luke's Hospital, said.
Novation Inc., an Irving, Texas-based hospital supply company, said its members bought $847,000 worth of patient lifts in 2001. Last year, that number was up to $3 million.
Another source of growth for the industry is the exploding popularity of bariatric surgery, such as gastric bypass, or so-called "stomach stapling."
The American Society for Bariatric Surgery estimates 140,600 bariatric procedures will be performed in the nation this year, more than eight times the 16,200 procedures recorded 10 years ago.
That popularity - and the fact operations can cost up to $30,000 before postoperative care - has led hospitals to open their own bariatrics practices and even hospital wings. That means hospitals that were renting equipment for the occasional patient are now buying whole suites of specially designed beds, walkers and commodes.
"The volume (of operations) has dramatically increased, and that had drawn more companies to what they see as a lucrative field for them," said Dr. Harvey Sugerman, society president. "The number of people getting the surgery is only 1 or 2 percent of those eligible for the surgery."
While most in the industry agree that the number of obese patients is fueling the current boom, others say society is becoming more tolerant of "patients of size." People who may have stayed at home for years out of shame now get treatment and demand equipment built for their needs.
"People would not be doing this if there wasn't market share to be captured, but the reason there is a market share is that this population has been underserved," said Walter Lindstrom, founding partner of the San Diego-based Obesity Law and Advocacy Center. "This isn't just for bariatric surgery. Bariatric patients also need to get their gall bladders taken out or they get cancer."
Looking ahead, many company officials said they didn't foresee a downturn for their products unless the country undergoes a fundamental shift in how it views diet and exercise. In the meantime, with federal statistics showing that 15 percent of children are now overweight, a second surge of potential customers may not be too far over the horizon.
Newcombe - 22 Aug 2004 02:31 GMT > KANSAS CITY, Mo. - When St. Luke's Hospital renovated 14 neurology > intensive care rooms, officials included a feature that is becoming a [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > up to 600 pounds, a $6,000-per-room expense hospital officials said is far > from an extravagance.
> The equipment can be a blessing for hospital staff, who have the > third-highest rate of injuries or illnesses among industries with 100,000 > or more reported cases, according to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. > > Many of those injuries come from lifting and moving patients, an activity > made more dangerous when the patient is obese. Yet another example of the excess costs and even INJURY that obese people impose on the rest of us. What a disgrace that these infantile people cannot control themselves. Disgusting.
N.
> Yet another example of the excess costs and even INJURY that obese > people impose on the rest of us. What a disgrace that these infantile > people cannot control themselves. Disgusting. How is obesity so different from your obvious choice to ignore education? You made the choice to be stupid and society suffers as a result of your actions.
Love, Satan
Life is hell. Welcome to my world.
Newcombe - 23 Aug 2004 03:06 GMT >>Yet another example of the excess costs and even INJURY that obese >>people impose on the rest of us. What a disgrace that these infantile [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > You made the choice to be stupid and society suffers as a result of your > actions. Amazing how obesity apologists routinely accuse anyone who disagrees with them of being "stupid" and "ignorant", without offering so much as a single *fact* as an argument for their pro-obesity point of view.
N.
> >>Yet another example of the excess costs and even INJURY that obese > >>people impose on the rest of us. What a disgrace that these infantile [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > with them of being "stupid" and "ignorant", without offering so much as > a single *fact* as an argument for their pro-obesity point of view. Who said I was pro obesity? I am pro treating people who deserve it with dignity and respect. Obviously you are not.
Love, Satan
Life is Hell. Welcome to my world.
Newcombe - 24 Aug 2004 04:38 GMT > Who said I was pro obesity? I am pro treating people who deserve it with > dignity and respect. That goes both ways. People who want to be treated with dignity should behave with dignity. People who want to be treated with respect, should treat others and *themselves* with respect. Those who engage in grotesque over-consumption of food and refuse to exercise do not meet these qualifications. I do not respect such people, nor should anyone else be obliged to.
N.
Satan - 25 Aug 2004 02:08 GMT > > Who said I was pro obesity? I am pro treating people who deserve it with > > dignity and respect. [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > these qualifications. I do not respect such people, nor should anyone > else be obliged to. A lot of people are in situations that put them in this position. Poor people eat a lot of fattening foods. Medical reasons exist for some. Young adults have been raised on junk food and don't know any better. Some even do what you said. Did it ever occur to you that an untreated psychological condition may be the reason they got obese in the first place? Why do you find it necessary to degrade people and place blame on them? They may be unaware that they are doing something wrong. Denial is difficult to overcome.
The Voice of Reason - 25 Aug 2004 18:19 GMT > A lot of people are in situations that put them in this position. Poor > people eat a lot of fattening foods. What forces them to overeat? Vegetables, rice, grain, meat and dairy products are cheap. Pizza is expensive. Burgers are expensive. Microwave meals are expensive.
> Medical reasons exist for some. Very very few.
> Young > adults have been raised on junk food and don't know any better. What's stopping them from learning better eating habits? Nothing.
> Some even > do what you said. Did it ever occur to you that an untreated psychological > condition may be the reason they got obese in the first place? Why do you > find it necessary to degrade people and place blame on them? They may be > unaware that they are doing something wrong. Denial is difficult to > overcome. It's about taking responsiblity for your life rather than feeling sorry for yourself and making excuses.
Lictor - 23 Aug 2004 21:10 GMT > Yet another example of the excess costs and even INJURY that obese > people impose on the rest of us. What a disgrace that these infantile > people cannot control themselves. Disgusting. Well, that's the very basis for what solidarity is... As a society, and as citizens, we do accept to share the costs of supporting the various members of our community. I accept to pay the costs pregnant women impose on the commuity, even though I'm not a woman and will never be pregnant. I accept to pay the costs kids impose on the community, even though I'm not a kid anymore. I see no problem in covering the cost of surgery for transexuals, of artificial insemination for lesbians or infertile women, of care for failed suicides, beaten wives... I don't mind paying for rehab costs for people who spent time in jail, I don't mind paying the psychotherapy for pedophiles. Smokers do cost extra, but if we declare tobacco legal, then we should also accept the associated costs. That's what solidarity is about. It's about providing help to others without expecting any direct benefit out of it, except for the knowledge that you will in turn get help if you need it. That's what living in a society is about. If you refuse that basic principle, you are a sociopath.
Lesanne - 23 Aug 2004 21:35 GMT Been browsing this since I am bored this week, between classes. Amazing what a deal people are making about what is essentially a corporate wake up, creating jobs and putting money Into the economy with this new "booming business". IF all the obese people were in terrible physical shape, which actually they are not maybe some of those whining would have a point. Fact is, a very big percentage of the people in the U S are overweight, so whenever they get any illness lazy health professionals blame it on fat. I am a normal weight today, but my blood pressure, cholesterol, etc, have been normal since I was in the 250's or so. Very healthy generally too, I am the only nurse in my district to have gone four years without a sick day, back when I was "obese". Generalizations are the hallmark of small minds.
 Signature Les
> > Yet another example of the excess costs and even INJURY that obese > > people impose on the rest of us. What a disgrace that these infantile [quoted text clipped - 15 lines] > will in turn get help if you need it. That's what living in a society is > about. If you refuse that basic principle, you are a sociopath. Newcombe - 24 Aug 2004 04:32 GMT >>Yet another example of the excess costs and even INJURY that obese >>people impose on the rest of us. What a disgrace that these infantile [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > to pay the costs kids impose on the community, even though I'm not a kid > anymore. Not a valid comparison. Children are the future of a society and a people. That child, if healthy in body and mind, will grow up to be a productive member of society who pays taxes. Procreation isn't an abnormal, unhealthy, addictive behavior that imposes a long-term drain on society. Alcoholism, drug addition, and extreme overeating are.
> If you refuse that basic principle, you are a sociopath. It seems to be that a sociopath is someone who doesn't care about the impacts of his actions on others. People who stuff themselves until they weigh 500 pounds, who are so oversized that special equipment has to be purchased to lift them, and who weigh so much that health care workers are actually INJURED trying to care for them, fit that bill very well to me.
Dave
Lictor - 24 Aug 2004 11:42 GMT > Not a valid comparison. Children are the future of a society and a > people. That child, if healthy in body and mind, will grow up to be a > productive member of society who pays taxes. Immigration would be a cheaper alternative, it takes twenty years to turn a kid into a productive member of society. Besides, the point remains for other categories. For instance, why spend money on old people? They generate only costs, and benefit nothing at all to society. Yet, part of my monthly earnings go to them (health care, pension...). According to your logic, we should just eliminate them.
> It seems to be that a sociopath is someone who doesn't care about the > impacts of his actions on others. People who stuff themselves until > they weigh 500 pounds, who are so oversized that special equipment has > to be purchased to lift them, and who weigh so much that health care > workers are actually INJURED trying to care for them, fit that bill very > well to me. No, there are already finer definition than sociopathy for their problem, sociopath is way too generic for them. It's like calling someone who kills people because he hears voices a sociopath, that's just too broad. A sociopath is someone who just cannot relate to the rules of society; he is in direct opposition to it or actively ignores it. Most super-obese are not in opposition to society, their aim is not to destroy society, it's to destroy themselves. Hence, they're not sociopaths. Super-obese are people who combine a purely physiological disease (because most people just can NOT gain that amount of weight with plain over-eating no matter how hard they try) and a complex socio-psychological setup. Your problem is that you refuse to understand complexity. You view them as people who chose to stuff themselves because it's "fun" (is it?) or because they can't resist the pleasure (hint: most super-obese feel less pleasure when eating that you do - actually, that's a whole part of their problem). You just can't understand the problem, because you refuse to use the right grid to analyse it.
fatman985@hotmail.com - 26 Aug 2004 15:48 GMT > Posted on Sat, Aug. 21, 2004 > [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > ><snip> Isn't this what capitalism is all about? Finding or creating a need and then filling it at a profit?
|
|
|