Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsGeneral TopicsLow CarbWeightWatchers
WeightAdviser.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Weight Loss Forum / General Topics / August 2004

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Diet and exercise to become obsolete soon

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Ignoramus13955 - 25 Aug 2004 02:39 GMT
http://www.nynewsday.com/news/health/ny-hsmouse0824,0,7562101,print.story?coll=n
y-health-headlines


The subject of this post is an embellishment, but the results so far
are very interesting.

Should we be looking to being fit, lean, and strong couch potatoes?
Would you take a drug that would make you lean, strong and boost your
endurance? I would, if there was no side effects.

``The animals given the drug experienced the same muscle and metabolic
benefits of the genetically-bred mice, including protection against
weight gain.''

i
not quite holding his breath
======================================================================
Gene research creates a 'Mighty Mouse'
                     
                     
                     
                     
                               
BY JAMIE TALAN
Staff Writer

August 23, 2004, 2:44 PM EDT

Increasing the activity of a single gene turns a mere rodent into
Mighty Mouse, according to a new study.

California scientists have genetically engineered an animal that has
more muscle, less fat and more physical endurance than their
littermates. The mice go twice as far as expected. They also seem
protected against the inevitable weight gain that follows a high fat,
high calorie diet.

"We were quite surprised," said Ronald M. Evans, a Howard Hughes
Medical Institute investigator at the Salk Institute in La Jolla,
Calif. "Most people think that increased endurance comes from
training. But we've been able to re-create this entire exercise
network by increasing the activity of a single protein."

Evans said that the findings could have implications for human
athletes and others who shy away from exercise despite the known
benefits for the cardiovascular system, the muscles and bones, and
even the brain. "While it could be used for patients who can't
exercise, it could also be abused by athletes to enhance performance,"
said Evans.

Nonetheless, the finding suggests that one gene, called PPAR-delta, is
designed to regulate muscle development. In turn, strong muscles have
positive effects on other body systems. Scientists modified the
PPAR-delta gene to express, or make, more protein.

The PPAR-delta is a master gene that regulates several other
genes. Enhancing its activity created animals with attributes
associated with extensive physical training.

Evans and his colleagues suspect that enhancing muscle development
alters the fat-burning and muscle-making machinery of the body. The
study appears Tuesday in the Public Library of Science Biology
journal.

In earlier work, the scientists showed that activating PPAR-delta
helped animals burn more fat. In the latest studies, they found that
the protein also alters the structure and function of muscle fibers,
making them more resistant to fatigue. The enhanced protein also
allows the animals to keep trim despite a diet rich in fat and
calories.

On an exercise wheel, the genetically engineered mice ran twice as
long as the normal animals -- an extra hour, Evans said, for the
equivalent of a mile.

While researchers altered the gene to make more protein, they also
designed a study to test the benefits of an experimental medicine that
increases the protein. The animals given the drug experienced the same
muscle and metabolic benefits of the genetically-bred mice, including
protection against weight gain. The experimental drug, developed by
GlaxoSmithKline, is now in clinical studies to test its safety and
effectiveness in pre-diabetes conditions.

The new study is the latest to examine how animals' athleticism can be
altered. In a study published last year, scientists created the next
generation of athletic mice -- animals that ran three times farther
and faster than usual.

"They are born to run," said neuroscientist Justin Rhodes. The study
appeared in the journal Behavioral Neuroscience. "Give them a wheel
and they want to run faster and more intensely than the other
animals."

Rhodes, at the Veteran's Administration Medical Center in Portland,
Ore., spent years measuring the movement of animals on a running
wheel. Then, in collaboration with University of Wisconsin's Stephen
Gammie and Ted Garland of the University of California at Riverside,
Rhodes mated animals with the longest records. After 32 generations,
they had four separate lines of animals that were faster and capable
of running farther.

These animals didn't have better hearts, stronger muscles or more
robust oxygen consumption than non-runners, Gammie said. But they did
have higher levels of the stress-hormone cortisol in their blood. In
addition, areas of the brain that regulate motivation were far more
active and a brain area known to give birth to new brain cells in
adults went into overdrive, producing 30 percent more new neurons in
this region.

Gammie said that these findings could prove what scientists have long
suspected: That exercise is naturally rewarding.

In that study, half the mice were given unlimited access to the
running wheel for six straight days. On the seventh day, only half of
these were allowed to use the wheel.

Researchers found a correlation between how much the animals had run
and the activity in certain parts of the brain. And brain regions
involved with motivation and movement registered more activity in the
animals that didn't get to run on the seventh day, suggesting that the
motivational circuits were craving the next opportunity, Rhodes said.

Genetic tests in the mice suggest that a gene that regulates the brain
chemical dopamine may be involved in this enhanced running
ability. Dopamine is a key chemical that regulates motivation and
reward, as well as movement. The animals ran into old age but didn't
live any longer than their normal littermates.
JMA - 25 Aug 2004 02:47 GMT
> http://www.nynewsday.com/news/health/ny-hsmouse0824,0,7562101,print.story?coll=n
y-health-headlines

>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> Would you take a drug that would make you lean, strong and boost your
> endurance? I would, if there was no side effects.

Umm sure, if you're lazy and exercise is a chore.  No pill is going to
replace things like the sunshine and breezes that make being outdoors
pleasant for some of us, nor will a pill give the feeling of accomplishment
when reaching a new fitness goal (lifting more, running farther or faster,
making that 8 ft. putt, etc.).

Jenn
Renegade5 - 26 Aug 2004 12:38 GMT
This reminds me of an article I read recenlty about a school-aged
child who was far stronger than the rest of the students in his age
group, had greater endurance, and less body-fat.  Almost kind of a
"Super-Boy".  Apart from his physical advantages, he was no different
mentally or socially for the other kids.   He looked and acted like
any other child on the playgroud (albiet a really fit child).  

After extensive medical investigation, they found that he had a
genetic mutation (which I think had something to do with protiens).
Most of us have a control mechanism in the body which regulates muscle
growth - a switch that says 'OK, that's enough muscle growth for now'.
This child was either missing that control, or it functioned
differently for him.

His uncle, who worked in construction, was known to be able to hoist
huge, heavy slabs of concrete and perform other amazing strengh tasks.

The researches speculated that this mutation might not be that rare,
but rather more common (found in something like 2-4% of the
population?) and largely goes undetected since it requires some very
elaborate tests to determine, and there are no know ill effect or
symptoms of this mutation.

I wonder if this new research is related?  Unfortunately, I can't
remember the medical publication that the article appeared in, or the
doctors involved.  The child's identity was kept anonymous.

>> Should we be looking to being fit, lean, and strong couch potatoes?
>> Would you take a drug that would make you lean, strong and boost your
>> endurance? I would, if there was no side effects.
Ignoramus24885 - 26 Aug 2004 13:18 GMT
> This reminds me of an article I read recenlty about a school-aged
> child who was far stronger than the rest of the students in his age
[quoted text clipped - 22 lines]
> remember the medical publication that the article appeared in, or the
> doctors involved.  The child's identity was kept anonymous.

If you do find something, post it, it is very interesting.

i

>>> Should we be looking to being fit, lean, and strong couch potatoes?
>>> Would you take a drug that would make you lean, strong and boost your
>>> endurance? I would, if there was no side effects.
JMA - 26 Aug 2004 23:55 GMT
>> This reminds me of an article I read recenlty about a school-aged
>> child who was far stronger than the rest of the students in his age
[quoted text clipped - 26 lines]
>
> i

http://tinyurl.com/2x6no
Luna - 25 Aug 2004 04:13 GMT
> http://www.nynewsday.com/news/health/ny-hsmouse0824,0,7562101,print.story?coll
> =ny-health-headlines
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> Would you take a drug that would make you lean, strong and boost your
> endurance? I would, if there was no side effects.

Well, I tend to believe in the addage that any medicine that is strong
enough to cure is strong enough to hurt.  The only things that don't have
the potential to cause side effects are things that don't work at all.

Signature

Michelle Levin
http://www.mindspring.com/~lunachick

I have only 3 flaws.  My first flaw is thinking that I only have 3 flaws.

Ignoramus13955 - 25 Aug 2004 04:44 GMT
>> http://www.nynewsday.com/news/health/ny-hsmouse0824,0,7562101,print.story?coll
>> =ny-health-headlines
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> enough to cure is strong enough to hurt.  The only things that don't have
> the potential to cause side effects are things that don't work at all.

I have found this also to be true, but it does not hurt to dream once
in a while...

i
Lictor - 25 Aug 2004 09:41 GMT
> Well, I tend to believe in the addage that any medicine that is strong
> enough to cure is strong enough to hurt.  The only things that don't have
> the potential to cause side effects are things that don't work at all.

This also apply to exercise... I wonder how high the medical cost for all
the New Year champions is...
Drugs like that will mostly be beneficial to the food industry. If we are to
maintain a positive economical growth rate, we will eventually have to use
pills like that in order to keep consumming more and more. The men in
Napoleon's infantry used to burn 7k calories a day - if every American
started to eat that much while staying healthy, that would cause a huge
economical boom, of the kind you experienced after WWII.
I wonder who funds these researches...
marengo - 25 Aug 2004 05:59 GMT
| Genetic tests in the mice suggest that a gene that regulates the brain
| chemical dopamine may be involved in this enhanced ... | ability. Dopamine
is a key chemical that regulates motivation and
| reward, as well as movement.

Dopamine is the same chemical that cocaine boosts (and prevents re-uptake
of) to make the user feel good and lose his appetite.  So now they can
genetically engineer a crack high and give us that skinny "crack ho" look
without having to smoke it?  Cool!
Signature

Peter
270/215/180
Before/Current Pix:
http://users.thelink.net/marengo/weightlosspix/weightlosspix.html

Lictor - 25 Aug 2004 09:43 GMT
> Dopamine is the same chemical that cocaine boosts (and prevents re-uptake
> of) to make the user feel good and lose his appetite.

Dopamine metabolism is also involved in schizophrenia (too high) and
parkinson (too low). Now, a nation of schizophrenic couch potato body
builders would be a fun sight to see ... from afar...
Roger Zoul - 25 Aug 2004 12:31 GMT
http://www.nynewsday.com/news/health/ny-hsmouse0824,0,7562101,print.story?coll=n
y-health-headlines


:: The subject of this post is an embellishment, but the results so far
:: are very interesting.
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
:: metabolic benefits of the genetically-bred mice, including
:: protection against weight gain.''

I doubt this drug would make exercise obsolete:

::" Researchers found a correlation between how much the animals had run
:: and the activity in certain parts of the brain. And brain regions
:: involved with motivation and movement registered more activity in the
:: animals that didn't get to run on the seventh day, suggesting that
:: the motivational circuits were craving the next opportunity, Rhodes
:: said. "

"Exercise is naturally rewarding."
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2012 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.