Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsGeneral TopicsLow CarbWeightWatchers
WeightAdviser.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Weight Loss Forum / General Topics / November 2003

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

sugar substitutes

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
roxan - 06 Nov 2003 03:03 GMT
Here is a good article on sugar substitute
http://www.nutricise.com/servlet/article/nutrition/29035.html
Roxan
Ignoramus14934 - 06 Nov 2003 04:03 GMT
> Here is a good article on sugar substitute
> http://www.nutricise.com/servlet/article/nutrition/29035.html
> Roxan

why would one need a sugar substitute...

let's say that you have a piece of meat. Would it be better with sugar
substitute?

How about a cup of water?

A piece of bread?

The answer is, if you add aspartame or splenda to them, they would not
be better!

Our taste has been spoiled by the unnecessary sweetness.

i
223/176/180
The Queen of Cans and Jars - 06 Nov 2003 05:00 GMT
> > Here is a good article on sugar substitute
> > http://www.nutricise.com/servlet/article/nutrition/29035.html
> > Roxan
>
> why would one need a sugar substitute...

some people can't eat sugar.  others choose not to.
Ignoramus909 - 06 Nov 2003 14:23 GMT
>> > Here is a good article on sugar substitute
>> > http://www.nutricise.com/servlet/article/nutrition/29035.html
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> some people can't eat sugar.  others choose not to.

I think you misunderstood my question.

Say you cannot eat sugar. Or choose not to, like I do.

So do not eat sugar. Why put some strange chemicals into you "instead
of" sugar? There are so many good foods available, meat butter,
fruits, vegetables, they do not require any aspartame... Plenty of
naturally sweet stuff if you want sweetness.

i
The Queen of Cans and Jars - 06 Nov 2003 15:15 GMT
> > roxan wrote:
> >> > Here is a good article on sugar substitute
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> I think you misunderstood my question.

i don't think so.

> Say you cannot eat sugar. Or choose not to, like I do.
>
> So do not eat sugar. Why put some strange chemicals into you "instead
> of" sugar? There are so many good foods available, meat butter,
> fruits, vegetables, they do not require any aspartame... Plenty of
> naturally sweet stuff if you want sweetness.

some recipes require it, to enhance or smooth out the flavors of other
ingredients.  some people just want something sweet, for whatever
reason.  it's not a crime to want something that tastes sweet, and not
everyone wants to eat a piece of fruit to satisfy that urge.  

it's not up to you to judge.

you don't want to use artificial sweeteners, so don't use them.  that's
fine.  but it doesn't give you the right to judge other people for using
them.

i personally don't use them, but i understand why other people do.
janice - 06 Nov 2003 07:47 GMT
>why would one need a sugar substitute...

Well, I wouldn't care to try to eat stewed fruit like gooseberries,
rhubarb or blackcurrants without a sweetener, for a start, and I
prefer to avoid adding the empty calories contained in sugar.
janice
MH - 06 Nov 2003 13:36 GMT
> >why would one need a sugar substitute...
>
> Well, I wouldn't care to try to eat stewed fruit like gooseberries,
> rhubarb or blackcurrants without a sweetener, for a start, and I
> prefer to avoid adding the empty calories contained in sugar.
> janice

And some folks like to avoid high sugar things such as dried fruit. : )

Martha
Wendy - 06 Nov 2003 13:58 GMT
> And some folks like to avoid high sugar things such as dried fruit. : )

Touche.  

Igor, I don't think you realize that your feelings about sugar have
reached the religious level: you have beliefs that require you obey a set
of rules about behavior.  That's fine.  You can demonize sugar if you
wish.  But fructose and lactose and sucrose are kissing cousins and I
personally think you're fooling yourself if you think you are reaping any
particular nutritional benefit from not allowing a single gram of sucrose
to pass your lips.  Avoid it on religious grounds, proselytize if you wish
(that's not likely to increase your popularity, though) but don't try to
make it a nutrition issue, please.

I like a range of tastes.  I don't add sugar to everything, but I do
prefer sweetened coffee (but not sweetened tea.)  I find that splenda is
an excellent substitute for sugar in places where I'd like the sweet but
don't need to the calories.

On the other hand, during "TV Free Week" in April I make my kids turn off
the TV and they can't even watch videos or sneak over to a friend's
house.  It's a religious observance.  It doesn't have to make sense.

-- Wendy
Ignoramus909 - 06 Nov 2003 15:12 GMT
>> And some folks like to avoid high sugar things such as dried fruit. : )
>
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> (that's not likely to increase your popularity, though) but don't try to
> make it a nutrition issue, please.

Well, surely there is no nutritional benefit in sugar, no matter how
you cut it.

You could say that a spoon of sugar per day won't kill you. And I
agree. But it would not make you better off either.

> I like a range of tastes.  I don't add sugar to everything, but I do
> prefer sweetened coffee (but not sweetened tea.)  I find that splenda is
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> the TV and they can't even watch videos or sneak over to a friend's
> house.  It's a religious observance.  It doesn't have to make sense.

yep, it does not have to make sense but it is a good idea (TV wise).

i
Wendy - 06 Nov 2003 17:11 GMT
>> Avoid it on religious grounds, proselytize if you wish
>> (that's not likely to increase your popularity, though) but don't try to
>> make it a nutrition issue, please.

> Well, surely there is no nutritional benefit in sugar, no matter how
> you cut it.

Yes there is.  Sugar contains calories.  It is a decent fuel for a
body needing energy on a short-term basis.  My four year old
weighs 28 pounds.  He now weighs 1.5 pounds more than he did two years
ago.  His doctor is VERY concerned about this.  

We need to get him to eat more.  Sugar has the benefit of having calories
(when he needs CALORIES) and it has the added benefit of making other
foods more palatable.  A spoonful of sugar helps the medicine go
down.  This morning, for instance, I added ground flaxseed to his oatmeal
and he protested the nutty flavor so I added a sprinkling of sugar on
top.  Voila, a picky eater ate a nutritious meal.

Circumstances differ.  Sugar is not evil.  My personal religion has
"moderation in all things" as a tenet.

Wendy
Ignoramus909 - 06 Nov 2003 18:27 GMT
>>> Avoid it on religious grounds, proselytize if you wish
>>> (that's not likely to increase your popularity, though) but don't try to
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> weighs 28 pounds.  He now weighs 1.5 pounds more than he did two years
> ago.  His doctor is VERY concerned about this.  

Wow, my 2.5 yo weight 28 lbs also! I hope that he will do well in the
future.

i

> We need to get him to eat more.  Sugar has the benefit of having calories
> (when he needs CALORIES) and it has the added benefit of making other
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> Wendy
Ignoramus909 - 06 Nov 2003 14:24 GMT
>>why would one need a sugar substitute...
>
> Well, I wouldn't care to try to eat stewed fruit like gooseberries,
> rhubarb or blackcurrants without a sweetener, for a start, and I
> prefer to avoid adding the empty calories contained in sugar.

Sounds like you grow wrong blackcurrants, the ones I used to eat were
plenty sweet. Cannot comment on the rest of the berries you mentioned,
as I do not know them.

i
janice - 06 Nov 2003 15:37 GMT
>> Well, I wouldn't care to try to eat stewed fruit like gooseberries,
>> rhubarb or blackcurrants without a sweetener, for a start, and I
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
>i

I did wonder after posting this whether anyone outside the UK would
know the fruits I was referring to (rhubarb isn't a berry, by the
way).  Just take it from me they are so sour it would be very
difficult IMO to eat them without sweetener of some sort.
janice
Daniel - 06 Nov 2003 17:04 GMT
> I did wonder after posting this whether anyone outside the UK would
> know the fruits I was referring to (rhubarb isn't a berry, by the
> way).  Just take it from me they are so sour it would be very
> difficult IMO to eat them without sweetener of some sort.
> janice

Rhubarb pie, yum, yum, yum, yum.  We used to grow rhubarb in our garden when
I was young.  A bite or two without sweetener is ok..  Any more, well,
you'll look like you are kissing the air for a while.

Dan - 305/288/220
determined - 06 Nov 2003 17:31 GMT
> >> Well, I wouldn't care to try to eat stewed fruit like gooseberries,
> >> rhubarb or blackcurrants without a sweetener, for a start, and I
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> know the fruits I was referring to (rhubarb isn't a berry, by the
> way).

I LOVE rhubarb.  I make rhubarb strawberry crisp almost weekly when it's in
season (I live in portland, or).  I have taken to using splenda in my crisp,
but it's still topped with butter and brown sugar!

det
MH - 07 Nov 2003 01:33 GMT
> >> Well, I wouldn't care to try to eat stewed fruit like gooseberries,
> >> rhubarb or blackcurrants without a sweetener, for a start, and I
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> difficult IMO to eat them without sweetener of some sort.
> janice

I know what they are. : )

That's OK, consider the source...he's in complete denial over the fact that
raisins and other dried fruit are LOADED with sugar!

Martha
Jennifer A - 07 Nov 2003 04:39 GMT
> >> Well, I wouldn't care to try to eat stewed fruit like gooseberries,
> >> rhubarb or blackcurrants without a sweetener, for a start, and I
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> difficult IMO to eat them without sweetener of some sort.
> janice

I've had rhubarb and it definitely needs sweetening.  It's not just a UK
thing.  My dad had us eating it since I was a kid.  There are definitely
fruits and some veggies out there that have many benefits nutritionally and
aren't palatable without some kind of sweetening, but with sweetening have a
unique flavor that can't be matched.  There are also many fruits sold
commercially that have been sweetened yet the consumer isn't aware of it.
Frozen berries are usually sweetened, as are many dried fruits.  I like
reading labels.
Jenn
George - 08 Nov 2003 01:21 GMT
>> >> Well, I wouldn't care to try to eat stewed fruit like gooseberries,
>> >> rhubarb or blackcurrants without a sweetener, for a start, and I
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
>reading labels.
>Jenn

I don't know about frozen berries being *usually* sweetened... I've
not had a bit of trouble finding unsweetened ones, even in North
Dakota. I use unsweetened berries in smoothies on a regular basis.

Yes, the stores generally have the sweetened varieties too, but it's
hardly difficult to pick the unsweetened sorts.

Cynthia
262/234.0/200 first goal
Jennifer A - 08 Nov 2003 05:10 GMT
> I don't know about frozen berries being *usually* sweetened... I've
> not had a bit of trouble finding unsweetened ones, even in North
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> Cynthia
> 262/234.0/200 first goal

Nope, it's not hard at all to find unless you're in a hurry and just reach
in the case and grab the first bag you see, or you're my DH :) (who I love
dearly and who hates to shop and has no problem eating the sweetened berries
purchased by accident)
Signature

Jenn
300/144 (HMR) in maintenance since 10/28/03
Living well is the best revenge

George - 09 Nov 2003 00:14 GMT
>> I don't know about frozen berries being *usually* sweetened... I've
>> not had a bit of trouble finding unsweetened ones, even in North
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>dearly and who hates to shop and has no problem eating the sweetened berries
>purchased by accident)

I'm fairly fortunate... my new hubby is a pretty good shopper. In fact
I goofed last week and didn't get HIM the right kind of sugar-free
yogurt!

Cynthia
262/234.0/200 first goal
Crafting Mom - 08 Nov 2003 13:57 GMT
>I don't know about frozen berries being *usually* sweetened... I've
>not had a bit of trouble finding unsweetened ones, even in North
>Dakota. I use unsweetened berries in smoothies on a regular basis.

I too, am a scrupulous label reader.  *Every* time.  I buy my frozen
blueberries without sugar.  My favorite are the wild blueberries.
The ingredients read simply, "blueberries".

cm
Signature

Drop everything and do it my way :)

rosie read and post - 06 Nov 2003 15:45 GMT
. Cannot comment on the rest of the berries you mentioned,
> as I do not know them.
>
> i

that is why your BLANKET STATEMENTS regarding sugar/sweeteners are just
plain silly!
roxan - 06 Nov 2003 16:33 GMT
Well you try eating cranberries without sugar, bet you can't eat many.
Roxan

> >>why would one need a sugar substitute...
> >
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> i
Jennifer A - 07 Nov 2003 04:41 GMT
> Well you try eating cranberries without sugar, bet you can't eat many.
> Roxan

I can actually eat them without sugar, but only the fresh ones I get from
the growers up here.  I still use splenda to make cranberry sauce however.
:)
Jenn
MH - 07 Nov 2003 06:38 GMT
> > Well you try eating cranberries without sugar, bet you can't eat many.
> > Roxan
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> :)
> Jenn

I use splenda in tea and a few other things, but I do like sugar in baking
and I like honey with my yogurt. I love Greek yogurt, which is so rich
tasting, not much honey is needed, so it's no biggie. I bake cookies for my
friends, co-workers, touring metal bands (they now expect it of me, but I
don't mind.....), and I use real sugar and butter in all the different types
I bake. But, I'm the type of baker that once I've made them, I'm sick of
looking at them, so I only have one or two; I'm not tempted to overeat. I
make room for sugar when I want it, which isn't often these days. Splenda
still has a fake taste to it to me, so I don't use it much.

Martha
Jennifer A - 08 Nov 2003 05:07 GMT
> > > Well you try eating cranberries without sugar, bet you can't eat many.
> > > Roxan
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>
> Martha

If I was baking for others I'd use the real stuff.  For me, I don't bake
anything :)  Splenda does have an aftertaste but it doesn't make me ill like
nutra sweet and I can't deal with sugar because once I start I don't stop.
I found that with splenda, a little can go a very long way and that cuts
down on the aftertaste.  I really do have a taste for sweet, but only a
little.

I tried a little honey in plain yogurt tonight which I use as a dip for
apples.  It wasn't bad.  I don't get Greek yogurt here.  I live in the
middle of nowhere and depend on places like super wal mart for shopping
(which totally sucks by the way).  I can't wait to go visit my dad in
Alabama at X-mas so I can visit Trader Joe's after hearing everyone talk
about it.  Told DH we'll have to bring the shell for the roof of the truck
so I have extra packing space.
Signature

Jenn
300/144 (HMR) in maintenance since 10/28/03
Living well is the best revenge

SnugBear - 08 Nov 2003 13:52 GMT
<snip>
> I can't wait to go visit my dad in
> Alabama at X-mas so I can visit Trader Joe's after hearing everyone talk
> about it.  Told DH we'll have to bring the shell for the roof of the truck
> so I have extra packing space.

Another TJ Pilgrim <s>

Signature

Walking on . . .
Laurie in Maine
207/110  60 inches of attitude!
Start: 2/02  Maintained since 2/03

George - 08 Nov 2003 01:23 GMT
>Well you try eating cranberries without sugar, bet you can't eat many.
>Roxan

They need less than one might think though. For instance, if you've
ever tried the fresh cranberry relish recipe on the back of most bags
of cranberries... it usually call for an orange, the cranberries and a
ton of sugar.

Well, you can cut the sugar by half or more... and the recipe tastes
BETTER, not worse. I also cut the amount of orange.

This year though, I may try it with Splenda.

Cynthia
262/234.0/200 first goal
SnugBear - 08 Nov 2003 03:01 GMT
"roxan"  wrote:

> >Well you try eating cranberries without sugar, bet you can't eat many.
> >Roxan

I love cranberries chopped up in my oatmeal or in my squash for lunch.  It
need's some splenda and cinnamon, but very yummy. I'm buying extra bags now
and throwing them in the freezer for the rest of the year.

Signature

Walking on . . .
Laurie in Maine
207/110  60 inches of attitude!
Start: 2/02  Maintained since 2/03

Jennifer A - 08 Nov 2003 05:13 GMT
>  "roxan"  wrote:
> >
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> need's some splenda and cinnamon, but very yummy. I'm buying extra bags now
> and throwing them in the freezer for the rest of the year.

My freezer is jammed with fresh cranberries.  I used my new vacuum sealer
bags.  Now we need a second freezer and since the ground froze before we
poured concrete for the new garage and have to wait until spring, I might
actually get my freezer!
Signature

Jenn
300/144 (HMR) in maintenance since 10/28/03
Living well is the best revenge

roxan - 08 Nov 2003 22:17 GMT
Did you blanch your berries before freezing them or did you just freeze them
without doing this?
Roxan

> > I love cranberries chopped up in my oatmeal or in my squash for lunch.  It
> > need's some splenda and cinnamon, but very yummy. I'm buying extra bags
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
> 300/144 (HMR) in maintenance since 10/28/03
> Living well is the best revenge
SnugBear - 09 Nov 2003 00:09 GMT
> Did you blanch your berries before freezing them or did you just freeze them
> without doing this?
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
> > 300/144 (HMR) in maintenance since 10/28/03
> > Living well is the best revenge

I don't know about Jenn, but i just throw the bags in the freezer when I get
home from the store.  I freeze the blueberries we rake the same way after
they're picked over.  Berries - YUM!

Signature

Walking on . . .
Laurie in Maine
207/110  60 inches of attitude!
Start: 2/02  Maintained since 2/03

Jennifer A - 09 Nov 2003 00:14 GMT
> Did you blanch your berries before freezing them or did you just freeze them
> without doing this?
> Roxan

Cranberries don't need blanching - it will break the skins.  They just need
to be washed and "pre-frozen" for an hour before vacuum sealing.
Signature

Jenn
300/144 (HMR) in maintenance since 10/28/03
Living well is the best revenge

roxan - 09 Nov 2003 23:43 GMT
Thanks, I will try this.
Roxan

> > Did you blanch your berries before freezing them or did you just freeze
> them
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> 300/144 (HMR) in maintenance since 10/28/03
> Living well is the best revenge
Jennifer A - 08 Nov 2003 05:11 GMT
> >Well you try eating cranberries without sugar, bet you can't eat many.
> >Roxan
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> Cynthia
> 262/234.0/200 first goal

It doesn't take much splenda at all.  My original recipe called for 2T to go
with 2c of cranberries.  1T works for me just fine.
Signature

Jenn
300/144 (HMR) in maintenance since 10/28/03
Living well is the best revenge

rosie read and post - 06 Nov 2003 15:42 GMT
> Well, I wouldn't care to try to eat stewed fruit like gooseberries,
> rhubarb or blackcurrants without a sweetener, for a start, and I
> prefer to avoid adding the empty calories contained in sugar.
> janice

good example!
Beverly - 06 Nov 2003 15:46 GMT
> >why would one need a sugar substitute...
>
> Well, I wouldn't care to try to eat stewed fruit like gooseberries,
> rhubarb or blackcurrants without a sweetener, for a start, and I
> prefer to avoid adding the empty calories contained in sugar.
> janice

I couldn't take rhubarb without sugar :)  My great-grandmother grew this
and I couldn't wait until it was ready so she could make stewed rhubarb.

Beverly
rosie read and post - 06 Nov 2003 15:50 GMT
> I couldn't take rhubarb without sugar :)  My great-grandmother grew this
> and I couldn't wait until it was ready so she could make stewed rhubarb.
>
> Beverly

i made a cobbler with rhubarb this summer, and used
SPLENDA..............it turned out perfectly!
Jayjay - 06 Nov 2003 14:07 GMT
>why would one need a sugar substitute...
>
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
>Our taste has been spoiled by the unnecessary sweetness.

I wouldn't add sugare to any of those above scenarios.  But...  That
being said - it doesn't mean I don't use sugar.

Baking bread - uses sugar  
Many home made recipes call for sugar to help witht he taste.   Its
not just to be a sweetener, but it also can take the bitterness out of
some foods to certainly make them more palitable.  

Frankly, I haven't bought sugar in a few years.   I also have my
original box of splenda that I bought a couple years ago.
Ignoramus909 - 06 Nov 2003 15:08 GMT
>>why would one need a sugar substitute...
>>
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
> not just to be a sweetener, but it also can take the bitterness out of
> some foods to certainly make them more palitable.  

Good bread does not need sugar JayJay. Read about "sourdough" a little
bit...

i

> Frankly, I haven't bought sugar in a few years.   I also have my
> original box of splenda that I bought a couple years ago.
determined - 06 Nov 2003 17:49 GMT
> Frankly, I haven't bought sugar in a few years.   I also have my
> original box of splenda that I bought a couple years ago.

Wow!  I go through about 10 lbs of sugar in a year, and I go through a box
of splenda about every other month...

det
Wendy - 06 Nov 2003 17:32 GMT
> "Jayjay" <jjf_71@notmail.com> wrote in message

>> Frankly, I haven't bought sugar in a few years.   I also have my
>> original box of splenda that I bought a couple years ago.

> Wow!  I go through about 10 lbs of sugar in a year, and I go through a box
> of splenda about every other month...

AND you make brownies AND you make rubarb strawberry crisp...

I don't.

I go through an outrageous amount of brown basmati rice, though.

Wendy
determined - 06 Nov 2003 18:54 GMT
> > "Jayjay" <jjf_71@notmail.com> wrote in message
>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> AND you make brownies AND you make rubarb strawberry crisp...

AND I weigh 128 lbs.  So, obviously, sugar is NOT all evil.  I also have
6lbs of real butter in my fridge, because we go through about a lb every
other week.  Go figure...

det
Ignoramus909 - 06 Nov 2003 19:18 GMT
>> > "Jayjay" <jjf_71@notmail.com> wrote in message
>>
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>
> det

to go on the record, I have nothing against butter.

i
Crafting Mom - 06 Nov 2003 19:42 GMT
>> > "Jayjay" <jjf_71@notmail.com> wrote in message
>>
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>6lbs of real butter in my fridge, because we go through about a lb every
>other week.  Go figure...

I seriously go without refined sugar 99% of the time.  However, each
month, exactly 4 days prior to my period, I seriously crave chocolate
almonds.  The exact *day* my period happens, the cravings stop.  I used
to *gain* weight by NOT giving in to the cravings, eating everything
else (on plan) to try to get my mind off it.  I now have been slowly
losing each month, because I just eat the damn things and get it over
with rather than trying to shove double that amount in calories with
other foods to stave off the cravings.

Every other day, anything containing refined sugar does me in and
*wrecks* my clean plan.  But those 4 days of having my chocolate almonds
seem to do the trick and I don't fall off plan.

cm
Signature

Drop everything and do it my way :)

Wendy - 06 Nov 2003 20:45 GMT
> I seriously go without refined sugar 99% of the time.  However, each
> month, exactly 4 days prior to my period, I seriously crave chocolate
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> with rather than trying to shove double that amount in calories with
> other foods to stave off the cravings.

I buy the family-sized bars of the grocery store brand dark
chocolate.  One small square meets my chocolate needs.  I keep a bar for
months at a time.  I say I have it for "medicinal purposes."  (And I mean
it.)

Wendy
Crafting Mom - 06 Nov 2003 21:54 GMT
>> I seriously go without refined sugar 99% of the time.  However, each
>> month, exactly 4 days prior to my period, I seriously crave chocolate
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>months at a time.  I say I have it for "medicinal purposes."  (And I mean
>it.)

I think my body chemistry must drastically change pre-menstrually,
because at any other time, having even the darkest chocolate would be
the start of ruination for me.  

However, caving in to it during the 4 days prior (and it's not
conscious, as my periods are quite irregular - so I don't think "oh, 4
days prior, time to have the chocolate almonds) seems to do the trick
for me.  I can eat it and carry on with life.  But not unless it's that
4 day stretch.

It *has* to be chocolate almonds, bonus points if the chocolate is dark
dark dark.  Chocolate in and of itself won't cut it.  I later looked up
on the web and discovered that chocolate and almonds top the charts as
magnesium sources, and it's something women often need during their
period.

cm
Signature

Drop everything and do it my way :)

Wendy - 06 Nov 2003 23:23 GMT
> It *has* to be chocolate almonds, bonus points if the chocolate is dark
> dark dark.  Chocolate in and of itself won't cut it.  I later looked up
> on the web and discovered that chocolate and almonds top the charts as
> magnesium sources, and it's something women often need during their
> period.

I think this is an excellent point and pertains to stuff I was trying to
tell Jenn in the hitting bottom thread.  We've got to make our plans fit
our needs.  I figure anything that needs "willpower" to make work is
doomed to failure.  If I crave chocolate I'm going to just eat
chocolate.  I'll do it in a controlled way, but there's just no point in
demanding that my body live by rules it's not intending to live by.

Wendy
Crafting Mom - 07 Nov 2003 02:16 GMT
>> It *has* to be chocolate almonds, bonus points if the chocolate is dark
>> dark dark.  Chocolate in and of itself won't cut it.  I later looked up
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>chocolate.  I'll do it in a controlled way, but there's just no point in
>demanding that my body live by rules it's not intending to live by.

Exactly.  I was starting to gain some weight ON PLAN and I was getting
annoyed.  I thought simply adding more of the same would cut my
cravings, being full and all.  However, it didn't.  I just gained
weight.  There's no WAY after all I've been through these past 2 years,
that I am going to start gaining the weight back.  I decided to simply
listen to my body during my period and to heck with my self-imposed
rules.  The stricter I got with myself, the more my body rebelled.
There are already enough things I *can't* eat, so why add more?

The rest of the time, I am very much anti-refined-sugar.  My sugars come
from natural fruit and vegetables (I don't eat desserts) and it doesn't
bother me the way refined sugar does.  That is just me, though, and it's
what works.  I'm currently going through the process of re-tuning my way
of eating.  Yep, you heard it here :)

cm

Signature

Drop everything and do it my way :)

Jennifer A - 07 Nov 2003 04:56 GMT
> > It *has* to be chocolate almonds, bonus points if the chocolate is dark
> > dark dark.  Chocolate in and of itself won't cut it.  I later looked up
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>
> Wendy

When I crave chocolate, I use an HMR chocolate shake with cocoa powder added
to it.  After reading the velvet cake recipe in another thread, I may find
better uses for unsweetened chocolate and splenda especially since it
freezes well (which will help with the control part).  For me it's the
chocolate, not the sweet that I crave.  When I crave sweet, splenda works.
I intend to try and live 99% by the no refined carbs, no added sugars rule
because these are physical binge triggers for me.  The other 1% will be the
controlled situations where I know I'll be able to handle the binge urge or
am incapable of acting on it.

Jenn
Jayjay - 06 Nov 2003 19:42 GMT
>> "Jayjay" <jjf_71@notmail.com> wrote in message
>
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>
>Wendy

Yeah - and I probably go through 10lbs of chicken every 2 weeks.  :)
Jennifer A - 07 Nov 2003 04:45 GMT
> > Frankly, I haven't bought sugar in a few years.   I also have my
> > original box of splenda that I bought a couple years ago.
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> det

We go through pounds of it all summer long, but it's for the hummingbird
feeders.  :)
Jenn
George - 08 Nov 2003 01:26 GMT
>> Frankly, I haven't bought sugar in a few years.   I also have my
>> original box of splenda that I bought a couple years ago.
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
>det

Jayjay isn't alone... I have the remnants of a box of sugar and have
had them for the last 5 years I think. The only time I ever used it
was for cranberry relish for Thanksgiving. Otherwise, it just sat
there.

OTOH... don't bake much.

Splenda seems to last a long time too.

Cynthia
262/234.0/200 first goal
Jennifer A - 07 Nov 2003 04:44 GMT
> On 6 Nov 2003 04:03:39 GMT, Ignoramus14934
> Baking bread - uses sugar
> Many home made recipes call for sugar to help witht he taste.   Its
> not just to be a sweetener, but it also can take the bitterness out of
> some foods to certainly make them more palitable.

Most breads with yeast require sugar to activate the yeast.  Honey or
molasses is can be used for the same purpose.  My pizza dough requires 1
teaspoon and makes 6 servings.  Not much sugar there.
Jenn
jmk - 07 Nov 2003 13:21 GMT
>>On 6 Nov 2003 04:03:39 GMT, Ignoramus14934
>>Baking bread - uses sugar
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> teaspoon and makes 6 servings.  Not much sugar there.
> Jenn

Yes, my yeast bread recipes all call for just a tiny bit of sugar or
honey to feed the yeast (must be the real thing in this case since you
are feeding the yeast to get the bread to rise).  The only breads that I
know of that call for lots of sugar for flavor are quick breads like
banana bread.
Signature

jmk in NC

Julianne - 07 Nov 2003 21:25 GMT
> >>On 6 Nov 2003 04:03:39 GMT, Ignoramus14934
> >>Baking bread - uses sugar
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> know of that call for lots of sugar for flavor are quick breads like
> banana bread.

I do make one recipe that uses oats and russet potatoes that does not
require yeast but I guess the little yeasts get enough food from the taters.
Salt, I hear, is also critical to make bread rise.

j
> jmk in NC
jmk - 10 Nov 2003 13:13 GMT
>>>>On 6 Nov 2003 04:03:39 GMT, Ignoramus14934
>>>>Baking bread - uses sugar
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
> require yeast but I guess the little yeasts get enough food from the taters.
> Salt, I hear, is also critical to make bread rise.

Actually, salt is needed to balance the recipe.  Salt retards the yeast
growth with sugars accelerate yeast growth.
Signature

jmk in NC

Ignoramus14327 - 07 Nov 2003 14:39 GMT
>> On 6 Nov 2003 04:03:39 GMT, Ignoramus14934
>> Baking bread - uses sugar
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> molasses is can be used for the same purpose.  My pizza dough requires 1
> teaspoon and makes 6 servings.  Not much sugar there.

That's correct, you need sugar so that the yeast will work.

I bake sourdough bread consisting of nothing but water, flour and
salt, and it rises wonderfully. 5 minutes per loaf.

i
SuzyQ - 07 Nov 2003 22:40 GMT
> >> On 6 Nov 2003 04:03:39 GMT, Ignoramus14934
> >> Baking bread - uses sugar
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> I bake sourdough bread consisting of nothing but water, flour and
> salt, and it rises wonderfully. 5 minutes per loaf.

I make Italian bread with just yeast, salt, water and whole wheat flour.
Signature

SuzyQ
Weight 124
WW Lifetime Membership Feb 03

Ignoramus14327 - 08 Nov 2003 00:23 GMT
>> >> On 6 Nov 2003 04:03:39 GMT, Ignoramus14934
>> >> Baking bread - uses sugar
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>
> I make Italian bread with just yeast, salt, water and whole wheat flour.

Does it taste good? Do you use a bread machine?

i
SuzyQ - 08 Nov 2003 12:13 GMT
> >> >> On 6 Nov 2003 04:03:39 GMT, Ignoramus14934
> >> >> Baking bread - uses sugar
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>
> Does it taste good? Do you use a bread machine?

It tastes very good and I don't have a bread machine.  Unlike breads that
are full of preservatives, it will not keep very well.  It tastes stale the
next day and is really only good the day I make it.
Signature

SuzyQ
Weight 124
WW Lifetime Membership Feb 03

Ignoramus28586 - 08 Nov 2003 12:52 GMT
>> >> >> On 6 Nov 2003 04:03:39 GMT, Ignoramus14934
>> >> >> Baking bread - uses sugar
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
> are full of preservatives, it will not keep very well.  It tastes stale the
> next day and is really only good the day I make it.

if you are interested in sourdough breads, I can send you my
starter. Sourdough bread baking does not use yeast, it uses a culture
of wild yeasts and lactobacilli that keeps growing in a jar. You woild
take a cup or whatever of that culture (usually pancake batter
consistency), add flour, let it rise, and bake. You would obviously
replenish the starter at the same time. The result is delicious bread
that only takes minutes (of your time) to prepare.

Check out rec.food.sourdough.

i
223/176/180
jmk - 10 Nov 2003 13:17 GMT
>>>>>>>On 6 Nov 2003 04:03:39 GMT, Ignoramus14934
>>>>>>>Baking bread - uses sugar
[quoted text clipped - 32 lines]
> replenish the starter at the same time. The result is delicious bread
> that only takes minutes (of your time) to prepare.

Sourdough starter does use yeast (as you point out above) -- just not
commercial yeast (unless you don't make your own starter).  It's really
easy to make your own sourdough starter but it does take a part of your
counter for a week or so :-)  Basically, you "capture" yeast from the
air into your starter.  You have to stir it and add ingredients (flour,
sugar) to get it going.  Once you have the starter -- uh -- STARTED, you
just use part to make the bread and hold back part and keep it in your
refrigerator.  Generally, the longer you keep your starter going, the
stronger the flavor becomes because it kind of ferments.  It's a fun
project actually.  In my experience, sourdough bread takes the same
amount of time to bake as any other yeast bread with a similar number of
rises.

> Check out rec.food.sourdough.
>
> i
> 223/176/180

Signature

jmk in NC

MH - 08 Nov 2003 03:26 GMT
> > >> On 6 Nov 2003 04:03:39 GMT, Ignoramus14934
> > >> Baking bread - uses sugar
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>
> I make Italian bread with just yeast, salt, water and whole wheat flour.

Most of the breads I make these days (all by hand) are made with half whole
wheat. I like using half unbleached white flour because I like the
consistency better. But, I don't make bread very often anymore. Once in a
while...

Martha
Anglea Woollcombe - 09 Nov 2003 22:03 GMT
suzyq

was wondering if u go on any other boards or not????? i reconize ur name. i
used to go on the us weightwatchers site as well as the canadian one and i
also belong to pointing my weight to success boards. i also am following
weight watchers and have lost 30lbs. congrads on making life time

angie

> > >> On 6 Nov 2003 04:03:39 GMT, Ignoramus14934
> > >> Baking bread - uses sugar
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>
> I make Italian bread with just yeast, salt, water and whole wheat flour.
SuzyQ - 09 Nov 2003 22:14 GMT
> suzyq
>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> angie
Actually I spend way more time on ASDWW than here as I have been on WW for
over a year now.
Signature

SuzyQ
Weight 124
WW Lifetime Membership Feb 03

jmk - 10 Nov 2003 16:14 GMT
>>suzyq
>>
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> Actually I spend way more time on ASDWW than here as I have been on WW for
> over a year now.

I ran across these two articles that mention Splenda and I thought that
I'd share the links since we have been discussing sugar substitutes:

http://www.eatingwell.com/articles_recipes/nutrition/nut_qa.htm#sweet
http://www.cspinet.org/reports/chemcuisine.htm

Signature

jmk in NC

roxan - 11 Nov 2003 17:57 GMT
Thanks that is a great site with lots of other good food handling tips etc.
Roxan

> >>suzyq
> >>
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
> --
> jmk in NC
Jane Lumley - 14 Nov 2003 15:36 GMT
Actually, if you use easy-blend yeast you don't need sugar.
Signature

Jane Lumley

roxan - 06 Nov 2003 16:30 GMT
Just because you have judged sugar a bad thing doesn't mean everyone does.
Using Splenda which is a safer substitute for sugar doesn't make it a bad
thing. Reducing the amount of sugar which adds lots of calories to food is a
good thing. Using a sugar substitute helps those who want to reduce the
amount of sugar they consumes. This article gives you a good way of
determining which one is best for you. If you chose not to use sugar at all,
good for you, but the rest of us may want to use a best substitute
available.
Roxan
> > Here is a good article on sugar substitute
> > http://www.nutricise.com/servlet/article/nutrition/29035.html
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
> i
> 223/176/180
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2012 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.