Weight Loss Forum / General Topics / March 2005
2 pound diet? (photos)
|
|
Thread rating:  |
Cubit - 04 Mar 2005 15:51 GMT Two pounds per week, that is.
[insert evil maniacal laughter]
Before photo: http://techmart.com/~cubit/11_2001.jpg
Current photo: http://techmart.com/~cubit/Cubit187.jpg
Chart: http://techmart.com/~cubit/Chart61.gif
Today's chart (above) shows a 2.14 pound per week average. Fitday shows the entire diet from November 2003 to March 2005 at 1.78 pounds per week.
My original goal was 165, but I'm now planning on 156. I have lost about 125 pounds, and have about 31 pounds to 156, or 22 pounds to the original 165 goal. My lifetime peak weight was 328 fully dressed on a friend's bathroom scale.
Cubit
Chris - 04 Mar 2005 16:02 GMT Wow! You're looking great!
Chris 262/130s/130s
Ignoramus17955 - 04 Mar 2005 16:02 GMT > Two pounds per week, that is. > [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > > Current photo: http://techmart.com/~cubit/Cubit187.jpg You look about 15 years younger.
If I remember your height correctly, your goal weight is quite sensible. Congratulations!
 Signature 223/173.2/180
JennA - 04 Mar 2005 16:23 GMT > Two pounds per week, that is. > > [insert evil maniacal laughter] WTG Cubit!
Jenn
Heidi - 04 Mar 2005 16:30 GMT Great progress!!
Heidi
> Two pounds per week, that is. > [quoted text clipped - 15 lines] > > Cubit Julie - 04 Mar 2005 16:36 GMT > Two pounds per week, that is. > [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > > Cubit You look like a different person! I like your new glasses better too :)
Congratulations, Julie
Roger Zoul - 04 Mar 2005 16:38 GMT Good job.
Don't stop lifting.
> Two pounds per week, that is. > [quoted text clipped - 16 lines] > > Cubit JJ - 04 Mar 2005 16:59 GMT > My original goal was 165, but I'm now planning on 156. I > have lost [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > fully dressed > on a friend's bathroom scale. Good job Cubit.
I can't recall if you have been doing any lifting. If not, I think it will help you overall (it certainly has helped my wife and I.) If so, keep it up.
Have a great weekend.
 Signature JJ. 275/180/180 - as of February 18, 2004 (adjusted target weight) Atkins since Sep 1, 2003 http://f2.pg.photos.yahoo.com/ph/jjsmythe/my_photos
Polar Light - 04 Mar 2005 17:24 GMT Did you also lose 2.14 yrs per week? You look like you did! :-)
> Two pounds per week, that is. > [quoted text clipped - 16 lines] > > Cubit janice - 04 Mar 2005 18:10 GMT >Two pounds per week, that is. > [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] >165 goal. My lifetime peak weight was 328 fully dressed on a friend's >bathroom scale. Congratulations on your progress Cubit - you look great!
janice
Chris Smolinski - 04 Mar 2005 18:11 GMT > Two pounds per week, that is. > [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] > 165 goal. My lifetime peak weight was 328 fully dressed on a friend's > bathroom scale. Excellent! One question, what is your height?
 Signature --- Chris Smolinski Black Cat Systems http://www.blackcatsystems.com
Cubit - 04 Mar 2005 18:40 GMT > In article <Gt%Vd.11382$Pz7.5822@newssvr13.news.prodigy.com>,
> Excellent! One question, what is your height? 5' 8"
Chris Smolinski - 05 Mar 2005 00:34 GMT > > In article <Gt%Vd.11382$Pz7.5822@newssvr13.news.prodigy.com>, > > > Excellent! One question, what is your height? > > 5' 8" Interesting, same height as me. My original goal was 175 pounds (starting weight 248), but I've revised that downwards to 165, as I'm at 177 now and there's no way 2 more pounds is going to make enough of a difference ;-)
It will be interesting to see how I feel at 165. How did you select 156?
 Signature --- Chris Smolinski Black Cat Systems http://www.blackcatsystems.com
Cubit - 05 Mar 2005 01:16 GMT > How did you select 156? My doctor suggested it, and it sounded like a good number. I can remember being around that weight when I was about 20.
I have read in CRON groups that the best life expectancy is with a weight at a BMI of 18. However, in our obese society men who are too slim look like they are ill.
I suspect that my lower belly bulge will be hard to remove. There might be a case for dropping to around 137 to presumably remove the bulge, and then regaining weight back up to around 156 to look healthy.
Time will tell.
Chris Smolinski - 05 Mar 2005 12:56 GMT > > How did you select 156? > > My doctor suggested it, and it sounded like a good number. I can remember > being around that weight when I was about 20. I can't even remember when I was around 177 ;-) I would have to guess sometime in high school. I was extremely thin up until around 7th grade, when we moved to Maryland from western New York, into a much more rural area with fewer kids to play with. I imagine the decrease in activity led to the weight gain. Plus an increase in eating. My mom says she can remember when I wouldn't come home for lunch because I was too busy playing outside. Surprisingly, I am actually finding that happening today. Well, not the playing outside part, but too busy doing something, and then not realizing until 2 or 3 in the afternoon that I'm hungry. It's nice to let my stomach set mealtime, not the clock.
> I have read in CRON groups that the best life expectancy is with a weight at > a BMI of 18. However, in our obese society men who are too slim look like > they are ill. Life expectancy was one of the major reasons I decided to lose weight, and re-start loosing weight after I let my loss lapse. I just keep reminding myself that there are extremely few fat old people. (Old meaning > 90 years old) You don't seem to make it much past your 60s being overweight, if that far. I think that genetics may set a maximum age you can obtain, but what you do to your body can take years off that.
> I suspect that my lower belly bulge will be hard to remove. There might be > a case for dropping to around 137 to presumably remove the bulge, and then > regaining weight back up to around 156 to look healthy. That's an interesting idea. You don't think maintaining around 156 would *slowly* cause loss of the belly? I'm having a difficult time visualizing myself at 156, let alone 137. I'm at the point now where I am only thinking ahead around 10 more pounds of loss at a time. It's entirely possible I'll have to end up around 156 as well. When I started at 248, I figured 175 would have to be thin enough. Now I realize 2 more pounds is not going to remove the belly, as well fat from the other areas where too much remains.
 Signature --- Chris Smolinski Black Cat Systems http://www.blackcatsystems.com
Nicky - 05 Mar 2005 20:08 GMT > I suspect that my lower belly bulge will be hard to remove. There might > be > a case for dropping to around 137 to presumably remove the bulge, and then > regaining weight back up to around 156 to look healthy. Problem is, wouldn't your belly just come back first? Or not go away even at the low weight, so you're a stick insect with a belly?
Nicky (who's also got a belly that won't go away : (
 Signature A1c 10.5/4.5/<6 Weight 95/77/72Kg 1g Metformin, 87.5ug Thyroxine T2 DX 05/2004
Cubit - 05 Mar 2005 20:43 GMT I don't know. Can you describe what you have tried, that failed, so far?
> > I suspect that my lower belly bulge will be hard to remove. There might > > be [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > > Nicky (who's also got a belly that won't go away : ( Roger Zoul - 05 Mar 2005 23:04 GMT > I don't know. Can you describe what you have tried, that failed, so > far? You can minimize the problem via proper weight training and bulking/cutting phases.
>> > I suspect that my lower belly bulge will be hard to remove. There >> > might be [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] >> 1g Metformin, 87.5ug Thyroxine >> T2 DX 05/2004 Nicky - 05 Mar 2005 23:13 GMT >> I don't know. Can you describe what you have tried, that failed, so >> far? > > You can minimize the problem via proper weight training and > bulking/cutting > phases. Could you expand a bit, Roger?
Nicky.
 Signature A1c 10.5/4.5/<6 Weight 95/77/72Kg 1g Metformin, 87.5ug Thyroxine T2 DX 05/2004
Roger Zoul - 05 Mar 2005 23:36 GMT >>> I don't know. Can you describe what you have tried, that failed, so >>> far? [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > > Could you expand a bit, Roger? Sure. With a proper weight training routine and a diet designed to put weight on, you can cause the gain of muscle and fat, with the focus on maximizing muscle mass and minimal fat gain. But you will gain some fat. After a while, you switch your focus. You keep training with weights but your goal is now to lose fat (maximize fat loss) while keeping muscle (minimize muscle loss). So you now must restrict calories (LC is good for that) Yeah, you may lose a bit of muscle, but you won't lose all of your muscle gains (unless you employ a retarded training protocal) but you will lose the fat. Hence, the overall weight gain over time will be muscle, not fat. Thus, no big belly. It is the type of routine commonly employed by bodybuilders, but without the extremes they apply (you don't get nearly as big, no drugs, no insane eating, etc.).
Nicky - 06 Mar 2005 11:19 GMT >>>> I don't know. Can you describe what you have tried, that failed, so >>>> far? [quoted text clipped - 19 lines] > bodybuilders, but without the extremes they apply (you don't get nearly as > big, no drugs, no insane eating, etc.). Got you - thanks.
Nicky.
 Signature A1c 10.5/4.5/<6 Weight 95/77/72Kg 1g Metformin, 87.5ug Thyroxine T2 DX 05/2004
Ruzinthra the Ruki - 06 Mar 2005 02:31 GMT <snip>
>Could you expand a bit, Roger? if he ate a lot of carbs, most likely. :| (bad joke of the evening.)
david
Roger Zoul - 06 Mar 2005 03:13 GMT > <snip> >>Could you expand a bit, Roger? [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > > david
:) Nicky - 05 Mar 2005 23:04 GMT >> > I suspect that my lower belly bulge will be hard to remove. There >> > might [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] >> >> Nicky (who's also got a belly that won't go away : (
>I don't know. Can you describe what you have tried, that failed, so far? Well, I haven't got down to goal weight yet - I'm 5' 7", and goal will be a BMI of 25. There's about 10lb still to go. I now have slim everything except this belly - I've dropped 10 clothes sizes up top, but my waist is still over the obesity limit at 90cm. I weight train 3 nights a week at the moment, with 3 nights cardio (salsa dancing is a new thing : ) plus walking 10,000 steps, and the weight is still going down - but not off my waist! I know adipose tissue is a particular problem for diabetics, although my blood work suggests that's pretty well under control; I'm beginning to think I'm going to have to put up with looking 8 months pregnant... OTOH, maybe a bit of patience would work wonders, never my strong suit... I also think I need one more hike in my thyroxine levels to get to my optimum level, which may also help.
Nicky.
 Signature A1c 10.5/4.5/<6 Weight 95/77/72Kg 1g Metformin, 87.5ug Thyroxine T2 DX 05/2004
JC Der Koenig - 05 Mar 2005 23:10 GMT Start thinking about a BMI of 20 if you want to lose the gut.
Of course you'll have to eat less.
 Signature You take stupid to a new level. -- MFW
>>> > I suspect that my lower belly bulge will be hard to remove. There >>> > might [quoted text clipped - 26 lines] > > Nicky. Carol Frilegh - 05 Mar 2005 01:23 GMT > My original goal was 175 pounds > (starting weight 248), but I've revised that downwards to 165, as I'm at > 177 now and there's no way 2 more pounds is going to make enough of a > difference ;-) Chris, in helping yourself you devised Diet Sleuth, something simple and useful to help others. I tried Fitday for a short time and beat a path back to Diet Sleuth because it is not obsessive or complicated.
It is nice to have had even a slight connection with someone for so many years on the Internet as see how they helped countless others. I believe DS has been my weight loss buddy since 1996. Have you made it available for the PC yet?
Diva,,
Diet Sleuth nutrition tracking software for Macintosh used nearly nine years No $$ interest http://www.blackcatsystems.com
Chris Smolinski - 05 Mar 2005 12:38 GMT > > My original goal was 175 pounds > > (starting weight 248), but I've revised that downwards to 165, as I'm at [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > and useful to help others. I tried Fitday for a short time and beat a > path back to Diet Sleuth because it is not obsessive or complicated. Hi Carol,
Thanks for the kind words. Diet Sleuth actually started as a program for my wife, who wanted something easy to use.
> It is nice to have had even a slight connection with someone for so > many years on the Internet as see how they helped countless others. > I believe DS has been my weight loss buddy since 1996. > Have you made it available for the PC yet? Hmm, 1996 sounds about right. Yes, there is a Windows version available now.
> Diva,, > > Diet Sleuth nutrition tracking software for Macintosh used nearly nine > years > No $$ interest > http://www.blackcatsystems.com
 Signature --- Chris Smolinski Black Cat Systems http://www.blackcatsystems.com
Mogget - 05 Mar 2005 18:57 GMT >Chris, in helping yourself you devised Diet Sleuth, something simple >and useful to help others. I tried Fitday for a short time and beat a >path back to Diet Sleuth because it is not obsessive or complicated. Sorry to butt in here, but are you the Diva who was here years back, and was on Montignac? I'd be interested to learn how you've been getting on.
 Signature Mogget, the Churl in the Puce Greatcoat
Berna Bleeker - 04 Mar 2005 19:31 GMT Cubit schreef:
> Two pounds per week, that is. > [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > > Current photo: http://techmart.com/~cubit/Cubit187.jpg WOW Cubit, that's impressive! Way to go! :-)
Berna (101.5/75..7/~68 kg)
 Signature ( )_( ) Berna M. Bleeker-Slikker / . . \ berna.bleeker@gmail.com \ \@/ / http://www.volksliedjes.nl
SweetVenom Bob - 05 Mar 2005 07:30 GMT >Cubit schreef: >> Two pounds per week, that is. [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > >Berna (101.5/75..7/~68 kg) / Wow, I'm impressed, happy for you and a tad jealous.
SweetVenom Bob To write to me, delete OneTwoThree
Nicky - 04 Mar 2005 21:40 GMT > Two pounds per week, that is. > > [insert evil maniacal laughter] Wow, man! That is stunning!
Nicky.
 Signature A1c 10.5/4.5/<6 Weight 95/77/72Kg 1g Metformin, 87.5ug Thyroxine T2 DX 05/2004
Wysong *~ - 04 Mar 2005 23:07 GMT > Two pounds per week, that is. > [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > > Current photo: http://techmart.com/~cubit/Cubit187.jpg =========================== You look fantastic! Keep at it....
 Signature Wysong Age 60. Height 5'6" Starting date: 1/8/05 171/ 162 / 140 lb Starting date LC 7/01 at 207lbs Stopped losing on LC 11/01 at 165lbs ==========================================
marengo - 05 Mar 2005 01:40 GMT | Two pounds per week, that is. | [quoted text clipped - 15 lines] | | Cubit Great job, Cubit. You look 15 years younger now than you did before!
Congratulations.
Peter
AngieRose - 05 Mar 2005 02:41 GMT > Two pounds per week, that is. > [quoted text clipped - 16 lines] > > Cubit Cubit you look awesome good job!!! Angie
SnugBear - 05 Mar 2005 15:24 GMT > Two pounds per week, that is. > > [insert evil maniacal laughter] Aww, Cubit! You've done so well<s> Keep it up and enjoy!
 Signature Running! Laurie in Maine 207/115 New Scale Start: 2/02 Maintained since 2/03
weedram58 - 05 Mar 2005 19:07 GMT >Two pounds per week, that is. > [quoted text clipped - 15 lines] > >Cubit Awesome dedication...and tangible results. Keep it going.
Rob
VirtualGuy - 10 Mar 2005 07:53 GMT > I have lost about 125 pounds, and have about 31 pounds to > 156, or 22 pounds to the original 165 goal. My lifetime > peak weight was 328 fully dressed on a friend's bathroom > scale. [Mr. Burns Mode: ON] Excellent! :)
Cheers!
Alex
 Signature ******************************************************* VirtualGuy - Edmonton, Alberta, Canada VirtualGuy.at.shaw.dot.ca Website: http://members.shaw.ca/virtualguy *******************************************************
marengo - 11 Mar 2005 04:35 GMT | > I have lost about 125 pounds, and have about 31 pounds to | > 156, or 22 pounds to the original 165 goal. My lifetime [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] | | Alex Hey Alex, the lasst pic ion your website is from 2000 .. how about an updated one! We want jpegs to see your success!
Peter
| ******************************************************* | VirtualGuy - Edmonton, Alberta, Canada | VirtualGuy.at.shaw.dot.ca | Website: http://members.shaw.ca/virtualguy | ******************************************************* VirtualGuy - 11 Mar 2005 11:58 GMT > Hey Alex, the lasst pic ion your website is from 2000 .. > how about an updated one! We want jpegs to see your > success! Peter:
Unfortunately, there is no success to report or show. In fact, I actually went backwards and regained all of my lost weight and then some over the past 4+ years. So, if you want to see where I stand, have a look at the July 1998 photo when I was at around 458 lbs. Blect! :(
Cheers!
Alex
 Signature ******************************************************* VirtualGuy - Edmonton, Alberta, Canada VirtualGuy.at.shaw.dot.ca Website: http://members.shaw.ca/virtualguy *******************************************************
sammy010580 - 11 Mar 2005 12:18 GMT Well Done!
Im totally amazed at the photos, they are very impressive.
Can you tell me by how much you decreased your food consumption by eac week. And how much are you consuming now??
I'm very interesting, because I have tried everything, I weigh abou 210 lbs and my target weight is about 150lb, and the no-weightloss i incredibly depressing.
I would appreciate your help/advise very much.
Cheers,
Sam
Cubit Wrote:
> Two pounds per week, that is. > [quoted text clipped - 18 lines] > > Cubi -- sammy010580
|
|
|