Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsGeneral TopicsLow CarbWeightWatchers
WeightAdviser.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Weight Loss Forum / General Topics / November 2003

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

unsweetened chocolate

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Ignoramus28586 - 08 Nov 2003 22:51 GMT
Thanks to Crafting Mom and jmk for suggesting that I try unsweetened
chocolate "baking squares". I bought them at a big supermarket and
they are exactly what I was looking for. Pure chocolate without
sweeteners. The taste is absolutely not sweet but very chocolatey. It
is basically a very low carb but high calorie food.

After 5 months with no chocolate whatsoever, being able to eat good
stuff is refreshing.

i
223/176/180
rosie read and post - 08 Nov 2003 22:55 GMT
am i to believe that you are not using ANY sweetener with BAKERS
chocolate?

Signature

read and post daily, it works!
rosie

the bumper sticker... is secular America's Book of Proverbs.
.................................... john shea

> Thanks to Crafting Mom and jmk for suggesting that I try unsweetened
> chocolate "baking squares". I bought them at a big supermarket and
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> i
> 223/176/180
Crafting Mom - 08 Nov 2003 23:10 GMT
>am i to believe that you are not using ANY sweetener with BAKERS
>chocolate?

It's not impossible.
I like the taste of pure, bitter chocolate with *no* sweetener of any
kind.
cm
Signature

Drop everything and do it my way :)

George - 09 Nov 2003 00:22 GMT
>>am i to believe that you are not using ANY sweetener with BAKERS
>>chocolate?
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>kind.
>cm

I used to sneak some out of the pantry when I was a kid. Good stuff.

Cynthia
262/234.0/200 first goal
Ignoramus28586 - 09 Nov 2003 00:46 GMT
> am i to believe that you are not using ANY sweetener with BAKERS
> chocolate?

When I ate it, I just ate the square, without adding any
sweeteners. There is no sweetener in it, according to the taste and
the list of ingredients. Ingredients are chocolate and "milk solids".

It did not have any sweetness in its taste.

i
223/176/180
MH - 09 Nov 2003 00:58 GMT
> am i to believe that you are not using ANY sweetener with BAKERS
> chocolate?

Even if it is not sweetened, if there are any milk solids it has a bit of
sugar in it.

Martha
Crafting Mom - 09 Nov 2003 01:07 GMT
>> am i to believe that you are not using ANY sweetener with BAKERS
>> chocolate?
>>
>Even if it is not sweetened, if there are any milk solids it has a bit of
>sugar in it.

The kind I buy has no milk solids.

Signature

Drop everything and do it my way :)

Ignoramus28586 - 09 Nov 2003 01:17 GMT
>>> am i to believe that you are not using ANY sweetener with BAKERS
>>> chocolate?
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> The kind I buy has no milk solids.

The nutrition facts on my squares say that in a 16 gram half square,
there are 4 grams of carbs, out of which there are 2 grams of fiber,
and 0 grams "sugars". That refers to all sugars and not just
sucrose. I think that the milk solids are some milk components needed
to bind the chocolate, since regular dehydrated milk does contain a
lot of "sugars" (in form of lactopse and not sucrose).

i
223/176/180
MH - 09 Nov 2003 01:45 GMT
> >> am i to believe that you are not using ANY sweetener with BAKERS
> >> chocolate?
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> The kind I buy has no milk solids.

I like sugar a little sweetened, like semisweet or Mexican style, which has
a bit of spice to it.

Martha
Crafting Mom - 08 Nov 2003 23:02 GMT
>Thanks to Crafting Mom and jmk for suggesting that I try unsweetened
>chocolate "baking squares". I bought them at a big supermarket and
>they are exactly what I was looking for. Pure chocolate without
>sweeteners. The taste is absolutely not sweet but very chocolatey. It
>is basically a very low carb but high calorie food.

Very nice!  I find that a half a square (or less) satisfies me because
it contains far *more* chocolate in it than say, in a whole milk
chocolate bar.  So, by comparison, it's much lower calorie when you
compare chocolate content :)

cm
Signature

Drop everything and do it my way :)

Ignoramus28586 - 09 Nov 2003 00:47 GMT
>>Thanks to Crafting Mom and jmk for suggesting that I try unsweetened
>>chocolate "baking squares". I bought them at a big supermarket and
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> cm

but itis much more calorically rich *per ounce of weight*. Sugar is 4
calories per gram, fat is 9 calories per gram.

i
Crafting Mom - 09 Nov 2003 01:11 GMT
>>>Thanks to Crafting Mom and jmk for suggesting that I try unsweetened
>>>chocolate "baking squares". I bought them at a big supermarket and
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>but itis much more calorically rich *per ounce of weight*. Sugar is 4
>calories per gram, fat is 9 calories per gram.

What I am saying though, is a half ounce of pure bitter chocolate has
far less calories than a "chocolate bar".  You get your "chocolate fix",
but with less of the calories.  Yes, it's a lot of calories if you eat a
lot of it, but because it's pure chocolate, you don't *need* a whole lot
of it.

One OUNCE of pure baking chocolate (without "milk solids" - just the
pure chocolate) has 178 calories, 141 of which come from fat.

But still, like I said, eating a HALF ounce, which I do, is 89 calories.
MORE chocolate than is contained in a 300 calorie chocolate bar.

cm
Signature

Drop everything and do it my way :)

Ignoramus28586 - 09 Nov 2003 01:37 GMT
> What I am saying though, is a half ounce of pure bitter chocolate has
> far less calories than a "chocolate bar".  You get your "chocolate fix",
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> But still, like I said, eating a HALF ounce, which I do, is 89 calories.
> MORE chocolate than is contained in a 300 calorie chocolate bar.

Right. I was thinking about the same thing today, after eating a
square of that chocolate. I realized that a little bit of pure food,
unspoiled and unaltered by food additives (such as sugar), satisfies a
craving and does not leave you craving more.

That made me reflect on my weight maintenance. I try to eat not too
prepared food. Raw vegetables, meat, soup, that sort of thing. Very
little commercial and overprepared food, although I eat some at
times. And what I realized today is that, for the last month, more or
less, my appetite matches what I should eat to maintain my
weight. That I am not left wanting to eat much more. (it was not the
case in the first month). And perhaps a big reason for it is that I
eat pure foods and nutrients, largely, without commercial additives
making you want to eat more and more.

It is just a personal anecdote, but I find that so far it works for
me.

I agree with you that I also would need to eat lots more sweetened
chocolate to make me feel satisfied.

i
223/176/180
Crafting Mom - 09 Nov 2003 01:44 GMT
>eat pure foods and nutrients, largely, without commercial additives
>making you want to eat more and more.

I completely agree.
The cleaner the diet, without all the embellishments, the less I find
myself with an addictive response.

I do like to season food and cook it, but only with "real ingredients".
cm
Signature

Drop everything and do it my way :)

Ignoramus28586 - 09 Nov 2003 02:19 GMT
>>eat pure foods and nutrients, largely, without commercial additives
>>making you want to eat more and more.
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> I do like to season food and cook it, but only with "real ingredients".
> cm

Very good.

i
Jarkat2002 - 08 Nov 2003 23:04 GMT
>Thanks to Crafting Mom and jmk for suggesting that I try unsweetened
>chocolate "baking squares". I bought them at a big supermarket and
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>i
>223/176/180

Do you drink coffee?  put a 1/4 oz in the bottom of your mug and pour coffee
over :)
It's a great way to start the day!
~Kat

"Rice Krispies.  East meets west"  
Cosmo Kramer
Crafting Mom - 08 Nov 2003 23:35 GMT
>Do you drink coffee?  put a 1/4 oz in the bottom of your mug and pour coffee
>over :)
>It's a great way to start the day!

I really enjoy coffee that way.
To those who are baffled by the idea of people liking bitter chocolate,
compare it to people who like their coffee black.

Some people like their chocolate "black".  Now, it's not the way I
prefer it, but I do like it.
cm
Signature

Drop everything and do it my way :)

George - 09 Nov 2003 00:23 GMT
>>Do you drink coffee?  put a 1/4 oz in the bottom of your mug and pour coffee
>>over :)
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>prefer it, but I do like it.
>cm

Dark, dark chocolate rocks. Black coffee isn't bad either!

Cynthia
262/234.0/200 first goal
Ignoramus28586 - 09 Nov 2003 00:48 GMT
>>Thanks to Crafting Mom and jmk for suggesting that I try unsweetened
>>chocolate "baking squares". I bought them at a big supermarket and
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> over :)
> It's a great way to start the day!

I do not drink coffee, not much anyway. If I am really falling asleep
at work, I might drink a few ounces, but that's it. I have some
history of hypertension and would not want to get into coffee. I may
try your suggestion with hot milk instead of coffee. Obviously the
possibilities are pretty endless.

i
Jarkat2002 - 09 Nov 2003 02:52 GMT
>I do not drink coffee, not much anyway. If I am really falling asleep
>at work, I might drink a few ounces, but that's it. I have some
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
>i

You know there is caffene in chocolat right?  

~Kat

"Rice Krispies.  East meets west"  
Cosmo Kramer
Ignoramus28586 - 09 Nov 2003 03:03 GMT
>>I do not drink coffee, not much anyway. If I am really falling asleep
>>at work, I might drink a few ounces, but that's it. I have some
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> You know there is caffene in chocolat right?  

Good point.

Yes, there is caffeine there also, but it seems to be less of it there
than in coffee.

i
Jarkat2002 - 09 Nov 2003 03:08 GMT
>> You know there is caffene in chocolat right?  
>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
>i

OK, just wanted to make sure.  If you are caffeine sensitive than it may be an
issue.  I would think that the density of bakers chocolate would be cause to
assume there would be more caffeine per oz than regular chocolate.
However, I'm not really sure and it's only a guess.

~Kat

"Rice Krispies.  East meets west"  
Cosmo Kramer
Ignoramus28586 - 09 Nov 2003 03:15 GMT
>>> You know there is caffene in chocolat right?  
>>
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> assume there would be more caffeine per oz than regular chocolate.
> However, I'm not really sure and it's only a guess.

I tried drinking a cup of coffee once and felt very bad. Since then I
try to drink only tiny amounts of it and only when necessary.

i

> ~Kat
>
> "Rice Krispies.  East meets west"  
> Cosmo Kramer
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2012 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.