Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsGeneral TopicsLow CarbWeightWatchers
WeightAdviser.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Weight Loss Forum / General Topics / March 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Excercise without eating

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Joker - 07 Mar 2005 23:14 GMT
I tried the cardio without eating in the morning and it does help make a
difference.  I was wondering though about weight training.  I do an
alternating strength day with cardio, so should I eat on the lifting days?

Signature

Joker
226/222/195
You have to be very careful when you do a Google search for "vacuum
enthusiast"

Jim Waggener - 07 Mar 2005 23:36 GMT
>I tried the cardio without eating in the morning and it does help make a
>difference.  I was wondering though about weight training.  I do an
>alternating strength day with cardio, so should I eat on the lifting days?

Why would you not eat?  Your body is going to store fat instead of losing .
Eat every day.
Joker - 08 Mar 2005 14:35 GMT
JW> "Joker" <post_master@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
JW> news:Jf5Xd.1852$WK2.1005@newssvr30.news.prodigy.com...
>>I tried the cardio without eating in the morning and it does help make
>>a difference.  I was wondering though about weight training.  I do an
>>alternating strength day with cardio, so should I eat on the lifting
>>days?

JW> Why would you not eat?  Your body is going to store fat instead of
JW> losing .
JW> Eat every day.

JW> ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet
JW> News==----
JW> http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
JW> 120,000+ Newsgroups
JW> ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via
JW> Encryption =----

Sorry for the confusion.  What I meant was that I eat breakfast after I work
out.  I have seen it pointed out in a few places that doing cardio before
you eat helps burn more fat.  I am trying to determine if the same is true
of lifting weights.

Signature

Joker
226/222/195
You have to be very careful when you do a Google search for "vacuum
enthusiast"

BCJ - 08 Mar 2005 02:08 GMT
There is some phenomenon I read that if you delay eating 30-60 mins after
cardio your fat burn will be higher. The cardio sucks all the glucose out of
your blood so to replenish it it has to go to the fat stores. But if you
immediately eat after cardio, it will replenish the blood glucose from the
food.

On the other hand bodybuilders, who have low body fat, like to eat simple
carbs after a work-out to replenish their blood glucose so the body doesn't
start breaking down muscle to get glucose.

These ideas are out of a bodybuilding book I have.
Dr_Dickie - 08 Mar 2005 12:51 GMT
> There is some phenomenon I read that if you delay eating 30-60 mins after
> cardio your fat burn will be higher. The cardio sucks all the glucose out of
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> These ideas are out of a bodybuilding book I have.

While this may be true, it is irrelevant. The bottom line is at the end of
the day how many calories in and how many calories out.  Deplete glycogen,
burn fat to replace, eat fat and it is stored to replace fat lost. Burn fat
in place of glycogen, and when you eat carbs, they will go to fat
replacement.
For weight lifting, there is evidence that carbs & protein before and after
can make a difference in muscle built; HOW MUCH a difference, I doubt it is
relevant to all but the most anal and dedicated bodybuilder or weight
lifter.  Life is too short to sweat the small stuff (unless you enjoy that
sort of thing--I do in many cases, gives me the allusion of control ;-). If
cause you to worry, then it is not worth it IMHO.

--
Dr. Dickie
Skepticult member in good standing #394-00596-438
Poking kooks with a pointy stick
BCJ - 08 Mar 2005 14:31 GMT
>While this may be true, it is irrelevant. The bottom line is at the end of
the day how many calories in and how many calories out.

Oh I completely agree. I didn't 'get' this until a few years ago. I used to
eat tons of healthy food like wholegrain bread and cereals. Good food but I
was eating too much to lower my body fat.
Dr_Dickie - 08 Mar 2005 15:53 GMT
> >While this may be true, it is irrelevant. The bottom line is at the end of
> the day how many calories in and how many calories out.
>
> Oh I completely agree. I didn't 'get' this until a few years ago. I used to
> eat tons of healthy food like wholegrain bread and cereals. Good food but I
> was eating too much to lower my body fat.

You hit the nail on the head as to why the "fat is bad" craze failed.
"I can't be gaining weight, this is low fat!!!"
Problem was, the food industry exchanged sugar for fat, and in some cases
the calories went up!
Now having said that, the added (usually omega 6) fats into most processed
food really was bad in the quantities that folks were getting them, but for
weight loss, nothing beats a real education (and in nutrition, that is
HARD). There is a lot of myths and a whole lot of pseudo-science involved in
the nutrition--and especially weight loss--business. And things that are
hard, just do not compute with the great masses. It has to be single
syllable simple for most to even attempt it, and so it goes ;-(

Signature

Dr. Dickie
Skepticult member in good standing #394-00596-438
Poking kooks with a pointy stick

Joker - 08 Mar 2005 14:39 GMT
DD> "BCJ" <bjoh2004@yahoo.com.au> wrote in message
DD> news:SO7Xd.188040$K7.60183@news-server.bigpond.net.au...
>> There is some phenomenon I read that if you delay eating 30-60 mins
>> after
>> cardio your fat burn will be higher. The cardio sucks all the glucose
>> out
DD> of
>> your blood so to replenish it it has to go to the fat stores. But if
>> you
>> immediately eat after cardio, it will replenish the blood glucose from
>> the
>> food.

>> On the other hand bodybuilders, who have low body fat, like to eat
>> simple
>> carbs after a work-out to replenish their blood glucose so the body
DD> doesn't
>> start breaking down muscle to get glucose.

>> These ideas are out of a bodybuilding book I have.

DD> While this may be true, it is irrelevant. The bottom line is at the
DD> end of
DD> the day how many calories in and how many calories out.  Deplete
DD> glycogen,
DD> burn fat to replace, eat fat and it is stored to replace fat lost.
DD> Burn fat
DD> in place of glycogen, and when you eat carbs, they will go to fat
DD> replacement.
DD> For weight lifting, there is evidence that carbs & protein before
DD> and after
DD> can make a difference in muscle built; HOW MUCH a difference, I
DD> doubt it is
DD> relevant to all but the most anal and dedicated bodybuilder or
DD> weight
DD> lifter.  Life is too short to sweat the small stuff (unless you
DD> enjoy that
DD> sort of thing--I do in many cases, gives me the allusion of control
DD> ;-). If
DD> cause you to worry, then it is not worth it IMHO.

DD>  --
DD> Dr. Dickie
DD> Skepticult member in good standing #394-00596-438
DD> Poking kooks with a pointy stick

I think there has been some evidence as to when you eat in relationship to
when you work out you get a higher caloric burn.  In the case of cardio
before breakfast, you have been fasting for 8-12 hours, so you are burning
the most readily available calories, your fat stores.  I think some of the
muscle is burned too, but that is why I lift weights three times a week.

Signature

Joker
226/222/195
You have to be very careful when you do a Google search for "vacuum
enthusiast"

Mike Turco - 08 Mar 2005 04:04 GMT
>I tried the cardio without eating in the morning and it does help make a
>difference.  I was wondering though about weight training.  I do an
>alternating strength day with cardio, so should I eat on the lifting days?

For better feedback I suggest you clarify the schedule. Do you mean that you
do cardio before breakfast and then don't eat until lunch? Or are you
talking about only eating every other day? -- Mike
Joker - 08 Mar 2005 14:34 GMT
MT> "Joker" <post_master@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
MT> news:Jf5Xd.1852$WK2.1005@newssvr30.news.prodigy.com...
>>I tried the cardio without eating in the morning and it does help make
>>a difference.  I was wondering though about weight training.  I do an
>>alternating strength day with cardio, so should I eat on the lifting
>>days?

MT> For better feedback I suggest you clarify the schedule. Do you mean
MT> that you
MT> do cardio before breakfast and then don't eat until lunch? Or are
MT> you
MT> talking about only eating every other day? -- Mike

Sorry for the confusion.  What I meant was that I eat breakfast after I work
out.  I have seen it pointed out in a few places that doing cardio before
you eat helps burn more fat.  I am trying to determine if the same is true
of lifting weights.

Signature

Joker
226/222/195
You have to be very careful when you do a Google search for "vacuum
enthusiast"

Ignoramus2605 - 08 Mar 2005 14:39 GMT
My own opinion is that this is a valid question, but the difference
that eating before/after workout would make is rather minimal. How
much is eaten during the day and just what are the exercises, is much
more important. Personally, I do not bother timing eating with
exercise.

Signature

223/173.2/180

Joker - 08 Mar 2005 14:45 GMT
I> My own opinion is that this is a valid question, but the difference
I> that eating before/after workout would make is rather minimal. How
I> much is eaten during the day and just what are the exercises, is much
I> more important. Personally, I do not bother timing eating with
I> exercise.

I> --
I> 223/173.2/180

I would have thought the same thing, but I got results quickly.  It may just
be the change shook up my work out enough to make it "new" again, but I lost
almost an inch between 1-2 weeks.  (I don't measure all that often, so I
don't know exactly when it happened.

Signature

Joker
226/222/195
You have to be very careful when you do a Google search for "vacuum
enthusiast"

Chris Braun - 08 Mar 2005 22:23 GMT
>Sorry for the confusion.  What I meant was that I eat breakfast after I work
>out.  I have seen it pointed out in a few places that doing cardio before
>you eat helps burn more fat.  I am trying to determine if the same is true
>of lifting weights.

I don't know.  If so, I'm sure the difference would be minimal.  But
the advantage to weightlifting from the calorie-burning perspective is
primarily the metabolic increase that results from added muscle,
rather than the calories burned during lifting.  So I'd go with
whatever best supports your performance when you lift.  For me, I lift
better when I've had something to eat first.

I question the premise about doing cardio on an empty stomach, by the
way.  But I don't have any definitive information one way or the
other.  For cardio too, I just do what works best for me, which is to
eat something modest-sized and carby an hour or two beforehand.

Chris
262/130s/130s
started dieting July 2002, maintaining since June 2004
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2012 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.