Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsGeneral TopicsLow CarbWeightWatchers
WeightAdviser.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Weight Loss Forum / General Topics / March 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Report: Obesity will reverse life expectancy gains

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Cathy - 17 Mar 2005 03:41 GMT
CHICAGO, Illinois (AP) -- U.S. life expectancy will fall dramatically in
coming years because of obesity, a startling shift in a long-running trend
toward longer lives, researchers contend in a report published Thursday.

By their calculations -- disputed by skeptics as shaky and overly dire --
within 50 years obesity likely will shorten the average life span of 77.6
years by at least two to five years. That's more than the impact of cancer
or heart disease, said lead author S. Jay Olshansky, a longevity researcher
at the University of Illinois at Chicago.

This would reverse the mostly steady increase in American life expectancy
that has occurred in the past two centuries and would have tremendous
social and economic consequences that could even inadvertently help "save"
Social Security, Olshansky and colleagues contend.

"We think today's younger generation will have shorter and less healthy
lives than their parents for the first time in modern history unless we
intervene," Olshansky said.

Already, the alarming rise in childhood obesity is fueling a new trend that
has shaved four to nine months off the average U.S. life span, the
researchers say.

With obesity affecting at least 15 percent of U.S. school-age children,
"it's not pie in the sky," Olshansky said. "The children who are extremely
obese are already here."

The report appears in the New England Journal of Medicine. In an
accompanying editorial, University of Pennsylvania demography expert Samuel
H. Preston calls the projections "excessively gloomy."

Opposing forecasts, projecting a continued increase in U.S. longevity,
assume that obesity will continue to worsen, but also account for medical
advances, Preston said.

Still, failure to curb obesity "could impede the improvements in longevity
that are otherwise in store," he said. Americans' current life expectancy
already trails more than 20 other developed countries.

Dr. David Ludwig of Children's Hospital Boston, a study co-author, cited
sobering obesity statistics:

Two-thirds of U.S. adults are overweight or obese; one-third of adults
qualify as obese.

Up to 30 percent of U.S. children are overweight, and childhood obesity has
more than doubled in the past 25 years.

Childhood diabetes has increased 10-fold in the past 20 years.
"It's one thing for an adult of 45 or 55 to develop type 2 diabetes and
then experience the life-threatening complications of that -- kidney
failure, heart attack, stroke -- in their late 50s or 60s. But for a
4-year-old or 6-year-old who's obese to develop Type 2 diabetes at 14 or
16" raises the possibility of devastating complications before reaching age
30, Ludwig said. "It's really a staggering prospect."

While national attention is starting to focus on contributors to obesity,
including the prevalence of fast-food, soft drinks in schools and cuts in
physical education classes, "what we presently lack is a clear,
comprehensive national vision for addressing the obesity epidemic," Ludwig
said.

The calculations are a stark contrast with Social Security Administration
forecasts for slow improvement in life expectancy, and with projections
publicized in 2002 that said the maximum human life span will reach 100 in
about six decades. In an interview, Olshansky said he hoped the new
research would play a role in the current discussion about overhauling
Social Security.

Critic calls report 'very one-sided'
James Vaupel, director of the Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research
in Rostock, Germany, and a research scientist at Duke University,
co-authored the 2002 forecast, based on data from developed nations
including the United States.

Vaupel called the new report "very one-sided" and said he doubts that
obesity will negate the effects of other medical progress in improving
mortality.

Emory University health policy expert Dr. Kenneth Thorpe said that while
obesity is clearly damaging public health and driving up health care
spending, rising rates aren't enough to resolve Social Security's woes.
"That's too simplistic," he said.

Other life expectancy forecasts rely on past mortality trends; the
Olshansky group used obesity prevalence data and previously published
estimates of years of life lost from obesity.

They calculated in reverse, assessing the fall in death rates that would
occur if all obese Americans had a normal weight. Their estimate shows
that, if not for obesity, life expectancy at birth should be four to nine
months higher than the record 77.6 years announced by the government last
month. That slight gain translates into a loss that will worsen if current
trends continue, the researchers said.

Richard Suzman, a researcher at the National Institute on Aging, which
helped fund the study, said the projections are "possible, but I would say
unlikely." He said the best approach is to estimate life expectancy using
historical trends.

The Center for Consumer Freedom, an advocacy group for the restaurant and
food industry, which argues the obesity problem has been exaggerated, said
the paper should be discredited because co-author David Allison has done
consulting for makers of weight-loss products.

Allison, a biostatistician at the University of Alabama at Birmingham,
noted that the journal mentions his financial ties. While the study methods
are partly based on assumptions, they are also sound, Allison said.

Obesity researcher Dr. JoAnn Manson said she agrees with the paper's
message, if not the methods.

"The calculations that were made may not be perfect," but the emphasis on
obesity's dangers "should serve as a wake-up call for policy makers and the
public health community," said Manson, chief of preventive medicine at
Harvard's Brigham and Women's Hospital.

U.S. Sen. Tom Harkin said Wednesday that the report supports his efforts to
have government regulation of junk food marketing to children.

If the dim life expectancy forecast doesn't demonstrate a need for action,
"I don't know what will," the Iowa Democrat said.
Mary_Gordon@tvo.org - 17 Mar 2005 17:41 GMT
I don't know why there is such a kerfuffle over this one - the paper
was full of related hot debates this morning occasioned by this
research.

We all know that being obese will shorten our lives. Its no different
than being a smoker - it's self imposed, it's hard to kick but no one
can do it but us, and it results in all kinds of health complications
that can make us miserable or kill us.

Why would we be surprised that on the aggregate level a lot of us
getting fatter (which we already knew) means a shorter average
lifespan?

I think we think modern medicine will somehow save us from ourselves,
so we don't have to take responsibility for our own health...like, I'll
just lie around like a sloth for 60 years eating cheetos and then
expect the doctor to be able to reverse the damage of all those years
of neglect and abuse so I can live to be 90.  

Mary G.
Rod Speed - 17 Mar 2005 19:07 GMT
>I don't know why there is such a kerfuffle over this one

Basically because they overstated the case.

> - the paper was full of related hot debates
> this morning occasioned by this research.

The controversy wasnt about the research, it was about the wild
prediction made, that we would see life national expectancys drop.

THAT hasnt actually been seen in a single modern first world country.

> We all know that being obese will shorten our lives. Its no
> different than being a smoker - it's self imposed, it's hard
> to kick but no one can do it but us, and it results in all kinds
> of health complications that can make us miserable or kill us.

Yes, but its quite a separate matter whether that will actually
see a drop in the NATIONAL LIFE EXPECTANCY STATS.

Its more likely it will just see a drop in the rate of increase instead.

> Why would we be surprised that on the aggregate level a lot of us
> getting fatter (which we already knew) means a shorter average lifespan?

Because average lifespans have kept increasing as well for other reasons.

> I think we think modern medicine will somehow save us from
> ourselves, so we don't have to take responsibility for our own health...
> like, I'll just lie around like a sloth for 60 years eating cheetos and
> then expect the doctor to be able to reverse the damage of all
> those years of neglect and abuse so I can live to be 90.

Its much more complicated than that.

And some essentially if unconsciously decide that they'd rather
have 60 years as a glutton rather than 90 years of eating lettuce.

I dont actually know what I would do if I was told that
I had to stop eating the stuff I like to eat, to potentially
get a few more years of 'life'. I'd likely tell them to get
stuffed if that involved eating say just lettuce etc.

In fact I know I could get a longer life by
starving myself and I choose not to do that.

And I am right in the middle of the ideal BMI.
samfroe@aol.com - 17 Mar 2005 19:13 GMT
Obesity could help keep Social Security solvent


UPI
03/17/05 7:34 AM PT

Obesity could help keep Social Security solvent because people will die younger.
"One of the consequences of our prediction is that Social Security does not
appear to be in nearly as bad a shape as we think," said study author S. Jay
Olshansky.

Upgrade your old office equipment today with HP technology and reap the
benefits. Trade in your old desktops, laptops and servers for leading-edge HP
technology and get great offers, such as money back and free shipping. HP will
even pick up your old equipment and deliver the new. Click here to increase your
business productivity.

University of Illinois at Chicago researchers Wednesday reported the rise in
obesity will result in a drop in life expectancy.

Professor S. Jay Olshansky's team, writing in the March 17 issue of the New
England Journal of Medicine, said obesity currently reduces life expectancy by
four to nine months.

The researchers said the life-span effects of obesity could rise two to five
years in the next 50 years, possibly exceeding the current life-shortening
effects of cancer or heart disease.

Most life-span forecasts are based on historical trends, which the researchers
said fail to consider the obesity epidemic.Scientists Say Life Expectancy To
Drop


UPI
03/17/05 7:34 AM PT

Obesity could help keep Social Security solvent because people will die younger.
"One of the consequences of our prediction is that Social Security does not
appear to be in nearly as bad a shape as we think," said study author S. Jay
Olshansky.

Upgrade your old office equipment today with HP technology and reap the
benefits. Trade in your old desktops, laptops and servers for leading-edge HP
technology and get great offers, such as money back and free shipping. HP will
even pick up your old equipment and deliver the new. Click here to increase your
business productivity.

University of Illinois at Chicago researchers Wednesday reported the rise in
obesity will result in a drop in life expectancy.

Professor S. Jay Olshansky's team, writing in the March 17 issue of the New
England Journal of Medicine, said obesity currently reduces life expectancy by
four to nine months.

The researchers said the life-span effects of obesity could rise two to five
years in the next 50 years, possibly exceeding the current life-shortening
effects of cancer or heart disease.

Most life-span forecasts are based on historical trends, which the researchers
said fail to consider the obesity epidemic.

They noted obesity actually could help keep Social Security solvent because
people will die younger.

"One of the consequences of our prediction is that Social Security does not
appear to be in nearly as bad a shape as we think," Olshansky said.

"The obese may be inadvertently 'saving' Social Security, but the obese
themselves and the healthcare  system that cares for them will pay a very heavy
price in terms of higher death rates and escalating healthcare costs."

They noted obesity actually could help keep Social Security solvent because
people will die younger.

"One of the consequences of our prediction is that Social Security does not
appear to be in nearly as bad a shape as we think," Olshansky said.

"The obese may be inadvertently 'saving' Social Security, but the obese
themselves and the healthcare  system that cares for them will pay a very heavy
price in terms of higher death rates and escalating healthcare costs."

>>I don't know why there is such a kerfuffle over this one
>
[quoted text clipped - 43 lines]
>
>And I am right in the middle of the ideal BMI.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2012 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.