http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk_news/story/0,3604,1439381,00.html
Felicity Lawrence, consumer affairs correspondent
Thursday March 17, 2005
Guardian
The Atkins low-carb diet appeared to be suffering from a hypoglycaemic
crash yesterday as it emerged that Atkins Nutritionals UK, the company
that sells its diet products in the UK, was about to call in the
administrators.
Jeremy Willmont from the chartered accountants Moore Stephens
confirmed that the company was taking steps to go into liquidation
following poor sales.
More than 30 million people around the world are thought to have
followed the diet devised by the US doctor Robert Atkins, which
depends on cutting out food high in refined carbohydrates and sugars
such as bread, potatoes, cereals, and instead eating a high-protein,
high-fat diet based on meat, eggs, butter and cheese.
The regime spawned a new industry, with celebrities endorsing the
effects of the low-carb diet. Sales of cereals, breads and potatoes
fell.
The Atkins name was then used to market low-carb versions of the
processed foods that the diet recommended cutting out, and a range of
cereals and snacks was launched in the UK. Leading manufacturers also
rushed products to the market to take advantage of the craze as their
own diet products were hit.
But in the fickle world of dieting, the fad has moved on. The focus
now is on the glycaemic index of foods - the rate at which they are
broken down into glucose in the blood. The GI index, originally used
by doctors to help people with diabetes regulate their diets, formed
part of the Atkins theory, but rivals said its interpretation was too
harsh to follow.
A report by market research firm Mintel last October highlighted the
high dropout rate. James McCoy, a consumer analyst at Mintel, said:
"While many customers may have been attracted to the promise of rapid
weight loss, they appear to have found it a difficult diet to stick to
in the long term."
Dr Atkins' diet suffered a blow to its image when a medical report
showed that he was fat when he died. Nutritionists also attacked it,
saying a diet high in fat and protein and low in antioxidants from
fruit and vegetables could lead to long-term ill health, including
heart disease. Followers admitted to bad breath and headaches.
Industry experts said that while the original diet was very popular,
the diet products never were.
"Once they started trying to flog their own products, consumers asked
whether it was a money-making machine rather than a proper diet," Sian
Harrington of the food trade magazine the Grocer said.
Marengo - 19 Mar 2005 16:57 GMT
|| http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk_news/story/0,3604,1439381,00.html
|| Dr Atkins' diet suffered a blow to its image when a medical report
|| showed that he was fat when he died.
Why do you post this slanted crap?

Signature
Peter
Website: http://users.thelink.net/marengo
Polar Light - 19 Mar 2005 17:15 GMT
> || http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk_news/story/0,3604,1439381,00.html
>
> || Dr Atkins' diet suffered a blow to its image when a medical report
> || showed that he was fat when he died.
>
> Why do you post this slanted crap?
Igor didn't make up the phrase above out of the blue, it was part of an
article in The Guardian, a well known London paper. You may wish to contact
the editors to find out more about the said report. Having said that, is it
really important whether the poor guy who's resting in peace was fat or not?
The Atkins diet may work very well for some people but Dr Atkins wasn't
'God' and his diet is not the answer to everybody's weight problem, as the
article very clearly states.
Marengo - 20 Mar 2005 04:22 GMT
||| Ignoramus27209 wrote:
||||| http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk_news/story/0,3604,1439381,00.html
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
|| answer to everybody's weight problem, as the article very clearly
|| states.
Whether Dr. Atkins was "God" or not, or whether is diet is the answer to
everybody's weight problem is not the issue. The point is that this article
is filled with misinformation, innuenedo, bias and outright lies.

Signature
Peter
Website: http://users.thelink.net/marengo
Polar Light - 20 Mar 2005 11:35 GMT
> http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk_news/story/0,3604,1439381,00.html
[SNIP]
> Whether Dr. Atkins was "God" or not, or whether is diet is the answer to
> everybody's weight problem is not the issue. The point is that this
> article
> is filled with misinformation, innuenedo, bias and outright lies.
119 Farringdon Road, London EC1R 3ER
Tel 0207 278 2332 Fax 0207 837 2114
...where you can enquire about their sources of information & express your
concerns.
Doug Freyburger - 20 Mar 2005 00:48 GMT
Ignoramus27209 quoted:
> http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk_news/story/0,3604,1439381,00.html
...
> Dr Atkins' diet suffered a blow to its image when a medical report
> showed that he was fat when he died.
Nice to see they need to resort to outright and easily
identified lies to make their statement. The day Dr A
hit his head on the ice he was in the 190s, and for his
height that might even be below his ideal weight by a
few pounds. THose liars can't even tell water bloat
from fat.
Ignoramus3417 - 20 Mar 2005 01:21 GMT
> Ignoramus27209 quoted:
>>
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> few pounds. THose liars can't even tell water bloat
> from fat.
Normally, journalists are relatively ignorant about the facts that
they are writing about. I would not necessarily suspect a malicious
intent.

Signature
223/173.3/180
Doug Freyburger - 20 Mar 2005 01:01 GMT
Ignoramus27209 quoted:
> http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk_news/story/0,3604,1439381,00.html
>
> The Atkins low-carb diet appeared to be suffering from a hypoglycaemic
> crash yesterday as it emerged that Atkins Nutritionals UK, the company
> that sells its diet products in the UK, was about to call in the
> administrators.
In another post I compalined asbout the lie that Dr
A was fat when he died. In this one I chuckle that
a company selling what can easily be called chemical
junk claimed to be selling Atkins food. Dr A stressed
eating veggies and meat more than he stressed eating
treats, and he stressed natural far more than he
stressed chemical.
> The Atkins name was then used to market low-carb versions of the
> processed foods that the diet recommended cutting out
I bet broccoli is still doing well, though. Is'nt
broccoli some sort of miracle food? It's endorsed
by every type of loss plan I can think of. Low carb,
low fat, low calorie, paleolithic, you name it.
Mitch Stevens - 20 Mar 2005 02:19 GMT
Well said! It's 'The Food!'
Mitch
> Ignoramus27209 quoted:
> >
[quoted text clipped - 22 lines]
> by every type of loss plan I can think of. Low carb,
> low fat, low calorie, paleolithic, you name it.
coff - 20 Mar 2005 14:29 GMT
> http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk_news/story/0,3604,1439381,00.html
>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> part of the Atkins theory, but rivals said its interpretation was too
> harsh to follow.
Any diet, including Atkins or simply low carb, will be a fad for many
who simply wish to lose lots of weight before their wedding, high
school reunion, etc. I cautiously predict any diet known to man will
have it's time in the sun, and will wane, being held in esteem by it's
most ardent followers.
> Industry experts said that while the original diet was very popular,
> the diet products never were.
>
> "Once they started trying to flog their own products, consumers asked
> whether it was a money-making machine rather than a proper diet," Sian
> Harrington of the food trade magazine the Grocer said.
Quoting a food retailer trade magazine about the retail qualities of
the Atkins products seems appropriate. Having a food retailer trade
magazine comment on the diet itself seems slightly out of their league
and a little self-motivated.
Coff
325/276.5/185
jbuch - 20 Mar 2005 16:31 GMT
> The Atkins name was then used to market low-carb versions of the
> processed foods that the diet recommended cutting out, and a range of
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> part of the Atkins theory, but rivals said its interpretation was too
> harsh to follow.
In retrospect, yes, new diets nearly always go from incubation to
glorious fashionalble peak and then decline.
The Atkins diet is a terrible choice for women or men who need to lose
"those 5 to 10 pounds" of excess.
But, those wanting to lose "those 5 to 10 pounds" of excess aren't
interested in the reality of losing the weight and keeping it off, only
the losing of the weight.
I have met a number of "low carb idiots" in the last six months.
They have steak and eggs for breakfast, skip lunch, munch on candy bars
when hunger urges strike, and then eat a "Weightwatcher" type dinner.
They never read a book or pamphlet on the nature of the low carb dietary
way, just improvising it from word of mouth, newspaper clips, and
whatever they feel like making up.
Often, they wouldn't know a carbohydrate from a crayon.
This seems like one of many good definitions of a "low carb idiot".
Gloria - 20 Mar 2005 21:25 GMT
I'm just wanting to say that I'm BACK to Atkins (the induction) as I
was eating carbs and GAINING weight plus FEELING like crap. I chose to
kind of ignore the things which you had told me (getting carbs out of my
diet) until I WOKE up !
Now I'm feeling so well.I'm keeping the carbs at bay .
glo
Willow Darcy Shaw - 25 Mar 2005 18:59 GMT
Sounds like you are back on track Glo! Good for you!
Willow
----------------------------------------------------------
Willow Darcy Shaw from Atlantic Canada
Current Loss: -22 lbs
Mini Goal: lose 25 lbs by 1st week May
Ultimate Goal: lose 70 lbs
> I'm just wanting to say that I'm BACK to Atkins (the induction) as I
> was eating carbs and GAINING weight plus FEELING like crap. I chose to
> kind of ignore the things which you had told me (getting carbs out of my
> diet) until I WOKE up !
> Now I'm feeling so well.I'm keeping the carbs at bay .
> glo