> However... I can't really find any good, scientific support for
> detoxification.
> Just wondered what you guys think here. Is it just a bunch of
> new-age hooey, or is there really something to this 'detox' thing?
>> Wow - I didn't realize that there were so many 'detox'
>> (detoxification) diets out there.
>
>So you don't read about many diets than. Even most
>that don't discuss the issue have features of it.
I try to keep up. I knew there were out there. Just not so many
(until I checked it out via Amazon, etc.)
>> However... I can't really find any good, scientific support for
>> detoxification.
>
>Every report that identifies a cause for cancer,
>a problem from a chemical and so on, you've missed
>all of them?
Umm... so if I go on a 'detox' diet there would be no need for me to
stop smoking... worry about too much sun exposore.... or any genetic
predisposition to various cancers?
>> Just wondered what you guys think here. Is it just a bunch of
>> new-age hooey, or is there really something to this 'detox' thing?
>
>Fewer chemicals, more veggies and fruits and such.
>Any plan like that is detox to some extent.
One interesting piece of info I can across is that generally, fruits
and veggies have more toxics and most meats, etc.
>> Anyone doing a 'detox-type diet'?
>
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>foods. Hard to argue with it once you've reduced it
>down to veggies-good hard-to-prnoun-chemicals-bad.
Well - I was talking more to diets to claim 'detox' as one of their
key components... I wouldn't really say that Atkins induction, eating
organically necessarily fit that bill. Specifically, I was looking at
diets that use water fasting, fruit fasting, and juicing with the
reasoning that this doesn't put much load on the 'digestive system',
giving it the time, energy, etc that it needs to 'detoxify'
>Whether the body build toxicity and stores it in fat,
>I think that's more a matter of perpective and how you
>define your words.
I think that part is unquestionable (some toxics are certainly stored
in body fat). The real question to my mind is whether any special
process is required to removes these toxins (such as fasting) or
whether the body does just as good a job operating under 'normal'
(non-fasting) conditions...
Doug Freyburger - 22 Mar 2005 22:31 GMT
> > > However... I can't really find any good,
> > > scientific support for detoxification.
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> stop smoking... worry about too much sun exposore.... or any genetic
> predisposition to various cancers?
Chuckle. There's a joke that folks in certain
nations consider tobacco to be a vegitable. So
starting to smoke would be a toxification diet.
Given that extremely stretched definition,
quiting smoking would be detoxification. I
don't think doing a detox in one item justifies
doing a tox in another item.
> > > Just wondered what you guys think here.
> > > Is it just a bunch of new-age hooey, or is
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> that generally, fruits and veggies have more toxics
> and most meats, etc.
That's why organic foods are becoming popular in
markets. More and more folks think of that topic.
> > > Anyone doing a 'detox-type diet'?
>
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> say that Atkins induction, eating organically
> necessarily fit that bill.
Induction is explicitly an unbalanced detox from
previously unbalanced high carb eating patterns. This
view appeared in the 1972, 1993 and 1999 editions.
> Specifically, I was looking at diets that use water
> fasting, fruit fasting, and juicing with the
> reasoning that this doesn't put much load on the
> 'digestive system', giving it the time, energy, etc
> that it needs to 'detoxify'
There are more extreme ones than Induction, to be
sure. Like Induction they tend to be short term.
> > Whether the body build toxicity and stores it in fat,
> > I think that's more a matter of perpective and how you
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> or whether the body does just as good a job
> operating under 'normal' (non-fasting) conditions...
Depends on how you view it. To some extent modern
foods supposedly block the body's natural removal.
So a detox plan could be anywhere from removing the
blocking foods through replacing blocking foods with
ones that support the natural removal. That
supposedly is in there because I'm doubious about
the definitions. Excess sugar intake for decades
can trigger hyer-insulin and eventually burn out
the pancreas and turn a person diabetic. Does that
make sugar "toxic"? Sorta.
Just how toxic is whatever gets stored in excess
body fat? I don't know. I do know that when folks
who have a lot to lose change their foods and start
dropping rapidly (whatever plan they use to do so)
bizzare symptoms appear and then go away again.
Folks tend to say this is from release of toxins.
Maybe. Whatever causes the trend, it is wierd but
predictable.
So back to detox plans - They tend to be short term.
I worry a lot more about falling completely off plan
and regaining than I do about short term stuff. As
long as you do short term stuff within a long term
framework, great stuff. If you hope that a single
shot anything will solve a long term problem, it
won't no matter what it is. Processes that have
detox in their names very often only last a couple of
weeks. Treat one as a bootcamp to start a long term
plan and I'll cheer. Treat one as a magic bullet,
and I'll sigh.