Limiting Carbs Results in Greater Weight Loss
Reuters Health
Monday, March 21, 2005
NEW YORK (Reuters Health) - Obese women who follow low-carbohydrate
diets, such as the Atkins diet, may lose more weight in a four-month
period than those who go on low-fat diets, new study findings show. The
reason for the greater weight loss, however, is not clear.
"The differential weight loss is not explained by differences in
resting energy expenditure, thermic effect of food or physical
activity," write study author Dr. Bonnie J. Brehm, of the University of
Cincinnati, Ohio and her team.
In a previously published study, Brehm and her colleagues compared the
effects of a low-carbohydrate diet versus a low-fat diet among obese
women. They found that the women on the low-carbohydrate diet lost more
than twice as much weight as those in the comparison group during a
six-month study period.
The researchers hypothesized that the greater weight loss among those
on the low-carbohydrate diet was due to the women's greater energy
expenditure. "If it's not calories in, it must be calories out," Brehm
told Reuters Health.
Some advocates of low-carbohydrate diets say that such diets promote
increased energy expenditure, but this claim has not been formally
tested, until now.
To investigate, Brehm and her team randomly assigned 50 moderately
obese women to a low-carbohydrate diet group or a low-fat diet group.
Only the low-fat group was told to restrict their caloric intake. Forty
women completed the study.
By the end of the four-month study, women in both groups had lost
weight and body fat, the researchers report in this month's issue of
the Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism. However, the
low-carbohydrate group lost more than 10 percent of their body weight,
while the low-fat group lost about 7 percent.
Specifically, the low-carbohydrate group lost 9.8 kilograms (21.6
pounds) of weight and 6.2 kilograms (13.7 pounds) of body fat, while
the low-fat group lost about 6.1 kilograms (13 pounds) of weight and
3.2 kilograms (7 pounds) of body fat, the report indicates.
To estimate their level of physical activity, women in both groups were
fitted with pedometers, which recorded the number of steps they took
daily. At the start of the study, both groups of women had similar
pedometer readings, and by the end of the study, there were no
significant changes, according to Brehm and her team.
Resting energy expenditure was also similar between the two groups at
the start of the study and remained comparable four months later.
The thermic effect of food (TEF), which comprises up to 10 percent of
the amount of energy consumed daily, includes the energy expended
during digestion. When the investigators obtained TEF measurements
after the women ate breakfasts containing a similar number of calories,
they found that those on the low-fat diet expended more energy in a
five-hour period.
This suggests that the low-fat meal was absorbed more quickly than the
low-carbohydrate meal, the report indicates. Yet, even if the TEF of
the low-carbohydrate meal had been underestimated, the researchers
"would not have approached the amount of energy needed to account for
the greater weight loss in this group," they write.
"These results confirm that short-term weight loss is greater in obese
women on a low-carbohydrate diet than in those on a low-fat diet even
when reported food intake is similar," according to Brehm and her team.
SOURCE: Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism, March 2005
Mirek Fidler - 23 Mar 2005 22:40 GMT
> This suggests that the low-fat meal was absorbed more quickly than the
> low-carbohydrate meal, the report indicates. Yet, even if the TEF of
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> women on a low-carbohydrate diet than in those on a low-fat diet even
> when reported food intake is similar," according to Brehm and her team.
Hm, I wonder when somebody finally will get his "hands dirty" and try to
measure how much of that fat is left unabsorbed...
Mirek
Cubit - 24 Mar 2005 19:53 GMT
I read somewhere that the body has a maximum amount of fat that it will
absorb in a day and rest gets dumped. I have also read that a human has
near 100% efficiency in extracting calories regardless. Also, in another
context, I have read claims that attempting to use laxatives to reduce
calorie absorption fails to stop the efficient absorption of calories.
Your suggestion is logical. Poop analysis is needed.
I have not noted any evidence of a change in my end product from high fat
days. Although there is a limit to my increasing fat, since food becomes
repulsive at some point. It may be that one stops gorging on fat before the
level is high enough to cause undigested elimination.
> > This suggests that the low-fat meal was absorbed more quickly than the
> > low-carbohydrate meal, the report indicates. Yet, even if the TEF of
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>
> Mirek
Mirek Fidler - 25 Mar 2005 10:52 GMT
> Your suggestion is logical. Poop analysis is needed.
>
> I have not noted any evidence of a change in my end product from high fat
> days. Although there is a limit to my increasing fat, since food becomes
Hm, my experience is that a lot of fat has slight laxative effect.
Especially when combined with a lot of fiber.
OTOH, IME protein is constipating.
Mirek
Marengo - 27 Mar 2005 08:06 GMT
|| Hm, my experience is that a lot of fat has slight laxative effect.
|| Especially when combined with a lot of fiber.
|| Mirek
I agree. Many years ago when I was a small kid our country family doctor
used to prescribe two heaping tablespoons of butter by mouth every 1/2 hour
for constipation. And it always worked!

Signature
Peter
Website: http://users.thelink.net/marengo
Ozgirl - 27 Mar 2005 08:53 GMT
>|| Hm, my experience is that a lot of fat has slight laxative effect.
>|| Especially when combined with a lot of fiber.
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> I agree. Many years ago when I was a small kid our country family
> doctor used to prescribe two heaping tablespoons of butter
by mouth
> every 1/2 hour for constipation. And it always worked!
OMG!! I would have vomited big time.
Lady Veteran - 27 Mar 2005 20:28 GMT
>|| Hm, my experience is that a lot of fat has slight laxative
>|| effect. Especially when combined with a lot of fiber.
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>doctor used to prescribe two heaping tablespoons of butter by mouth
>every 1/2 hour for constipation. And it always worked!
Yes, there are many ways to get rid of idiots.
LV
- ------------------------------------------------------
I rode a tank and held a General's rank
When the blitzkrieg raged and the bodies stank
- - - - Rolling Stones - Sympathy for the Devil
- ----------------------------------------
Today's mighty oak is yesterdays nut that held its ground.
- - -unknown
- ----------------------------------------
Yes, I have let myself go...Now I'm Free!!!
- - - unknown
- ----------------------------------------
If you are reading this, it means the idiot
who started this thread posted in soc.support.fat-acceptance
or soc.singles and I flamed his a.s. I consider the idiots I
flame a waste of humanity and deserving of ill
treatment. If you don't like it, that is just too bad.
Remove those two groups from your reply and you won't hear
from me.
- ----------------------------------------
Wordsmith - 23 Mar 2005 23:26 GMT