Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsGeneral TopicsLow CarbWeightWatchers
WeightAdviser.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Weight Loss Forum / General Topics / March 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Turkey hamburger

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Lori - 25 Mar 2005 01:43 GMT
> I am wondering... are turkey hamburger better for your diet compared to
> beef
> hamburger? Please help!
Jim Waggener - 25 Mar 2005 02:32 GMT
>> I am wondering... are turkey hamburger better for your diet compared to
>> beef
>> hamburger? Please help!

It is leaner..just about zero fat. So yes, it is better than even lean
hamburger.
joni - 26 Mar 2005 22:49 GMT
> >> I am wondering... are turkey hamburger better for your diet
> >> compared to beef hamburger? Please help!
>
> It is leaner..just about zero fat. So yes, it is better than
> even lean hamburger.

Zero fat!? In a turkey burger? Are you kidding? Some have 10x what very
lean (97%) hamburger meat has. Dont kid yourself, it really depends on
the maker of the turkey burger. Many, if not most, use the dark fatty
cheaper meat instead of the turkey breast which is the leanest. So
check your labels!! http://tinyurl.com/7xlyq
Note on that link the turkey burgers range in fat content from 1gram to
65grams! Ouch!

Now if you want absolutely no fat in a burger try the brands Boca
Burger or Morningstar Farms or Garden Burgers made from ground soy.
They come in all different flavors (onion,garlic,etc) and are quite
tasty. http://www.bocaburger.com 

<<joni>>
Andy - 27 Mar 2005 00:50 GMT
"joni" <jgrrl2@yahoo.com> wrote in news:1111873787.744429.185220
@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com:

> Now if you want absolutely no fat in a burger try the brands Boca
> Burger or Morningstar Farms or Garden Burgers made from ground soy.
> They come in all different flavors (onion,garlic,etc) and are quite
> tasty.

You know, you can reach a point in dieting where the real thing every so
often is actually better (safer!) than the dietic alternative, depending
on how much processing/poison goes into each.

For example, a margerine company's studies don't show that margarine is
better for you than butter taking the additives into consideration. But
they don't care about your diet at large anyway, they make fat!

You get the idea.

Andy

Signature

"If you can't do it naturally, then fake it."
- Alfred Hitchcock
 Spoken to Ingrid Bergman

Ignoramus29808 - 27 Mar 2005 05:43 GMT
I find this discussion about how lean turkey meat is better because it
has no fat, to be somewhat amusing to me personally. If I ate
hamburgers, I would choose the fattiest hamburger, eat the meat and
skip the bun. The exact opposite of preferring the lean turkey
hamburger.

i
still not dead from heart attack
Signature

223/173.3/180

Polar Light - 27 Mar 2005 09:24 GMT
>I find this discussion about how lean turkey meat is better because it
> has no fat, to be somewhat amusing to me personally. If I ate
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> i
> still not dead from heart attack

I'd be looking at the fat content too, not because I'm afraid of a heart
attack but because fat has over twice as many cals as P & C and generally
does not provide any nutritional value, just extra empty cals to contend
with, the exception being EFAs but you don't find them in burgers of any
kind. Buns are not good for losing weight either, only empty cals & there
are more wortwhile starchy things around.

You sound like a LCer, I believe in trying everything & have tried LC too on
several occasions but have found it's just not for me after a few unpleasant
experiences. As they all say, YMMV.
Chris Braun - 27 Mar 2005 13:54 GMT
>>I find this discussion about how lean turkey meat is better because it
>> has no fat, to be somewhat amusing to me personally. If I ate
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>several occasions but have found it's just not for me after a few unpleasant
>experiences. As they all say, YMMV.

I also watch fat only because it adds unneeded calories, not because
I'm a low-fat dieter per se.  I also find that too much dietary fat,
for me, leads to gastric upset, and besides I don't like the mouth
feel of really greasy food.  And I enjoy my burgers more in a bun or
English muffin.

I don't see any point in being "amused" by other people's food
choices.  It sounds kind of patronizing.

Chris
262/130s/130s
started dieting July 2002, maintaining since June 2004
Polar Light - 27 Mar 2005 19:57 GMT
>>>I find this discussion about how lean turkey meat is better because it
>>> has no fat, to be somewhat amusing to me personally. If I ate
[quoted text clipped - 23 lines]
> feel of really greasy food.  And I enjoy my burgers more in a bun or
> English muffin.

I don't like the taste of grease either & if I was going to make a high fat
choice I'd go for something like some full fat cheese, oil-based salad
dressings, pesto sauce with olive oil & pine nuts, cashew nuts... fatty meat
is certainly not near the top of the list...

> I don't see any point in being "amused" by other people's food
> choices.  It sounds kind of patronizing.

> Chris

Agreed 100%, there are many WOEs & we all know they're all different, not to
mention individual tastes in food.
> 262/130s/130s
> started dieting July 2002, maintaining since June 2004
Nunya B. - 27 Mar 2005 18:42 GMT
>>I find this discussion about how lean turkey meat is better because it
>> has no fat, to be somewhat amusing to me personally. If I ate
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
> on several occasions but have found it's just not for me after a few
> unpleasant experiences. As they all say, YMMV.

My DH loves hamburgers.  Over time he has stopped eating the buns (saving a
few empty cals) and because he only eats one 4 oz patty at a time I get the
97% lean meat that I grind myself.  I like turkey burgers - I load them with
chopped veggies - but I do grind them myself from turkey breast to insure
there's no skin or added fat.  I can then choose the fat I add, like
avocado, which is healthier than the saturated fat in beef.

Signature

the volleyballchick

Andy - 27 Mar 2005 21:06 GMT
>>>I find this discussion about how lean turkey meat is better because
>>>it
[quoted text clipped - 25 lines]
> can then choose the fat I add, like avocado, which is healthier than
> the saturated fat in beef.

From GuinnessWorldRecords.com:

Most Nutritive Fruit
An analysis of 38 fruits commonly eaten raw (as opposed to dried) shows
the avocado (Persea americana) has the highest calorific value, with 163
kilocalories per edible 100 g. (741 kcal./lb.).

Avocado is good fat, but a lot of it!

Andy

Signature

"If you can't do it naturally, then fake it."
- Alfred Hitchcock
 Spoken to Ingrid Bergman

P.S. Least nutritive fruit: cucumber --A

Nunya B. - 27 Mar 2005 21:32 GMT
>>>>I find this discussion about how lean turkey meat is better because
>>>>it
[quoted text clipped - 34 lines]
>
> Avocado is good fat, but a lot of it!

a little goes a long way...

Signature

the volleyballchick

Chris Braun - 27 Mar 2005 02:58 GMT
>Zero fat!? In a turkey burger? Are you kidding? Some have 10x what very
>lean (97%) hamburger meat has. Dont kid yourself, it really depends on
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>Note on that link the turkey burgers range in fat content from 1gram to
>65grams! Ouch!

I noticed the zero fat comment too and meant to question it.  But I
don't understand about the 65 gram version.  I didn't follow all of
the links to see which one that was, but I'm sure it's a complete
sandwich with lots of other fattening stuff in it like cheese and
mayonnaise, not just the turkey patty.  65 grams of fat would be 585
calories just in fat -- more than any kind of meat patty would have.  

The turkey burgers I eat are pre-made -- a brand called Jennie-O.
Each has 160 calories and 9g of fat (and 0g carbs, 19g protein).
Those made of just turkey breast, as you note, are lower in fat, but
can be kind of dry.

>Now if you want absolutely no fat in a burger try the brands Boca
>Burger or Morningstar Farms or Garden Burgers made from ground soy.
>They come in all different flavors (onion,garlic,etc) and are quite
>tasty. http://www.bocaburger.com 

I think most soy-based burgers that I've bought have a little fat.
The Gardenburger Flame Grilled Burgers that I have in my freezer have
120 calories and 4g fat (and 7g carbs, 14g protein).  For a low-carber
(which I'm not) this would perhaps be a less favorable choice than the
turkey burger.  I eat both, myself.

Chris
262/130s/130s
started dieting July 2002, maintaining since June 2004
Lori - 27 Mar 2005 14:17 GMT
Alrighty... Thanks for all the ideas... gives me some idea to think about.
Sure will be a change for me as I've always had meat. But then I can always
learn to like them if I'm determined.. I had turkey burger before and they
are not all that bad at all.
Lori

>>Zero fat!? In a turkey burger? Are you kidding? Some have 10x what very
>>lean (97%) hamburger meat has. Dont kid yourself, it really depends on
[quoted text clipped - 30 lines]
> 262/130s/130s
> started dieting July 2002, maintaining since June 2004
Nunya B. - 27 Mar 2005 18:47 GMT
> Alrighty... Thanks for all the ideas... gives me some idea to think about.
> Sure will be a change for me as I've always had meat. But then I can
> always learn to like them if I'm determined.. I had turkey burger before
> and they are not all that bad at all.
> Lori

Turkey burgers have an advantage in that in general turkey is a lightly
flavored meat.  This means you can enhance the flavor with fresh herbs or
finely chopped vegetables mixed into the meat.  I use a food processor to
grind turkey breast and will occasionally throw in some freshly roasted red
pepper, cilantro, and cumin to make a southwestern style turkey burger.

Signature

the volleyballchick

Ignoramus5106 - 25 Mar 2005 03:06 GMT
>> I am wondering... are turkey hamburger better for your diet
>> compared to beef hamburger? Please help!

It depends on what food offers the most satiety per given number of
calories.

Signature

223/173.3/180

Dr_Dickie - 30 Mar 2005 14:35 GMT
> > I am wondering... are turkey hamburger better for your diet compared to
> > beef
> > hamburger? Please help!

Turkey is generally very low in fat (I love the stuff), that makes is
generally pound for pound lower in calories.  So, if you are looking for
calorie restriction, and want to keep some bulk to your food, substituting
turkey is not bad.  Note that fat is not bad for you (although I agree that
with the way they feed animals today their fat profile tends to be heavier
in the low chain saturated fats and even more trans fats--both not the best
fats for you cholesterol levels); even so, moderation covers a multitude of
sins.
Many people find greater satiety in fat (note: this is the miracle of the
Atkins diet--self control of calories; Atkins was not correct in whole lot
of what he believed, but he did accidentally stumble into a diet that had
been used for years by epileptics and does help a lot of people).
In the end it is your call, it really depends on what the rest of your diet
is, and how the turkey burger will impact your calories overall (how's that
for a definitive answer ;-)

Signature

Dr. Dickie
Skepticult member in good standing #394-00596-438
Poking kooks with a pointy stick.
"The most exciting phrase to hear in science, the one that heralds new
discoveries,
is not 'Eureka!' ('I found it!'), but rather 'hmm....that's funny...'"
- Isaac Asimov

avid - 30 Mar 2005 16:25 GMT
> been used for years by epileptics
Can I get some more information on this??  I have been diagnosed with
"visual" epilepsy and we haven't been able to track down what triggers it.
That's one of the motivations for my weight loss, to see if it makes a
difference.  Thanks!

Mel
eat less, move more
225/210/160

> > > I am wondering... are turkey hamburger better for your diet compared to
> > > beef
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
> is, and how the turkey burger will impact your calories overall (how's that
> for a definitive answer ;-)
Dr_Dickie - 30 Mar 2005 17:56 GMT
> > been used for years by epileptics
> Can I get some more information on this??  I have been diagnosed with
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> eat less, move more
> 225/210/160

Google Ketosis and Epilepsy
Here's a hit to get you started:
http://www.epilepsy.org.uk/info/ketogenic.html
http://serendip.brynmawr.edu/bb/neuro/neuro00/web1/Webster.html

Signature

Dr. Dickie
Skepticult member in good standing #394-00596-438
Poking kooks with a pointy stick.
"The most exciting phrase to hear in science, the one that heralds new
discoveries,
is not 'Eureka!' ('I found it!'), but rather 'hmm....that's funny...'"
- Isaac Asimov

Andy - 30 Mar 2005 18:26 GMT
> Can I get some more information on this??  I have been diagnosed with
> "visual" epilepsy and we haven't been able to track down what triggers
> it. That's one of the motivations for my weight loss, to see if it
> makes a difference.  Thanks!
>
> Mel

Mel,

I might be way off-base but my sister had something like that and
removing caffiene from her diet, coffee, sodas, etc. solved it. I forget
what she called it. It's been a decade or more.

$0.02

Andy

Signature

"If you can't do it naturally, then fake it."
- Alfred Hitchcock
 Spoken to Ingrid Bergman

Wendy - 30 Mar 2005 22:58 GMT
I am glad to hear cucumbers are at the bottom of the list......I love
cucumbers, they smell and taste delicious. Good to know I can eat them
to excess. : )

Wendy
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2012 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.