Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsGeneral TopicsLow CarbWeightWatchers
WeightAdviser.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Weight Loss Forum / General Topics / April 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Resolve to Keep Shysters from Your Diet Plans

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Sarah - 28 Apr 2005 02:51 GMT
Resolve to Keep Shysters from Your Diet Plans
By Michael Fumento

Scripps Howard News Service, January 6, 2005
Copyright 2005 Scripps Howard News Service

Last week, millions of Americans made a New Years' resolution to lose
weight. By next week, many will be falling off the wagon. They will
continue to be part of a national tragedy in which 65 percent of Americans
are overweight or obese. Medical studies keep pouring in, but they rarely
show what works – just what doesn't.

Thus a report in the January 4 Annals of Internal Medicine was slightly
more helpful than most in its evaluation of ten of the nation's most
popular weight-loss programs. It found that for nine there was either no
evidence that they worked or, indeed, evidence that they didn't. One lonely
plan, however, Weight Watchers, was somewhat effective.

Yet even the Weight Watchers results were hardly spectacular. In the single
study worth evaluating, members lost only 5 percent of their initial weight
(around 10 pounds) and kept about half that off for at least two years.

So where does a heavyweight turn? Currently-approved weight-loss drugs are
just better than nothing, though one that may be available next year
(called Acomplia) will be the best yet judging by tests so far.

Fad diets STILL don't work. It appears even the low-carb craze – sparked by
a July 2002 New York Times Magazine article by Gary Taubes that was
essentially an advertorial for Atkins – is dying. According to the research
firm NPD Group, the percent of Americans following low-carb diets like
Atkins, South Beach and The Zone fell by half just from last January to
September. The Atkins empire, a.k.a., Atkins Nutritionals, began laying off
40 percent of its employees in September.

The medical literature shows why. Short-term studies seem to vindicate
Atkins. But representative of longer ones is that which just appeared in
the January 5 Journal of the American Medical Association. It found that
half of the Atkins dieters couldn't stick with the program for 12 months.
Among those who did, although their beginning average weight was a morbidly
obese 200 pounds their loss at six months was only 13 pounds and six months
later it was merely eight pounds.
 
Some of my readers have wondered (often in nasty language) why I have been
so critical of Atkins. After all, he is rather dead. But his older books
continue to sell, and through the miracle of modern publishing he somehow
keeps producing new ones. If "The Peanut Butter Diet" (and there is such a
book) had sold more than 45 million copies as Atkins books have, I'd have
repeatedly slammed it too.

But people like fad diets because they promise magic – literally a free
lunch, at least as far as calories are concerned. How else to explain the
incredible success of diet books from gurus who are (or were when they
died) fat themselves, including Atkins, Andrew Weill, and "Dr. Phil"
McGraw? Taking weight-loss advice from these fat cats is like receiving
religious tolerance lessons from Osama bin Laden.

This year, why not resolve to try a new tack? Instead of putting so much
emphasis on input, try putting more on output. (Note to editor: Can I write
"exercise" in a family newspaper?) Consider information collected from the
National Weight Control Registry, a group of about 4,000 people who lost an
average of 60 pounds and kept off at least 30 pounds for more than six
years. They do limit their calories to about 1,800 per day, but over 90
percent also regularly exercise.
       
More weight-loss specialists also seem to be realizing the advantages of
resistance exercise – free weights or machines with steel plates, rubber
bands, or bendable plastic rods. With aerobic exercise, you burn calories
while doing it. But with resistance training you build muscle tissue that
revs up your metabolism so you burn more calories 24/7. I attribute most of
my 35-pound weight-loss (maintained for seven years) to Bowflex, though I
also bike ride about 35 miles each week and watch what I eat.

Having begun with words of discouragement, I conclude with the opposite. No
matter how often you've failed to lose weight there is no law – physical or
otherwise – saying you won't this time. If you fall off the wagon, dust
yourself off and get back on. And remember that while the growing obesity
epidemic is the concern of health experts; your concern stops at your own
waistline.
Willow - 28 Apr 2005 13:49 GMT
The success rate of Weight Watchers is most studies is based only on current
members, ignoring the life time members, 1/3 of which are at goal... and
mataining !

Not to mention that my "At Work" meetings have an average weight loss of 120
lbs in 12 weeks, and that's about 15 members... *buff nails on pyjama* Gotta
admit they have a hell of a good leader ! heheheh

But seriously, no matter how great the program, the problem remain the
same.. if you ain't working it.. it ain't gonna work for you..

I just love members who gain week after week and swear they are following
the program... and of course blame me for it..

Signature

Will~

196.2 / 131.8 / 137 lbs
89 / 59.8 / 62.1 Kg

Personal goal 125 lbs / 56.7 Kg

> Resolve to Keep Shysters from Your Diet Plans
> By Michael Fumento
[quoted text clipped - 23 lines]
>
> Fad diets STILL don't work. It appears even the low-carb craze - sparked
by
> a July 2002 New York Times Magazine article by Gary Taubes that was
> essentially an advertorial for Atkins - is dying. According to the
research
> firm NPD Group, the percent of Americans following low-carb diets like
> Atkins, South Beach and The Zone fell by half just from last January to
[quoted text clipped - 41 lines]
> Having begun with words of discouragement, I conclude with the opposite. No
> matter how often you've failed to lose weight there is no law - physical
or
> otherwise - saying you won't this time. If you fall off the wagon, dust
> yourself off and get back on. And remember that while the growing obesity
> epidemic is the concern of health experts; your concern stops at your own
> waistline.
Marengo - 28 Apr 2005 23:45 GMT
mataining !

|| Not to mention that my "At Work" meetings have an average weight
|| loss of 120 lbs in 12 weeks, and that's about 15 members...

Bullsh*t.

Do you think we are all as stupid as you are a prevaricating crossposter?
Lady Veteran - 28 Apr 2005 14:35 GMT
>Resolve to Keep Shysters from Your Diet Plans
>By Michael Fumento
I would rather keep shysters from posting to fat acceptance where
they know that diet talk is off charter.

LV

- ------------------------------------------------------
I rode a tank and held a General's rank
When the blitzkrieg raged and the bodies stank

- - - - Rolling Stones - Sympathy for the Devil
- ----------------------------------------
Today's mighty oak is yesterdays nut that held its ground.

- - -unknown
- ----------------------------------------
Yes, I have let myself go...Now I'm Free!!!

- - - unknown
- ----------------------------------------
If you are reading this in a group that is not
soc.support.fat-acceptance, soc.singles or soc.women,
it means the idiot who started this thread posted  
in your group as well as mine and I flamed his a.s.
I consider the idiots I flame a waste of humanity
and deserving  of all of the ill treatment I can
hand them. If you  don't like it, remove the groups
I use from your reply and you won't hear from me.
- ----------------------------------------
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2012 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.