Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsGeneral TopicsLow CarbWeightWatchers
WeightAdviser.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Weight Loss Forum / General Topics / November 2003

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Frustrated

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Rubystars - 14 Nov 2003 05:29 GMT
I've been trying to stay under 2,000 calories a day and I've been
walking 2 miles almost every night for the last 4 weeks or so. Do you
know where that got me? 5 pounds lost. That's it. I passed up pieces
of my sister's birthday cake, I passed up handfuls of candy I normally
would've eaten on halloween, and I've got nothing to show for it.

Why the hell do I even try? Five pounds seems like nothing when I've
got over 100 lbs. to lose.  I feel like I'm not losing anything even
after all that work.

I've been eating low calorie food and low fat food and avoiding things
I would've enjoyed. I mean I could've had deluxe macaroni and cheese
the other night when my dad had some but instead the remainder went
uneaten because I was trying hard as hell to lose weight.

When I would've normally enjoyed nachos on tortilla chips, I ate some
fat free refried beans and super lean hamburger meat and vegetables
with just a tiny bit of cheese (not the normal amount) and instead of
putting it on tortilla chips like I always enjoyed I ate my "nachos"
on lettuce.

I'm still overweight, still dog tired from that exercise and still
craving all the tasty food I have been dutifully avoiding.

I even passed up chili dogs with fritos when I really wanted some!

I've been making low fat vegetable soups and low fat/calorie recipes
with Mori Nu light tofu but apparently that wasn't good enough because
all I lost in 4 weeks of all this was 5 lbs. I'm scared that when
thanksgiving comes it'll all be erased anyway because I'll be damned
if I can't sit down and participate in a nice holiday dinner with my
family.

I wanted to lose 2 lbs. a week. Was that really too much to ask? Are
2,000 calories too many? I don't want to think of having to be hungry
all the time to lose weight. :(

-Rubystars
ultrasoni_c - 14 Nov 2003 07:52 GMT
I don't think its a good idea to lose more than 2 pounds a week. You lost 5
in 4 weeks and that is not bad at all. Sweets will make you eat more, so
avoiding them as much as possible is a good idea. Too much fat also is not
good for your general health. I would definately not give up the diet and
exercise. I've started a low-carb high-protein diet and working out
"full-time" about 6 months ago and it is now that I'm seeing some results
and believe it or not I am feeling better about myself. I dont think you
have to stick to the diet forever. When I eat that fattening meal, I make up
for it during the day, or the next day. Maybe instead of tortilla chips I
eat a tuna can or roasted chicken without skin which is a good source of
protein (I do weights as well and I find that helps me maintain my
muscle --important for my metabolism I believe). Others in this group
probably have better tips, but I'd say this the only way worth trying.

> I've been trying to stay under 2,000 calories a day and I've been
> walking 2 miles almost every night for the last 4 weeks or so. Do you
[quoted text clipped - 34 lines]
>
> -Rubystars
Jeri - 14 Nov 2003 10:11 GMT
> I've been trying to stay under 2,000 calories a day and I've been
> walking 2 miles almost every night for the last 4 weeks or so. Do you
> know where that got me? 5 pounds lost. That's it.
<snip>

> I've been eating low calorie food and low fat food and avoiding things
> I would've enjoyed. I mean I could've had deluxe macaroni and cheese
> the other night when my dad had some but instead the remainder went
> uneaten because I was trying hard as hell to lose weight.

If low fat doesn't work for you try low carb. Low fat never worked well for
me. It was always a huge struggle even with exercise.
The alt.support.diet.low-carb FAQ has short descriptions of most of the
major low carb plans.
http://www.grossweb.com/asdlc/faq.htm#2a
Signature

Jeri
265/189/120
Atkins since 11/5/01
"Whether you think you can or think you can't, you're right."

Rubystars - 14 Nov 2003 16:16 GMT
Thanks guys but no way I'm going on the low carb thing. I personally
think it's dangerous.

I guess I should be happy with what I've lost but at this rate it'll
take me a whole year to lose 52 lbs. I need to lose total, about 120
lbs to get within normal range. That's why I'm frustrated, I think.

I've tried to lose weight before and quit because it wasn't fast
enough. If I knew I could lose 2 lbs. a week, I'd feel better because
at least I'd know the first 100 lbs. would be gone in a year.

I'm going to start drinking more water. I'm thinking that will help
me. Sometimes I've had this gnawing hunger even when I eat till I'm
full lately. I think maybe it's thirst.

It's just frustrating I guess because all I want is to feel normal.
When I look in the mirror I don't even see the image I have of myself.
I feel that it's not "me" in the mirror. I remember what I used to
look like, before I gained all this weight, and that is "me." Then I
look in the mirror and see someone else, and it's hard, especially
after all that work.

-Rubystars
Ignoramus26064 - 14 Nov 2003 16:41 GMT
> Thanks guys but no way I'm going on the low carb thing. I personally
> think it's dangerous.

I also think so by the way.

You do not have to go "low carb". But some of the ideas of low carb
diets are not bad. For example, some carbs do interfere with
dieting. Sugar is one such example, if you eat sweetened foods, they
make you hungrier. Some people report same effects from bread and
potatoes.

So, even if you do not jump on the low carb bandwagon, you can borrow
some of their ideas and replace junk carbs (sugar and junk food, maybe
bread and potatoes) with low calorie vegetables and fats, maybe
vegetable fats if you like.

Do you also have high cholesterol and high BP?

> I guess I should be happy with what I've lost but at this rate it'll
> take me a whole year to lose 52 lbs. I need to lose total, about 120
> lbs to get within normal range. That's why I'm frustrated, I think.

I understand your frustration. It always seems slow in the
beginning. Think about your higher education (if you have any). Maybe
there was a point in the beginning at which graduation seemed like it
would never happen. And then you graduated and now you look back to it
and think that it was not that bad.

Or, think about a pregnancy. It seems like it would be forever until
the birth, and then voila, your kid is 3 years old and you think that
it was not that long.

> I've tried to lose weight before and quit because it wasn't fast
> enough.

Some things that I read suggest that it was just a mental excuse you
used to drop dieting and return back to overeating.

They say that willpower is unimportant in dieting. That's a
lie. Willpower, meaning sticking with something that you know is good
despite temptation, is important. The key is to use it intelligently
and not wreck your body in the process.

> If I knew I could lose 2 lbs. a week, I'd feel better because
> at least I'd know the first 100 lbs. would be gone in a year.

If you can (wrt your knees and time etc), you can walk one hour more
per day and that would equal, at your weight, about 0.8 lbs per week
extra weight loss. If, on top of that, you lift weights and do some
calisthenics (squats, bends etc) for 10 minutes per day, that would
also accelerate your weight loss due to development of muscles, which,
in turn, burn more energy even when they are at rest.

> I'm going to start drinking more water. I'm thinking that will help
> me. Sometimes I've had this gnawing hunger even when I eat till I'm
> full lately. I think maybe it's thirst.

Maybe you eat wrong food. What is your typical day's eating like?
(let's say what you ate yesterday).

> It's just frustrating I guess because all I want is to feel normal.

you have to act normal to feel normal, which means not overeat.

also, it is perfectly normal to feel slightly hungry for a good part
of the day. That's how people lived for centuries.

> When I look in the mirror I don't even see the image I have of myself.
> I feel that it's not "me" in the mirror. I remember what I used to
> look like, before I gained all this weight, and that is "me." Then I
> look in the mirror and see someone else, and it's hard, especially
> after all that work.

Unfortunately, many things in life rquire "fortitude" and "staying
power".

You complain that it is hard to exercise and eat less and that it is
frustrating. But think, hypothetically, that you reach your perfect
weight. Do you think you can go back to gorging on chili hot dogs and
whatnot? No. You will be stuck with moderating your eating and
exercising for the rest of your life.

So, if you lose weight quickly or slowly, ytou are stuck with dieting
forever.

Even if you stay fat, and drop your weight loss, you have to moderate
your eating or you will become into a whale. But when you are fat, you
have a whole bunch of problems, knees, acid reflux, laziness, bad
looks, cholesterol problems, heart problems, diabetes, hypertension,
the list is endless.

So it makes sense to make a little effort and get to a better physical
condition. Save your current photos of yourself for comparison. Go for
the really disgusting ones. If you live alone, attach one to your
refrigerator.

i
223/177/180
Wendy - 14 Nov 2003 16:26 GMT
> They say that willpower is unimportant in dieting. That's a
> lie. Willpower, meaning sticking with something that you know is good
> despite temptation, is important.

I think I'm the only one arguing against using willpower, and it's not
that it's unimportant, it's that dieting doesn't work unless you don't
need it.  You've got to decide you don't want nachos because you would
prefer to be thin, not resist the nachos that you really want.  Resisting
your own self is a futile move.  You've got to get yourself on board with
your decisions.

Jarkat just mentioned not wanting to eat cake.  Not that she RESISTED the
cake, but that she didn't WANT the cake.  Get there and you'll be
fine.  (It may take some willpower to develop some new habits along the
way, though.)

Wendy
Ignoramus26064 - 14 Nov 2003 17:47 GMT
>> They say that willpower is unimportant in dieting. That's a
>> lie. Willpower, meaning sticking with something that you know is good
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> your own self is a futile move.  You've got to get yourself on board with
> your decisions.

Sure. It is important to be on a plan where you are not miserable and
where you do not need too much willpower. But then there are
temptations everywhere. Even you complained at some point about some
difficulties dieting/exercising. And yet you stuck through
it. Willpower is needed to avoid being sidetracked.

> Jarkat just mentioned not wanting to eat cake.  Not that she RESISTED the
> cake, but that she didn't WANT the cake.  Get there and you'll be
> fine.  (It may take some willpower to develop some new habits along the
> way, though.)
>
> Wendy

Exactly. When I look at cakes etc, I do not even consider them food. I
am not hungry when I look at sawdust, and I am not much hungrier
looking at junk cakes. But, still, exercising every day, not
overeating, saying no to too much food, all requires some willpower.

i
determined - 14 Nov 2003 17:54 GMT
> > They say that willpower is unimportant in dieting. That's a
> > lie. Willpower, meaning sticking with something that you know is good
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> your own self is a futile move.  You've got to get yourself on board with
> your decisions.

I agree 100%.  When I first came here to asd several years ago, someone
quoted, "nothing tastes as good as being thin feels".  It's true.  But it's
not all about being thin, but being healthy.  When I started viewing my body
as a machine - and started asking myself, do I want to run on high octane
fuel, or crap?  I started fueling my body for optimal performance.  Now, I
still cave for some unhealthy things some of the time.  But most of the
time, my eating is pretty clean.  The way I see it is - if I eat on track
95% of the time, the other 5% is not going to throw me off track.  But alot
of the things I used to crave are no longer appealing to me.

det
Cat - 15 Nov 2003 22:27 GMT
I like your analogy of the body as a machine. Your decision to feed your
body the correct fuel is exactly right. I can't begin to tell all the ways
in which I feel better now that I'm eating the right food. I enjoy the food
I eat more. Sure, I get cravings, but it comes down to a choice between
something I know will make me feel bad and feeling good. So I usually choose
"good".

Cat
Jennifer A - 16 Nov 2003 01:30 GMT
> I like your analogy of the body as a machine. Your decision to feed your
> body the correct fuel is exactly right. I can't begin to tell all the ways
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> Cat

I feel like total crap right now because I chose to eat some chinese food
for dinner.  I decided to have a refeed day for a change especially since my
gut was feeling much better.  I'm still out of town and some people decided
to get takeout and eat at the hotel before working tonight and I decided to
join in since it was always one of my favorites.  I got one of my
favorites - the triple delight (shrimp, scallops, chicken, and veggies).  It
was saltier than hell and just didn't taste as good as I remember it.  Now I
have indigestion to boot.  Back to "clean" living tomorrow :)

Jenn
Beverly - 16 Nov 2003 04:12 GMT
> > I like your analogy of the body as a machine. Your decision to feed your
> > body the correct fuel is exactly right. I can't begin to tell all the ways
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
>
> Jenn

Hope you're feeling better, Jenn.  It's amazing how out taste changes once
we start a healthy eating plan.

Beverly
Jennifer A - 16 Nov 2003 14:18 GMT
> > I feel like total crap right now because I chose to eat some chinese food
> > for dinner.  I decided to have a refeed day for a change especially since
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
>
> Beverly

I woke up this morning and my face is completely swollen.  I'm VERY salt
sensitive.  Last night I took some alka seltzer and went to bed shortly
after my post.  Mentally I feel fine, not feeling bad about eating what I
wanted (or thought I wanted) yesterday - which is kind of an accomplishment
for me.  Physically, I feel kind of cruddy still, hung over in a way and no
matter how I many times I brush my teeth I can't get the crappy taste out.
I still don't feel as bad as with the intestinal problems of earlier in the
week, but bad enough that sweets, greasy, or salty stuff doesn't even appeal
to me right now.  Going back on track is going to be a treat once I actually
get hungry enough to eat.  I have a beautiful apple from the continental
bfast that I'm going to have once I can stomach it :)

Jenn
(still in class, hoping to get out before halftime of the Packers/TB game
later today)
Wendy - 17 Nov 2003 15:37 GMT
> I woke up this morning and my face is completely swollen.  I'm VERY salt
> sensitive.  Last night I took some alka seltzer and went to bed shortly
> after my post.

Thank you for mentioning that.  My weight was up about three pounds this
morning (an unofficial weigh-in, but still!)  I just remembered we ate
sushi for dinner last night and I finished my small son's that was
drenched in soy sauce.  (I use some, but not as much.)  Salt does that to
me, too.

My solution is to drink a lot of fluids.  I'm behind on my water today so
I'm going to go get a glass right now!  (Maybe this will catch on the way
our reminders to sit up straight made everyone do that, too.)  :-)

-- Wendy
Jennifer A - 18 Nov 2003 01:51 GMT
> > I woke up this morning and my face is completely swollen.  I'm VERY salt
> > sensitive.  Last night I took some alka seltzer and went to bed shortly
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>
> -- Wendy

I'm making a conscious effort to drink about 2 gal a day right now.  When I
got home last night I got on the scale for a laugh to see how much water I
was retaining - let's just say it was double digits and leave it at that.
The next morning I also saw a double digit loss (only a few more pounds to
go to be back to Friday morning's weight).  I'm sure I experienced this
regularly when I was 300+ pounds, but it was barely a blip on the radar at
that time.  This is so not healthy.  One more thing to consciously eliminate
from my WOE (salt).

Jenn
Gloria - 16 Nov 2003 14:58 GMT
Det. said this so well!!! I look at those 'goodies' now as if they were
crap to me! t my job I pass out the samples ,at my job,and most are crap
foods. One day I watched those people ,who ate freely, and after really
seeing them it gave me THE WAKE-UP CALL! Not everyone was over-weight
but many were. The ones who were VERY LARGE were the people who ask if
they can have another !
I've said many times here that this whole prosses is the mind-set. We
need to slowly change the head. When I started looking at myself as a
health-nut  it ALL began to really come together. It's all about the
mind! Just THINK about how you can be! It worked for me!!!

glo
Cat - 15 Nov 2003 22:25 GMT
Very important point you've made there, Wendy.  Couldn't agree more. It is a
"state of mind". In my case, I'm giving up something (fattening foods) for
something I want more (good health, better appearance, etc.)

Cat

> > They say that willpower is unimportant in dieting. That's a
> > lie. Willpower, meaning sticking with something that you know is good
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>
> Wendy
Cat - 15 Nov 2003 22:30 GMT
Totally agree. Sugar absolutely makes me ravenously hungry (and nervous).

Cat

"> You do not have to go "low carb". But some of the ideas of low carb
> diets are not bad. For example, some carbs do interfere with
> dieting. Sugar is one such example, if you eat sweetened foods, they
> make you hungrier. Some people report same effects from bread and
> potatoes.
determined - 14 Nov 2003 16:45 GMT
> Thanks guys but no way I'm going on the low carb thing. I personally
> think it's dangerous.

Reducing simple carbs is a GOOD thing - you don't have to cut out all carbs,
just limit carbs from soda, juice, potatoes, bread, rice.

> I guess I should be happy with what I've lost but at this rate it'll
> take me a whole year to lose 52 lbs. I need to lose total, about 120
> lbs to get within normal range. That's why I'm frustrated, I think.

It takes patience - lots of it.  Might as well settle in for the long haul.
It took me a year to lose 30 lbs, and I'm still working on reducing bodyfat.
It's a life long committment.

det
Chrys - 14 Nov 2003 16:46 GMT
> Thanks guys but no way I'm going on the low carb thing. I personally
> think it's dangerous.
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
>
> -Rubystars

It seems this is a very dangerous time for you.  Your original message
sounds like you're feeling extremely deprived.  The problem with feeling
deprived is that sooner or later, it's not unlikely that you'll end up
giving up and eating all the foods you're missing and undo the progress
you've made.  You have to try to find ways to incorporate reasonable
quantities of foods that are like what you're missing.  You can still have
chili dogs and lose weight if you're having a small portion and careful to
get lower calorie bread and hot dogs and not too much chili.  This is
something I eat and have still managed to lose weight.  You shouldn't eat
things you don't enjoy or skip having reasonable portions of the ones you
do enjoy.

Don't be discouraged.  You didn't gain the weight overnight and you can't
lose it overnight either.  Think of this as getting healthier.  Any amount
of loss, or even maintaining your weight while continuing to build muscle,
is still giving you a benefit.
A Ross - 14 Nov 2003 17:56 GMT
> Thanks guys but no way I'm going on the low carb thing. I personally
> think it's dangerous.
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
>
> -Rubystars

Wow. I am really at a loss here--it took me three years to lose my
initial 48 lbs via Weight Watchers, and I was THRILLED at losing a half
pound a week some weeks, especially as I neared goal.

1-1/2 lbs weight loss a week is a sensible goal. A half pound is nothing
to sneeze at. Be happy you're trying to do the right thing, and losing.
Quit beating yourself up and starving yourself thinking it'll help. I
won't. You'll feel deprived and depressed and slip into bad habits. It
happens to all of us.

Take a really good look at what you eat--don't call it a diet. Write
everything down. Weigh and measure. Count calories, points, carbs,
whatever works for YOU. Exercise, and write that down too--set goals,
and track your progress towards your goals.

Start enjoying the person you are instead of worrying about the person
you're not. Your attitude worries me--it looks like you're punishing
yourself for being overweight, and punishing yourself for being hungry.

Amy (and Low Carb is not dangerous)
MadJock - 14 Nov 2003 18:56 GMT
You can't just say low carb is not dangerous.  In your opinion it's not
dangerous, but there is still a lot of argument on it.  Are you a doctor?
Are you just choosing who you want to believe?  You're giving that out as
fact, and whilst it MAY not be dangerous, none of us know that for sure.

MadJock
rosie read and post - 14 Nov 2003 19:10 GMT
LOW CARB isn't anymore dangerous, than breathing the
air...............in fact, probably less!

Signature

read and post daily, it works!
rosie

it ain't what they call you, it's what you answer to.
............................b.clinton

> You can't just say low carb is not dangerous.  In your opinion it's not
> dangerous, but there is still a lot of argument on it.  Are you a doctor?
> Are you just choosing who you want to believe?  You're giving that out as
> fact, and whilst it MAY not be dangerous, none of us know that for sure.
>
> MadJock
Ignoramus26064 - 14 Nov 2003 19:13 GMT
> You can't just say low carb is not dangerous.  In your opinion it's not
> dangerous, but there is still a lot of argument on it.  Are you a doctor?
> Are you just choosing who you want to believe?  You're giving that out as
> fact, and whilst it MAY not be dangerous, none of us know that for sure.
>
> MadJock

I do not think that A Ross said that low carb was not dangerous.

As far as I am concerned, there is more to dangers of excess meat
consumption than high cholesterol. Meat that is cooked in certain ways
becomes carcinogenic. e.g. bacon. Sausages and most preserved meats
have carcinogenic nitrites added to them. Meat consumption may have
something to do with colorectal cancer, although the link is tenuous
so far.

I am not saying that low carbing is dangerous, but it has some chances
of being dangerous. Of course, it is even more dangerous to be obese
and overeat. There is little doubt about that.

i
MadJock - 14 Nov 2003 20:57 GMT
> I do not think that A Ross said that low carb was not dangerous.

She did:

>Amy (and Low Carb is not dangerous)
MH - 15 Nov 2003 07:42 GMT
> You can't just say low carb is not dangerous.  In your opinion it's not
> dangerous, but there is still a lot of argument on it.  Are you a doctor?

No, he's not, and he's stated on many, many occassions that doctors know
much less than himself about medicine. He holds everyone else (except
himself, of course) in low opinion, including those who have gone to years
and years of medical school. He, of course, knows much, much more about
medicine from reading a couple of books.

> Are you just choosing who you want to believe?

Yes, he is.

 You're giving that out as
> fact, and whilst it MAY not be dangerous, none of us know that for sure.

Precisely.

You're a smart guy, Madjock. : )

Martha

> MadJock
A Ross - 17 Nov 2003 13:03 GMT
> You can't just say low carb is not dangerous.  In your opinion it's not
> dangerous, but there is still a lot of argument on it.  Are you a doctor?
> Are you just choosing who you want to believe?  You're giving that out as
> fact, and whilst it MAY not be dangerous, none of us know that for sure.
>
> MadJock

I'm sorry. I should have couched that as "IN MY EXPERIENCE". Does that
make you feel better? How about "quality carbing" instead of "low
carbing." Is that an acceptable statement?  I think you'll find that
many, many people are successfully low-carbing or quality-carbing in
various ways with good, lasting results.

Amy
jmk - 17 Nov 2003 15:19 GMT
> You can't just say low carb is not dangerous.  In your opinion it's not
> dangerous, but there is still a lot of argument on it.  Are you a doctor?
> Are you just choosing who you want to believe?  You're giving that out as
> fact, and whilst it MAY not be dangerous, none of us know that for sure.
>
> MadJock

Agreed, although I'd add that it doesn't have to be dangerous (or vice
versa).  I mean, it depends on what you are replacing the carbs with?
Protein and Saturated Fat?  Protein and Unsaturated Fat?  You get my
drift.  It also depends on what carbs are being cut and what carbs are
being kept?  I mean, I think that most people know to cut the refined
carbs and keep the whole grains but we all know to to assume!  :-)

Signature

jmk in NC

Chris Braun - 15 Nov 2003 00:22 GMT
>Thanks guys but no way I'm going on the low carb thing. I personally
>think it's dangerous.
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
>
>-Rubystars

For most women 2 lbs. a week -- unless doing some kind of supervised
fast -- is pretty ambitious.  I wouldn't be in so much of a hurry --
losing 52 lbs. in a year is a heck of a lot better than not losing 52
lbs., after all :-).  I've lost 87 lbs. in 16 months and I'm very
happy with that -- maybe a tad faster than you're losing but not lots.
And at this point certainly not faster.

You haven't said how old you are (that I've noticed, anyway), and that
can make a difference in how fast you can lose.  I'm 55, and in
menopause, which tends to slow down one's metabolism.

You've gotten varying advice on how many calories you should be
eating.  I think this is something you have to experiment with.  I
started at 262 lbs. and have been targeting around 1600 calories per
day the whole time -- a little less lately.  And I exercise more
strenuously than you do, I'd say -- lots of weight lifting and more
challenging cardio activity.  But your metabolism may differ from
mine.  If what you're doing now is leading to a pound a week weight
loss, I think that you might just want to stick with it.  But you
might want to try varying your exercise a bit -- adding more strength
training and maybe cardio interval training.

I'd be dubious that you're in any sort of starvation mode at 2000
calories a day.  But if you think this is a possibility, try adding
more and see if it helps.  (Also, I think others have suggested using
something like Fitday to calculate your actual consumption -- since
it's easy to be pretty far off if you just estimate.)

Good luck with whatever approach you choose.

By the way, I don't do low carb either.  I average around 25% fat,
with the rest pretty even split between carbs and protein.  I try to
eat mostly good carbs and good fats, but I'm not a purist.

Chris
262/175/???
George - 17 Nov 2003 01:53 GMT
>Thanks guys but no way I'm going on the low carb thing. I personally
>think it's dangerous.

Just modify the types of carbs you eat. Ask any scientist... and
they'll probably agree that eating more veggies is a good thing,
rather than eating tortilla chips...

>I guess I should be happy with what I've lost but at this rate it'll
>take me a whole year to lose 52 lbs. I need to lose total, about 120
>lbs to get within normal range. That's why I'm frustrated, I think.

Well, here's some real world scoop. I started trying to seriously lose
weight at 262 pounds. I managed, and I worked like a dog at it, to
lose 62 pounds in one year.

Then, my parents both died, I got depressed, I let the exercise go,
then went back to my old eating habits. Almost all 62 of those pounds
came back... and I'm lucky I didn't add more.

Better to take it at a pace you can live with. I went too whacko on
exercise and could not keep it up. Now I am more moderate and it's
easier to keep to.

It's a lifetime battle. You have to come to terms with that. Mind you,
I know that doesn't help much with the frustration of wanting it done
and over with. However, it never will be *done*. You will always have
to keep an eye on yourself, so that you don't drop back into the
habits that got you fat. Been there, done that. Done it twice
actually...

>I've tried to lose weight before and quit because it wasn't fast
>enough. If I knew I could lose 2 lbs. a week, I'd feel better because
>at least I'd know the first 100 lbs. would be gone in a year.

Well, some folks lose quicker on low carb. I understand you don't want
to go that route, but you could try a modified carb diet.

Right now, it may be difficult to do much exercise besides walking,
but if you could do some weight lifting, it might help you in the long
run.

>I'm going to start drinking more water. I'm thinking that will help
>me. Sometimes I've had this gnawing hunger even when I eat till I'm
>full lately. I think maybe it's thirst.

It's an excellent idea!

>It's just frustrating I guess because all I want is to feel normal.
>When I look in the mirror I don't even see the image I have of myself.
>I feel that it's not "me" in the mirror. I remember what I used to
>look like, before I gained all this weight, and that is "me." Then I
>look in the mirror and see someone else, and it's hard, especially
>after all that work.

Yep, but it's gonna be a lifetime of work. Sorry, truth. As we get
older, our metabolism tends to slow. That makes it easier to gain
weight.

Try to make it as fun for yourself as you can. Pick exercises you
enjoy, try new recipes to see if you can come up with tasty food that
does fit into your eating plan.

Best,

Cynthia
262/233.0/200 first goal
Ignoramus26064 - 14 Nov 2003 11:59 GMT
> I've been trying to stay under 2,000 calories a day and I've been
> walking 2 miles almost every night for the last 4 weeks or so. Do you
> know where that got me? 5 pounds lost. That's it.

excellent result.

How tall are you and what is your current weight? 2,000 calories is
not that little, especially for a female.

and 2 miles  "almost every night" is not THAT much, although it is
good for you.

> I passed up pieces
> of my sister's birthday cake, I passed up handfuls of candy I normally
> would've eaten on halloween, and I've got nothing to show for it.

You have 5 lbs lost. Losing weight is not that easy.

> Why the hell do I even try? Five pounds seems like nothing when I've
> got over 100 lbs. to lose.  I feel like I'm not losing anything even
> after all that work.

You just need to get used to the idea that losing weight is not
easy. But bein 100 lbs overweight is pretty difficult also, to carry
all that fat on  you.

> I've been eating low calorie food and low fat food and avoiding things
> I would've enjoyed. I mean I could've had deluxe macaroni and cheese
> the other night when my dad had some but instead the remainder went
> uneaten because I was trying hard as hell to lose weight.

Very good, you should be happy about it and not complaining. Please
note that your choice to eat low fat is not necessarily helping you to
feel satiated. Fat is known to quickly bring satiety. Obviously low
fat or not low fat, you still have to limit your calories.

> When I would've normally enjoyed nachos on tortilla chips, I ate some
> fat free refried beans and super lean hamburger meat and vegetables
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> I'm still overweight, still dog tired from that exercise and still
> craving all the tasty food I have been dutifully avoiding.

If you are really craving food, maybe you need to change what you eat
on your diet, still staying within your calorie limit.

Anyway, with 100 lbs to go, you obviously had some unhealthy eating
havits that you got used to. Do you think that it is going to be easy
to start eating well?

> I even passed up chili dogs with fritos when I really wanted some!

Ruby, sounds like you are very hungry. Can you tell us what your diet
is like? Possibly you can eat different foods and feel less hungry
because other foods can satisfy your needs for nutrients.

Anyhow, with 100 extra lbs on you, your life expectancy is greatly reduced
and you have a lot of chances to develop heart disease and
diabetes. So losing weight will add several years to your life. But it
is difficult and most diet attempts fail for a reason. So try not to
become a statistic. We have a bunch of people here, myself included,
who lost weight and it is not coming back.

> I've been making low fat vegetable soups and low fat/calorie recipes
> with Mori Nu light tofu but apparently that wasn't good enough because
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> 2,000 calories too many? I don't want to think of having to be hungry
> all the time to lose weight. :(

Sounds like you developed a real food fixation. Could be due to your
hunger, or could be preexisting condition. But it is not helping.

Consider upping your fat while still limiting calories. Eat more
vegetables and meat and lower bread and pasta etc.

i
223/177/180
MadJock - 14 Nov 2003 12:53 GMT
Walking two miles is tiring - especially if you are carrying an extra 100lb.
As Igoramus says, it's very good for you, but exercise doesn't actually burn
a lot of calories when compared to your diet as a whole.  It's not
insignificant, but don't think that your walking two miles is going to make
the fat drop off you - it won't.  What will get the fat off your body is
changing your diet (which does NOT mean starving yourself).

Here's an example.  I'll use myself here, because I don't know your weight.
When I walk (a fairly brisk walk at around 4mph) I burn off about 7 calories
a minute.  So if I were to walk 2 miles at 4 mph, I would walk for half an
hour.  Calories burned = 30 x 7 = 210kcal.  210 calories is only an extra 7%
on the calories I would burn if I were to do no exercise at all.  And the
energy required to walk for that long can be found in a single banana.

So why is exercise so good then?  Well it tells your body which weight you
want to lose.  You want to lose the fat and keep the muscle, and the only
way to tell your body to burn the fat instead of the muscle is by doing
exercise.

Reading your post suggests to me that you are depriving yourself of
calories.  This is as bad as eating too many.  You should eat no less than
eight times your weight in calories.  I weigh 185lb, so I should eat no less
than about 1500 calories daily.  You say you have 100lb to lose which means
you could weight around 250lb?  If so, the very minimum amount you should be
eating is 2000 calories a day.  Some nutritionists even say that 10 times
your weight is a better figure so this would suggest 2500 cal as a minimum.

Eating less than that amount is dangerous.  I don't know if this applies to
you because I don't actually know your height and weight, but you could be
starving yourself.  Starving yourself triggers a metabolic change which
tells your body to start burning muscle and keep the fat.  It thinks that
you are going to have to last a bit before you can find your next meal - and
doesn't realise that the fridge is full.  It puts you in survival mode.
When in survival mode, your body grabs all the fat it can get and puts it in
storage.  It burns your muscles instead.  And when you do relax for that
thanksgiving dinner, your body says "Aw thank feic for that - ah thought ah
wiz gonny perish!" and stores all of that fat too.

Result?  You get fed up with being hungry, accept that you are 'naturally
fat' and start eating what you were.  Your body will take a while to realise
that it's not starving any more and you will end up heavier than you started
out.  This is the reason most diets fail.

I think you need to do a little research and design a suitable diet for
yourself.  This list will help, but needs more information on you.  So
please reply.

Congratulations on the 5lb lost so far, and good luck!

MadJock
204/185/165
determined - 14 Nov 2003 16:09 GMT
> Walking two miles is tiring - especially if you are carrying an extra 100lb.
> As Igoramus says, it's very good for you, but exercise doesn't actually burn
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> on the calories I would burn if I were to do no exercise at all.  And the
> energy required to walk for that long can be found in a single banana.

A banana does NOT have 210 calories in it.
Jennifer A - 14 Nov 2003 16:34 GMT
> > Here's an example.  I'll use myself here, because I don't know your
> weight.
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> A banana does NOT have 210 calories in it.

Unless it's a really big banana (>8 oz. edible portion)!

Jenn
MadJock - 14 Nov 2003 16:53 GMT
> A banana does NOT have 210 calories in it.

I'll be a little more precise then - an 8oz banana has around that figure.
The last banana I had was 8oz when peeled, so that is what I am basing it
on.  Of course, bananas come in all sizes, so it could vary.

So an 8oz banana has about 210 calories (yes, it does)

MadJock
Melissa - 14 Nov 2003 16:56 GMT
> > A banana does NOT have 210 calories in it.
>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> MadJock

Dole.com lists a "medium" banana at 110 calories, but they don't say how
large of an edible serving that is. My Calorie King book has 4 ounces of
edible banana at 105, which would agree with the 210 in your 8 ounce.  I
can't eat them anyway, but they are on the high side calorie wise as far as
fruit goes.

Melissa
Cat - 16 Nov 2003 05:16 GMT
Thank heavens for that!!!!

Cat (suddenly anxious about the banana she ate a few hours ago...)

> A banana does NOT have 210 calories in it.
Wendy - 14 Nov 2003 16:15 GMT
> Walking two miles is tiring - especially if you are carrying an extra 100lb.
> As Igoramus says, it's very good for you, but exercise doesn't actually burn
> a lot of calories when compared to your diet as a whole.

No, but exercise changes you into a person who has a faster metabolism and
that burns calories 24/7.  It is NOT an incidental part of weight loss
especially for the very obese.

What typically happens when an inactive person starts exercising is that
they gain some muscle mass and some glycogen reserves in their muscles and
some associated water.  In other words, they gain some weight.

When she says she lost five pounds I have to wonder if she didn't lose 10
pounds of fat and gain five pounds of muscle and associated water
weight.  I would be surprised if that wasn't the case, actually.

> What will get the fat off your body is
> changing your diet (which does NOT mean starving yourself).

No, what will get the fat off her body is to burn more calories than she
consumes.  It's a two part sentance: you have to eat less AND exercise
more, especially when there is the sort of metabolism damage that comes
from being an overweight woman.

> Reading your post suggests to me that you are depriving yourself of
> calories.  This is as bad as eating too many.  You should eat no less than
> eight times your weight in calories.  I weigh 185lb, so I should eat no less
> than about 1500 calories daily.  You say you have 100lb to lose which means
> you could weight around 250lb?  If so, the very minimum amount you should be
> eating is 2000 calories a day.

It sounds like she is aiming for 2000 calories.

> Congratulations on the 5lb lost so far, and good luck!

My advice is to look a bit more on the brighter side.  You would have
GAINED some more fat by eating the way you used to - it's not like you
were at maintenance, you were still gaining 10-15 pounds a year,
right?  So by losing 5 pounds you avoided gaining a pound instead.

Also you have to look at the long haul.  You've got to change your habits
if you want to lose weight.  You're still newly into that journey and it's
not an overnight process.  But in the end, what's your alternative?  If
you want to lose fat then you're going to have to become a restrained
eater who exercises.  There isn't another way.  It really works.  Who
cares if it works fast enough?  It's a lifelong process.

Wendy
244/189/174
determined - 14 Nov 2003 17:55 GMT
> > Walking two miles is tiring - especially if you are carrying an extra 100lb.
> > As Igoramus says, it's very good for you, but exercise doesn't actually burn
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> they gain some muscle mass and some glycogen reserves in their muscles and
> some associated water.  In other words, they gain some weight.

Good point.  When I first started lifting weights, I gained 7 lbs in the
first 3 weeks.  It wasn't muscle, but it wasn't fat either.  I think it was
the water/glycogen thing you're referring to.

det
jmk - 14 Nov 2003 13:15 GMT
> I've been trying to stay under 2,000 calories a day and I've been
> walking 2 miles almost every night for the last 4 weeks or so. Do you
> know where that got me? 5 pounds lost. That's it. I passed up pieces
> of my sister's birthday cake, I passed up handfuls of candy I normally
> would've eaten on halloween, and I've got nothing to show for it.

Five pounds is a great start!  I am sorry to hear that you are
frustrated but hey, that's five pounds GONE!  Most folks recommend a
weight loss rate of 1-2 pounds per week so you are more or less on
track.  That's good news.

Are you logging your food intake?  A lot of people on this newsgroup use
fitday (www.fitday.com) -- or spreadsheets or palm pilots to log their
food.  I use my Palm and that works out great for me.  If you are not
currently logging your food intake, you might want to try fitday for a
week or so and see if you notice any trends.  Alternatively, you could
post a food log to this newsgroup for feedback.

What are your goals?  Weight loss?  Better overall health?  Running a
marathon?  :-)  (hey, one of my friends has that for a goal!)

Also, I don't recall the exact formula (someone, help me out here) but
you can figure out a good caloric intake by something like .8 * yoru
body weight?  Anyway, hopefully someone will post the formulas for both
weight loss and maintenance.

Hang in there!

Signature

jmk in NC

Patricia Heil - 14 Nov 2003 13:53 GMT
You're too impatient.  That is a good weight loss.  It's
sustainable -- you're not starving and you're not injuring
yourself by working out too much so that you have to stop
and then put the weight back on.

Remember, you have to set up something you can live with
the rest of your life or one of two things will happen.
Either the weight will come back on or you will do something
that hurts your health.

> I've been trying to stay under 2,000 calories a day and I've been
> walking 2 miles almost every night for the last 4 weeks or so. Do you
[quoted text clipped - 34 lines]
>
> -Rubystars
Gloria - 16 Nov 2003 13:08 GMT
Ruby, 5 LBS!!! GREAT LOSS!!
I know how it feels to begin as I was also 100 LBS over weight and it
felt so bad. But I made it and I took one day at a ttime. You can't look
at that BIG picture as it will look tooooo big and you might panic. You
are trying hard and you seem very strong !! Keep posting and remember
how you have us here to help you! I was feeling so 'fat' today so I
closed my eyes to imagine my thinner self! WOW! I FEEL thinner now. I
think of the out-fit I will wear after I weigh 10 lbs less. Little
rewards are my big help! Sometimes itt's just a new lipstick if  money
is short. Or to the thrift store to find a 'new' top. You WANT thin MORE
than sweets? Than cut out a pcture from a magazine that loos like you
WANT to be. I put mine on the frig!! It is a picture of a woman with
city shorts and a nice top.
So keep close and come here OFTEN!

Warmly,
glo
rosie read and post - 14 Nov 2003 14:02 GMT
dear ruby,
congrats to you on the FIVE POUNDS lost.................that IS A BIG
DEAL!

your sound VERY frustrated!
may i suggest that you find a WOE (way of eating) that will not make you
feel like your "missing out" on something?

Signature

read and post daily, it works!
rosie

it ain't what they call you, it's what you answer to.
............................b.clinton

> I've been trying to stay under 2,000 calories a day and I've been
> walking 2 miles almost every night for the last 4 weeks or so. Do you
[quoted text clipped - 34 lines]
>
> -Rubystars
The Queen of Cans and Jars - 14 Nov 2003 15:33 GMT
> I've been trying to stay under 2,000 calories a day and I've been
> walking 2 miles almost every night for the last 4 weeks or so. Do you
> know where that got me? 5 pounds lost. That's it. I passed up pieces
> of my sister's birthday cake, I passed up handfuls of candy I normally
> would've eaten on halloween, and I've got nothing to show for it.

you lost over a pound a week.  that's perfect progress; losing much more
than that isn't healthy.  don't be so impatient.
determined - 14 Nov 2003 16:08 GMT
> I've been trying to stay under 2,000 calories a day and I've been
> walking 2 miles almost every night for the last 4 weeks or so. Do you
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> got over 100 lbs. to lose.  I feel like I'm not losing anything even
> after all that work.

5lbs lost is 5% of what you have to lose.  It adds up!  A slow and steady
loss is best, you'll find it's easier to maintain your new woe (way of
eating) because you aren't in a huge calorie deficit.  If you're still not
happy with your progress, perhaps you could start incorporating some
resistance training - get a set of dumbells for home use.

> I've been eating low calorie food and low fat food and avoiding things
> I would've enjoyed. I mean I could've had deluxe macaroni and cheese

> the other night when my dad had some but instead the remainder went
> uneaten because I was trying hard as hell to lose weight.

You need to get out of the mindsed that you have to deprive yourself in
order to lose weight - you just need to learn how to moderate.  Eat mostly
healthy, most of the time, you can splurge once in awhile.  Perhaps you
should try incorporating a refeed day into your diet every couple of weeks.

> When I would've normally enjoyed nachos on tortilla chips, I ate some
> fat free refried beans and super lean hamburger meat and vegetables
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> I even passed up chili dogs with fritos when I really wanted some!

YUCK!  I think once you start eating healthy for awhile, this kinda food
won't appeal to you anymore.

> I've been making low fat vegetable soups and low fat/calorie recipes
> with Mori Nu light tofu but apparently that wasn't good enough because
> all I lost in 4 weeks of all this was 5 lbs. I'm scared that when
> thanksgiving comes it'll all be erased anyway because I'll be damned
> if I can't sit down and participate in a nice holiday dinner with my
> family.

> I wanted to lose 2 lbs. a week. Was that really too much to ask? Are
> 2,000 calories too many? I don't want to think of having to be hungry
> all the time to lose weight. :(

You don't have to be hungry to lose weight - you just have to make good food
choices.  You should consume about 8-10 cal x current bodyweight in lbs.
Try tracking your food and drink intake (every single bite and sip) at
www.fitday.com and report back to us - what's a day's worth of food look
like for you?  How many calories? Carbs?  Fat? Protein?

det
Cat - 15 Nov 2003 22:40 GMT
How long did it take you to gain the weight? That might give you some idea
how long it will take to lose it. So what if you only lose a pound a week?
Or half a pound? Aren't you  headed in the right direction? Look at it that
way. I know it is hard to make sacrifices and not see a lot of results. How
do I know? Because I do it every day. But if you keep being careful and
counting calories, etc., you WILL lose the weight eventually.

Meanwhile, set shorter goals (like 5 pounds or 10 pounds) and celebrate when
you reach that goal. Give yourself non-food rewards for your
accomplishments. In addition, you could buy some new (smaller) clothes for
every 15-20 pounds lost. Or buy a pretty scarf or some cosmetics or whatever
makes you feel good, and reward yourself for the 5 pound losses.

I bought some decorative graph paper at a paper store and I record my weight
once a week (I weigh every day, but only write it down once a week). I
started out at 222 and now I'm down to 142. It has taken me since January of
this year to lose 80 pounds. But what if it took until next year? It is
still worth it. It is very satisfying to see the graph line going down,
down, down. I have hit a few plateaus, like everyone else here. My goal is
to weigh 120, but the closer I get to it, the harder it is to lose weight. I
don't care, though. I will NEVER give up. My body will eventually have to
give up the pounds. In the meantime, I'm busy "outsmarting" my metabolism.
My next goal is to get into weight-lifting. That oughta get things going. :)
My point is, you are smarter than your fat. You CAN lose the weight, but you
have to have determination and a lot of patience to do it.

Try to think of your weight loss as a life-long change in eating and
exercise. You didn't get fat overnight and you won't get thin overnight,
either.

Hugs, Cat

> I've been trying to stay under 2,000 calories a day and I've been
> walking 2 miles almost every night for the last 4 weeks or so. Do you
[quoted text clipped - 34 lines]
>
> -Rubystars
George - 17 Nov 2003 01:44 GMT
>I've been trying to stay under 2,000 calories a day and I've been
>walking 2 miles almost every night for the last 4 weeks or so. Do you
>know where that got me? 5 pounds lost. That's it. I passed up pieces
>of my sister's birthday cake, I passed up handfuls of candy I normally
>would've eaten on halloween, and I've got nothing to show for it.

Nothing? Stop the pity party... you've lost 1.25 pounds a week. This
is not a bad thing! It's actually a pretty decent rate of loss.

>Why the hell do I even try? Five pounds seems like nothing when I've
>got over 100 lbs. to lose.  I feel like I'm not losing anything even
>after all that work.

You try, because not trying means staying fat... or worse, continuing
to gain!

Stop thinking of that 100 pounds to lose. It won't go away overnight.
You may have to think in terms of a couple years to lose it.

Start thinking of small goals, maybe 5-10 pounds at a time. That makes
it easier for me to handle... and yes, where I started from, I also
had at least a 100 pounds to lose. And I've not gotten extremely far
down the road myself. Yet.

>I've been eating low calorie food and low fat food and avoiding things
>I would've enjoyed. I mean I could've had deluxe macaroni and cheese
>the other night when my dad had some but instead the remainder went
>uneaten because I was trying hard as hell to lose weight.

The thing is, if you learn to enjoy other good food, and by good food,
I mean real food, quality veggies, meats, whole grains, fruits, etc...
you may miss things like mac and cheese less. Frankly, mac & cheese is
not something I miss at all. It tastes so artificial to me now.

Also, don't deprive yourself of good food. One can lose weight eating
tasty food. Today, had breakfast consisting of 3 eggs, at least a cup
of sauteed veggies and a slice of ham with pineapple. It wasn't low
fat, but it was healthy. Nope, didn't use all the egg yolks either.
And the sautee was in olive oil. It was not a hugely high calorie
breakfast either.

Lunch was some whole wheat bulgur, tomato, avocado, about a tablespoon
of olive oil and lemon dressing and a grilled chicken breast. And one
tangerine. Good stuff.

>When I would've normally enjoyed nachos on tortilla chips, I ate some
>fat free refried beans and super lean hamburger meat and vegetables
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>I'm still overweight, still dog tired from that exercise and still
>craving all the tasty food I have been dutifully avoiding.

Yes, well, all that tasty food got you where you are today. Find
healthy ways to fix tasty food. Learn that other foods besides junk
food can be tasty. And remember, tasty food may be had in SMALL
portions. Occasionally.

>I even passed up chili dogs with fritos when I really wanted some!

Yikes... that would give me heartburn... which I wouldn't want much.

You gotta form some better habits, because if you are mourning things
like chili dogs and fritos now, what happens when you have lost the
100 pounds? You'll start eating those things again, and pretty soon,
the 100 pounds will be back. And possibly with friends.

>I've been making low fat vegetable soups and low fat/calorie recipes
>with Mori Nu light tofu but apparently that wasn't good enough because
>all I lost in 4 weeks of all this was 5 lbs. I'm scared that when
>thanksgiving comes it'll all be erased anyway because I'll be damned
>if I can't sit down and participate in a nice holiday dinner with my
>family.

Well, I'm losing at a rate of about a pound a week, or sometimes a
little more. It's a normal rate to lose at. 2 pounds a week
consistently is not gonna happen for most folks.

Also, why are you thinking that you need to eat so hugely at
Thanksgiving that you regain the entire 5 pounds? Sounds defeatist to
me. That's what, 3500 calories times 5? That's 17,500 calories. You
are gonna have to really work some to consume all that in ONE day!

Consider that you can have small portions of everything at
Thanksgiving and still stay on a diet. Consider that participation is
not limited to eating... conversation is good!



>I wanted to lose 2 lbs. a week. Was that really too much to ask? Are
>2,000 calories too many? I don't want to think of having to be hungry
>all the time to lose weight. :(

Everyone's body is different. We'd all like to be able to choose some
set amount of weight to lose a week... in a steady consistent fashion.
But weight loss rarely works like that. You should see the graph of my
loss.... down, down, then up, then down, it zigs and zags. But the ups
are rarely more than a pound and the consistent trend is down.

Also, you shouldn't have to be hungry all the time to lose weight! Be
sure you get enough protein in your diet... fiber helps too. Eat
plenty of good non-starchy veggies! Low fat does not mean NO-fat...
fats in the diet are important too.

Perhaps you'd be happier trying a more balanced diet. Say 25-30% fat,
30% protein and 40% carbs.

Keep up the good work with the walking! That's a habit that will
really help you for a lifetime.

Cynthia
262/233.0/200 first goal
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2012 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.