Weight Loss Forum / General Topics / November 2003
Frustrated
|
|
Thread rating:  |
Rubystars - 14 Nov 2003 05:29 GMT I've been trying to stay under 2,000 calories a day and I've been walking 2 miles almost every night for the last 4 weeks or so. Do you know where that got me? 5 pounds lost. That's it. I passed up pieces of my sister's birthday cake, I passed up handfuls of candy I normally would've eaten on halloween, and I've got nothing to show for it.
Why the hell do I even try? Five pounds seems like nothing when I've got over 100 lbs. to lose. I feel like I'm not losing anything even after all that work.
I've been eating low calorie food and low fat food and avoiding things I would've enjoyed. I mean I could've had deluxe macaroni and cheese the other night when my dad had some but instead the remainder went uneaten because I was trying hard as hell to lose weight.
When I would've normally enjoyed nachos on tortilla chips, I ate some fat free refried beans and super lean hamburger meat and vegetables with just a tiny bit of cheese (not the normal amount) and instead of putting it on tortilla chips like I always enjoyed I ate my "nachos" on lettuce.
I'm still overweight, still dog tired from that exercise and still craving all the tasty food I have been dutifully avoiding.
I even passed up chili dogs with fritos when I really wanted some!
I've been making low fat vegetable soups and low fat/calorie recipes with Mori Nu light tofu but apparently that wasn't good enough because all I lost in 4 weeks of all this was 5 lbs. I'm scared that when thanksgiving comes it'll all be erased anyway because I'll be damned if I can't sit down and participate in a nice holiday dinner with my family.
I wanted to lose 2 lbs. a week. Was that really too much to ask? Are 2,000 calories too many? I don't want to think of having to be hungry all the time to lose weight. :(
-Rubystars
ultrasoni_c - 14 Nov 2003 07:52 GMT I don't think its a good idea to lose more than 2 pounds a week. You lost 5 in 4 weeks and that is not bad at all. Sweets will make you eat more, so avoiding them as much as possible is a good idea. Too much fat also is not good for your general health. I would definately not give up the diet and exercise. I've started a low-carb high-protein diet and working out "full-time" about 6 months ago and it is now that I'm seeing some results and believe it or not I am feeling better about myself. I dont think you have to stick to the diet forever. When I eat that fattening meal, I make up for it during the day, or the next day. Maybe instead of tortilla chips I eat a tuna can or roasted chicken without skin which is a good source of protein (I do weights as well and I find that helps me maintain my muscle --important for my metabolism I believe). Others in this group probably have better tips, but I'd say this the only way worth trying.
> I've been trying to stay under 2,000 calories a day and I've been > walking 2 miles almost every night for the last 4 weeks or so. Do you [quoted text clipped - 34 lines] > > -Rubystars Jeri - 14 Nov 2003 10:11 GMT > I've been trying to stay under 2,000 calories a day and I've been > walking 2 miles almost every night for the last 4 weeks or so. Do you > know where that got me? 5 pounds lost. That's it. <snip>
> I've been eating low calorie food and low fat food and avoiding things > I would've enjoyed. I mean I could've had deluxe macaroni and cheese > the other night when my dad had some but instead the remainder went > uneaten because I was trying hard as hell to lose weight. If low fat doesn't work for you try low carb. Low fat never worked well for me. It was always a huge struggle even with exercise. The alt.support.diet.low-carb FAQ has short descriptions of most of the major low carb plans. http://www.grossweb.com/asdlc/faq.htm#2a
 Signature Jeri 265/189/120 Atkins since 11/5/01 "Whether you think you can or think you can't, you're right."
Rubystars - 14 Nov 2003 16:16 GMT Thanks guys but no way I'm going on the low carb thing. I personally think it's dangerous.
I guess I should be happy with what I've lost but at this rate it'll take me a whole year to lose 52 lbs. I need to lose total, about 120 lbs to get within normal range. That's why I'm frustrated, I think.
I've tried to lose weight before and quit because it wasn't fast enough. If I knew I could lose 2 lbs. a week, I'd feel better because at least I'd know the first 100 lbs. would be gone in a year.
I'm going to start drinking more water. I'm thinking that will help me. Sometimes I've had this gnawing hunger even when I eat till I'm full lately. I think maybe it's thirst.
It's just frustrating I guess because all I want is to feel normal. When I look in the mirror I don't even see the image I have of myself. I feel that it's not "me" in the mirror. I remember what I used to look like, before I gained all this weight, and that is "me." Then I look in the mirror and see someone else, and it's hard, especially after all that work.
-Rubystars
Ignoramus26064 - 14 Nov 2003 16:41 GMT > Thanks guys but no way I'm going on the low carb thing. I personally > think it's dangerous. I also think so by the way.
You do not have to go "low carb". But some of the ideas of low carb diets are not bad. For example, some carbs do interfere with dieting. Sugar is one such example, if you eat sweetened foods, they make you hungrier. Some people report same effects from bread and potatoes.
So, even if you do not jump on the low carb bandwagon, you can borrow some of their ideas and replace junk carbs (sugar and junk food, maybe bread and potatoes) with low calorie vegetables and fats, maybe vegetable fats if you like.
Do you also have high cholesterol and high BP?
> I guess I should be happy with what I've lost but at this rate it'll > take me a whole year to lose 52 lbs. I need to lose total, about 120 > lbs to get within normal range. That's why I'm frustrated, I think. I understand your frustration. It always seems slow in the beginning. Think about your higher education (if you have any). Maybe there was a point in the beginning at which graduation seemed like it would never happen. And then you graduated and now you look back to it and think that it was not that bad.
Or, think about a pregnancy. It seems like it would be forever until the birth, and then voila, your kid is 3 years old and you think that it was not that long.
> I've tried to lose weight before and quit because it wasn't fast > enough. Some things that I read suggest that it was just a mental excuse you used to drop dieting and return back to overeating.
They say that willpower is unimportant in dieting. That's a lie. Willpower, meaning sticking with something that you know is good despite temptation, is important. The key is to use it intelligently and not wreck your body in the process.
> If I knew I could lose 2 lbs. a week, I'd feel better because > at least I'd know the first 100 lbs. would be gone in a year. If you can (wrt your knees and time etc), you can walk one hour more per day and that would equal, at your weight, about 0.8 lbs per week extra weight loss. If, on top of that, you lift weights and do some calisthenics (squats, bends etc) for 10 minutes per day, that would also accelerate your weight loss due to development of muscles, which, in turn, burn more energy even when they are at rest.
> I'm going to start drinking more water. I'm thinking that will help > me. Sometimes I've had this gnawing hunger even when I eat till I'm > full lately. I think maybe it's thirst. Maybe you eat wrong food. What is your typical day's eating like? (let's say what you ate yesterday).
> It's just frustrating I guess because all I want is to feel normal. you have to act normal to feel normal, which means not overeat.
also, it is perfectly normal to feel slightly hungry for a good part of the day. That's how people lived for centuries.
> When I look in the mirror I don't even see the image I have of myself. > I feel that it's not "me" in the mirror. I remember what I used to > look like, before I gained all this weight, and that is "me." Then I > look in the mirror and see someone else, and it's hard, especially > after all that work. Unfortunately, many things in life rquire "fortitude" and "staying power".
You complain that it is hard to exercise and eat less and that it is frustrating. But think, hypothetically, that you reach your perfect weight. Do you think you can go back to gorging on chili hot dogs and whatnot? No. You will be stuck with moderating your eating and exercising for the rest of your life.
So, if you lose weight quickly or slowly, ytou are stuck with dieting forever.
Even if you stay fat, and drop your weight loss, you have to moderate your eating or you will become into a whale. But when you are fat, you have a whole bunch of problems, knees, acid reflux, laziness, bad looks, cholesterol problems, heart problems, diabetes, hypertension, the list is endless.
So it makes sense to make a little effort and get to a better physical condition. Save your current photos of yourself for comparison. Go for the really disgusting ones. If you live alone, attach one to your refrigerator.
i 223/177/180
Wendy - 14 Nov 2003 16:26 GMT > They say that willpower is unimportant in dieting. That's a > lie. Willpower, meaning sticking with something that you know is good > despite temptation, is important. I think I'm the only one arguing against using willpower, and it's not that it's unimportant, it's that dieting doesn't work unless you don't need it. You've got to decide you don't want nachos because you would prefer to be thin, not resist the nachos that you really want. Resisting your own self is a futile move. You've got to get yourself on board with your decisions.
Jarkat just mentioned not wanting to eat cake. Not that she RESISTED the cake, but that she didn't WANT the cake. Get there and you'll be fine. (It may take some willpower to develop some new habits along the way, though.)
Wendy
Ignoramus26064 - 14 Nov 2003 17:47 GMT >> They say that willpower is unimportant in dieting. That's a >> lie. Willpower, meaning sticking with something that you know is good [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > your own self is a futile move. You've got to get yourself on board with > your decisions. Sure. It is important to be on a plan where you are not miserable and where you do not need too much willpower. But then there are temptations everywhere. Even you complained at some point about some difficulties dieting/exercising. And yet you stuck through it. Willpower is needed to avoid being sidetracked.
> Jarkat just mentioned not wanting to eat cake. Not that she RESISTED the > cake, but that she didn't WANT the cake. Get there and you'll be > fine. (It may take some willpower to develop some new habits along the > way, though.) > > Wendy Exactly. When I look at cakes etc, I do not even consider them food. I am not hungry when I look at sawdust, and I am not much hungrier looking at junk cakes. But, still, exercising every day, not overeating, saying no to too much food, all requires some willpower.
i
determined - 14 Nov 2003 17:54 GMT > > They say that willpower is unimportant in dieting. That's a > > lie. Willpower, meaning sticking with something that you know is good [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > your own self is a futile move. You've got to get yourself on board with > your decisions. I agree 100%. When I first came here to asd several years ago, someone quoted, "nothing tastes as good as being thin feels". It's true. But it's not all about being thin, but being healthy. When I started viewing my body as a machine - and started asking myself, do I want to run on high octane fuel, or crap? I started fueling my body for optimal performance. Now, I still cave for some unhealthy things some of the time. But most of the time, my eating is pretty clean. The way I see it is - if I eat on track 95% of the time, the other 5% is not going to throw me off track. But alot of the things I used to crave are no longer appealing to me.
det
Cat - 15 Nov 2003 22:27 GMT I like your analogy of the body as a machine. Your decision to feed your body the correct fuel is exactly right. I can't begin to tell all the ways in which I feel better now that I'm eating the right food. I enjoy the food I eat more. Sure, I get cravings, but it comes down to a choice between something I know will make me feel bad and feeling good. So I usually choose "good".
Cat
Jennifer A - 16 Nov 2003 01:30 GMT > I like your analogy of the body as a machine. Your decision to feed your > body the correct fuel is exactly right. I can't begin to tell all the ways [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > > Cat I feel like total crap right now because I chose to eat some chinese food for dinner. I decided to have a refeed day for a change especially since my gut was feeling much better. I'm still out of town and some people decided to get takeout and eat at the hotel before working tonight and I decided to join in since it was always one of my favorites. I got one of my favorites - the triple delight (shrimp, scallops, chicken, and veggies). It was saltier than hell and just didn't taste as good as I remember it. Now I have indigestion to boot. Back to "clean" living tomorrow :)
Jenn
Beverly - 16 Nov 2003 04:12 GMT > > I like your analogy of the body as a machine. Your decision to feed your > > body the correct fuel is exactly right. I can't begin to tell all the ways [quoted text clipped - 17 lines] > > Jenn Hope you're feeling better, Jenn. It's amazing how out taste changes once we start a healthy eating plan.
Beverly
Jennifer A - 16 Nov 2003 14:18 GMT > > I feel like total crap right now because I chose to eat some chinese food > > for dinner. I decided to have a refeed day for a change especially since [quoted text clipped - 16 lines] > > Beverly I woke up this morning and my face is completely swollen. I'm VERY salt sensitive. Last night I took some alka seltzer and went to bed shortly after my post. Mentally I feel fine, not feeling bad about eating what I wanted (or thought I wanted) yesterday - which is kind of an accomplishment for me. Physically, I feel kind of cruddy still, hung over in a way and no matter how I many times I brush my teeth I can't get the crappy taste out. I still don't feel as bad as with the intestinal problems of earlier in the week, but bad enough that sweets, greasy, or salty stuff doesn't even appeal to me right now. Going back on track is going to be a treat once I actually get hungry enough to eat. I have a beautiful apple from the continental bfast that I'm going to have once I can stomach it :)
Jenn (still in class, hoping to get out before halftime of the Packers/TB game later today)
Wendy - 17 Nov 2003 15:37 GMT > I woke up this morning and my face is completely swollen. I'm VERY salt > sensitive. Last night I took some alka seltzer and went to bed shortly > after my post. Thank you for mentioning that. My weight was up about three pounds this morning (an unofficial weigh-in, but still!) I just remembered we ate sushi for dinner last night and I finished my small son's that was drenched in soy sauce. (I use some, but not as much.) Salt does that to me, too.
My solution is to drink a lot of fluids. I'm behind on my water today so I'm going to go get a glass right now! (Maybe this will catch on the way our reminders to sit up straight made everyone do that, too.) :-)
-- Wendy
Jennifer A - 18 Nov 2003 01:51 GMT > > I woke up this morning and my face is completely swollen. I'm VERY salt > > sensitive. Last night I took some alka seltzer and went to bed shortly [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > > -- Wendy I'm making a conscious effort to drink about 2 gal a day right now. When I got home last night I got on the scale for a laugh to see how much water I was retaining - let's just say it was double digits and leave it at that. The next morning I also saw a double digit loss (only a few more pounds to go to be back to Friday morning's weight). I'm sure I experienced this regularly when I was 300+ pounds, but it was barely a blip on the radar at that time. This is so not healthy. One more thing to consciously eliminate from my WOE (salt).
Jenn
Gloria - 16 Nov 2003 14:58 GMT Det. said this so well!!! I look at those 'goodies' now as if they were crap to me! t my job I pass out the samples ,at my job,and most are crap foods. One day I watched those people ,who ate freely, and after really seeing them it gave me THE WAKE-UP CALL! Not everyone was over-weight but many were. The ones who were VERY LARGE were the people who ask if they can have another ! I've said many times here that this whole prosses is the mind-set. We need to slowly change the head. When I started looking at myself as a health-nut it ALL began to really come together. It's all about the mind! Just THINK about how you can be! It worked for me!!!
glo
Cat - 15 Nov 2003 22:25 GMT Very important point you've made there, Wendy. Couldn't agree more. It is a "state of mind". In my case, I'm giving up something (fattening foods) for something I want more (good health, better appearance, etc.)
Cat
> > They say that willpower is unimportant in dieting. That's a > > lie. Willpower, meaning sticking with something that you know is good [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] > > Wendy Cat - 15 Nov 2003 22:30 GMT Totally agree. Sugar absolutely makes me ravenously hungry (and nervous).
Cat
"> You do not have to go "low carb". But some of the ideas of low carb
> diets are not bad. For example, some carbs do interfere with > dieting. Sugar is one such example, if you eat sweetened foods, they > make you hungrier. Some people report same effects from bread and > potatoes. determined - 14 Nov 2003 16:45 GMT > Thanks guys but no way I'm going on the low carb thing. I personally > think it's dangerous. Reducing simple carbs is a GOOD thing - you don't have to cut out all carbs, just limit carbs from soda, juice, potatoes, bread, rice.
> I guess I should be happy with what I've lost but at this rate it'll > take me a whole year to lose 52 lbs. I need to lose total, about 120 > lbs to get within normal range. That's why I'm frustrated, I think. It takes patience - lots of it. Might as well settle in for the long haul. It took me a year to lose 30 lbs, and I'm still working on reducing bodyfat. It's a life long committment.
det
Chrys - 14 Nov 2003 16:46 GMT > Thanks guys but no way I'm going on the low carb thing. I personally > think it's dangerous. [quoted text clipped - 19 lines] > > -Rubystars It seems this is a very dangerous time for you. Your original message sounds like you're feeling extremely deprived. The problem with feeling deprived is that sooner or later, it's not unlikely that you'll end up giving up and eating all the foods you're missing and undo the progress you've made. You have to try to find ways to incorporate reasonable quantities of foods that are like what you're missing. You can still have chili dogs and lose weight if you're having a small portion and careful to get lower calorie bread and hot dogs and not too much chili. This is something I eat and have still managed to lose weight. You shouldn't eat things you don't enjoy or skip having reasonable portions of the ones you do enjoy.
Don't be discouraged. You didn't gain the weight overnight and you can't lose it overnight either. Think of this as getting healthier. Any amount of loss, or even maintaining your weight while continuing to build muscle, is still giving you a benefit.
A Ross - 14 Nov 2003 17:56 GMT > Thanks guys but no way I'm going on the low carb thing. I personally > think it's dangerous. [quoted text clipped - 19 lines] > > -Rubystars Wow. I am really at a loss here--it took me three years to lose my initial 48 lbs via Weight Watchers, and I was THRILLED at losing a half pound a week some weeks, especially as I neared goal.
1-1/2 lbs weight loss a week is a sensible goal. A half pound is nothing to sneeze at. Be happy you're trying to do the right thing, and losing. Quit beating yourself up and starving yourself thinking it'll help. I won't. You'll feel deprived and depressed and slip into bad habits. It happens to all of us.
Take a really good look at what you eat--don't call it a diet. Write everything down. Weigh and measure. Count calories, points, carbs, whatever works for YOU. Exercise, and write that down too--set goals, and track your progress towards your goals.
Start enjoying the person you are instead of worrying about the person you're not. Your attitude worries me--it looks like you're punishing yourself for being overweight, and punishing yourself for being hungry.
Amy (and Low Carb is not dangerous)
MadJock - 14 Nov 2003 18:56 GMT You can't just say low carb is not dangerous. In your opinion it's not dangerous, but there is still a lot of argument on it. Are you a doctor? Are you just choosing who you want to believe? You're giving that out as fact, and whilst it MAY not be dangerous, none of us know that for sure.
MadJock
rosie read and post - 14 Nov 2003 19:10 GMT LOW CARB isn't anymore dangerous, than breathing the air...............in fact, probably less!
 Signature read and post daily, it works! rosie
it ain't what they call you, it's what you answer to. ............................b.clinton
> You can't just say low carb is not dangerous. In your opinion it's not > dangerous, but there is still a lot of argument on it. Are you a doctor? > Are you just choosing who you want to believe? You're giving that out as > fact, and whilst it MAY not be dangerous, none of us know that for sure. > > MadJock Ignoramus26064 - 14 Nov 2003 19:13 GMT > You can't just say low carb is not dangerous. In your opinion it's not > dangerous, but there is still a lot of argument on it. Are you a doctor? > Are you just choosing who you want to believe? You're giving that out as > fact, and whilst it MAY not be dangerous, none of us know that for sure. > > MadJock I do not think that A Ross said that low carb was not dangerous.
As far as I am concerned, there is more to dangers of excess meat consumption than high cholesterol. Meat that is cooked in certain ways becomes carcinogenic. e.g. bacon. Sausages and most preserved meats have carcinogenic nitrites added to them. Meat consumption may have something to do with colorectal cancer, although the link is tenuous so far.
I am not saying that low carbing is dangerous, but it has some chances of being dangerous. Of course, it is even more dangerous to be obese and overeat. There is little doubt about that.
i
MadJock - 14 Nov 2003 20:57 GMT > I do not think that A Ross said that low carb was not dangerous. She did:
>Amy (and Low Carb is not dangerous) MH - 15 Nov 2003 07:42 GMT > You can't just say low carb is not dangerous. In your opinion it's not > dangerous, but there is still a lot of argument on it. Are you a doctor? No, he's not, and he's stated on many, many occassions that doctors know much less than himself about medicine. He holds everyone else (except himself, of course) in low opinion, including those who have gone to years and years of medical school. He, of course, knows much, much more about medicine from reading a couple of books.
> Are you just choosing who you want to believe? Yes, he is.
You're giving that out as
> fact, and whilst it MAY not be dangerous, none of us know that for sure. Precisely.
You're a smart guy, Madjock. : )
Martha
> MadJock A Ross - 17 Nov 2003 13:03 GMT > You can't just say low carb is not dangerous. In your opinion it's not > dangerous, but there is still a lot of argument on it. Are you a doctor? > Are you just choosing who you want to believe? You're giving that out as > fact, and whilst it MAY not be dangerous, none of us know that for sure. > > MadJock I'm sorry. I should have couched that as "IN MY EXPERIENCE". Does that make you feel better? How about "quality carbing" instead of "low carbing." Is that an acceptable statement? I think you'll find that many, many people are successfully low-carbing or quality-carbing in various ways with good, lasting results.
Amy
jmk - 17 Nov 2003 15:19 GMT > You can't just say low carb is not dangerous. In your opinion it's not > dangerous, but there is still a lot of argument on it. Are you a doctor? > Are you just choosing who you want to believe? You're giving that out as > fact, and whilst it MAY not be dangerous, none of us know that for sure. > > MadJock Agreed, although I'd add that it doesn't have to be dangerous (or vice versa). I mean, it depends on what you are replacing the carbs with? Protein and Saturated Fat? Protein and Unsaturated Fat? You get my drift. It also depends on what carbs are being cut and what carbs are being kept? I mean, I think that most people know to cut the refined carbs and keep the whole grains but we all know to to assume! :-)
 Signature jmk in NC
Chris Braun - 15 Nov 2003 00:22 GMT >Thanks guys but no way I'm going on the low carb thing. I personally >think it's dangerous. [quoted text clipped - 19 lines] > >-Rubystars For most women 2 lbs. a week -- unless doing some kind of supervised fast -- is pretty ambitious. I wouldn't be in so much of a hurry -- losing 52 lbs. in a year is a heck of a lot better than not losing 52 lbs., after all :-). I've lost 87 lbs. in 16 months and I'm very happy with that -- maybe a tad faster than you're losing but not lots. And at this point certainly not faster.
You haven't said how old you are (that I've noticed, anyway), and that can make a difference in how fast you can lose. I'm 55, and in menopause, which tends to slow down one's metabolism.
You've gotten varying advice on how many calories you should be eating. I think this is something you have to experiment with. I started at 262 lbs. and have been targeting around 1600 calories per day the whole time -- a little less lately. And I exercise more strenuously than you do, I'd say -- lots of weight lifting and more challenging cardio activity. But your metabolism may differ from mine. If what you're doing now is leading to a pound a week weight loss, I think that you might just want to stick with it. But you might want to try varying your exercise a bit -- adding more strength training and maybe cardio interval training.
I'd be dubious that you're in any sort of starvation mode at 2000 calories a day. But if you think this is a possibility, try adding more and see if it helps. (Also, I think others have suggested using something like Fitday to calculate your actual consumption -- since it's easy to be pretty far off if you just estimate.)
Good luck with whatever approach you choose.
By the way, I don't do low carb either. I average around 25% fat, with the rest pretty even split between carbs and protein. I try to eat mostly good carbs and good fats, but I'm not a purist.
Chris 262/175/???
George - 17 Nov 2003 01:53 GMT >Thanks guys but no way I'm going on the low carb thing. I personally >think it's dangerous. Just modify the types of carbs you eat. Ask any scientist... and they'll probably agree that eating more veggies is a good thing, rather than eating tortilla chips...
>I guess I should be happy with what I've lost but at this rate it'll >take me a whole year to lose 52 lbs. I need to lose total, about 120 >lbs to get within normal range. That's why I'm frustrated, I think. Well, here's some real world scoop. I started trying to seriously lose weight at 262 pounds. I managed, and I worked like a dog at it, to lose 62 pounds in one year.
Then, my parents both died, I got depressed, I let the exercise go, then went back to my old eating habits. Almost all 62 of those pounds came back... and I'm lucky I didn't add more.
Better to take it at a pace you can live with. I went too whacko on exercise and could not keep it up. Now I am more moderate and it's easier to keep to.
It's a lifetime battle. You have to come to terms with that. Mind you, I know that doesn't help much with the frustration of wanting it done and over with. However, it never will be *done*. You will always have to keep an eye on yourself, so that you don't drop back into the habits that got you fat. Been there, done that. Done it twice actually...
>I've tried to lose weight before and quit because it wasn't fast >enough. If I knew I could lose 2 lbs. a week, I'd feel better because >at least I'd know the first 100 lbs. would be gone in a year. Well, some folks lose quicker on low carb. I understand you don't want to go that route, but you could try a modified carb diet.
Right now, it may be difficult to do much exercise besides walking, but if you could do some weight lifting, it might help you in the long run.
>I'm going to start drinking more water. I'm thinking that will help >me. Sometimes I've had this gnawing hunger even when I eat till I'm >full lately. I think maybe it's thirst. It's an excellent idea!
>It's just frustrating I guess because all I want is to feel normal. >When I look in the mirror I don't even see the image I have of myself. >I feel that it's not "me" in the mirror. I remember what I used to >look like, before I gained all this weight, and that is "me." Then I >look in the mirror and see someone else, and it's hard, especially >after all that work. Yep, but it's gonna be a lifetime of work. Sorry, truth. As we get older, our metabolism tends to slow. That makes it easier to gain weight.
Try to make it as fun for yourself as you can. Pick exercises you enjoy, try new recipes to see if you can come up with tasty food that does fit into your eating plan.
Best,
Cynthia 262/233.0/200 first goal
Ignoramus26064 - 14 Nov 2003 11:59 GMT > I've been trying to stay under 2,000 calories a day and I've been > walking 2 miles almost every night for the last 4 weeks or so. Do you > know where that got me? 5 pounds lost. That's it. excellent result.
How tall are you and what is your current weight? 2,000 calories is not that little, especially for a female.
and 2 miles "almost every night" is not THAT much, although it is good for you.
> I passed up pieces > of my sister's birthday cake, I passed up handfuls of candy I normally > would've eaten on halloween, and I've got nothing to show for it. You have 5 lbs lost. Losing weight is not that easy.
> Why the hell do I even try? Five pounds seems like nothing when I've > got over 100 lbs. to lose. I feel like I'm not losing anything even > after all that work. You just need to get used to the idea that losing weight is not easy. But bein 100 lbs overweight is pretty difficult also, to carry all that fat on you.
> I've been eating low calorie food and low fat food and avoiding things > I would've enjoyed. I mean I could've had deluxe macaroni and cheese > the other night when my dad had some but instead the remainder went > uneaten because I was trying hard as hell to lose weight. Very good, you should be happy about it and not complaining. Please note that your choice to eat low fat is not necessarily helping you to feel satiated. Fat is known to quickly bring satiety. Obviously low fat or not low fat, you still have to limit your calories.
> When I would've normally enjoyed nachos on tortilla chips, I ate some > fat free refried beans and super lean hamburger meat and vegetables [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > I'm still overweight, still dog tired from that exercise and still > craving all the tasty food I have been dutifully avoiding. If you are really craving food, maybe you need to change what you eat on your diet, still staying within your calorie limit.
Anyway, with 100 lbs to go, you obviously had some unhealthy eating havits that you got used to. Do you think that it is going to be easy to start eating well?
> I even passed up chili dogs with fritos when I really wanted some! Ruby, sounds like you are very hungry. Can you tell us what your diet is like? Possibly you can eat different foods and feel less hungry because other foods can satisfy your needs for nutrients.
Anyhow, with 100 extra lbs on you, your life expectancy is greatly reduced and you have a lot of chances to develop heart disease and diabetes. So losing weight will add several years to your life. But it is difficult and most diet attempts fail for a reason. So try not to become a statistic. We have a bunch of people here, myself included, who lost weight and it is not coming back.
> I've been making low fat vegetable soups and low fat/calorie recipes > with Mori Nu light tofu but apparently that wasn't good enough because [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > 2,000 calories too many? I don't want to think of having to be hungry > all the time to lose weight. :( Sounds like you developed a real food fixation. Could be due to your hunger, or could be preexisting condition. But it is not helping.
Consider upping your fat while still limiting calories. Eat more vegetables and meat and lower bread and pasta etc.
i 223/177/180
MadJock - 14 Nov 2003 12:53 GMT Walking two miles is tiring - especially if you are carrying an extra 100lb. As Igoramus says, it's very good for you, but exercise doesn't actually burn a lot of calories when compared to your diet as a whole. It's not insignificant, but don't think that your walking two miles is going to make the fat drop off you - it won't. What will get the fat off your body is changing your diet (which does NOT mean starving yourself).
Here's an example. I'll use myself here, because I don't know your weight. When I walk (a fairly brisk walk at around 4mph) I burn off about 7 calories a minute. So if I were to walk 2 miles at 4 mph, I would walk for half an hour. Calories burned = 30 x 7 = 210kcal. 210 calories is only an extra 7% on the calories I would burn if I were to do no exercise at all. And the energy required to walk for that long can be found in a single banana.
So why is exercise so good then? Well it tells your body which weight you want to lose. You want to lose the fat and keep the muscle, and the only way to tell your body to burn the fat instead of the muscle is by doing exercise.
Reading your post suggests to me that you are depriving yourself of calories. This is as bad as eating too many. You should eat no less than eight times your weight in calories. I weigh 185lb, so I should eat no less than about 1500 calories daily. You say you have 100lb to lose which means you could weight around 250lb? If so, the very minimum amount you should be eating is 2000 calories a day. Some nutritionists even say that 10 times your weight is a better figure so this would suggest 2500 cal as a minimum.
Eating less than that amount is dangerous. I don't know if this applies to you because I don't actually know your height and weight, but you could be starving yourself. Starving yourself triggers a metabolic change which tells your body to start burning muscle and keep the fat. It thinks that you are going to have to last a bit before you can find your next meal - and doesn't realise that the fridge is full. It puts you in survival mode. When in survival mode, your body grabs all the fat it can get and puts it in storage. It burns your muscles instead. And when you do relax for that thanksgiving dinner, your body says "Aw thank feic for that - ah thought ah wiz gonny perish!" and stores all of that fat too.
Result? You get fed up with being hungry, accept that you are 'naturally fat' and start eating what you were. Your body will take a while to realise that it's not starving any more and you will end up heavier than you started out. This is the reason most diets fail.
I think you need to do a little research and design a suitable diet for yourself. This list will help, but needs more information on you. So please reply.
Congratulations on the 5lb lost so far, and good luck!
MadJock 204/185/165
determined - 14 Nov 2003 16:09 GMT > Walking two miles is tiring - especially if you are carrying an extra 100lb. > As Igoramus says, it's very good for you, but exercise doesn't actually burn [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > on the calories I would burn if I were to do no exercise at all. And the > energy required to walk for that long can be found in a single banana. A banana does NOT have 210 calories in it.
Jennifer A - 14 Nov 2003 16:34 GMT > > Here's an example. I'll use myself here, because I don't know your > weight. [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > > A banana does NOT have 210 calories in it. Unless it's a really big banana (>8 oz. edible portion)!
Jenn
MadJock - 14 Nov 2003 16:53 GMT > A banana does NOT have 210 calories in it. I'll be a little more precise then - an 8oz banana has around that figure. The last banana I had was 8oz when peeled, so that is what I am basing it on. Of course, bananas come in all sizes, so it could vary.
So an 8oz banana has about 210 calories (yes, it does)
MadJock
Melissa - 14 Nov 2003 16:56 GMT > > A banana does NOT have 210 calories in it. > [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > > MadJock Dole.com lists a "medium" banana at 110 calories, but they don't say how large of an edible serving that is. My Calorie King book has 4 ounces of edible banana at 105, which would agree with the 210 in your 8 ounce. I can't eat them anyway, but they are on the high side calorie wise as far as fruit goes.
Melissa
Cat - 16 Nov 2003 05:16 GMT Thank heavens for that!!!!
Cat (suddenly anxious about the banana she ate a few hours ago...)
> A banana does NOT have 210 calories in it. Wendy - 14 Nov 2003 16:15 GMT > Walking two miles is tiring - especially if you are carrying an extra 100lb. > As Igoramus says, it's very good for you, but exercise doesn't actually burn > a lot of calories when compared to your diet as a whole. No, but exercise changes you into a person who has a faster metabolism and that burns calories 24/7. It is NOT an incidental part of weight loss especially for the very obese.
What typically happens when an inactive person starts exercising is that they gain some muscle mass and some glycogen reserves in their muscles and some associated water. In other words, they gain some weight.
When she says she lost five pounds I have to wonder if she didn't lose 10 pounds of fat and gain five pounds of muscle and associated water weight. I would be surprised if that wasn't the case, actually.
> What will get the fat off your body is > changing your diet (which does NOT mean starving yourself). No, what will get the fat off her body is to burn more calories than she consumes. It's a two part sentance: you have to eat less AND exercise more, especially when there is the sort of metabolism damage that comes from being an overweight woman.
> Reading your post suggests to me that you are depriving yourself of > calories. This is as bad as eating too many. You should eat no less than > eight times your weight in calories. I weigh 185lb, so I should eat no less > than about 1500 calories daily. You say you have 100lb to lose which means > you could weight around 250lb? If so, the very minimum amount you should be > eating is 2000 calories a day. It sounds like she is aiming for 2000 calories.
> Congratulations on the 5lb lost so far, and good luck! My advice is to look a bit more on the brighter side. You would have GAINED some more fat by eating the way you used to - it's not like you were at maintenance, you were still gaining 10-15 pounds a year, right? So by losing 5 pounds you avoided gaining a pound instead.
Also you have to look at the long haul. You've got to change your habits if you want to lose weight. You're still newly into that journey and it's not an overnight process. But in the end, what's your alternative? If you want to lose fat then you're going to have to become a restrained eater who exercises. There isn't another way. It really works. Who cares if it works fast enough? It's a lifelong process.
Wendy 244/189/174
determined - 14 Nov 2003 17:55 GMT > > Walking two miles is tiring - especially if you are carrying an extra 100lb. > > As Igoramus says, it's very good for you, but exercise doesn't actually burn [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > they gain some muscle mass and some glycogen reserves in their muscles and > some associated water. In other words, they gain some weight. Good point. When I first started lifting weights, I gained 7 lbs in the first 3 weeks. It wasn't muscle, but it wasn't fat either. I think it was the water/glycogen thing you're referring to.
det
jmk - 14 Nov 2003 13:15 GMT > I've been trying to stay under 2,000 calories a day and I've been > walking 2 miles almost every night for the last 4 weeks or so. Do you > know where that got me? 5 pounds lost. That's it. I passed up pieces > of my sister's birthday cake, I passed up handfuls of candy I normally > would've eaten on halloween, and I've got nothing to show for it. Five pounds is a great start! I am sorry to hear that you are frustrated but hey, that's five pounds GONE! Most folks recommend a weight loss rate of 1-2 pounds per week so you are more or less on track. That's good news.
Are you logging your food intake? A lot of people on this newsgroup use fitday (www.fitday.com) -- or spreadsheets or palm pilots to log their food. I use my Palm and that works out great for me. If you are not currently logging your food intake, you might want to try fitday for a week or so and see if you notice any trends. Alternatively, you could post a food log to this newsgroup for feedback.
What are your goals? Weight loss? Better overall health? Running a marathon? :-) (hey, one of my friends has that for a goal!)
Also, I don't recall the exact formula (someone, help me out here) but you can figure out a good caloric intake by something like .8 * yoru body weight? Anyway, hopefully someone will post the formulas for both weight loss and maintenance.
Hang in there!
 Signature jmk in NC
Patricia Heil - 14 Nov 2003 13:53 GMT You're too impatient. That is a good weight loss. It's sustainable -- you're not starving and you're not injuring yourself by working out too much so that you have to stop and then put the weight back on.
Remember, you have to set up something you can live with the rest of your life or one of two things will happen. Either the weight will come back on or you will do something that hurts your health.
> I've been trying to stay under 2,000 calories a day and I've been > walking 2 miles almost every night for the last 4 weeks or so. Do you [quoted text clipped - 34 lines] > > -Rubystars Gloria - 16 Nov 2003 13:08 GMT Ruby, 5 LBS!!! GREAT LOSS!! I know how it feels to begin as I was also 100 LBS over weight and it felt so bad. But I made it and I took one day at a ttime. You can't look at that BIG picture as it will look tooooo big and you might panic. You are trying hard and you seem very strong !! Keep posting and remember how you have us here to help you! I was feeling so 'fat' today so I closed my eyes to imagine my thinner self! WOW! I FEEL thinner now. I think of the out-fit I will wear after I weigh 10 lbs less. Little rewards are my big help! Sometimes itt's just a new lipstick if money is short. Or to the thrift store to find a 'new' top. You WANT thin MORE than sweets? Than cut out a pcture from a magazine that loos like you WANT to be. I put mine on the frig!! It is a picture of a woman with city shorts and a nice top. So keep close and come here OFTEN!
Warmly, glo
rosie read and post - 14 Nov 2003 14:02 GMT dear ruby, congrats to you on the FIVE POUNDS lost.................that IS A BIG DEAL!
your sound VERY frustrated! may i suggest that you find a WOE (way of eating) that will not make you feel like your "missing out" on something?
 Signature read and post daily, it works! rosie
it ain't what they call you, it's what you answer to. ............................b.clinton
> I've been trying to stay under 2,000 calories a day and I've been > walking 2 miles almost every night for the last 4 weeks or so. Do you [quoted text clipped - 34 lines] > > -Rubystars The Queen of Cans and Jars - 14 Nov 2003 15:33 GMT > I've been trying to stay under 2,000 calories a day and I've been > walking 2 miles almost every night for the last 4 weeks or so. Do you > know where that got me? 5 pounds lost. That's it. I passed up pieces > of my sister's birthday cake, I passed up handfuls of candy I normally > would've eaten on halloween, and I've got nothing to show for it. you lost over a pound a week. that's perfect progress; losing much more than that isn't healthy. don't be so impatient.
determined - 14 Nov 2003 16:08 GMT > I've been trying to stay under 2,000 calories a day and I've been > walking 2 miles almost every night for the last 4 weeks or so. Do you [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > got over 100 lbs. to lose. I feel like I'm not losing anything even > after all that work. 5lbs lost is 5% of what you have to lose. It adds up! A slow and steady loss is best, you'll find it's easier to maintain your new woe (way of eating) because you aren't in a huge calorie deficit. If you're still not happy with your progress, perhaps you could start incorporating some resistance training - get a set of dumbells for home use.
> I've been eating low calorie food and low fat food and avoiding things > I would've enjoyed. I mean I could've had deluxe macaroni and cheese
> the other night when my dad had some but instead the remainder went > uneaten because I was trying hard as hell to lose weight. You need to get out of the mindsed that you have to deprive yourself in order to lose weight - you just need to learn how to moderate. Eat mostly healthy, most of the time, you can splurge once in awhile. Perhaps you should try incorporating a refeed day into your diet every couple of weeks.
> When I would've normally enjoyed nachos on tortilla chips, I ate some > fat free refried beans and super lean hamburger meat and vegetables [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > > I even passed up chili dogs with fritos when I really wanted some! YUCK! I think once you start eating healthy for awhile, this kinda food won't appeal to you anymore.
> I've been making low fat vegetable soups and low fat/calorie recipes > with Mori Nu light tofu but apparently that wasn't good enough because > all I lost in 4 weeks of all this was 5 lbs. I'm scared that when > thanksgiving comes it'll all be erased anyway because I'll be damned > if I can't sit down and participate in a nice holiday dinner with my > family.
> I wanted to lose 2 lbs. a week. Was that really too much to ask? Are > 2,000 calories too many? I don't want to think of having to be hungry > all the time to lose weight. :( You don't have to be hungry to lose weight - you just have to make good food choices. You should consume about 8-10 cal x current bodyweight in lbs. Try tracking your food and drink intake (every single bite and sip) at www.fitday.com and report back to us - what's a day's worth of food look like for you? How many calories? Carbs? Fat? Protein?
det
Cat - 15 Nov 2003 22:40 GMT How long did it take you to gain the weight? That might give you some idea how long it will take to lose it. So what if you only lose a pound a week? Or half a pound? Aren't you headed in the right direction? Look at it that way. I know it is hard to make sacrifices and not see a lot of results. How do I know? Because I do it every day. But if you keep being careful and counting calories, etc., you WILL lose the weight eventually.
Meanwhile, set shorter goals (like 5 pounds or 10 pounds) and celebrate when you reach that goal. Give yourself non-food rewards for your accomplishments. In addition, you could buy some new (smaller) clothes for every 15-20 pounds lost. Or buy a pretty scarf or some cosmetics or whatever makes you feel good, and reward yourself for the 5 pound losses.
I bought some decorative graph paper at a paper store and I record my weight once a week (I weigh every day, but only write it down once a week). I started out at 222 and now I'm down to 142. It has taken me since January of this year to lose 80 pounds. But what if it took until next year? It is still worth it. It is very satisfying to see the graph line going down, down, down. I have hit a few plateaus, like everyone else here. My goal is to weigh 120, but the closer I get to it, the harder it is to lose weight. I don't care, though. I will NEVER give up. My body will eventually have to give up the pounds. In the meantime, I'm busy "outsmarting" my metabolism. My next goal is to get into weight-lifting. That oughta get things going. :) My point is, you are smarter than your fat. You CAN lose the weight, but you have to have determination and a lot of patience to do it.
Try to think of your weight loss as a life-long change in eating and exercise. You didn't get fat overnight and you won't get thin overnight, either.
Hugs, Cat
> I've been trying to stay under 2,000 calories a day and I've been > walking 2 miles almost every night for the last 4 weeks or so. Do you [quoted text clipped - 34 lines] > > -Rubystars George - 17 Nov 2003 01:44 GMT >I've been trying to stay under 2,000 calories a day and I've been >walking 2 miles almost every night for the last 4 weeks or so. Do you >know where that got me? 5 pounds lost. That's it. I passed up pieces >of my sister's birthday cake, I passed up handfuls of candy I normally >would've eaten on halloween, and I've got nothing to show for it. Nothing? Stop the pity party... you've lost 1.25 pounds a week. This is not a bad thing! It's actually a pretty decent rate of loss.
>Why the hell do I even try? Five pounds seems like nothing when I've >got over 100 lbs. to lose. I feel like I'm not losing anything even >after all that work. You try, because not trying means staying fat... or worse, continuing to gain!
Stop thinking of that 100 pounds to lose. It won't go away overnight. You may have to think in terms of a couple years to lose it.
Start thinking of small goals, maybe 5-10 pounds at a time. That makes it easier for me to handle... and yes, where I started from, I also had at least a 100 pounds to lose. And I've not gotten extremely far down the road myself. Yet.
>I've been eating low calorie food and low fat food and avoiding things >I would've enjoyed. I mean I could've had deluxe macaroni and cheese >the other night when my dad had some but instead the remainder went >uneaten because I was trying hard as hell to lose weight. The thing is, if you learn to enjoy other good food, and by good food, I mean real food, quality veggies, meats, whole grains, fruits, etc... you may miss things like mac and cheese less. Frankly, mac & cheese is not something I miss at all. It tastes so artificial to me now.
Also, don't deprive yourself of good food. One can lose weight eating tasty food. Today, had breakfast consisting of 3 eggs, at least a cup of sauteed veggies and a slice of ham with pineapple. It wasn't low fat, but it was healthy. Nope, didn't use all the egg yolks either. And the sautee was in olive oil. It was not a hugely high calorie breakfast either.
Lunch was some whole wheat bulgur, tomato, avocado, about a tablespoon of olive oil and lemon dressing and a grilled chicken breast. And one tangerine. Good stuff.
>When I would've normally enjoyed nachos on tortilla chips, I ate some >fat free refried beans and super lean hamburger meat and vegetables [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] >I'm still overweight, still dog tired from that exercise and still >craving all the tasty food I have been dutifully avoiding. Yes, well, all that tasty food got you where you are today. Find healthy ways to fix tasty food. Learn that other foods besides junk food can be tasty. And remember, tasty food may be had in SMALL portions. Occasionally.
>I even passed up chili dogs with fritos when I really wanted some! Yikes... that would give me heartburn... which I wouldn't want much.
You gotta form some better habits, because if you are mourning things like chili dogs and fritos now, what happens when you have lost the 100 pounds? You'll start eating those things again, and pretty soon, the 100 pounds will be back. And possibly with friends.
>I've been making low fat vegetable soups and low fat/calorie recipes >with Mori Nu light tofu but apparently that wasn't good enough because >all I lost in 4 weeks of all this was 5 lbs. I'm scared that when >thanksgiving comes it'll all be erased anyway because I'll be damned >if I can't sit down and participate in a nice holiday dinner with my >family. Well, I'm losing at a rate of about a pound a week, or sometimes a little more. It's a normal rate to lose at. 2 pounds a week consistently is not gonna happen for most folks.
Also, why are you thinking that you need to eat so hugely at Thanksgiving that you regain the entire 5 pounds? Sounds defeatist to me. That's what, 3500 calories times 5? That's 17,500 calories. You are gonna have to really work some to consume all that in ONE day!
Consider that you can have small portions of everything at Thanksgiving and still stay on a diet. Consider that participation is not limited to eating... conversation is good!
>I wanted to lose 2 lbs. a week. Was that really too much to ask? Are >2,000 calories too many? I don't want to think of having to be hungry >all the time to lose weight. :( Everyone's body is different. We'd all like to be able to choose some set amount of weight to lose a week... in a steady consistent fashion. But weight loss rarely works like that. You should see the graph of my loss.... down, down, then up, then down, it zigs and zags. But the ups are rarely more than a pound and the consistent trend is down.
Also, you shouldn't have to be hungry all the time to lose weight! Be sure you get enough protein in your diet... fiber helps too. Eat plenty of good non-starchy veggies! Low fat does not mean NO-fat... fats in the diet are important too.
Perhaps you'd be happier trying a more balanced diet. Say 25-30% fat, 30% protein and 40% carbs.
Keep up the good work with the walking! That's a habit that will really help you for a lifetime.
Cynthia 262/233.0/200 first goal
|
|
|