This felicitous hypothesis says that grains are the environmental factor specific to agrarian societies that is responsible for diseases of affluence. http://www.pubmedcentral.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pubmed&pubmedid=16336696
The easiest way to disprove this hypothesis is to point out the obvious.
If grains were indeed the causative factor then accordingly as grains in agrarian societies have been in their diet for some 10,000 years than these very same agrarian societies should have been suffering from diseases of affluence for the past 10,000 years. This clearly was not the case. Furthermore, these same diseases of affluence should logically be in a period of decline as man gradually has biologically adapted to grains. Or in other words, the worst case of the diseases of affluence would have logically existed some 10,000 years ago when man first started eating grains rather than today.
Further, this very same academic paper contradicts this conclusion by saying that "CHD was reportedly rare in developed populations until the early 1900s."
So, what happen in the 1900s? I can tell you. Food science developed and accordingly a sudden surge in the widespread consumption of refined-grain junk food took place. So, if grains are to be blamed for this post 1900 phenomenon then we are clearly talking about refined grains rather than whole-grains. Of course, there are other possibilities too, such as global warming and modern stress.
Furthermore, this paper presents only an untested and unproven hypothesis. I have easily this hypothesis to be wrong.
As previously stated, the tomato has been in the European diet for less than 200 years. Yet, it is clearly one of the healthiest foods in the human diet. So, the notion that 10,000 years is not long enough for humans to adapt to grains is total nonsense.
Who says so? I do. http://naturalhealthperspective.com/food/whole-grains.html -- John Gohde, Achieving good Nutrition is an Art, NOT a Science!
The nutrition of eating a healthy diet is a biological factor of the mind-body connection. Now, weighing in at 18 web pages, the Nutrition of a Healthy Diet is with more documentation and sharper terminology than ever before. http://naturalhealthperspective.com/food/
|